180mm lens for Pentax 35mm

2003-12-03 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Is there anyone making a 180mm lens comparable in quality to the
A*200/2.8 that will fit or can be adapted to the K mount?  No need for
auto focus, just good optical quality.

shel



Re: 180mm lens for Pentax 35mm

2003-12-03 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 03.12.03 16:03, Shel Belinkoff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is there anyone making a 180mm lens comparable in quality to the
 A*200/2.8 that will fit or can be adapted to the K mount?  No need for
 auto focus, just good optical quality.
 
You could try Sigma EX 180/3.5 - slightly darker, but equally good at macro
(it has 1:1 magnification) and in infinity (thanks to floating elements).
Low chromatic aberrations (it uses ED glass), quite sharp even wide open,
real circular shape 9-blades diaphragm. It has good MF feeling, although AF
gear noise is then noticable slightly.

-- 
Best Regards
Sylwek




Re: 180mm lens for Pentax 35mm

2003-12-03 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: 180mm lens for Pentax 35mm


 Is there anyone making a 180mm lens comparable in quality to the
 A*200/2.8 that will fit or can be adapted to the K mount?  No need for
 auto focus, just good optical quality.

I think Tamron makes a good one, and I have heard very good things about the
Nikkor 180mm.
Doesn't leica make something around that length for the R series?

William Robb



Re: 180mm lens for Pentax 35mm

2003-12-03 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Well, seems odd to me, but what do I know.

Not sure if floating elements are a good thing, unless you drop the lens
in a lake groan.  

No need to make scans, but thanks for the offer ... too much time and
trouble for the result.  If I'm more interested in the lens, I may ask
later.  Best bet for me would be to put it on a camera and burn a roll
of film.

However, I'm leaning more towards a simpler lens - just a plain old
tele, no AF, no magic elements. Sheesh, how boring L

shel

Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:

 No, it has floating elements (group of lenses that moves independent from
 main focusing group), that takes care of optimum performance at all fosuing
 distances. [...] I can search for some sample slides and scan it
 for you if you want.



Re: 180mm lens for Pentax 35mm

2003-12-03 Thread Matti Etelapera
Shel wrote:

 Is there anyone making a 180mm lens comparable in quality to the
 A*200/2.8 that will fit or can be adapted to the K mount?  No need for
 auto focus, just good optical quality.

Tamron SP 180mm f:2.5 LD [IF] is a beauty. Two low dispersion elements and
focuses to 1,2 meters with a very short focus throw. Only thing bothering
me with it is that is has some pincushion distortion. Actually more than
the Tamron 80-200 2.8 SP LD at *any* focal length! The Pentax Fan has it
as the only third party telephoto prime lens in this list (follow link to
pictures of it):

http://www.pentax-fan.jp/lens35.asp?fl=Tty=K

And a comparison between the Tamron, a 180mm Nikkor and a 70-200 f:2.8 
Sigma (in japanese):
http://www.akina.ne.jp/~dvkoji/page8/01003photo.html

Sigma made a huge 180mm f:2.8 AF macro lens which went to 1:2. The current
model is the AF 180mm f:3.5 on which I guess is very highly regarded (and 
goes to 1:1).

  -Matti




Re: 180mm lens for Pentax 35mm

2003-12-03 Thread b_rubenstein
Unless you are intending to do macro, don't get a macro. There have been 
several version of the Nikon 180/2.8. They are wonderful for people and give 
great out of focus backgrounds. The MF ones aren't very expensive used. (you 
could probably get one with a matching body for $500) The throat dia. is 
smaller than the K mount. One possible problem is that the flim plane to lens 
mount flange distance is, I think, greater on Nikons. If it is, you would 
lose infinity focus without something something fancy.

BR

From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]

However, I'm leaning more towards a simpler lens - just a plain old
tele, no AF, no magic elements. Sheesh, how boring L