RE: PAW: From my recent trip to Northern AZ, and Southern UT.

2004-06-03 Thread Jeff Jonsson
Well, if it's of any interest, the four images I shot for my panorama,
It took maybe 10 seconds. Since it was handheld, I just hopped out of my
car with my *istD, walked over to the edge, snap, snap, snap, snap, with
the foreknowledge that I would be stitching them. Then when I got home,
and after I had loaded my images, and done some editing, I found those
4. I fired up panavue, and within maybe 10 minutes, I had the stitched
image. After a crop, and some image adjustment, voila. Very simple, very
easy, and I didn't have to lug around a tripod, or a heavy camera, or
wait for film processing, or pay for film or processing. I used to own a
Mamiya 6x6. I found myself never using it, and yearning for the *istD.
So I sold it, and haven't looked back.

Thanks,
Jeff Jonsson
Marriott Library, University of Utah
801.585.5587 

-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 12:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PAW: From my recent trip to Northern AZ, and Southern UT.



> Methinks you have this backwards from a practicality standpoint.
> Stitching multiple exposures is hardly a practical substitute For a 
> simple single LF image

Well of course it can't offer all the benefits of an LF image but for
wide high 
pixel count images the great works that are popping up here are
excellent 
examples of what can be achieved without investing in any extra kit but
a 
software package (of which there are free packages) and a little post 
processing.

==
Just a little post processing? What about all the time and effort to
take The photo? That's what I am talking about. I am sure I can setup
and Expose one large format photo much faster and easier than taking a
whole bunch Of little shots and spending more time stitching together.
And with a single LF Image at least you can see entire image for
composition and also shoot For the decisive moment, like waiting for
perfect sunset or the wind to die down, or the clouds to open up, not so
with multiple images and stitching.


One nice thing about stitching is you can go wider than you widest lens
For extreme wide angle photography. But you can do that with any format,
Dslr or LF.

JCO




RE: PAW: From my recent trip to Northern AZ, and Southern UT.

2004-06-02 Thread Jeff Jonsson
The FAJ had no problems with vignetting that I could see. There was
maybe 1/4 of the image overlap. It was all handheld. If the folks on the
list have never looked at or used Panavue ImageAssembler, ($64 from
www.panavue.com) let me tell you it's the absolute bomb. I tried lining
up the 4 shots using Photomerge in Photoshop CS. It was a joke. I
plugged them into Panavue, set my flags to the same points in each
photo, and voila, what you see is what you get. Panavue seems to look
closely at each photo and warp them just so, to produce one hell of a
nice panorama. The original is about 8000 x 2000 pixels. I have printed
it at 12" x 47" and I'm gonna have to redo it. I somehow got the color
balance all wrong and it just looks green. Ah the joys of print color
matching.

Thanks,
Jeff Jonsson
Marriott Library, University of Utah
801.585.5587 

-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 6:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW: From my recent trip to Northern AZ, and Southern UT.


On 1 Jun 2004 at 9:24, Jeff Jonsson wrote:

> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2407474

That's pretty amazing, well done. 

How did the FAJ hold up WRT vignetting and CA? How much overlap did you
allow 
and did you use a tripod and calibrated pano head?

What were the dimensions (in pixels) of the final composite and have you

printed it poster sized? :-)

Cheers,


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998