[PD] Wii external for windows?
Hi curious if this exists? Thanks, Jim ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] live coding, [was: Re: paranoid pd]
i just had a try at it, wouldn't say it sounded particularly amazing, but i managed to build enough up in a few minutes to make it kind of interesting. will try again later and see if practice makes things better. best idea i came up with in the first run: [key] | [t b] | [random 10] | [sel 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9] that way, while i was coding, sounds were being changed and triggered by keystrokes. personally i think if you're going to do live coding, you should do it from scratch without using abstractions. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] live coding, [was: Re: paranoid pd]
i'm doing a talk in delhi next month on pure data for live performance, so i will definitely incorporate some live coding in there, any tips and tricks people have found useful would be much appreciated. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] vline~ question
Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > however, i would say that the 3rd digit is more or less useless (only > there for convenience) because you can get the same behaviour with > scheduled messages. > e.g. > [0, 1 1000 500( > | > [vline~] > > is the same as > > [t b b] > | | > [0( [del 500] > | | > | [1 1000( > +-+ > | > [vline~] Note that the former version is *muchmuch* more convenient, especially when building line segments dynamically. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ __footils.org__ ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] startup flags problem
Hello! I foolishly made the following mistake: File/Startup.../flags.. -path "blah blah" and I get this on startup since: error: blah": can't open The thing is, the File/Startup... link is dead! It just does nothing, no startup... window! So I can't correct it... (all this under WinXP) So I guess the question is..how can I otherwise edit the startup flags? alabala -- Ypatios. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] startup flags problem
Ypatios Grigoriadis wrote: > (all this under WinXP) (time for a reinstall) > > > So I guess the question is..how can I otherwise edit the startup flags? regedit fgmasd.r IOhannes ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] vline~ question
Frank Barknecht wrote: > Note that the former version is *muchmuch* more convenient, especially > when building line segments dynamically. totally! i just wanted to demonstrate that there is indeed no mandatory reason to have the 3rd value - but not because of the shortcuts kyle mentioned (which seem to do more harm than good) fgmadsr. IOhannes ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] startup flags problem
On 27/01/2008, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ypatios Grigoriadis wrote: > > > (all this under WinXP) > > (time for a reinstall) mpouhaha! I was veeery close... :-) > > > > > So I guess the question is..how can I otherwise edit the startup flags? > > regedit thanx! I did it with regAlyzer.. it's prettier than regedit.. :P cu! -- Ypatios. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] callbacks
Hello! What exactly is this option in the audio settings window (0.41)? [tick box] use callbacks -- Ypatios. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] paranoid pd
let me ask the other way? why has pd to behave different than every other program on my computer? marius. IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > marius schebella wrote: >> no, I am not happy with it, either. >> would it be possible to make this an option in the pd-settings. > > i would be interested to know what keeps you from using the Ctrl-Shift > versions of the shortcuts if you don't want the "annoying" dialogs. > > for me it seems, like asking for an extra option is asking for something > you already have. > > > mfgasd.r > IOhannes > ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] paranoid pd
marius schebella schrieb: > let me ask the other way? why has pd to behave different than every > other program on my computer? Yes, I also don't understand this ... Although there might be a workaround, newbies (and even me as not so new newbie) don't know this and are only irritated. LG Georg ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] live coding, [was: Re: paranoid pd]
hard off a écrit : > i'm doing a talk in delhi next month on pure data for live > performance, so i will definitely incorporate some live coding in > there, > > any tips and tricks people have found useful would be much appreciated. you could record into a buffer what is thrown to dac~ and rediffuse it randomly or following the rule you find at the moment you do it. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] live coding, [was: Re: paranoid pd]
hard off a écrit : > i just had a try at it, > > wouldn't say it sounded particularly amazing, but i managed to build > enough up in a few minutes to make it kind of interesting. will try > again later and see if practice makes things better. > > best idea i came up with in the first run: > > [key] > | > [t b] > | > [random 10] > | > [sel 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9] > > > that way, while i was coding, sounds were being changed and triggered > by keystrokes. > > > > personally i think if you're going to do live coding, you should do it > from scratch without using abstractions. Hello, using abstraction would be cheating, :p. It would be bummer to not use useful list-abs, or some RTC, and obviously, the doc files, where the consultation almost always turns to livecoding. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Problems installing pd-extended
You can also get the packages from the debian repos at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages though I have not tried installing them in Ubuntu. I just ignored those dependencies. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] Routing Oepen GL streams through Gem
Is there a way to have video created in real time by other programs that use OpenGL routed through Gem so those windows can be processed by Gem? I'm thinking of Windows but would also love to do this under Linux. Thanks, Jim ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] [ANN] Lily, browser based visual programming language released
Hi All- I'm happy to announce that the first beta release of Lily, an browser based visual programming environment for Firefox/Mozilla, is now available for download. Lily is a patcher interface to the functionality of Mozilla platform: svg graphics, html/xul UI, networking, file system access, xml parsing/transformation & sqlite data storage. It's OSC enabled, is capable of interfacing with the Arduino I/O board and has a processing compatible graphics api. It's written in Javascript. Have a look at the music/graphics examples below to get a feel for some of what it can do: http://www.vimeo.com/625294 http://www.vimeo.com/625739 http://www.vimeo.com/625400 http://www.vimeo.com/625460 More information about Lily is available on the website: http://www.lilyapp.org/ thanks -Bill ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] vline~ question
I agree as well, prefer the existing vline message syntax. (I hope we haven't started a movement against the third value!) Now that I get it, it is much more intuitive than emulating an old 2 value breakpoint envelope. Has anyone made a vline-like external that only takes the first two values? Cheers, ~Brandon On Jan 27, 2008, at 7:08 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Frank Barknecht wrote: > >> Note that the former version is *muchmuch* more convenient, >> especially >> when building line segments dynamically. > > totally! > i just wanted to demonstrate that there is indeed no mandatory > reason to > have the 3rd value - but not because of the shortcuts kyle mentioned > (which seem to do more harm than good) > > fgmadsr. > IOhannes > > ___ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] realtime linux + puredata
Hi guys, I don't normally keep up with linux kernel development, but apparently realtime support should have been fully built into 2.6.22 and up. I'm currently not (yet) a Linux user, so I can't check this for myself. I am curious if the Linux users on this board have found 2.6.22+ to suite their realtime needs, or are you guys are still patching your kernels for realtime support? If so, what do the realtime patches or modified kernels (in ubuntu studio, for example) provide that the stock kernel does not? Thanks again, ~Brandon ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] live coding, [was: Re: paranoid pd]
Hi Tim, > I havent seen many examples yet around here though. > Are many people doing this with pd ? The pd-graz group has done a variant of live-coding in its 'blind date' performances. There we take a teamwork approach, letting multiple players edit the same patch at the same time on stage during performance. In the past this was done using multiple mice and keyboards connected to one machine, but we switched to IOhannes' 'multipd' which uses a special proxy written in pd itself which interconnects itself between the gui and dsp part of pd and contributes all events (mouse clicks, object creation) amonst various clients. For the live coding itself, we decide not to use too many abstractions, since we require our patches to be readable by all players, and to make the coding reproduceable to the audience. We definitely start from zero, so the beginning of each concert is, well, silence. The past performances of pd-graz were at Musikprotokoll Graz, Roxy/NoD Praha, PdConvention2 Montreal. See: http://pd-graz.mur.at/concerts/blinddate/praha/praha_pics http://umlaeute.mur.at/Members/zmoelnig/dissertation/papers/pd2007/patchingtogether_slides.pdf glg, PP > Is there an audience for it, or is it just pd-geeks who enjoy it? (not > that th?t's not an audience ofcourse :) ) > Do you start from zero, or do you open an existing patch and start > modifying that ? > do you restrict yourself to 'basic' objects, or do you use alot of > abstractions (so the audience doesn't really see things being built-up > from zero)? > > Tim > ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] paranoid pd
Quoting marius schebella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > let me ask the other way? why has pd to behave different than every > other program on my computer? because if it was the same as any other program, one of them would be redundant :-) mfgasdr. IOhannes This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list