Vivitar Series 1 compared to the new zooms

2003-03-16 Thread Peter Patershuk
   Hi to all,
I need help to sort out whether the vivitar lens I have is worth keeping
or should I get rid of it and buy a newer larger zoom. The camera I have is
the Mz 6. I have a Vivitar Series one 70/210  f3.5  62 mm filter thread, I
think it is the tokina made lens. Does this lens even come close to the
abilities of the pentax and consumer grade 70-300, 80-320 and 100-300 zooms.
I have looked at data that talks about lines per inch etc. Then there is
statements which say it's just not sharpness but things like contrast I
guess this equates into colour and shadow detail. So in your opinion is this
lens something that I should keep.

Thanks for your time, Peter.




Re: Alternative to the 360 FGZ AF flash on Mz 6

2003-03-11 Thread Peter Patershuk
Thanks Joe,
 I will look into those. Peter

- Original Message - 
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: Alternative to the 360 FGZ AF flash on Mz 6


 Try Sigma, Sunpak, Metz.
 
 Joe
 



Re: Alternative to the 360 FGZ AF flash on Mz 6

2003-03-11 Thread Peter Patershuk
Hi Lawrence,
I think you are right in suggesting that I would be giving up allot by
not going with the 360 FGZ. I guess there are only so many corners to cut.
So it is time to be patient and save a bit longer and get the proper flash.
Thanks Peter
- Original Message -
From: Lawrence Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: Alternative to the 360 FGZ AF flash on Mz 6


 On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Peter Patershuk wrote:
  I am not sure if I should save for longer and buy the 360 FGZ flash for
my
  Mz 6. Are there any real alternatives.

 But if you want to take advantage of MZ-6's (ZX-L in US) advanced flash
 feature, you really have no alternatives.  All the other flash and 3rd
 party ones can do the traditional TTL flash.  On the other hand, if you
 want P-TTL, High speed sync and wireless flash, AF360FGZ is your only
 choice.  Depending on your application, it may be worth the extra expense.

 --
 --Lawrence Kwan--SMS Info Service/Ringtone Convertor--PGP:finger/www--
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence/ -Key ID:0x6D23F3C4--






Re: An introduction and the 360 FGZ flash

2003-02-27 Thread Peter Patershuk
This is good news thanks Peter.
- Original Message - 
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: An introduction and the 360 FGZ flash


 Welcome.  And feel free to ramble at will.  I think the FGZ 360 will
 work just fine, although they might come out with a more powerful
 version.  I suspect, however that Pentax might continue this trend of
 putting the nifty flash features in the flash and not the body.
 
 I'm sure their will be other opinions on this, however.
 
 
 Steven Desjardins
 Department of Chemistry
 Washington and Lee University
 Lexington, VA 24450
 (540) 458-8873
 FAX: (540) 458-8878
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]