Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
Graywolf wrote: >Very strange, when I go to that page the links insist the pictures are in my C:\Windows\Temp\ directory. Of course they are not. How are others managing to see them? Usually when this happens to me it means that I need to reboot, somehow my browser is messing up. The page loads. No problemo. Marnie aka Doe
Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
>I wanna know why there's no piccies of Marnie. >cheers, frank Because, sadly, I don't photography well and never have. So when people take out their cameras I hide or put a sackcloth over my head. :-) Well, I wish I could. I've only had about 3-4 good pictures taken of me during my lifetime. The true answer is Bruce has access to some that we should be sharing soon. Marnie aka Doe
Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
I THINK she's coming to GFM, we'll get some then. Bill - Original Message - From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 6:52 PM Subject: Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures > I wanna know why there's no piccies of Marnie. > > cheers, > frank > > > > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist > fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer > > > > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 07:59:39 > >US/Eastern > > > >Nice report Marnie.Photos come out nice on my computer too. > > > > > _ > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > >
Re: Re[2]: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
Hi, Bruce, Egg-cellent!! -knarf "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re[2]: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:58:06 -0700 Frank, At least two are forthcoming! --- Bruce Friday, October 24, 2003, 3:52:04 PM, you wrote: ft> I wanna know why there's no piccies of Marnie. ft> cheers, ft> frank ft> "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist ft> fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 07:59:39 >>US/Eastern >> >>Nice report Marnie.Photos come out nice on my computer too. >> ft> ft> _ ft> Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. ft> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Re[2]: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
Frank, At least two are forthcoming! --- Bruce Friday, October 24, 2003, 3:52:04 PM, you wrote: ft> I wanna know why there's no piccies of Marnie. ft> cheers, ft> frank ft> "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist ft> fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 07:59:39 >>US/Eastern >> >>Nice report Marnie.Photos come out nice on my computer too. >> ft> ft> _ ft> Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. ft> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
I wanna know why there's no piccies of Marnie. cheers, frank "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 07:59:39 US/Eastern Nice report Marnie.Photos come out nice on my computer too. _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Re[2]: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
Dave, I use a LowePro Photo Trekker Classic. In it I have a P67II body/AE prism + wood handgrip, 55/4, 75/4.5, 90/2.8LS, 120/3.5 soft, 165/2.8, 165/4LS, 300/4, Tube Set, light meter, filters and odds and ends. A wonderful pack that seems made for the stuff I need to fit in. --- Bruce Wednesday, October 22, 2003, 4:59:39 PM, you wrote: bcin> Nice report Marnie.Photos come out nice on my computer too. bcin> Bruce,just wondering what you use for backpack and tripod.I have the Manfrotto bcin> 028 for the MF and am looking into backpacks. bcin> Dave bcin> > I finally have some pictures from the Northern bcin> California PDML Meet up. >> >> http://members.aol.com/doepage2/PDML/ >> >> Some people pixs, more scenery pixs, and a humorous (to me, anyway) >> accompanying little story. Nothing fantastic photograph-wise, but some passable. >> >> *Unfortunately some of the jpegs are pretty bad and do not accurately reflect >> the picture quality (or lack of it). :-) >> >> But enjoy, anyway! >> >> *I've had this problem before and I have not yet figured out how to solve it. >> Elements (1) seems to create jpegs that AOL cannot read or something. Every >> time I go to upload them, AOL crashes. So I had to open them and resave them >> with Microsoft Photo Editor, thus degrading them severely. This also happened >> last time I used Elements and later uploaded pictures to a ftp site/web page. I >> still haven't figured out what the problem is. I did not resize the pictures >> in the M$ Photo Editor, so I am thinking maybe it is a file header problem. >> But, who knows? >> >> Marnie aka Doe >>
Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
Nice report Marnie.Photos come out nice on my computer too. Bruce,just wondering what you use for backpack and tripod.I have the Manfrotto 028 for the MF and am looking into backpacks. Dave > I finally have some pictures from the Northern California PDML Meet up. > > http://members.aol.com/doepage2/PDML/ > > Some people pixs, more scenery pixs, and a humorous (to me, anyway) > accompanying little story. Nothing fantastic photograph-wise, but some passable. > > *Unfortunately some of the jpegs are pretty bad and do not accurately reflect > the picture quality (or lack of it). :-) > > But enjoy, anyway! > > *I've had this problem before and I have not yet figured out how to solve it. > Elements (1) seems to create jpegs that AOL cannot read or something. Every > time I go to upload them, AOL crashes. So I had to open them and resave them > with Microsoft Photo Editor, thus degrading them severely. This also happened > last time I used Elements and later uploaded pictures to a ftp site/web page. I > still haven't figured out what the problem is. I did not resize the pictures > in the M$ Photo Editor, so I am thinking maybe it is a file header problem. > But, who knows? > > Marnie aka Doe >
Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
On 22/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: >*I've had this problem before and I have not yet figured out how to solve it. >Elements (1) seems to create jpegs that AOL cannot read or something. Every >time I go to upload them, AOL crashes. So I had to open them and resave them >with Microsoft Photo Editor, thus degrading them severely. This also happened >last time I used Elements and later uploaded pictures to a ftp site/web >page. I >still haven't figured out what the problem is. I did not resize the pictures >in the M$ Photo Editor, so I am thinking maybe it is a file header problem. >But, who knows? Is there a 'Save for Web' facility in Elements? If it is, it should be listed near 'Save' and 'Save As' in the File menu. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:21:16 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I finally have some pictures from the Northern California PDML Meet up. > > http://members.aol.com/doepage2/PDML/ Marnie, Thanks for sharing that. Now I see what I missed. That was the whirlwind weekend I came back from a trip to Toronto; didn't get the chance to meet TOPDMLers either. Imagine that, missing not one, but TWO, PDML meets in a weeks time. :-O BTW, I too have experienced a Pentax SLR (Zx-5n) and a Canon Powershot digi-P&S. In some ways, the 5n is simpler to operate. All the dials are right there, no fiddling w/ menus and an LCD... Pat in SF __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
> > The MZ/S really IS that good, huh, John? Maybe we need to arrange a mini-PDML meet. You're going to be up in Boulder Creek; Thomas is in Santa Cruz; I'm in south San Jose. You could try the MZ-S and/or the PZ-1p. Or even the *ist-D, if I'm prepared to take my hands off it ... I could probably tempt you with a couple of lenses, too, if you like longer glass; I don't have much in the wide-angle field.
Enablement; Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
Marnie wrote: > I finally have some pictures from the Northern California PDML Meet up. > > http://members.aol.com/doepage2/PDML/ > > Some people pixs, more scenery pixs, and a humorous (to me, anyway) > accompanying little story. Read the humorous little story. Makes me glad that the one time I got together with other Pentaxians, they all had SLRs that I also own -- unfortunately, two of the others had Limited lenses. However, meeting another PDMLer's 100/2.8 is the reason I went out and found one. Then again, I think I helped him decide he needed that PZ-1p ..
Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
Very good! I really enjoyed the pictures. The MZ/S really IS that good, huh, John? I know Marnie wouldn't fool us... Anyhow, a fun time was had by all, it seems. Thanks for the report. keith whaley John Francis wrote: > > > > > I finally have some pictures from the Northern California PDML Meet up. > > > > http://members.aol.com/doepage2/PDML/ > > > > Some people pixs, more scenery pixs, and a humorous (to me, anyway) > > accompanying little story. Nothing fantastic photograph-wise, but some passable. > > A little better than passable! > I think my favourite is the "rolling waves" shot. > > As to the attempted enablement: you *had* mentioned you wanted to try an MX. > I didn't even show you the PZ-1p, did I? I had one of those in the car, too! > > > *I've had this problem before and I have not yet figured out how to solve it. > > Elements (1) seems to create jpegs that AOL cannot read or something. > > Is it creating progressive jpegs? Many viewers have problems with these. > (I don't know elements, but it should be an option somewhere in the JPEG stuff)
Re: NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
> > I finally have some pictures from the Northern California PDML Meet up. > > http://members.aol.com/doepage2/PDML/ > > Some people pixs, more scenery pixs, and a humorous (to me, anyway) > accompanying little story. Nothing fantastic photograph-wise, but some passable. A little better than passable! I think my favourite is the "rolling waves" shot. As to the attempted enablement: you *had* mentioned you wanted to try an MX. I didn't even show you the PZ-1p, did I? I had one of those in the car, too! > *I've had this problem before and I have not yet figured out how to solve it. > Elements (1) seems to create jpegs that AOL cannot read or something. Is it creating progressive jpegs? Many viewers have problems with these. (I don't know elements, but it should be an option somewhere in the JPEG stuff)
NorCal PDML Meet Pictures
I finally have some pictures from the Northern California PDML Meet up. http://members.aol.com/doepage2/PDML/ Some people pixs, more scenery pixs, and a humorous (to me, anyway) accompanying little story. Nothing fantastic photograph-wise, but some passable. *Unfortunately some of the jpegs are pretty bad and do not accurately reflect the picture quality (or lack of it). :-) But enjoy, anyway! *I've had this problem before and I have not yet figured out how to solve it. Elements (1) seems to create jpegs that AOL cannot read or something. Every time I go to upload them, AOL crashes. So I had to open them and resave them with Microsoft Photo Editor, thus degrading them severely. This also happened last time I used Elements and later uploaded pictures to a ftp site/web page. I still haven't figured out what the problem is. I did not resize the pictures in the M$ Photo Editor, so I am thinking maybe it is a file header problem. But, who knows? Marnie aka Doe
