Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Collin Brendemuehl
What is it?
(By cheapest I mean poorest construction/materials.)
The Vivitar V4000 comes to mind.
Is there anything worse that that?

Collin




Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Gary L. Murphy

Your email has been deleted un-read. I have better things to do then waste my time 
with your drivel.





Later,
Gary





RE: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Rob Brigham
Then why the hell did you waste even more of your time replying?

Also, how did you know it was drivel without reading it?

 -Original Message-
 From: Gary L. Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 12 February 2003 15:01
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Cheapest k-mount body
 
 
 
 Your email has been deleted un-read. I have better things to 
 do then waste my time with your drivel.
 
 
 
 
 
 Later,
 Gary
 
 
 




RE: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread tom
 -Original Message-
 From: Gary L. Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 
 Your email has been deleted un-read. I have better things 
 to do then waste my time with your drivel.

Ouch. What was that for?

tv







Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
Isn't that OEMd by Cosina?

BR

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


What is it?
(By cheapest I mean poorest construction/materials.)
The Vivitar V4000 comes to mind.
Is there anything worse that that?

Collin

 






Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Lasse Karlsson
One thing that keeps puzzling me is how some people seem to be in such
a total lack of selfrespect that they don't hesitatet to, or obviously
don't care if they
even show the whole world what an extraordinary asshole they are.

Lasse

- Original Message -
From: Gary L. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Cheapest k-mount body



 Your email has been deleted un-read. I have better things to do then
waste my time with your drivel.
 Later,
 Gary







Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Mat Maessen
Kalimar K-90.
cheap cheap cheap. But it does do pseudo-mirror-lockup with the
self-timer.

-Mat

Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
 
 What is it?
 (By cheapest I mean poorest construction/materials.)
 The Vivitar V4000 comes to mind.
 Is there anything worse that that?
 
 Collin




Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Mark Roberts
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: Gary L. Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 
 Your email has been deleted un-read. I have better things 
 to do then waste my time with your drivel.

Ouch. What was that for?

Probably he's just in a bad mood because of being hit on by a gay
florist. And because Pentax is about to switch to a
totally-non-backwards-compatible lens mount and send special agents into
all our homes to confiscate all our old-style k-mount gear.

Tempers get short when these kind of things happen...

-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com




Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Doug Brewer
At 01:20 PM 2/12/03, Mark wrote:


Probably he's just in a bad mood because of being hit on by a gay
florist. And because Pentax is about to switch to a
totally-non-backwards-compatible lens mount and send special agents into
all our homes to confiscate all our old-style k-mount gear.

Tempers get short when these kind of things happen...






hahahahahahahahahahaha





Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread frank theriault
I have no idea if they're still around, and I've never held one, but
there are/were a bunch of Chinese K1000 knock-offs around - Mingca was
one of them.  IIRC, they were made in factories that Pentax used to
source K1000's at the end of their run.

Anyone know what they're like, or if they're still available?  This
thread just made me wonder...

cheers,
frank

Collin Brendemuehl wrote:

 What is it?
 (By cheapest I mean poorest construction/materials.)
 The Vivitar V4000 comes to mind.
 Is there anything worse that that?

 Collin

--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer





Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread frank theriault
And, the original post was even on topic!  Go figure...

cheers,
frank

Rob Brigham wrote:

 Then why the hell did you waste even more of your time replying?

 Also, how did you know it was drivel without reading it?

  -Original Message-
  From: Gary L. Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 12 February 2003 15:01
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Cheapest k-mount body
 
 
 
  Your email has been deleted un-read. I have better things to
  do then waste my time with your drivel.
 
 
 
 
 
  Later,
  Gary
 
 
 

--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer





Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Gary L. Murphy
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 17:03:17 -0500, frank theriault wrote:

I have no idea if they're still around, and I've never held one, but
there are/were a bunch of Chinese K1000 knock-offs around - Mingca was
one of them.  IIRC, they were made in factories that Pentax used to
source K1000's at the end of their run.

Anyone know what they're like, or if they're still available?  This
thread just made me wonder...

Still own one of the Mingca's... Works exactly like a K1000... The main difference is 
the Mingca has LED's for the meter rather then 
the match needle of the Pentax K1000 

I picked it up of eBay about two years ago and only paid $55 US for it. 





Later,
Gary





Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread frank theriault
Hi, Gary,

And, what are they like in terms of sturdiness, etc.?  Pretty much like the last few 
years of K1000's?

thanks,
frank

Gary L. Murphy wrote:

 Still own one of the Mingca's... Works exactly like a K1000... The main difference 
is the Mingca has LED's for the meter rather then
 the match needle of the Pentax K1000

 I picked it up of eBay about two years ago and only paid $55 US for it.

 Later,
 Gary

--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it 
is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer





Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Gary L. Murphy
Lasse Karlsson wrote:


One thing that keeps puzzling me is how some people seem to be in such
a total lack of selfrespect that they don't hesitatet to, or obviously
don't care if they
even show the whole world what an extraordinary asshole they are.


Why thank you, Lasse. Of course, you have never made a mistake...



--
Later,
Gary





Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Gary L. Murphy
Mark Roberts wrote:



Probably he's just in a bad mood because of being hit on by a gay
florist. And because Pentax is about to switch to a
totally-non-backwards-compatible lens mount and send special agents into
all our homes to confiscate all our old-style k-mount gear.


Yeah, and they just left with all of mine!  g



--
Later,
Gary





Re: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Gary L. Murphy
frank theriault wrote:


And, what are they like in terms of sturdiness, etc.?  Pretty much like the last few years of K1000's?


To quote Bob Segar, Like a Rock.:-)

--- 
Later,
Gary




Re: Vs: Cheapest k-mount body

2003-02-12 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi!

PA I don't know the Zenit seems to be made with good materials, it's just the
PA result that's bad.

PA At 06:01 PM 2/12/2003 +0100, you wrote:

Zenit
All the best!
Raimo

tongue-in-cheek vgb
Zenit (though M42 mount) was my first camera, along with Helios 44-2
58/2 lens. So gentlemen, let us be courteous towards this camera.
/tongue-in-cheek

I am getting slowly but surely convinced that I should take my time
and restore (digitally of course) some of my photographs from 15 years
ago...

I will make sure you're informed when it is done... It will be very
interesting for me to see what you'd have to say...

---
Boris Liberman
www.geocities.com/dunno57
www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=38625