Re: [PD] [OT] PD users in Bulgaria
Am 18.11.2006 um 07:22 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner: Max, what brings you to Bulgaria for a year, if you don't mind me asking? not for a year, just 5 weeks. i have a residency at the art today assiciation http://www.arttoday.org max On Nov 17, 2006, at 2:11 PM, Chuckk Hubbard wrote: Not I, but my friend just played me some severely microtonal womens' choir music from there. Dreamy. On 11/17/06, Max Neupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, are there any pd users from bulgaria on this list, especially plovdiv? i'm there until the end of the year. max ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] comport issue
A bit of a strange one this. Hope someone can help. I have an arduino communicating with PD via comport. If I set the baud rate higher than about 22000 comport throws out rubbish. The arduino is just counting from 1 to 10 with a 10ms gap between each value. If I use zterm to look at the data its all fine and as expected. So I was seeing this as a limitation of comport not supporting higher baudrate but I have also used comport to communicate with a bluetooth device set at 115200 and no problems at all. Any ideas? That zterm shows the correct info rules out a problem with the arduino. That comport talks happily to bluetooth device I took to rule out the iea that it cant support higher baud. Im on os x 10.3.9 Thanks Nick ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] comport issue
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an arduino communicating with PD via comport. If I set the baud rate higher than about 22000 comport throws out rubbish. I don't know anything about Arduino, but serial ports are usually made to support exactly those values: 19200 38400 = 2*19200 57600 = 3*19200 115200 = 6*19200 230400 = 12*19200 and I don't know whether they support any other speeds, but I suspect that any other speeds would be multiples of 19200. _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] pd on ps3
Hi, is someone of you planning to use Pd on a playstation 3? would that be a good hardware choice for bare-pd systems? marius. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] desiredata 0.39.A.pre2
On 11/14/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 14/11/2006, at 17.14, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Thomas Grill wrote: There are no plans to incorporate Miller's 0.40 into devel_0_39 Well, there are - but no manpower available. Oh sure there are would-likes for that... there are many would- likes... But I wouldn't like calling it a plan until there is some hint of allocated resources I think there is a difference between a would-like and a sure-would- not-ever-like. - The first is much more like a plan since it is a possible plan, where the later is a plan not to or never to. I say this, since i when i first read it, understood 'there are no plans to' as 'there are plans never to' which proved not to be the case. I would call what you guys are talking about more of a wouldn't-it-be-cool-if, if people want it but no one intends it. I interpreted 'there are no plans to' as 'whatever, but I'm not doing it,' which sounds like what Mathieu was saying. One could argue that a flaw in - or a mixture of - my understanding of grammar, time or aristotle. An impressive understanding of grammar it is. I had to read this 4 times before I realized it was a complete sentence. The grammar is almost acrobatic, but correct. -Chuckk ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] desiredata 0.39.A.pre2
I just wanted it to build. I don't use scons and I spend already too much time on build issues, so I stopped. But please take it on, you could write that script for example. But I am not one of the devel/dd people, so it'd be best if you coordinated with them. .hc On Nov 18, 2006, at 12:46 AM, day five wrote: Hi Hans, So what ever happened with this? I'm trying myself at present time and I managed to work through a lot of the problems you mentioned, and I kept a log which can be viewed here http://www.csounds.com/akbari/desiredata_log.txt I'm stuck at the last step at link time, the compiler errors out with ld: Undefined symbols: _OSAtomicAnd32 _OSAtomicOr32 According to http://www.hmug.org/man/3/OSAtomicAnd32.php it seems these symbols belong to libc ... Did you manage to build successfully? What was the trick? ./d5 On 11/13/06, Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 13, 2006, at 11:55 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: How about putting out some binaries too? One day I'll provide some but only for Linux. If you want to provide OSX binaries, feel free to do so, this is free software. Its still not easy to build DD. First off, there is no mention of installing portaudio in the INSTALL.txt. Then after that, it dies here on Mac OS X 10.4: I can try to help about OSX, but I don't use OSX, and I don't have easy access to OSX. Often, someone else will have to reply. Write a build script and put it into scripts/auto-build/pd-devel- auto- builder.sh, then you will have easy, automated access to many platforms, included Mac OS X 10.3, 10.4, and Intel. .hc http://at.or.at/hans/ ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
