Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-27 Thread Mark Roberts

Mike wrote:

>Apparently the hot rig is the Canon EOS D30 with Canon's 100-400 Image
>Stabilizer lens. It becomes a 160-640mm lens on the D30, and more than

>one person I asked SWORE that they could handhold 640mm with it.
>
>Several wildlife photographers are so crazy about this rig that they've

>said they have no interest in trading up to the new EOS-1D (on which the

>lens becomes just a 130-520mm).

Although I'd only be interested in a full-frame CCD for my own phtoography,
this shows that there's clearly a market for smaller sensors with "focal
length multipliers" and why SLRs with smaller CCDs are likely to remain
with us even after full-frame sensors become common. They'll be a "different"
option rather than better or worse. That Canon setup sounds like the business
for wildlife photographers. With the combination of focal length multiplication
AND image stabilization I think anyone who actually earns a living at wildlife
photography would be crazy to use anything else. Before long none of them
will be I expect.

Mike, do you know of any of these guys using the equivalent Nikon setup
(with the 80-400 Vibration Reduction lens)? I'm wondering if Canon isn't
taking better advantage of the transition to digital to win over a bigger
share of the pro market.




-- 
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-27 Thread Aaron Reynolds

On Tuesday, November 27, 2001, at 02:30  AM, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:

> Well I have read that 10K ppi will record the grain pattern.

Depends on the film.  4000ppi resolves the grain in Provia 400F and RSX 
II 200 quite nicely.

-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-27 Thread Aaron Reynolds

My perfect camera would be my Pentax 67 with the meter from the LX 
somehow transposed into it.  Yeah, I know, that's asking a lot. :)

I'm very happy with my 67 just the way it is, though.  I had kind of 
hoped that the metering prism from the 67II would fit on my 67 and give 
me spot metering, but no such luck.  Oh well.

-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-27 Thread Skofteland, Christian

Mine would be an LX with full range (4sec - 1/2000) mechanical shutter and a
spot meter.

Christian Skofteland


> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 
> That's it. That's my perfect camera. Anything I left out?
> 
> --Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread J. C. O'Connell

A mint black spotmatic F motordrive
with a mint SMC Takumar 50mm F1.4 
mounted on it.

or maybe a 35mm F2.0 SMCT...

or maybe a 85mm F 1.8 SMCT...

JCO
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread Tom Rittenhouse

Well I have read that 10K ppi will record the grain pattern.

--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.


- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: My Perfect Camera


> In a message dated 11/26/01 5:39:51 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
>
> > Well, how many megapixels?
> >
>
> I don't know. Just for the record, how many megapixels are there in a
24x36
> film frame? More than in an APS sized digital?
>
> Mafud
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread Bill D. Casselberry

  from the thread (or is it yarn?),
 
> > Well, how many megapixels?

> I don't know. Just for the record, how many megapixels are there in a 24x36
> film frame? More than in an APS sized digital?
 
all depends on how big/little the pixels are!


Bill

-
Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast

http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread SudaMafud

In a message dated 11/26/01 6:10:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:


> Re: "Anything left out?" Yes - autofocus capability. Sometimes my 67 
> year-old 
> eyes need it.
> 

What Ed M said
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread SudaMafud

In a message dated 11/26/01 5:39:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:


> Well, how many megapixels?
> 

I don't know. Just for the record, how many megapixels are there in a 24x36 
film frame? More than in an APS sized digital? 

Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread Brian Campbell (PM)

On 26 Nov 2001, at 15:14, Mike Johnston wrote:

> 
> That's it. That's my perfect camera. Anything I left out?
> 


Does it serve martinis?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread Dan Scott

I 'd like something much like my ZX-5n, but ...

silent,
alloy body,
weatherproof, 
110% viewfinder (so I can see what's coming--as Shel does with his Leica), 
user-adjustable readout brightness, 
user-changeable screens, 
selectable autofocus points, 
trap focus. 

Able to take Contax as well as Pentax lenses.

I'd also like it powered by fuel cell, not batteries.

Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> That's it. That's my perfect camera. Anything I left out?
> 
> --Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread LEDMRVM

In a message dated 11/26/2001 6:26:07 PM US Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> >That's it. That's my perfect camera. Anything I left out?
>  
>  It would be digital.
>  
>  ;-)
>  
>  Cotty
>  
>  

C'mon, Cotty - no one said the damn thing had to be practical :-)

Best regards,
Ed M.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread Cotty

>It would be built by Pentax to the same high standards as the Spotmatics
>(with the same kind of cosmetic durability--more old Spotties look better

[snip]

>Finally, it would have only one new feature--a small button next to the
>shutter button that would act a spotmeter and exposure lock in one, a la the
>Olympus OM-4T. This is a wonderful feature in real life, very handy and
>quick.
>
>That's it. That's my perfect camera. Anything I left out?

It would be digital.

;-)

Cotty

___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads 
http://www.macads.co.uk
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread Shel Belinkoff

There goes the dream ... 

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes of his dream canera:

> > That's it. That's my perfect camera. 
> > Anything I left out?

And Ed replied:

> Re: "Anything left out?" Yes - autofocus capability. 
> Sometimes my 67 year-old eyes need it.

-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/pow/enter.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/cameras/pentax_repair_shops.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread LEDMRVM

In a message dated 11/26/2001 4:21:46 PM US Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> 
>  This is the WORST sort of mental masturbation, but this is what my all-
> time
>  perfect camera would be like:
>  
>  It would be built by Pentax to the same high standards as the Spotmatics
>  (with the same kind of cosmetic durability--more old Spotties look better
>  for longer than any other kind of old camera). The only differences would 
be
>  that it would be a few millimeters shorter in the "shoulders," and have an
>  LX-Grip-B-style grip. Oh, and it would have a flip-up keyed battery
>  compartment, built to last.
>  
>  Then, it would have EVERY SINGLE feature of the Nikon FM3a except the 93%
>  finder, the F lensmount, the double-exposure switch, and Nikon's dopey
>  pull-the-winding-crank-out-from-the-body on-off switch. You know, the one
>  that always pokes you in the forehead whenever you shoot a vertical. 
Instead
>  of the Nikon's 93% finder, it would have a 100% finder for those backwards
>  purists who shoot full-frame.
>  
>  Its winding crank would be as smooth-acting as a Leica M's.
>  
>  Its shutter would be veeery quiet.
>  
>  Finally, it would have only one new feature--a small button next to the
>  shutter button that would act a spotmeter and exposure lock in one, a la 
the
>  Olympus OM-4T. This is a wonderful feature in real life, very handy and
>  quick.
>  
>  That's it. That's my perfect camera. Anything I left out?
>  
>  --Mike
> 

Re: "Anything left out?" Yes - autofocus capability. Sometimes my 67 year-old 
eyes need it.

Best, 
Ed M
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread Juan J. Buhler

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Mike Johnston wrote:

[...]
> That's it. That's my perfect camera. Anything I left out?

Well, how many megapixels?

:-)


--
---
 Juan J. Buhler | Sr. FX Animator @ PDI | Photos at http://www.jbuhler.com
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




My Perfect Camera

2001-11-26 Thread Mike Johnston

This is the WORST sort of mental masturbation, but this is what my all-time
perfect camera would be like:

It would be built by Pentax to the same high standards as the Spotmatics
(with the same kind of cosmetic durability--more old Spotties look better
for longer than any other kind of old camera). The only differences would be
that it would be a few millimeters shorter in the "shoulders," and have an
LX-Grip-B-style grip. Oh, and it would have a flip-up keyed battery
compartment, built to last.

Then, it would have EVERY SINGLE feature of the Nikon FM3a except the 93%
finder, the F lensmount, the double-exposure switch, and Nikon's dopey
pull-the-winding-crank-out-from-the-body on-off switch. You know, the one
that always pokes you in the forehead whenever you shoot a vertical. Instead
of the Nikon's 93% finder, it would have a 100% finder for those backwards
purists who shoot full-frame.

Its winding crank would be as smooth-acting as a Leica M's.

Its shutter would be veeery quiet.

Finally, it would have only one new feature--a small button next to the
shutter button that would act a spotmeter and exposure lock in one, a la the
Olympus OM-4T. This is a wonderful feature in real life, very handy and
quick.

That's it. That's my perfect camera. Anything I left out?

--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .