Well, badly underexposed images are going to suck for noise. very poor
test subject, guaranteed to have noise issues.
I wouldn't consider those images as a good test of the 450D/XSi's
noise performance. At worst it's an indictment of its metering.
-Adam
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:20 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.fotovilag.hu/teszt/canon/Canon-450D/canon450d-iso.htm
>
> Kinda sucks above ISO 400.
>
> (the page is in hungarian but the pictures are universal :D)
>
> Cheers,
> .t
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> the directions.
>
--
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
