RE: Another crystal image

2005-11-03 Thread Tom C
Now that's my cup of tea there!  The 1st one seemed void or unbalanced to 
me.  This one I love!


Tom C.





From: Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: "pentax-discuss@pdml.net" 
Subject: Another crystal image
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 09:38:58 +0200

I thought this might be interesting.

http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/only003.jpg

Its a stack of five pictures. Sometimes, if one is not careful the growth 
gets a bit thick (deep) and since the depth of field is almost non-existent 
one has to resort to other means. The images were stacked with CombZ and 
had the levels slightly altered in Photoshop. No sharpening was done and 
they were 'stacked only'. I didn't measure the focus steps. The total might 
have been about 120um.


Don

--
Dr E D F Williams
___
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
See feature: The Cement Company from Hell
Updated: Photomicro Link -- 18 05 2005






Re: Another crystal image

2005-11-03 Thread Ann Sanfedele
Don Williams wrote:
> 
> I think I need to add that the picture
> I've posted is rather small. The
> original is a full sized TIFF with
> masses of fine detail.
> 
> D

And I thank you for that a zillion times!

So beautiful.


Don't suppose you have any thin sections of rocks
such
as serpentine (without asbestos :) :) ) or the
like
that you have photoed with birefringence do you?

taking petrography in , I think it was, 1970 I
enjoyed
observing how much some of the samples looked like
the
work of some abstract impressionists or even 19th
century
impressionists - Id use it as a guide to remember
which was
which and the professor even accepted that, do a
degree,
when we had to explain how we knew which rock or
mineral
was what it was. 

It was sort of a "there is nothing new under the
sun" experience.


back then there was a poster that could be
found of the moon rock under a microscope which 
I had for quite a while.

ann

> 
> Don Williams wrote:
> > I thought this might be interesting.
> >
> > http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/only003.jpg
> >
> > Its a stack of five pictures. Sometimes, if one is not careful the
> > growth gets a bit thick (deep) and since the depth of field is almost
> > non-existent one has to resort to other means. The images were stacked
> > with CombZ and had the levels slightly altered in Photoshop. No
> > sharpening was done and they were 'stacked only'. I didn't measure the
> > focus steps. The total might have been about 120um.
> >
> > Don
> >
> 
> --
> Dr E D F Williams
> ___
> http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
> See feature: The Cement Company from Hell
> Updated: Photomicro Link -- 18 05 2005



Re: Another crystal image

2005-11-03 Thread Jack Davis
Don,
I feel that this "type" of image would be particularly suited to
commercial use. Virtually any sort of business office or attendant
customer receiving or waiting area. 
Engineering office reception areas immediately comes to mind. They will
trend to occupy the viewers mind to a greater extent than would a
quickly read common theme. One route to reaching such locations would,
of course, be through arming commercial interior decorating businesses
with examples (watermarked) for their portfolios. Has worked some for
me.
Very marketable, at least the one I've seen.

Jack

--- Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This one is also salicylic acid, but the 
> crystals have grown much faster and 
> overlap and join. Conditions are the 
> same as before -- more or less. I've 
> taken well over 150 similar images with 
> the *ist D about half of which have been 
> scrapped. I have dozens on film as well.
> 
> This is the start of a commercial 
> operation. They'll be offered for sale 
> from a US website as prints, framed, or 
> mailed in tubes. But because I have such 
> warm feelings for the Pentax group I've 
> snatched the opportunity to come back -- 
> now that I have a Pentax body on the 
> microscopes again and can legitimately 
> do so -- and show some of this stuff.
> 
> One idea is that many prints could be 
> original -- one image one print. This 
> way you could not find, hanging in a 
> neighbors bathroom, the same one you 
> have in the prized spot in your front 
> hall. I've been looking at websites 
> where pictures are for sale and trying 
> to decide how to price them. However 
> they're different insofar as they'll be 
> originals with no others like them 
> anywhere. Any suggestions? Off-list 
> would be best for a reply to this one.
> 
> The big printer has been set up, paper 
> and loads of ink bought (in Oklahoma by 
> the way) and soon we'll start. The first 
> ones should be ready in a week. Because 
> my partner and I are now in business I 
> have to forgo the satisfaction of 
> posting galleries of these images as I 
> have done with other photomicrographs 
> and videos.
> 
> Diatoms and other interesting and 
> beautiful 'micro-life' will be included 
> in these collections.
> 
> Don
> 
> skye wrote:
> > This is amazing (and again, begs the question: what is it,
> exactly?).
> > It looks like organic stained glass.
> > 
> > You're truly putting that camera to good use :)
> > 
> > On 11/2/05, Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I thought this might be interesting.
> >>
> >> http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/only003.jpg
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Dr E D F Williams
> ___
> http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
> See feature: The Cement Company from Hell
> Updated: Photomicro Link -- 18 05 2005
> 
> 





__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com



Re: Another crystal image

2005-11-03 Thread frank theriault
On 11/3/05, Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought this might be interesting.
>
> http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/only003.jpg
>
> Its a stack of five pictures. Sometimes,
> if one is not careful the growth gets a
> bit thick (deep) and since the depth of
> field is almost non-existent one has to
> resort to other means. The images were
> stacked with CombZ and had the levels
> slightly altered in Photoshop. No
> sharpening was done and they were
> 'stacked only'. I didn't measure the
> focus steps. The total might have been
> about 120um.


you're right, it is interesting!  cool shot.

-frank


--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson



Re: Re: Another crystal image

2005-11-03 Thread mike wilson
> From: Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>  But because I have such 
> warm feelings for the Pentax group I've 
> snatched the opportunity to come back -- 

Steady, there.


-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information



Re: Another crystal image

2005-11-03 Thread Don Williams
This one is also salicylic acid, but the 
crystals have grown much faster and 
overlap and join. Conditions are the 
same as before -- more or less. I've 
taken well over 150 similar images with 
the *ist D about half of which have been 
scrapped. I have dozens on film as well.


This is the start of a commercial 
operation. They'll be offered for sale 
from a US website as prints, framed, or 
mailed in tubes. But because I have such 
warm feelings for the Pentax group I've 
snatched the opportunity to come back -- 
now that I have a Pentax body on the 
microscopes again and can legitimately 
do so -- and show some of this stuff.


One idea is that many prints could be 
original -- one image one print. This 
way you could not find, hanging in a 
neighbors bathroom, the same one you 
have in the prized spot in your front 
hall. I've been looking at websites 
where pictures are for sale and trying 
to decide how to price them. However 
they're different insofar as they'll be 
originals with no others like them 
anywhere. Any suggestions? Off-list 
would be best for a reply to this one.


The big printer has been set up, paper 
and loads of ink bought (in Oklahoma by 
the way) and soon we'll start. The first 
ones should be ready in a week. Because 
my partner and I are now in business I 
have to forgo the satisfaction of 
posting galleries of these images as I 
have done with other photomicrographs 
and videos.


Diatoms and other interesting and 
beautiful 'micro-life' will be included 
in these collections.


Don

skye wrote:

This is amazing (and again, begs the question: what is it, exactly?).
It looks like organic stained glass.

You're truly putting that camera to good use :)

On 11/2/05, Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I thought this might be interesting.

http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/only003.jpg






--
Dr E D F Williams
___
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
See feature: The Cement Company from Hell
Updated: Photomicro Link -- 18 05 2005



Re: Another crystal image

2005-11-03 Thread skye
This is amazing (and again, begs the question: what is it, exactly?).
It looks like organic stained glass.

You're truly putting that camera to good use :)

On 11/2/05, Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought this might be interesting.
>
> http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/only003.jpg



Re: Another crystal image

2005-11-02 Thread Don Williams
I think I need to add that the picture 
I've posted is rather small. The 
original is a full sized TIFF with 
masses of fine detail.


D

Don Williams wrote:

I thought this might be interesting.

http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/only003.jpg

Its a stack of five pictures. Sometimes, if one is not careful the 
growth gets a bit thick (deep) and since the depth of field is almost 
non-existent one has to resort to other means. The images were stacked 
with CombZ and had the levels slightly altered in Photoshop. No 
sharpening was done and they were 'stacked only'. I didn't measure the 
focus steps. The total might have been about 120um.


Don



--
Dr E D F Williams
___
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
See feature: The Cement Company from Hell
Updated: Photomicro Link -- 18 05 2005



Another crystal image

2005-11-02 Thread Don Williams

I thought this might be interesting.

http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/only003.jpg

Its a stack of five pictures. Sometimes, 
if one is not careful the growth gets a 
bit thick (deep) and since the depth of 
field is almost non-existent one has to 
resort to other means. The images were 
stacked with CombZ and had the levels 
slightly altered in Photoshop. No 
sharpening was done and they were 
'stacked only'. I didn't measure the 
focus steps. The total might have been 
about 120um.


Don

--
Dr E D F Williams
___
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
See feature: The Cement Company from Hell
Updated: Photomicro Link -- 18 05 2005