Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Support, have following suggestions. Sec 3. Path Setup Type TLV The one octet value contains the Path Setup Type (PST). This document specifies the following PST value: o PST = 0: Path is setup via RSVP-TE signaling protocol(default). Can some PST value be reserved for experimental or private use for future experiments? If a PCEP speaker does not recognize the PATH-SETUP-TYPE TLV, it MUST ignore the TLV in accordance with ([RFC5440]). Along with the unrecognizable TLV type, we should also state the behavior for unrecognized PST value (for future documents that define new PST). It is better if this is uniform across PST and defined in this document itself. Sec 4. Operation Regardless of whether PATH-SETUP-TYPE TLV is used or not, if the PCE does not support the intended path setup type it MUST send PCErr with Error-Type = TBD (Traffic engineering path setup error) (recommended value is 21) and Error-Value = 1 (Unsupported path setup type) and close the PCEP session. On the first read closing the session seems harsh, but since open message MUST exchange the capability of supporting new path setup type, this seems fine. Maybe a few lines to explain the rationale can be added. Something in line of... Before using the PATH-SETUP-TYPE (other than default), the PCEP speaker MUST notify the capability to support the new path setup type during the session establishment phase. Only if both PCEP peers support the capability the PATH-SETUP-TYPE TLV with new PST be used. Editorial Nits - Expand RSVP-TE, PCEP on first use in abstract Hope the authors find these useful. Regards, Dhruv -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: 14 September 2014 18:06 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan- pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Support. Brgds,DG I've had good seasons and some deeply painful ones. I've made some spectacularly good choices and some outrageously bad mistakes. I'm very human - a work in progress. - Robin Sharma ~ On Mon, 9/15/14, Zafar Ali (zali) z...@cisco.com wrote: Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document To: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com, pce@ietf.org pce@ietf.org Date: Monday, September 15, 2014, 12:17 AM Support! Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com Date: Sunday, September 14, 2014 6:06 AM To: pce@ietf.org pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Yes, I'm in favour of adopting this. Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: 14 September 2014 11:06 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Yes/Support. Have comments and will send later. -- Uma C. -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 3:06 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Support. Thanks, Rakesh On 2014-09-14 6:06 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote: Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Yes/support Cheers, Jeff We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Support Best, r. On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:06 PM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote: Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Support! Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com Date: Sunday, September 14, 2014 6:06 AM To: pce@ietf.org pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
