Hi,
why not do a clip test and decide from that?
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saturday, May 11, 2002, 9:29:23 AM, you wrote:
Outrageously old rolls of exposed film pop up in our household
occasionally - found in a drawer or at the bottom of a closet. I have two
rolls found like this. One is a 24 exp FP4 that I processed normally in
Ilfosol for 6.5 mins at 1:9 and the negs were horribly thin. Shot by the
SO, judging form the look of our son in some images, at least 5 years
ago. Now, this could have been due to exposure errors, but before I
develop the next roll (details below), would there be any advantage of
pushing or pulling development to compensate for the effects of age on
exposed images?
The next roll is at least 6 years old The label on the cassette
indicates it's a roll of Jessop KB17 36 exp @ 100 ISO and was made in
Croatia. I would expect to treat it like FP4, but would there be any
advantage in cutting or increasing development time? Not concerned about
the contents (obviously!)...
Many thanks
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
http://www.macads.co.uk
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
