Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Tom C

Today is the autumnal equinox.

Per earlier posts, I'm willing to host a Synchronocity Gallery for the PDML 
just for the fun of it.


All shots would need to be taken within -12 to +12 hours of the equinox.

AUTUMNAL EQUINOX...(FALL)   SEP 22 2005   2223 UTC or 523 PM EST

If anyone would like to participate please send the .jpg photos to my 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address.


Please follow the same general rules regarding image sizing as are followed 
for the PDML (600 pixels in largest dimension)  Please submit images no 
larger than 100KB (up from 75KB for PUG).  Please one image per person.  
Please include name, country, and comments.


I will post them in a tasteful manner something like, but not exactly like, 
this:


http://www.peaceoflight.com/album/index.html

All rights of course remain with the photographer and photographs will be 
used for no other purposes than this gallery.


Since this is my own personal webspace I'll exercise my rights to edit, 
refuse, censor, and all those other nasty words, etc., etc., etc., if I 
personally find picture content to be objectionable.   Please use good 
judgement.


Please allow me several weeks to get it up.

Tom C.





From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Irrelevant Poll: What do you WANT in a digital camera?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:46:15 -0400

On 9/22/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 And some just are tools...

You talking to me? Are you talking to me?  I don't see anybody else here.

sincerely,
Travis



--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson






Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread William Robb

Am I +1 or -1 from EST?

b


- Original Message - 
From: Tom C

Subject: Informal Synchronocity?



Today is the autumnal equinox.

Per earlier posts, I'm willing to host a Synchronocity Gallery for the 
PDML just for the fun of it.


All shots would need to be taken within -12 to +12 hours of the equinox.

AUTUMNAL EQUINOX...(FALL)   SEP 22 2005   2223 UTC or 523 PM EST

If anyone would like to participate please send the .jpg photos to my 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address.


Please follow the same general rules regarding image sizing as are 
followed for the PDML (600 pixels in largest dimension)  Please submit 
images no larger than 100KB (up from 75KB for PUG).  Please one image per 
person.  Please include name, country, and comments.


I will post them in a tasteful manner something like, but not exactly 
like, this:


http://www.peaceoflight.com/album/index.html

All rights of course remain with the photographer and photographs will be 
used for no other purposes than this gallery.


Since this is my own personal webspace I'll exercise my rights to edit, 
refuse, censor, and all those other nasty words, etc., etc., etc., if I 
personally find picture content to be objectionable.   Please use good 
judgement.


Please allow me several weeks to get it up.

Tom C.





From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Irrelevant Poll: What do you WANT in a digital camera?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:46:15 -0400

On 9/22/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 And some just are tools...

You talking to me? Are you talking to me?  I don't see anybody else here.

sincerely,
Travis



--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson










Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Paul Sorenson

That would be minus if you're further west

William Robb wrote:

Am I +1 or -1 from EST?

b


- Original Message - From: Tom C
Subject: Informal Synchronocity?



Today is the autumnal equinox.

Per earlier posts, I'm willing to host a Synchronocity Gallery for the 
PDML just for the fun of it.


All shots would need to be taken within -12 to +12 hours of the equinox.

AUTUMNAL EQUINOX...(FALL)   SEP 22 2005   2223 UTC or 523 PM EST

If anyone would like to participate please send the .jpg photos to my 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address.


Please follow the same general rules regarding image sizing as are 
followed for the PDML (600 pixels in largest dimension)  Please submit 
images no larger than 100KB (up from 75KB for PUG).  Please one image 
per person.  Please include name, country, and comments.


I will post them in a tasteful manner something like, but not exactly 
like, this:


http://www.peaceoflight.com/album/index.html

All rights of course remain with the photographer and photographs will 
be used for no other purposes than this gallery.


Since this is my own personal webspace I'll exercise my rights to 
edit, refuse, censor, and all those other nasty words, etc., etc., 
etc., if I personally find picture content to be objectionable.   
Please use good judgement.


Please allow me several weeks to get it up.

Tom C.





From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Irrelevant Poll: What do you WANT in a digital camera?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:46:15 -0400

On 9/22/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 And some just are tools...

You talking to me? Are you talking to me?  I don't see anybody else 
here.


sincerely,
Travis



--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson














RE: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Tom C
While pictures need to be taken within the 24 hour window, time is needed 
for the photographer to process the shot,etc.  So I'll accept photo 
submissions up through next Thursday allowing a week to get them in.


Tom C.





From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Informal Synchronocity?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:00:14 -0600

Today is the autumnal equinox.

Per earlier posts, I'm willing to host a Synchronocity Gallery for the PDML 
just for the fun of it.


All shots would need to be taken within -12 to +12 hours of the equinox.

AUTUMNAL EQUINOX...(FALL)   SEP 22 2005   2223 UTC or 523 PM EST

If anyone would like to participate please send the .jpg photos to my 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address.


Please follow the same general rules regarding image sizing as are followed 
for the PDML (600 pixels in largest dimension)  Please submit images no 
larger than 100KB (up from 75KB for PUG).  Please one image per person.  
Please include name, country, and comments.


I will post them in a tasteful manner something like, but not exactly like, 
this:


http://www.peaceoflight.com/album/index.html

All rights of course remain with the photographer and photographs will be 
used for no other purposes than this gallery.


Since this is my own personal webspace I'll exercise my rights to edit, 
refuse, censor, and all those other nasty words, etc., etc., etc., if I 
personally find picture content to be objectionable.   Please use good 
judgement.


Please allow me several weeks to get it up.

Tom C.





From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Irrelevant Poll: What do you WANT in a digital camera?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:46:15 -0400

On 9/22/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 And some just are tools...

You talking to me? Are you talking to me?  I don't see anybody else here.

sincerely,
Travis



--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson









RE: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Markus Maurer
Hi Tom
I will go out in 2 hours and take some night shots of Zurich and the traffic
lights.
But you will have to wait up to 7 days for the results since I use film ;-)

thanks for the idea and work, I'm very interested to see the results.
greetings
Markus

All shots would need to be taken within -12 to +12 hours of the equinox.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] address.





RE: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Glen

At 02:29 PM 9/22/2005, Tom C wrote:

While pictures need to be taken within the 24 hour window, time is needed 
for the photographer to process the shot,etc.  So I'll accept photo 
submissions up through next Thursday allowing a week to get them in.


Tom C.



Hi Tom,

What do you want pictures of? What type of subject matter?

At the exact moment of the equinox, I'll be hiking through the woods. (I'm 
not sure if that's something you want a picture of.)


(Exact Time of Autumnal Equinox = Sept. 22, 2005, 6:23 P.M. EDT)


take care,
Glen



Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread William Robb


- Original Message - 
From: Glen

Subject: RE: Informal Synchronocity?





What do you want pictures of? What type of subject matter?


Nekkid wimmen...


At the exact moment of the equinox, I'll be hiking through the woods. (I'm 
not sure if that's something you want a picture of.)


Seriously, the Synchronicity theme is more of a slice of life thing than 
anyting else.

Take a picture of a stick at the appropriate moment.

William Robb





Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Tom C
Yes it is a 'slice of life'.  I'm hoping though that most will be somewhat 
more than that.  In other words, don't just pick up the camera and take a 
snapshot.  Even spending a minute looking around and thinking about it can 
make a better shot, right? :)


Tom C.





From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Informal Synchronocity?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:16:18 -0600


- Original Message - From: Glen
Subject: RE: Informal Synchronocity?





What do you want pictures of? What type of subject matter?


Nekkid wimmen...


At the exact moment of the equinox, I'll be hiking through the woods. (I'm 
not sure if that's something you want a picture of.)


Seriously, the Synchronicity theme is more of a slice of life thing than 
anyting else.

Take a picture of a stick at the appropriate moment.

William Robb








RE: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Tom C

Thanks for contributing Markus.

I will send out an e-mail to each contributor acknowledging receipt.

Tom C.





From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Informal Synchronocity?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:59:15 +0200

Hi Tom
I will go out in 2 hours and take some night shots of Zurich and the 
traffic

lights.
But you will have to wait up to 7 days for the results since I use film ;-)

thanks for the idea and work, I'm very interested to see the results.
greetings
Markus

All shots would need to be taken within -12 to +12 hours of the equinox.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] address.








RE: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Tom C
P.S.  Didn't mean to slight you mates in the Southern climes.  It's your 
spring equinox so please feel free to contribute! :)


Tom C.





From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Informal Synchronocity?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:00:14 -0600

Today is the autumnal equinox.

Per earlier posts, I'm willing to host a Synchronocity Gallery for the PDML 
just for the fun of it.


All shots would need to be taken within -12 to +12 hours of the equinox.

AUTUMNAL EQUINOX...(FALL)   SEP 22 2005   2223 UTC or 523 PM EST

If anyone would like to participate please send the .jpg photos to my 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address.


Please follow the same general rules regarding image sizing as are followed 
for the PDML (600 pixels in largest dimension)  Please submit images no 
larger than 100KB (up from 75KB for PUG).  Please one image per person.  
Please include name, country, and comments.


I will post them in a tasteful manner something like, but not exactly like, 
this:


http://www.peaceoflight.com/album/index.html

All rights of course remain with the photographer and photographs will be 
used for no other purposes than this gallery.


Since this is my own personal webspace I'll exercise my rights to edit, 
refuse, censor, and all those other nasty words, etc., etc., etc., if I 
personally find picture content to be objectionable.   Please use good 
judgement.


Please allow me several weeks to get it up.

Tom C.





From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Irrelevant Poll: What do you WANT in a digital camera?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:46:15 -0400

On 9/22/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 And some just are tools...

You talking to me? Are you talking to me?  I don't see anybody else here.

sincerely,
Travis



--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson









RE: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Tom C
One other thought... sorry.  Please also include a title for the submission 
and a date/time if possible in UTC.  If you don't know or can't figure out 
(or don't want to) the UTC date/time, please tell me what date and time and 
time zone you live in and I'll figure it.


I may decide to add the date/UTC as part of the photo title.  I'll also 
extend the time frame to -24/+24 hours in the hopes more people will 
contribute... including PDML lurkers.


Thanks.

Tom C.





From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Informal Synchronocity?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:00:14 -0600

Today is the autumnal equinox.

Per earlier posts, I'm willing to host a Synchronocity Gallery for the 
PDML just for the fun of it.


All shots would need to be taken within -12 to +12 hours of the equinox.

AUTUMNAL EQUINOX...(FALL)   SEP 22 2005   2223 UTC or 523 PM EST

If anyone would like to participate please send the .jpg photos to my 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address.


Please follow the same general rules regarding image sizing as are 
followed for the PDML (600 pixels in largest dimension)  Please submit 
images no larger than 100KB (up from 75KB for PUG).  Please one image per 
person.  Please include name, country, and comments.


I will post them in a tasteful manner something like, but not exactly 
like, this:


http://www.peaceoflight.com/album/index.html

All rights of course remain with the photographer and photographs will be 
used for no other purposes than this gallery.


Since this is my own personal webspace I'll exercise my rights to edit, 
refuse, censor, and all those other nasty words, etc., etc., etc., if I 
personally find picture content to be objectionable.   Please use good 
judgement.


Please allow me several weeks to get it up.

Tom C.





From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Irrelevant Poll: What do you WANT in a digital camera?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:46:15 -0400

On 9/22/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 And some just are tools...

You talking to me? Are you talking to me?  I don't see anybody else here.

sincerely,
Travis



--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson












Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 9/22/2005 5:18:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One other thought... sorry.  Please also include a title for the submission 
and a date/time if possible in UTC.  If you don't know or can't figure out 
(or don't want to) the UTC date/time, please tell me what date and time and 
time zone you live in and I'll figure it.

I may decide to add the date/UTC as part of the photo title.  I'll also 
extend the time frame to -24/+24 hours in the hopes more people will 
contribute... including PDML lurkers.

Thanks.

Tom C.
==
Thanks, because as far as I can figure, we are already past the equinox on 
the left coast.

Marnie aka Doe 



Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Eactivist
Ignore me. Oops, it's tommorrow. Okay, 3:23 pm it is.

Marnie aka Doe   I never could add.



Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Glen

At 01:00 PM 9/22/2005, Tom C wrote:


Today is the autumnal equinox.

Per earlier posts, I'm willing to host a Synchronocity Gallery for the 
PDML just for the fun of it.


Okay, I just sent my equinox photo.

Tom, let me know whether it reaches you. I tried to send photos to two 
different people recently, only to have problems with them receiving the files.


take care,
Glen



Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Glen

At 08:19 PM 9/22/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I may decide to add the date/UTC as part of the photo title.  I'll also
extend the time frame to -24/+24 hours in the hopes more people will
contribute... including PDML lurkers.

Thanks.

Tom C.
==
Thanks, because as far as I can figure, we are already past the equinox on
the left coast.

Marnie aka Doe


Yeah, I left the house with only 6 minutes before the official equinox, 
when I found out about this project.


Come next equinox, or other notable event, please give us a little more 
advance notice.  ;)


take care,
Glen



Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 9/22/2005 5:31:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I may decide to add the date/UTC as part of the photo title.  I'll also
extend the time frame to -24/+24 hours in the hopes more people will
contribute... including PDML lurkers.

Thanks.

Tom C.
==
Thanks, because as far as I can figure, we are already past the equinox on
the left coast.

Marnie aka Doe

Yeah, I left the house with only 6 minutes before the official equinox, 
when I found out about this project.

Come next equinox, or other notable event, please give us a little more 
advance notice.  ;)

take care,
Glen

Oh, right, it IS Thursday. Blew it already. Yup, more advance notice. I was 
thinking it must be tomorrow because we needed time to think about it. 

I can however make the 6:23 deadline. Only we won't say which time zone. :-)

Marnie aka Doe 



Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Glen

At 08:20 PM 9/22/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Ignore me. Oops, it's tommorrow. Okay, 3:23 pm it is.

Marnie aka Doe   I never could add.


Actually, the moment of equinox was today. It was 6:23 pm EST. I looked it 
up on a few different web sites, just to make sure. (For the record, some 
of those web sites say 6:22 pm EST, instead of 6:23 pm EST. It appears that 
no one knows the exact time.)  ;)



take care,
Glen



Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread Tom C
LOL.  I had suggested it about three weeks ago with little positive 
feedback.  I was getting ready to send out the e-mail on Tuesday but was 
stressed out at work and am changing jobs in a week, so I hesitated to 
commit myself.  Today it was the equinox and I was in a better frame of mind 
and decided what the heck, it'll be fun if nothing else.




Tom C.





From: Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Informal Synchronocity?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:30:15 -0400

At 08:19 PM 9/22/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I may decide to add the date/UTC as part of the photo title.  I'll also
extend the time frame to -24/+24 hours in the hopes more people will
contribute... including PDML lurkers.

Thanks.

Tom C.
==
Thanks, because as far as I can figure, we are already past the equinox on
the left coast.

Marnie aka Doe


Yeah, I left the house with only 6 minutes before the official equinox, 
when I found out about this project.


Come next equinox, or other notable event, please give us a little more 
advance notice.  ;)


take care,
Glen






Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread cbwaters


- Original Message - 
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: Informal Synchronocity?


LOL.  I had suggested it about three weeks ago with little positive 
feedback.  I was getting ready to send out the e-mail on Tuesday but was 
stressed out at work and am changing jobs in a week, so I hesitated to 
commit myself.  Today it was the equinox and I was in a better frame of 
mind and decided what the heck, it'll be fun if nothing else.




Tom C.





From: Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Informal Synchronocity?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:30:15 -0400

At 08:19 PM 9/22/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I may decide to add the date/UTC as part of the photo title.  I'll also
extend the time frame to -24/+24 hours in the hopes more people will
contribute... including PDML lurkers.

Thanks.

Tom C.
==
Thanks, because as far as I can figure, we are already past the equinox 
on

the left coast.

Marnie aka Doe


Yeah, I left the house with only 6 minutes before the official equinox, 
when I found out about this project.


Come next equinox, or other notable event, please give us a little more 
advance notice.  ;)


take care,
Glen









--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.4/109 - Release Date: 9/21/2005



Re: Informal Synchronocity?

2005-09-22 Thread cbwaters

Tom,
Tried to send mine but the darned thing keeps bouncing...
CW
- Original Message - 
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 8:17 PM
Subject: RE: Informal Synchronocity?


One other thought... sorry.  Please also include a title for the 
submission and a date/time if possible in UTC.  If you don't know or can't 
figure out (or don't want to) the UTC date/time, please tell me what date 
and time and time zone you live in and I'll figure it.


I may decide to add the date/UTC as part of the photo title.  I'll also 
extend the time frame to -24/+24 hours in the hopes more people will 
contribute... including PDML lurkers.


Thanks.

Tom C.





From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Informal Synchronocity?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:00:14 -0600

Today is the autumnal equinox.

Per earlier posts, I'm willing to host a Synchronocity Gallery for the 
PDML just for the fun of it.


All shots would need to be taken within -12 to +12 hours of the equinox.

AUTUMNAL EQUINOX...(FALL)   SEP 22 2005   2223 UTC or 523 PM EST

If anyone would like to participate please send the .jpg photos to my 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address.


Please follow the same general rules regarding image sizing as are 
followed for the PDML (600 pixels in largest dimension)  Please submit 
images no larger than 100KB (up from 75KB for PUG).  Please one image per 
person.  Please include name, country, and comments.


I will post them in a tasteful manner something like, but not exactly 
like, this:


http://www.peaceoflight.com/album/index.html

All rights of course remain with the photographer and photographs will be 
used for no other purposes than this gallery.


Since this is my own personal webspace I'll exercise my rights to edit, 
refuse, censor, and all those other nasty words, etc., etc., etc., if I 
personally find picture content to be objectionable.   Please use good 
judgement.


Please allow me several weeks to get it up.

Tom C.





From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Irrelevant Poll: What do you WANT in a digital camera?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:46:15 -0400

On 9/22/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 And some just are tools...

You talking to me? Are you talking to me?  I don't see anybody else 
here.


sincerely,
Travis



--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson















--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.4/109 - Release Date: 9/21/2005