Re: PESO More Pretty Lady

[Mark C]

Nice - the new rendering really does pop.

On 12/21/2015 11:58 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

Fiddling with the Cardinal pics from this weekend. Here’s the same shot I 
posted with a shite balance change. She was in the shade, and I hadn’t 
originally fooled with the white balance that AWB rendered. I usually add 
warmth in those situations, although there’s no good neutral color in frame by 
which to gauge the white balance. In any case, here’s the warm version:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145090=lg

And my original rendering:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667=lg

And here’s another frame from a few seconds earlier, where she is looking the 
other way. I of course cropped it differently:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145089=lg



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO More Pretty Lady

[ann sanfedele]

Like 'em both - slight preference for less saturation but also like 
"eyes left" a lot.. she has a sweeter expression, looks younger somehow.

I found it looking to toggle between the other two..

ann

On 12/21/2015 1:40 PM, Rick Womer wrote:

The warmer version is a real improvement.

What surprises me about this pic is the range of motion in the bird's
neck. It almost looks as though her head was installed backwards.

Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW


On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote:

I can’t recall with any certainty, but I would guess 30 feet.



On Dec 21, 2015, at 12:19 PM, Jack Davis <jdavi...@comcast.net> wrote:

Like this version somewhat better, Paul.
Here I go again; can you estimate how far you "MAY"
have been from her?
Thanks,

J

- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <pnstenqu...@comcast.net>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 8:58:36 AM
Subject: PESO More Pretty Lady

Fiddling with the Cardinal pics from this weekend. Here’s the same shot I 
posted with a shite balance change. She was in the shade, and I hadn’t 
originally fooled with the white balance that AWB rendered. I usually add 
warmth in those situations, although there’s no good neutral color in frame by 
which to gauge the white balance. In any case, here’s the warm version:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145090=lg

And my original rendering:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667=lg

And here’s another frame from a few seconds earlier, where she is looking the 
other way. I of course cropped it differently:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145089=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO More Pretty Lady

[Ken Waller]

Paul, its obvious either one is very good.

Its more a question of which one you like and how it compares to the 
conditions under which it was captured.


Having seen the non warm version first, I'd prefer that over the warmer 
version - either way very good work !



Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: "Paul Stenquist" <pnstenqu...@comcast.net>

Subject: PESO More Pretty Lady


Fiddling with the Cardinal pics from this weekend. Here’s the same shot I 
posted with a shite balance change. She was in the shade, and I hadn’t 
originally fooled with the white balance that AWB rendered. I usually add 
warmth in those situations, although there’s no good neutral color in 
frame by which to gauge the white balance. In any case, here’s the warm 
version:


http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145090=lg

And my original rendering:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667=lg

And here’s another frame from a few seconds earlier, where she is looking 
the other way. I of course cropped it differently:


http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145089=lg



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO More Pretty Lady

[Rick Womer]

The warmer version is a real improvement.

What surprises me about this pic is the range of motion in the bird's
neck. It almost looks as though her head was installed backwards.

Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW


On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote:
> I can’t recall with any certainty, but I would guess 30 feet.
>
>
>> On Dec 21, 2015, at 12:19 PM, Jack Davis <jdavi...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> Like this version somewhat better, Paul.
>> Here I go again; can you estimate how far you "MAY"
>> have been from her?
>> Thanks,
>>
>> J
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Paul Stenquist" <pnstenqu...@comcast.net>
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
>> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 8:58:36 AM
>> Subject: PESO More Pretty Lady
>>
>> Fiddling with the Cardinal pics from this weekend. Here’s the same shot I 
>> posted with a shite balance change. She was in the shade, and I hadn’t 
>> originally fooled with the white balance that AWB rendered. I usually add 
>> warmth in those situations, although there’s no good neutral color in frame 
>> by which to gauge the white balance. In any case, here’s the warm version:
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145090=lg
>>
>> And my original rendering:
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667=lg
>>
>> And here’s another frame from a few seconds earlier, where she is looking 
>> the other way. I of course cropped it differently:
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145089=lg
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO More Pretty Lady

[Paul Stenquist]

I can’t recall with any certainty, but I would guess 30 feet.


> On Dec 21, 2015, at 12:19 PM, Jack Davis <jdavi...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> Like this version somewhat better, Paul.
> Here I go again; can you estimate how far you "MAY"
> have been from her?
> Thanks,
> 
> J
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Stenquist" <pnstenqu...@comcast.net>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 8:58:36 AM
> Subject: PESO More Pretty Lady
> 
> Fiddling with the Cardinal pics from this weekend. Here’s the same shot I 
> posted with a shite balance change. She was in the shade, and I hadn’t 
> originally fooled with the white balance that AWB rendered. I usually add 
> warmth in those situations, although there’s no good neutral color in frame 
> by which to gauge the white balance. In any case, here’s the warm version:
> 
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145090=lg
> 
> And my original rendering:
> 
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667=lg
> 
> And here’s another frame from a few seconds earlier, where she is looking the 
> other way. I of course cropped it differently:
> 
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145089=lg
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO More Pretty Lady

[knarf]

Yeah, I think I'm in accord with Ken. They're each wonderful renditions - I 
certainly can't say that one's "better" but I prefer the cooler shot. Probably 
because it's the one I saw first.

Cheers,

frank 

On December 21, 2015 2:22:44 PM EST, Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>Paul, its obvious either one is very good.
>
>Its more a question of which one you like and how it compares to the 
>conditions under which it was captured.
>
>Having seen the non warm version first, I'd prefer that over the warmer
>
>version - either way very good work !
>
>
>Kenneth Waller
>http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
>- Original Message - 
>From: "Paul Stenquist" <pnstenqu...@comcast.net>
>Subject: PESO More Pretty Lady
>
>
>> Fiddling with the Cardinal pics from this weekend. Here’s the same
>shot I 
>> posted with a shite balance change. She was in the shade, and I
>hadn’t 
>> originally fooled with the white balance that AWB rendered. I usually
>add 
>> warmth in those situations, although there’s no good neutral color in
>
>> frame by which to gauge the white balance. In any case, here’s the
>warm 
>> version:
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145090=lg
>>
>> And my original rendering:
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667=lg
>>
>> And here’s another frame from a few seconds earlier, where she is
>looking 
>> the other way. I of course cropped it differently:
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145089=lg
>
>
>-- 
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>PDML@pdml.net
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>follow the directions.

-- 

"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson

Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO More Pretty Lady

[Paul Stenquist]

Thanks. Good to know.

Paul via phone

> On Dec 21, 2015, at 10:54 PM, knarf <knarftheria...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, I think I'm in accord with Ken. They're each wonderful renditions - I 
> certainly can't say that one's "better" but I prefer the cooler shot. 
> Probably because it's the one I saw first.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> frank 
> 
>> On December 21, 2015 2:22:44 PM EST, Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>> Paul, its obvious either one is very good.
>> 
>> Its more a question of which one you like and how it compares to the 
>> conditions under which it was captured.
>> 
>> Having seen the non warm version first, I'd prefer that over the warmer
>> 
>> version - either way very good work !
>> 
>> 
>> Kenneth Waller
>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>> 
>> - Original Message - 
>> From: "Paul Stenquist" <pnstenqu...@comcast.net>
>> Subject: PESO More Pretty Lady
>> 
>> 
>>> Fiddling with the Cardinal pics from this weekend. Here’s the same
>> shot I 
>>> posted with a shite balance change. She was in the shade, and I
>> hadn’t 
>>> originally fooled with the white balance that AWB rendered. I usually
>> add 
>>> warmth in those situations, although there’s no good neutral color in
>> 
>>> frame by which to gauge the white balance. In any case, here’s the
>> warm 
>>> version:
>>> 
>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145090=lg
>>> 
>>> And my original rendering:
>>> 
>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667=lg
>>> 
>>> And here’s another frame from a few seconds earlier, where she is
>> looking 
>>> the other way. I of course cropped it differently:
>>> 
>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145089=lg
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> 
> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson
> 
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

PESO More Pretty Lady

[Paul Stenquist]

Fiddling with the Cardinal pics from this weekend. Here’s the same shot I 
posted with a shite balance change. She was in the shade, and I hadn’t 
originally fooled with the white balance that AWB rendered. I usually add 
warmth in those situations, although there’s no good neutral color in frame by 
which to gauge the white balance. In any case, here’s the warm version:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145090=lg

And my original rendering:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667=lg

And here’s another frame from a few seconds earlier, where she is looking the 
other way. I of course cropped it differently:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145089=lg
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO More Pretty Lady

[Jack Davis]

Like this version somewhat better, Paul.
Here I go again; can you estimate how far you "MAY"
have been from her?
Thanks,

J

- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <pnstenqu...@comcast.net>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 8:58:36 AM
Subject: PESO More Pretty Lady

Fiddling with the Cardinal pics from this weekend. Here’s the same shot I 
posted with a shite balance change. She was in the shade, and I hadn’t 
originally fooled with the white balance that AWB rendered. I usually add 
warmth in those situations, although there’s no good neutral color in frame by 
which to gauge the white balance. In any case, here’s the warm version:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145090=lg

And my original rendering:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667=lg

And here’s another frame from a few seconds earlier, where she is looking the 
other way. I of course cropped it differently:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145089=lg
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO More Pretty Lady

[Christine Aguila]

Wow!  Those reds really pop, Paul!  I like the warmer version very much!  
Excellent!  Cheers, Christine


> On Dec 21, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Paul Stenquist  wrote:
> 
> Fiddling with the Cardinal pics from this weekend. Here’s the same shot I 
> posted with a shite balance change. She was in the shade, and I hadn’t 
> originally fooled with the white balance that AWB rendered. I usually add 
> warmth in those situations, although there’s no good neutral color in frame 
> by which to gauge the white balance. In any case, here’s the warm version:
> 
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145090=lg
> 
> And my original rendering:
> 
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667=lg
> 
> And here’s another frame from a few seconds earlier, where she is looking the 
> other way. I of course cropped it differently:
> 
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18145089=lg
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO More Pretty Lady

[Tim Ferguson]

On 21/12/15 16:58, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Fiddling with the Cardinal pics from this weekend. Here’s the same shot I 
> posted with a shite balance change. 

I wouldn't have said it was that bad...


Tim



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.