RE: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-11 Thread Jens Bladt
Funny movei. It zooms in further every time. After placing it 10 times I
don't get to see the guys face anmore!
Regards
jens

Jens Bladt

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Godfrey
DiGiorgi
Sendt: 10. marts 2007 21:57
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment



On Mar 10, 2007, at 9:07 AM, David Savage wrote:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8h2AMllP0Y

 It's almost a video camera!!

Remarkable speed. Not that I have even the first idea how I would use
it other than to make motion pictures...

G

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/716 - Release Date: 03/09/2007
18:53

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/716 - Release Date: 03/09/2007
18:53


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-11 Thread Cotty
On 11/3/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:

Cotty, machine guns would only fire as long as they have ammo, right?

Er, yes.

And?

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-11 Thread P. J. Alling
This is more interesting, especially the second half...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfZzmfjygwQNR

Jens Bladt wrote:
 Funny movei. It zooms in further every time. After placing it 10 times I
 don't get to see the guys face anmore!
 Regards
 jens

 Jens Bladt

 http://www.jensbladt.dk
 +45 56 63 77 11
 +45 23 43 85 77
 Skype: jensbladt248

 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Godfrey
 DiGiorgi
 Sendt: 10. marts 2007 21:57
 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Emne: Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment



 On Mar 10, 2007, at 9:07 AM, David Savage wrote:

   
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8h2AMllP0Y

 It's almost a video camera!!
 

 Remarkable speed. Not that I have even the first idea how I would use
 it other than to make motion pictures...

 G

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/716 - Release Date: 03/09/2007
 18:53

 --
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/716 - Release Date: 03/09/2007
 18:53


   


-- 
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf 
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-10 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi

On Mar 10, 2007, at 9:07 AM, David Savage wrote:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8h2AMllP0Y

 It's almost a video camera!!

Remarkable speed. Not that I have even the first idea how I would use  
it other than to make motion pictures...

G

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-10 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi

On Mar 10, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Cotty wrote:

 Good point.
 ...
 I don't use single frame, always 'continuous - low' which is
 easy to shoot single frames with. This is more like film cameras of  
 old,
 as I can shoot and focus at the same time instead of waiting for silly
 focus confirmation beeps etc.

Interesting differences in shooting methodology. I normally have the  
K10D set to one-shot as I rarely make more than one or two exposures,  
unless I have auto-bracketing turned on, and the focusing/ 
responsiveness of the K10D seems able to keep up with me: the camera  
always seems to be ready to make the next exposure at the moment I am.

 The decisive moment is the best way to shoot as most would agree,  
 but it
 depends on the situation, surely.  ...

Yes, I agree. Even for sports work, though, I've found it best to  
work on MY timing, not machine gun blast it. The latter generally  
makes for a whole lot of mostly boring photos.

Godfrey



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-10 Thread Cotty
On 10/3/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:

Remarkable speed. Not that I have even the first idea how I would use  
it other than to make motion pictures...

Good point. My 1DmII will do (allegedly) 8.5 fps but I hardly ever use
that. In continuous mode there are two speed settings on the quick top-
panel switches - high and low and the user can set the frame rates for
both. I have high set at max and low set at 4 fps which is usually
plenty. I don't use single frame, always 'continuous - low' which is
easy to shoot single frames with. This is more like film cameras of old,
as I can shoot and focus at the same time instead of waiting for silly
focus confirmation beeps etc.

The decisive moment is the best way to shoot as most would agree, but it
depends on the situation, surely. I have photographed football (soccer)
and with some scenarios it is better to use the machine gun due to the
frequent unpredictable nature of the game. Sure, lots of it is quite
predictable, like a corner kick, but the scramble in the goal mouth can
be totally whacky and half the time the decisive moment turns out to be
not when and where one expects. Machine guns at 8 or 10 fps will get the
result most of the time. if you're making money selling pictures like
this, it's a no-brainer IMO.



-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-10 Thread Adam Maas
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
 On Mar 10, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Cotty wrote:
 
 Good point.
 ...
 I don't use single frame, always 'continuous - low' which is
 easy to shoot single frames with. This is more like film cameras of  
 old,
 as I can shoot and focus at the same time instead of waiting for silly
 focus confirmation beeps etc.
 
 Interesting differences in shooting methodology. I normally have the  
 K10D set to one-shot as I rarely make more than one or two exposures,  
 unless I have auto-bracketing turned on, and the focusing/ 
 responsiveness of the K10D seems able to keep up with me: the camera  
 always seems to be ready to make the next exposure at the moment I am.

Interesting as well. Right now I've got the 10D set to continuous, which 
is how I normally have my film cameras setup (except the F3, which is 
just too fast to leave in Continuous, unless I get around to buying a 
MK-1 firing rate converter to slow it down). I find it's very easy on a 
2-3fps body to not shoot that extra frame, and sometimes I want the 
extra frame and don't have time to reset the drive mode. The only DSLR I 
left in single was the K100D, the shutter was just too sensitive for 
continuous to be left on.

 
 The decisive moment is the best way to shoot as most would agree,  
 but it
 depends on the situation, surely.  ...
 
 Yes, I agree. Even for sports work, though, I've found it best to  
 work on MY timing, not machine gun blast it. The latter generally  
 makes for a whole lot of mostly boring photos.
 
 Godfrey

Indeed it does, except for some particular circumstances, such as what 
Cotty's shooting.

-Adam

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-10 Thread Nick Wright
I used to leave my EOS1D in continuous mode, which is rated for 8
frames per second.

And I got sick and tired of shooting that way. So I set it to single
frame as something of an experiment. And I believe that my photography
is improving because of it.

Take the following example:
In motor-drive mode I'd shoot 600+ images at a high school basketball
game. Out of those 600 frames I'd get 10-20 keepers. Now in single
frame mode, I shoot 60 images at a game and I still get 10 to 20
keepers. The only differences are that now each photo is a conscious
act of creation (instead of spraying and praying), and I don't have to
wade through 580 crap shots to find the good ones.

Also, in my experience with motor drive, if I missed the best action
with the first shutter press, then all the subsequent frames missed it
too. I can't think of a single time where I got a good action shot out
of a motor sequence. The frames were always one bit too soon or one
bit too late.

The only good thing that I think comes out of so many frames per
second is that it means that in single frame mode the camera is ready
to take another picture at my press of the button that much sooner.

On 3/10/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
  On Mar 10, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Cotty wrote:
 
  Good point.
  ...
  I don't use single frame, always 'continuous - low' which is
  easy to shoot single frames with. This is more like film cameras of
  old,
  as I can shoot and focus at the same time instead of waiting for silly
  focus confirmation beeps etc.
 
  Interesting differences in shooting methodology. I normally have the
  K10D set to one-shot as I rarely make more than one or two exposures,
  unless I have auto-bracketing turned on, and the focusing/
  responsiveness of the K10D seems able to keep up with me: the camera
  always seems to be ready to make the next exposure at the moment I am.

 Interesting as well. Right now I've got the 10D set to continuous, which
 is how I normally have my film cameras setup (except the F3, which is
 just too fast to leave in Continuous, unless I get around to buying a
 MK-1 firing rate converter to slow it down). I find it's very easy on a
 2-3fps body to not shoot that extra frame, and sometimes I want the
 extra frame and don't have time to reset the drive mode. The only DSLR I
 left in single was the K100D, the shutter was just too sensitive for
 continuous to be left on.

 
  The decisive moment is the best way to shoot as most would agree,
  but it
  depends on the situation, surely.  ...
 
  Yes, I agree. Even for sports work, though, I've found it best to
  work on MY timing, not machine gun blast it. The latter generally
  makes for a whole lot of mostly boring photos.
 
  Godfrey

 Indeed it does, except for some particular circumstances, such as what
 Cotty's shooting.

 -Adam

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
~Nick Wright
http://blog.phojonick.com/
http://www.phojonick.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-10 Thread Adam Maas
I tend to shoot single frames. Continuous mode doesn't require 
spray-and-pray shooting, although it's difficult no to if the camera is 
setup for 8fps (That's actually one reason I don't want a high fps 
camera, the other being the inherent audible noise, my 10D is rather 
quiet compared to a 20D, let alone a 1D).

-Adam


Nick Wright wrote:
 I used to leave my EOS1D in continuous mode, which is rated for 8
 frames per second.
 
 And I got sick and tired of shooting that way. So I set it to single
 frame as something of an experiment. And I believe that my photography
 is improving because of it.
 
 Take the following example:
 In motor-drive mode I'd shoot 600+ images at a high school basketball
 game. Out of those 600 frames I'd get 10-20 keepers. Now in single
 frame mode, I shoot 60 images at a game and I still get 10 to 20
 keepers. The only differences are that now each photo is a conscious
 act of creation (instead of spraying and praying), and I don't have to
 wade through 580 crap shots to find the good ones.
 
 Also, in my experience with motor drive, if I missed the best action
 with the first shutter press, then all the subsequent frames missed it
 too. I can't think of a single time where I got a good action shot out
 of a motor sequence. The frames were always one bit too soon or one
 bit too late.
 
 The only good thing that I think comes out of so many frames per
 second is that it means that in single frame mode the camera is ready
 to take another picture at my press of the button that much sooner.
 
 On 3/10/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
 On Mar 10, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Cotty wrote:

 Good point.
 ...
 I don't use single frame, always 'continuous - low' which is
 easy to shoot single frames with. This is more like film cameras of
 old,
 as I can shoot and focus at the same time instead of waiting for silly
 focus confirmation beeps etc.
 Interesting differences in shooting methodology. I normally have the
 K10D set to one-shot as I rarely make more than one or two exposures,
 unless I have auto-bracketing turned on, and the focusing/
 responsiveness of the K10D seems able to keep up with me: the camera
 always seems to be ready to make the next exposure at the moment I am.
 Interesting as well. Right now I've got the 10D set to continuous, which
 is how I normally have my film cameras setup (except the F3, which is
 just too fast to leave in Continuous, unless I get around to buying a
 MK-1 firing rate converter to slow it down). I find it's very easy on a
 2-3fps body to not shoot that extra frame, and sometimes I want the
 extra frame and don't have time to reset the drive mode. The only DSLR I
 left in single was the K100D, the shutter was just too sensitive for
 continuous to be left on.

 The decisive moment is the best way to shoot as most would agree,
 but it
 depends on the situation, surely.  ...
 Yes, I agree. Even for sports work, though, I've found it best to
 work on MY timing, not machine gun blast it. The latter generally
 makes for a whole lot of mostly boring photos.

 Godfrey
 Indeed it does, except for some particular circumstances, such as what
 Cotty's shooting.

 -Adam

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

 
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-10 Thread Bruce Dayton
Guess I should chime in a bit here.  I just got back from shooting
little league baseball.  I do set the K10D to continuous but rarely
machine gun.  Pretty much I do that when I want an actual sequence of
shots rather than just trying to get the 'moment' - like a slide into
2nd or 3rd or a pitcher in windup and throwing.  The concept there is
that most of the frames are good rather than boring or throwaway.

However, I will say that there have been many times especially
shooting something less predictable like soccer where I have missed
the moment partly because I never really saw the moment.  I could see
sometimes getting an interesting shot in the bunch by machine gunning
in the thick of the action.

I don't shoot that way, but can see some logic in it.

-- 
Bruce


Saturday, March 10, 2007, 2:37:25 PM, you wrote:


GD On Mar 10, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Cotty wrote:

 Good point.
 ...
 I don't use single frame, always 'continuous - low' which is
 easy to shoot single frames with. This is more like film cameras of
 old,
 as I can shoot and focus at the same time instead of waiting for silly
 focus confirmation beeps etc.

GD Interesting differences in shooting methodology. I normally have the
GD K10D set to one-shot as I rarely make more than one or two exposures,
GD unless I have auto-bracketing turned on, and the focusing/ 
GD responsiveness of the K10D seems able to keep up with me: the camera
GD always seems to be ready to make the next exposure at the moment I am.

 The decisive moment is the best way to shoot as most would agree,  
 but it
 depends on the situation, surely.  ...

GD Yes, I agree. Even for sports work, though, I've found it best to
GD work on MY timing, not machine gun blast it. The latter generally
GD makes for a whole lot of mostly boring photos.

GD Godfrey






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-10 Thread Boris Liberman
Cotty, machine guns would only fire as long as they have ammo, right?

;-)

Boris


Cotty wrote:
 On 10/3/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
 
 Remarkable speed. Not that I have even the first idea how I would use  
 it other than to make motion pictures...
 
 Good point. My 1DmII will do (allegedly) 8.5 fps but I hardly ever use
 that. In continuous mode there are two speed settings on the quick top-
 panel switches - high and low and the user can set the frame rates for
 both. I have high set at max and low set at 4 fps which is usually
 plenty. I don't use single frame, always 'continuous - low' which is
 easy to shoot single frames with. This is more like film cameras of old,
 as I can shoot and focus at the same time instead of waiting for silly
 focus confirmation beeps etc.
 
 The decisive moment is the best way to shoot as most would agree, but it
 depends on the situation, surely. I have photographed football (soccer)
 and with some scenarios it is better to use the machine gun due to the
 frequent unpredictable nature of the game. Sure, lots of it is quite
 predictable, like a corner kick, but the scramble in the goal mouth can
 be totally whacky and half the time the decisive moment turns out to be
 not when and where one expects. Machine guns at 8 or 10 fps will get the
 result most of the time. if you're making money selling pictures like
 this, it's a no-brainer IMO.
 
 
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-10 Thread David Savage
With the wireless transmitter it's conceivable that the memory card
would never get full.

Cheers,

Dave

On 3/11/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Cotty, machine guns would only fire as long as they have ammo, right?

 ;-)

 Boris

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Don't ever miss the decisive moment

2007-03-10 Thread John Francis
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 08:37:58PM -0600, Nick Wright wrote:
 
 The only good thing that I think comes out of so many frames per
 second is that it means that in single frame mode the camera is ready
 to take another picture at my press of the button that much sooner.

I quite agree.  That's why I want a 5fps or better body.  The PZ-1p
(4+ fps) was pretty good, but still not as good as the MX+motor drive.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net