Re: [PD] bcr2000 and midi-feedback

2008-07-22 Thread Jason Plumb
 > The problem is that pd sends it's send-symbol, even if the fader is
 > moved as a result of the receive-symbol. This means that the bcr get's
 > the value right back, with a small delay, which causes the whole to be
 > very reluctent to accept movements from the bcr.

I had to solve a similar problem in a few patches with my bcr2000, so I 
wrote a few small "helper" abstractions.  I wanted to be able to move 
the controller and have it update a UI element in pd, and vice versa -- 
and I needed them to be in sync all the time.  You can get these two 
abstractions here:
http://noisybox.net/computers/pd/ctrl_sync.pd
http://noisybox.net/computers/pd/nrpn_sync.pd

They basically encapsulate the logic around spigot as Luigi suggested. 
Input the signal from a UI element (slider/ui/etc) into the top and feed 
back the control output back to the UI element.  They're simple, so you 
should hopefully be able to extend them easily.  They're a little stupid 
in that they assume a control range with 0 at the low end...but they 
helped clean up some patches and keep things in sync.

-jason

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] bcr2000 and midi-feedback

2008-07-22 Thread Atte André Jensen
kristof lauwers wrote:

> You can set the value of the slider without having it sent back with 
> a 'set' message

Thanks alot, exactly what I was looking for.

-- 
peace, love & harmony
Atte

http://atte.dk   | http://myspace.com/attejensen
http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] bcr2000 and midi-feedback

2008-07-22 Thread Luigi Rensinghoff

thats cool

i didn know/never used that



Am 22.07.2008 um 15:50 schrieb kristof lauwers:


Hi,

You can set the value of the slider without having it sent back with
a 'set' message

[ctlin 1]
|
[/127]
|
[set $1(
|
[s rec]

cheers,
Kristof



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net
http://myspace.com/xofxof


At 15:31 2008-07-22, you wrote:


Hi

I have assigned a knob on my bcr2000 to a vertical slider in pd.  
Under

the sliders properties, I have set send-symbol and receive-symbol to
"send" and "rec". I then have

[ctlin 1]
|
[/ 127]
|
[s rec]


[r send]
|
[* 127]
|
[ctlout 1]

This basically works, the upper one is receiving from the bcr and  
moving
the fader in pd, the lower one is updating the display on the bcr  
when

the knob is moved in pd.

The problem is that pd sends it's send-symbol, even if the fader is
moved as a result of the receive-symbol. This means that the bcr  
get's
the value right back, with a small delay, which causes the whole  
to be

very reluctent to accept movements from the bcr.

I could make some logic that doesn't send the value back if it was
received from midi, but thought I'd ask if there was a simpler  
solution?

For instance is it possible to have pd's knobs *not* send it's
send-symbol if the fader was moved as a result of a receive-symbol?

--
peace, love & harmony
Atte

http://atte.dk   | http://myspace.com/attejensen
http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list







___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
listinfo/pd-list




>---<

Luigi Rensinghoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype:gigischinke
ichat:gigicarlo




___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] bcr2000 and midi-feedback

2008-07-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Atte André Jensen wrote:
> Hi

> 
> This basically works, the upper one is receiving from the bcr and moving 
> the fader in pd, the lower one is updating the display on the bcr when 
> the knob is moved in pd.
> 
> The problem is that pd sends it's send-symbol, even if the fader is 

i doubt that Pd sends it's send-symbol

> moved as a result of the receive-symbol. This means that the bcr get's 
> the value right back, with a small delay, which causes the whole to be 
> very reluctent to accept movements from the bcr.
> 
> I could make some logic that doesn't send the value back if it was 
> received from midi, but thought I'd ask if there was a simpler solution? 
> For instance is it possible to have pd's knobs *not* send it's 
> send-symbol if the fader was moved as a result of a receive-symbol?
> 



anyhow, under the link below [1] is the abstraction that we use in our 
CUBEmixer-application in order to interact with midi (using 
behringer-sh!t) among other things.

use it like

[ctlin 1]
|
[sendreceive send]
|
[ctlout 0]


[r bla]
|
[ \


the abstraction depends on iemlib2 in order to have settable 
sends/receives but if you don't want this, just replace it by ordinary 
[s]/[r].


fgmasdr.
IOhannes


[1] 
https://iem.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/iem/spatialization/CUBEmixer/trunk/lib/abs/sendreceive.pd

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] bcr2000 and midi-feedback

2008-07-22 Thread Luigi Rensinghoff


Am 22.07.2008 um 15:31 schrieb Atte André Jensen:


Hi

I have assigned a knob on my bcr2000 to a vertical slider in pd. Under
the sliders properties, I have set send-symbol and receive-symbol to
"send" and "rec". I then have

[ctlin 1]
|
[/ 127]
|
[s rec]


[r send]
|
[* 127]
|
[ctlout 1]

This basically works, the upper one is receiving from the bcr and  
moving

the fader in pd, the lower one is updating the display on the bcr when
the knob is moved in pd.

The problem is that pd sends it's send-symbol, even if the fader is
moved as a result of the receive-symbol. This means that the bcr get's
the value right back, with a small delay, which causes the whole to be
very reluctent to accept movements from the bcr.

I could make some logic that doesn't send the value back if it was
received from midi, but thought I'd ask if there was a simpler  
solution?


i cant think of any

probably you need to pit the send and receive out of the slider and  
do something


with "t b b" and "spigot"...

but that would be what you call the "logic"

cheers luigi


For instance is it possible to have pd's knobs *not* send it's
send-symbol if the fader was moved as a result of a receive-symbol?

--
peace, love & harmony
Atte

http://atte.dk   | http://myspace.com/attejensen
http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
listinfo/pd-list




>---<

Luigi Rensinghoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype:gigischinke
ichat:gigicarlo




___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] bcr2000 and midi-feedback

2008-07-22 Thread kristof lauwers
Hi,

You can set the value of the slider without having it sent back with 
a 'set' message

[ctlin 1]
|
[/127]
|
[set $1(
|
[s rec]

cheers,
Kristof



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net
http://myspace.com/xofxof


At 15:31 2008-07-22, you wrote:

>Hi
>
>I have assigned a knob on my bcr2000 to a vertical slider in pd. Under
>the sliders properties, I have set send-symbol and receive-symbol to
>"send" and "rec". I then have
>
>[ctlin 1]
>|
>[/ 127]
>|
>[s rec]
>
>
>[r send]
>|
>[* 127]
>|
>[ctlout 1]
>
>This basically works, the upper one is receiving from the bcr and moving
>the fader in pd, the lower one is updating the display on the bcr when
>the knob is moved in pd.
>
>The problem is that pd sends it's send-symbol, even if the fader is
>moved as a result of the receive-symbol. This means that the bcr get's
>the value right back, with a small delay, which causes the whole to be
>very reluctent to accept movements from the bcr.
>
>I could make some logic that doesn't send the value back if it was
>received from midi, but thought I'd ask if there was a simpler solution?
>For instance is it possible to have pd's knobs *not* send it's
>send-symbol if the fader was moved as a result of a receive-symbol?
>
>--
>peace, love & harmony
>Atte
>
>http://atte.dk   | http://myspace.com/attejensen
>http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk
>
>___
>Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list






___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] bcr2000 and midi-feedback

2008-07-22 Thread Atte André Jensen
Hi

I have assigned a knob on my bcr2000 to a vertical slider in pd. Under 
the sliders properties, I have set send-symbol and receive-symbol to 
"send" and "rec". I then have

[ctlin 1]
|
[/ 127]
|
[s rec]


[r send]
|
[* 127]
|
[ctlout 1]

This basically works, the upper one is receiving from the bcr and moving 
the fader in pd, the lower one is updating the display on the bcr when 
the knob is moved in pd.

The problem is that pd sends it's send-symbol, even if the fader is 
moved as a result of the receive-symbol. This means that the bcr get's 
the value right back, with a small delay, which causes the whole to be 
very reluctent to accept movements from the bcr.

I could make some logic that doesn't send the value back if it was 
received from midi, but thought I'd ask if there was a simpler solution? 
For instance is it possible to have pd's knobs *not* send it's 
send-symbol if the fader was moved as a result of a receive-symbol?

-- 
peace, love & harmony
Atte

http://atte.dk   | http://myspace.com/attejensen
http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list