Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2013-01-10 Thread P. J. Alling
I just finished reading this damned review, and while I can nit pick 
with the best of them, but could these pissants be any more annoying? 
Well at least they did a review, DPReview will ignore these cameras 
until they are superseded.


On 10/29/2012 1:39 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:

From our friends at Pentax Forums. :-)

http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-k-5-ii-iis/introduction.html

Some highlights:
AF much better in low light, unimproved in normal light.
Resolution jump up from K-5 very noticeable.
Noticeable moire on finely patterned fabric, otherwise no worries.

Speaking of which: anyone know if some simple (eg Gaussian) blurring
in post will give the same effect as the now removed optical sensor
filter? That is, if I see moire in my shot, can I do a simple pass
over it, or is the image just screwed now?

Enjoy.



--
Buy a Leica to get the full “Leica Experience”, (a quick reduction of funds in 
the bank account).


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2012-10-31 Thread Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 Nah, if I upgrade it has to be another system, Pentax are just falling
 further and further behind the competition with each incarnation. It's
 a pity really. Save for the hassle and cost of going through the big
 sell-off and re-buying everything I would have left the brand some
 years ago. I just put in my Lotto and hope these days.

With Pentax finally freed from Hoya's shackles, I wonder if it's
indeed a good time to jump ship... unless you need something better,
now.
Anyway, I don't think Pentax is falling further and further behind
the competition - the K-30 and the K-5 II(s) are solid products and,
for example, Nikon still didn't replaced the D300s.

-- 
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2012-10-30 Thread SV Hovland
Adam at Pentaxforums is only concerned about focus speed. And that is the only 
property he tested. So we really don't know how much better autofocus is in 
normal light. Someone has to test focus tracking (AF-C), focus accuracy, focus 
repeatability and so on.

Stig Vidar Hovland


Fra: PDML [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av Bruce Walker 
[bruce.wal...@gmail.com]
Sendt: 29. oktober 2012 19:39
To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List
Emne: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

From our friends at Pentax Forums. :-)

http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-k-5-ii-iis/introduction.html

Some highlights:
AF much better in low light, unimproved in normal light.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2012-10-30 Thread Bruce Walker
You're right Stig, but for me what AF parameters he did measure is
useful to know. I find SDM lens focussing to be pretty good in bright
light already, even on the K20D. So if low-light focus speed was made
a lot better -- and it sounds like it was -- then that puts the K-5IIs
on my wish-list. That and the improved resolution are a strong
motivation for me.


On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:44 AM, SV Hovland pdml...@heime.org wrote:
 Adam at Pentaxforums is only concerned about focus speed. And that is the 
 only property he tested. So we really don't know how much better autofocus is 
 in normal light. Someone has to test focus tracking (AF-C), focus accuracy, 
 focus repeatability and so on.

 Stig Vidar Hovland

 
 Fra: PDML [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av Bruce Walker 
 [bruce.wal...@gmail.com]
 Sendt: 29. oktober 2012 19:39
 To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List
 Emne: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

 From our friends at Pentax Forums. :-)

 http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-k-5-ii-iis/introduction.html

 Some highlights:
 AF much better in low light, unimproved in normal light.
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2012-10-30 Thread SV Hovland
There are already reports from K-30 users that this model is better than K-5. 
And K-5 II is using a similar AF system as K-30 so I expect it to be more of an 
upgrade than Adam at Pentaxforums seems to know.

My K-5 is in for a repair (lens release button fell of) so K-5 IIs is more than 
tempting.

Stig Vidar Hovland

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Walker
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 2:36 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

You're right Stig, but for me what AF parameters he did measure is useful to 
know. I find SDM lens focussing to be pretty good in bright light already, even 
on the K20D. So if low-light focus speed was made a lot better -- and it sounds 
like it was -- then that puts the K-5IIs on my wish-list. That and the improved 
resolution are a strong motivation for me.


On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:44 AM, SV Hovland pdml...@heime.org wrote:
 Adam at Pentaxforums is only concerned about focus speed. And that is the 
 only property he tested. So we really don't know how much better autofocus is 
 in normal light. Someone has to test focus tracking (AF-C), focus accuracy, 
 focus repeatability and so on.

 Stig Vidar Hovland

 
 Fra: PDML [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av Bruce Walker 
 [bruce.wal...@gmail.com]
 Sendt: 29. oktober 2012 19:39
 To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List
 Emne: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

 From our friends at Pentax Forums. :-)

 http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-k-5-ii-iis/introduction.htm
 l

 Some highlights:
 AF much better in low light, unimproved in normal light.
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



--
-bmw

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2012-10-30 Thread Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM, SV Hovland pdml...@heime.org wrote:
 There are already reports from K-30 users that this model is better than K-5. 
 And K-5 II is using a similar AF system as K-30 so I expect it to be more of 
 an upgrade than Adam at Pentaxforums seems to know.

 My K-5 is in for a repair (lens release button fell of) so K-5 IIs is more 
 than tempting.

 Stig Vidar Hovland

The K-5 II uses a new AF system, the SAFOX X - with redesigned optics,
works from EV -3 and the center point has additional accuracy with
f/2.8 (or faster) lenses.
The K-30's SAFOX IXi+ is the K-5's SAFOX IX+ with optics redesigned to
counter chromatic aberrations (probably to solve the tungsten light
issues).

-- 
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2012-10-30 Thread J.C. O'Connell
According to the review, the biggest difference in AF between the K5 and the
K5II is in low light conditions only.

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alexandru-Cristian
Sarbu
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 11:06 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM, SV Hovland pdml...@heime.org wrote:
 There are already reports from K-30 users that this model is better than
K-5. And K-5 II is using a similar AF system as K-30 so I expect it to be
more of an upgrade than Adam at Pentaxforums seems to know.

 My K-5 is in for a repair (lens release button fell of) so K-5 IIs is more
than tempting.

 Stig Vidar Hovland

The K-5 II uses a new AF system, the SAFOX X - with redesigned optics,
works from EV -3 and the center point has additional accuracy with
f/2.8 (or faster) lenses.
The K-30's SAFOX IXi+ is the K-5's SAFOX IX+ with optics redesigned to
counter chromatic aberrations (probably to solve the tungsten light
issues).

-- 
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2012-10-30 Thread Rob Studdert
On 31 October 2012 03:00, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 According to the review, the biggest difference in AF between the K5 and the
 K5II is in low light conditions only.

Hmm, which is precisely where the k5's have been letting me down regularly.

-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2012-10-30 Thread Christine Aguila
I greatly want improved low light focusing, which makes the K5 IIs so tempting. 
 Cheers, Christine 



On Oct 30, 2012, at 8:53 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 31 October 2012 03:00, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 According to the review, the biggest difference in AF between the K5 and the
 K5II is in low light conditions only.
 
 Hmm, which is precisely where the k5's have been letting me down regularly.
 
 -- 
 Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
 Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
 Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2012-10-30 Thread J.C. O'Connell
well by all means then upgrade to the k5IIs

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Christine Aguila
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 10:13 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

I greatly want improved low light focusing, which makes the K5 IIs so
tempting.  Cheers, Christine 



On Oct 30, 2012, at 8:53 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 31 October 2012 03:00, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 According to the review, the biggest difference in AF between the K5 and
the
 K5II is in low light conditions only.
 
 Hmm, which is precisely where the k5's have been letting me down
regularly.
 
 -- 
 Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
 Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
 Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2012-10-30 Thread Rob Studdert
On 31 October 2012 13:30, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 well by all means then upgrade to the k5IIs

 -
 J.C.O'Connell
 hifis...@gate.net
 -

 -Original Message-
 From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Christine Aguila
 Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 10:13 PM
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

 I greatly want improved low light focusing, which makes the K5 IIs so
 tempting.  Cheers, Christine

Nah, if I upgrade it has to be another system, Pentax are just falling
further and further behind the competition with each incarnation. It's
a pity really. Save for the hassle and cost of going through the big
sell-off and re-buying everything I would have left the brand some
years ago. I just put in my Lotto and hope these days.

-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5

2012-10-29 Thread Steven Desjardins
I guess it depends on how large the affected area is.  I read that
review and it was hard to say how the whole shot would look.  I mean,
if the face is sharper but the clothing is not quite right, is that
OK?

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
 From our friends at Pentax Forums. :-)

 http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-k-5-ii-iis/introduction.html

 Some highlights:
 AF much better in low light, unimproved in normal light.
 Resolution jump up from K-5 very noticeable.
 Noticeable moire on finely patterned fabric, otherwise no worries.

 Speaking of which: anyone know if some simple (eg Gaussian) blurring
 in post will give the same effect as the now removed optical sensor
 filter? That is, if I see moire in my shot, can I do a simple pass
 over it, or is the image just screwed now?

 Enjoy.
 --
 -bmw

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.