Re: Pentax - Selling HQ and Apparently Drops 645D
Completing the information: Of course, It's not guaranteed and it's not valid for all DA lenses. Cassio On 5/10/07, Cassio Vogel Dorneles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've read somewhere some DA lenses could even be used with (obviously > FF) film cameras. Unfortunately, I've lost the source :-( > > Cassio (Hi, I'm new here) > > On 5/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That could happen. I would imagine that the DA lenses were designed with > > some room for sensor expansion. > > Paul > > -- Original message -- > > From: Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > Whatever size sensor Pentax uses in the K1D, we can > > > > be sure it will work with DA lenses. They wouldn't > > > > be introducing a full line of expensive lenses for > > > > cameras that can't use them. So FF is definitely a > > > > no go. > > > > Paul > > > > > > That's a good point, Paul. I was thinking about that > > > last night. Couple this with the press release and it > > > seems that a FF camera is most likely not in the > > > cards...at least not right away. The lens map hasn't > > > pointed to anything much larger in sensors, that can't > > > be argued. Unless of course they pull a new body/new > > > lenses release thing as they done many times in the > > > past. But I'm not holding my breath. > > > > > > But how about a K1D with a APS-H sized sensor like in > > > the new Mark III? That could be cool, plus the boost > > > in pixels. > > > > > > -Brendan > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Original message > > > > -- > > > > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Digital Image Studio wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >But they just can't go on increasing the density > > > > of APS sized sensor > > > > > >ad infinitum, it will only end in tears. > > > > > > > > > > It's true. If the K1D is 14 megapixels as > > > > reported, it'll certainly > > > > > have to have a larger sensor than APS-C if they're > > > > going to meet users' > > > > > (ever-increasing) demands for low noise. (I would > > > > expect around a 1.3 > > > > > crop to keep it usable with current DA lenses.) > > > > > > > > > > Here's a sobering statistic I just read: > > > > > Even if Canon pushes the upcoming 1Ds-III up to 22 > > > > megapixels as > > > > > rumored it will still have *lower* pixel density > > > > (that is, larger > > > > > pixels) than the Nikon D2x does *now* at 12 > > > > megapixels. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > > > PDML@pdml.net > > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > > PDML@pdml.net > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > PDML@pdml.net > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > Cassio Vogel Dorneles > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Cassio Vogel Dorneles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax - Selling HQ and Apparently Drops 645D
I've read somewhere some DA lenses could even be used with (obviously FF) film cameras. Unfortunately, I've lost the source :-( Cassio (Hi, I'm new here) On 5/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That could happen. I would imagine that the DA lenses were designed with some > room for sensor expansion. > Paul > -- Original message -- > From: Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Whatever size sensor Pentax uses in the K1D, we can > > > be sure it will work with DA lenses. They wouldn't > > > be introducing a full line of expensive lenses for > > > cameras that can't use them. So FF is definitely a > > > no go. > > > Paul > > > > That's a good point, Paul. I was thinking about that > > last night. Couple this with the press release and it > > seems that a FF camera is most likely not in the > > cards...at least not right away. The lens map hasn't > > pointed to anything much larger in sensors, that can't > > be argued. Unless of course they pull a new body/new > > lenses release thing as they done many times in the > > past. But I'm not holding my breath. > > > > But how about a K1D with a APS-H sized sensor like in > > the new Mark III? That could be cool, plus the boost > > in pixels. > > > > -Brendan > > > > > > > > > -- Original message > > > -- > > > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Digital Image Studio wrote: > > > > > > > > >But they just can't go on increasing the density > > > of APS sized sensor > > > > >ad infinitum, it will only end in tears. > > > > > > > > It's true. If the K1D is 14 megapixels as > > > reported, it'll certainly > > > > have to have a larger sensor than APS-C if they're > > > going to meet users' > > > > (ever-increasing) demands for low noise. (I would > > > expect around a 1.3 > > > > crop to keep it usable with current DA lenses.) > > > > > > > > Here's a sobering statistic I just read: > > > > Even if Canon pushes the upcoming 1Ds-III up to 22 > > > megapixels as > > > > rumored it will still have *lower* pixel density > > > (that is, larger > > > > pixels) than the Nikon D2x does *now* at 12 > > > megapixels. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > > PDML@pdml.net > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > PDML@pdml.net > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Cassio Vogel Dorneles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO 2007 - 25b, 25c, 25d - GDG
Hi. I like all the three pictures. I can see some details in shadows in the last two, and I think a lighter background with more details would be distracting. Being a little perfectionist, I would point that "halos" on the fishies. I don't know if it's due processing or if it was there when the picture was taken, but I think it's a little disturbing. Great pictures, anyway. Cassio On 6/7/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like the compositions, particularly the last two. But I'm not keen > on the high contrast and subsequent lack of shadow detail. > On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:46 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > > Three pictures from Wednesday's explorations in a new site ... > > > >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/25b.htm > >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/25c.htm > >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/25d.htm > > > > Larger versions in the above pages by clicking on the images. > > > > Comments, critique, and bait always appreciated. > > > > best, > > Godfrey > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Cassio Vogel Dorneles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: My Flickr portfolio
Hi! You can use your Yahoo! account (if you have one, of course), but if you are in Singapore, Germany, Hong Kong or Korea you wouldn't be able to see Bob's pics: "If your Yahoo! ID is based in Singapore, Germany, Hong Kong or Korea you will only be able to view safe content based on your local Terms of Service so won't be able to turn SafeSearch off." (from http://www.flickr.com/help/filters/ ) On 8/19/07, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: > Bob Shell > > On Aug 17, 2007, at 3:09 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > > > >> It seems that they want me to sign in to look at your portfolio. Since I > >> have no real interest in joining Flicker, I guess I'll always be in the > >> dark. > > > > It's free to join, only takes a few minutes, and there are lots of > > great portfolios there. Joining doesn't obligate you to anything. > But, it's another account that I would then have to keep up with. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Cassio Vogel Dorneles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: My Flickr portfolio
I got able to see your work without covering the monitor just now. Really well done, good taste pics with beautiful models and great lighting. On 8/20/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't seem to find em > > Dave > > On 8/17/07, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been a member of Flickr for a while but only recently was > > motivated to put up a portfolio there. > > > > Advisory: I do a lot of nudes. Don't look if you'll be offended. > > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/?saved=1 > > > > Bob > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > Equine Photography > www.caughtinmotion.com > http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ > Ontario Canada > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Cassio Vogel Dorneles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
