PESO -- Fishin' at Sunset II
In light of a couple of comments I decided to look back at my "proofs" and see if there wasn't another shot. It doesn't address everyones suggestions but the framing is different, I cropped it as an 8x10 and the image involved less post processing which seems to be building up in the way the water is rendered. Still the same relatively high saturation. This was taken a few seconds after the first. http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_fishinatsunset2.html Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 800 % 1/3 sec. smc Pentax 43mm f1.9 Limited @ f3.5 Notes: Hand held braced against stone pier IIRC. As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO -- Fishin' at Sunset II
Hi, PEte - I just got back on list... as to this crop . Yikes - go back to the first one - I agreed with Jack, though, it (number 1) seemed _too_ vivid be interesting to see a print of it or the original as you said you did up the saturation... I think the structure of the first one works much better - the cropped one looks, well...um, , cropped. ann P. J. Alling wrote: >In light of a couple of comments I decided to look back at my "proofs" >and see if there wasn't another shot. It doesn't address everyones >suggestions but the framing is different, I cropped it as an 8x10 and >the image involved less post processing which seems to be building up in >the way the water is rendered. Still the same relatively high >saturation. This was taken a few seconds after the first. > >http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_fishinatsunset2.html > >Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 800 % 1/3 sec. >smc Pentax 43mm f1.9 Limited @ f3.5 > >Notes: Hand held braced against stone pier IIRC. > >As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO -- Fishin' at Sunset II
Man that is a heavy stark result. If that's the way you like it, then it's right. Jack --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In light of a couple of comments I decided to look back at my > "proofs" > and see if there wasn't another shot. It doesn't address everyones > suggestions but the framing is different, I cropped it as an 8x10 and > > the image involved less post processing which seems to be building up > in > the way the water is rendered. Still the same relatively high > saturation. This was taken a few seconds after the first. > > http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_fishinatsunset2.html > > Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 800 % 1/3 sec. > smc Pentax 43mm f1.9 Limited @ f3.5 > > Notes: Hand held braced against stone pier IIRC. > > As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored > > -- > > Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw > uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO -- Fishin' at Sunset II
I was trying to figure out which planet this was photographed on . -- Bruce Monday, April 16, 2007, 3:34:03 PM, you wrote: JD> Man that is a heavy stark result. If that's the way you like it, then JD> it's right. JD> Jack JD> --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In light of a couple of comments I decided to look back at my >> "proofs" >> and see if there wasn't another shot. It doesn't address everyones >> suggestions but the framing is different, I cropped it as an 8x10 and >> >> the image involved less post processing which seems to be building up >> in >> the way the water is rendered. Still the same relatively high >> saturation. This was taken a few seconds after the first. >> >> http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_fishinatsunset2.html >> >> Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 800 % 1/3 sec. >> smc Pentax 43mm f1.9 Limited @ f3.5 >> >> Notes: Hand held braced against stone pier IIRC. >> >> As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored >> >> -- >> >> Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw >> uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> JD> __ JD> Do You Yahoo!? JD> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around JD> http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO -- Fishin' at Sunset II
Much better, IMHO. I'd get rid of that black spot on the RH horizon. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: PESO -- Fishin' at Sunset II > In light of a couple of comments I decided to look back at my "proofs" > and see if there wasn't another shot. It doesn't address everyones > suggestions but the framing is different, I cropped it as an 8x10 and > the image involved less post processing which seems to be building up in > the way the water is rendered. Still the same relatively high > saturation. This was taken a few seconds after the first. > > http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_fishinatsunset2.html > > Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 800 % 1/3 sec. > smc Pentax 43mm f1.9 Limited @ f3.5 > > Notes: Hand held braced against stone pier IIRC. > > As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
