Re: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)
Thanks. Make sure it appears in the ToC. Regards, B. Hi Benoit, Adrian, I have updated Appendix A to include all changes from RFC6006 and made the RBNF changes as a sub-section. See working copy at - https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/blob/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt Thanks! Dhruv -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: 30 August 2017 17:39 To: 'Benoit Claise' <bcla...@cisco.com>; 'The IESG' <i...@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; 'Fred Baker' <fredbaker.i...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce- rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT) Morning Komrade Claise, Did you spot Appendix A? A -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise Sent: 30 August 2017 10:32 To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; Fred Baker Subject: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce- rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT) Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/ -- COMMENT: -- - Where is the "diff from RFC6006" section? The following is not useful: This document obsoletes RFC 6006 and incorporates all outstanding Errata: o Erratum with IDs: 3819, 3830, 3836, 4867, and 4868. I found "Appendix A. Summary of the RBNF Changes from RFC 6006", as a good start, but it doesn't even appear in the table of content. Why? - I've not been following the IPR situation (as described by Alvaro), but would like to understand and it should be discussed during the telechat. Is it the case that https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1686/ (related to RFC6006) is updated by https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2983/ (related to RFC6006 and RFC6006bis)? ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce . ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)
Hi Benoit, Adrian, I have updated Appendix A to include all changes from RFC6006 and made the RBNF changes as a sub-section. See working copy at - https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/blob/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt Thanks! Dhruv > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > Sent: 30 August 2017 17:39 > To: 'Benoit Claise' <bcla...@cisco.com>; 'The IESG' <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; > 'Fred Baker' <fredbaker.i...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce- > rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT) > > Morning Komrade Claise, > > Did you spot Appendix A? > > A > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise > > Sent: 30 August 2017 10:32 > > To: The IESG > > Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; > > pce-cha...@ietf.org; > Fred > > Baker > > Subject: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce- > rfc6006bis-03: > (with > > COMMENT) > > > > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > > this introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to > > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/ > > > > > > > > -- > > COMMENT: > > -- > > > > - Where is the "diff from RFC6006" section? > > The following is not useful: > > > >This document obsoletes RFC 6006 and incorporates all outstanding > >Errata: > > > >o Erratum with IDs: 3819, 3830, 3836, 4867, and 4868. > > > > I found "Appendix A. Summary of the RBNF Changes from RFC 6006", as a > > good start, but it doesn't even appear in the table of content. Why? > > > > - I've not been following the IPR situation (as described by Alvaro), > > but > would > > like to understand and it should be discussed during the telechat. Is > > it the case that https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1686/ (related to > > RFC6006) is updated by https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2983/ (related > > to RFC6006 and RFC6006bis)? > > > > > > ___ > > Pce mailing list > > Pce@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)
Morning Komrade Claise, Did you spot Appendix A? A > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise > Sent: 30 August 2017 10:32 > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; Fred > Baker > Subject: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with > COMMENT) > > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/ > > > > -- > COMMENT: > -- > > - Where is the "diff from RFC6006" section? > The following is not useful: > >This document obsoletes RFC 6006 and incorporates all outstanding >Errata: > >o Erratum with IDs: 3819, 3830, 3836, 4867, and 4868. > > I found "Appendix A. Summary of the RBNF Changes from RFC 6006", as a good > start, but it doesn't even appear in the table of content. Why? > > - I've not been following the IPR situation (as described by Alvaro), but would > like to understand and it should be discussed during the telechat. Is it the > case that https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1686/ (related to RFC6006) is > updated by https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2983/ (related to RFC6006 and > RFC6006bis)? > > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
