RE: PESO: Sierra Ranch

2006-07-20 Thread Jack Davis
Jens,
I've wondered if that color hue is due to early spring growth. It may
not be the cause, but maybe cholesterol development has a ways to
go.(?)
Thanks much.

Jack

--- Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Very nice photograph, Jack. The colours look a little like it came
> from an
> old geography book - I think there's a tiny hint of yellow cast - or
> what?
> Regards
> jens Bladt
> http://www.jensbladt.dk
> +45 56 63 77 11
> +45 23 43 85 77
> Skype: jensbladt248
> 
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
> Jack
> Davis
> Sendt: 17. juli 2006 04:03
> Til: pdml@pdml.net
> Emne: PESO: Sierra Ranch
> 
> 
> Moving on to another barn. Sierra Co, CA cabin and barn drive by shot
> of a few years back.
> Last barn for the time being.
> Comments appreciated!
> 
> Jack
> 
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=133
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date:
> 07/14/2006
> 
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/391 - Release Date:
> 07/18/2006
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: PESO: Sierra Ranch

2006-07-19 Thread Jens Bladt
Very nice photograph, Jack. The colours look a little like it came from an
old geography book - I think there's a tiny hint of yellow cast - or what?
Regards
jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jack
Davis
Sendt: 17. juli 2006 04:03
Til: pdml@pdml.net
Emne: PESO: Sierra Ranch


Moving on to another barn. Sierra Co, CA cabin and barn drive by shot
of a few years back.
Last barn for the time being.
Comments appreciated!

Jack

http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=133

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date: 07/14/2006

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/391 - Release Date: 07/18/2006


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-19 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 7/19/2006 6:08:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll apologize for belaboring dial-up systems and hope I'll eventually
get the idea.
Thanks for encouraging remarks.

Jack
===
Later when I watched some other pictures take a long time to load, realized 
yours took no longer (than some of the slower ones).

It was just all that file size discussion that made me think it did.

Marnie aka Doe :-)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-19 Thread Jack Davis
I'll apologize for belaboring dial-up systems and hope I'll eventually
get the idea.
Thanks for encouraging remarks.

Jack

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> In a message dated 7/18/2006 9:57:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Bruce,
> I'll just go ahead and embarrass myself (my life long challenge) by
> saying that I don't have any idea. 
> I'm going to try a much larger upload. 
> I desaturated the green, but the image still has a green look about
> it.
> I think, it's simply do to the expanse of grass.
> I set the image size, but when attached, it's seriously
> compressed.(??)
> How do I estimate the final size?
> 
> Jack
> 
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=139
> =
> Jack, that's a lot better re green. A lot, lot. And I like it a lot
> better.
> 
> But the file size seems a bit big for dial-up, takes a while to load.
> 
> Of course, I have not helped the file size issue at all, have I?
> 
> Hehehehe.
> 
> Marnie aka Doe 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-18 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 7/18/2006 9:57:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce,
I'll just go ahead and embarrass myself (my life long challenge) by
saying that I don't have any idea. 
I'm going to try a much larger upload. 
I desaturated the green, but the image still has a green look about it.
I think, it's simply do to the expanse of grass.
I set the image size, but when attached, it's seriously compressed.(??)
How do I estimate the final size?

Jack

http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=139
=
Jack, that's a lot better re green. A lot, lot. And I like it a lot better.

But the file size seems a bit big for dial-up, takes a while to load.

Of course, I have not helped the file size issue at all, have I?

Hehehehe.

Marnie aka Doe 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-18 Thread Jack Davis
Good information Bruce. I'll keep.
Thanks.

Jack

--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As was stated by someone else, for the web, you don't really need to
> worry about DPI, just the total number of pixels.  I'm not sure what
> software you are using to do you sizing/sharpening - but I just set
> the final pixel size, and then sharpen.  If you save that as a tiff,
> you don't need to worry about compression.  Then do a series of
> convert/compressions to jpg to see how small you can make it without
> causing problems.  For the most part, you should be able to size to
> about 800 pixels on the long edge and be less than 300K and still
> have
> a very good image.
> 
> -- 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 11:41:18 AM, you wrote:
> 
> JD> I do it just that way. Some "trys" have failed in the past.
> JD> IOW, I'm very insecure. :]]
> 
> JD> Jack
> 
> JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >> Why do you have to 'try' an upload?  Are you sizing the image
> before
> >> uploading or is there some software you use to do it all at once?
> >> 
> >> To do it best you should resize your image to the dimensions you
> want
> >> and then after that, sharpen to taste for that size.  Then save it
> >> with the amount of compression you can live with.  Lastly, upload
> the
> >> image to your site.
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Best regards,
> >> Bruce
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 9:52:07 AM, you wrote:
> >> 
> >> JD> Bruce,
> >> JD> I'll just go ahead and embarrass myself (my life long
> challenge)
> >> by
> >> JD> saying that I don't have any idea. 
> >> JD> I'm going to try a much larger upload. 
> >> JD> I desaturated the green, but the image still has a green look
> >> about it.
> >> JD> I think, it's simply do to the expanse of grass.
> >> JD> I set the image size, but when attached, it's seriously
> >> compressed.(??)
> >> JD> How do I estimate the final size?
> >> 
> >> JD> Jack
> >> 
> >> JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=139
> >> 
> >> JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >> Hello Jack,
> >> >> 
> >> >> It looks a bit better in regards to sharpening.  I do like the
> >> image.
> >> >> I routinely post my images at 800 pixels on the long edge and
> >> almost
> >> >> never go above 200k - I'm wondering why you are having a
> struggle?
> >> >> What level of compression are you using?
> >> >> 
> >> >> The reason I ask, is because I think this photo will continue
> to
> >> get
> >> >> even better, the bigger it can be viewed.
> >> >> 
> >> >> -- 
> >> >> Bruce
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 5:58:08 AM, you wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> JD> @ 72 dpi: (It's too early)
> >> >> 
> >> >> JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136
> >> >> 
> >> >> JD> Jack
> >> >> 
> >> >> JD> __
> >> >> JD> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> >> JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> >> around
> >> >> JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> -- 
> >> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> >> PDML@pdml.net
> >> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> JD> __
> >> JD> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> around
> >> JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> PDML@pdml.net
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> 
> 
> 
> JD> __
> JD> Do You Yahoo!?
> JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-18 Thread Jack Davis
Thanks for the information, Powell.

Jack

--- Powell Hargrave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On a web page all that matters is pixels.  ie. 600 pixels x 800
> pixels.
> Level of compression will change the number of bytes in the image
> file
> versus the image quality.
> PPI, DPI, Inches do not matter.  These only come into effect when you
> print.
> 
> Powell
> 
> 
> >I set the image size, but when attached, it's seriously
> compressed.(??)
> >How do I estimate the final size?
> >
> >Jack
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-18 Thread Bruce Dayton
As was stated by someone else, for the web, you don't really need to
worry about DPI, just the total number of pixels.  I'm not sure what
software you are using to do you sizing/sharpening - but I just set
the final pixel size, and then sharpen.  If you save that as a tiff,
you don't need to worry about compression.  Then do a series of
convert/compressions to jpg to see how small you can make it without
causing problems.  For the most part, you should be able to size to
about 800 pixels on the long edge and be less than 300K and still have
a very good image.

-- 
Bruce


Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 11:41:18 AM, you wrote:

JD> I do it just that way. Some "trys" have failed in the past.
JD> IOW, I'm very insecure. :]]

JD> Jack

JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> Why do you have to 'try' an upload?  Are you sizing the image before
>> uploading or is there some software you use to do it all at once?
>> 
>> To do it best you should resize your image to the dimensions you want
>> and then after that, sharpen to taste for that size.  Then save it
>> with the amount of compression you can live with.  Lastly, upload the
>> image to your site.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best regards,
>> Bruce
>> 
>> 
>> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 9:52:07 AM, you wrote:
>> 
>> JD> Bruce,
>> JD> I'll just go ahead and embarrass myself (my life long challenge)
>> by
>> JD> saying that I don't have any idea. 
>> JD> I'm going to try a much larger upload. 
>> JD> I desaturated the green, but the image still has a green look
>> about it.
>> JD> I think, it's simply do to the expanse of grass.
>> JD> I set the image size, but when attached, it's seriously
>> compressed.(??)
>> JD> How do I estimate the final size?
>> 
>> JD> Jack
>> 
>> JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=139
>> 
>> JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> >> Hello Jack,
>> >> 
>> >> It looks a bit better in regards to sharpening.  I do like the
>> image.
>> >> I routinely post my images at 800 pixels on the long edge and
>> almost
>> >> never go above 200k - I'm wondering why you are having a struggle?
>> >> What level of compression are you using?
>> >> 
>> >> The reason I ask, is because I think this photo will continue to
>> get
>> >> even better, the bigger it can be viewed.
>> >> 
>> >> -- 
>> >> Bruce
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 5:58:08 AM, you wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> JD> @ 72 dpi: (It's too early)
>> >> 
>> >> JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136
>> >> 
>> >> JD> Jack
>> >> 
>> >> JD> __
>> >> JD> Do You Yahoo!?
>> >> JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
>> around
>> >> JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> -- 
>> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> >> PDML@pdml.net
>> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> >> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> JD> __
>> JD> Do You Yahoo!?
>> JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> 


JD> __
JD> Do You Yahoo!?
JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-18 Thread Jack Davis
I do it just that way. Some "trys" have failed in the past.
IOW, I'm very insecure. :]]

Jack

--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Why do you have to 'try' an upload?  Are you sizing the image before
> uploading or is there some software you use to do it all at once?
> 
> To do it best you should resize your image to the dimensions you want
> and then after that, sharpen to taste for that size.  Then save it
> with the amount of compression you can live with.  Lastly, upload the
> image to your site.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Bruce
> 
> 
> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 9:52:07 AM, you wrote:
> 
> JD> Bruce,
> JD> I'll just go ahead and embarrass myself (my life long challenge)
> by
> JD> saying that I don't have any idea. 
> JD> I'm going to try a much larger upload. 
> JD> I desaturated the green, but the image still has a green look
> about it.
> JD> I think, it's simply do to the expanse of grass.
> JD> I set the image size, but when attached, it's seriously
> compressed.(??)
> JD> How do I estimate the final size?
> 
> JD> Jack
> 
> JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=139
> 
> JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >> Hello Jack,
> >> 
> >> It looks a bit better in regards to sharpening.  I do like the
> image.
> >> I routinely post my images at 800 pixels on the long edge and
> almost
> >> never go above 200k - I'm wondering why you are having a struggle?
> >> What level of compression are you using?
> >> 
> >> The reason I ask, is because I think this photo will continue to
> get
> >> even better, the bigger it can be viewed.
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Bruce
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 5:58:08 AM, you wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> JD> @ 72 dpi: (It's too early)
> >> 
> >> JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136
> >> 
> >> JD> Jack
> >> 
> >> JD> __
> >> JD> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> around
> >> JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> PDML@pdml.net
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> JD> __
> JD> Do You Yahoo!?
> JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-18 Thread Powell Hargrave
On a web page all that matters is pixels.  ie. 600 pixels x 800 pixels.
Level of compression will change the number of bytes in the image file
versus the image quality.
PPI, DPI, Inches do not matter.  These only come into effect when you print.

Powell


>I set the image size, but when attached, it's seriously compressed.(??)
>How do I estimate the final size?
>
>Jack


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-18 Thread Bruce Dayton
Why do you have to 'try' an upload?  Are you sizing the image before
uploading or is there some software you use to do it all at once?

To do it best you should resize your image to the dimensions you want
and then after that, sharpen to taste for that size.  Then save it
with the amount of compression you can live with.  Lastly, upload the
image to your site.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 9:52:07 AM, you wrote:

JD> Bruce,
JD> I'll just go ahead and embarrass myself (my life long challenge) by
JD> saying that I don't have any idea. 
JD> I'm going to try a much larger upload. 
JD> I desaturated the green, but the image still has a green look about it.
JD> I think, it's simply do to the expanse of grass.
JD> I set the image size, but when attached, it's seriously compressed.(??)
JD> How do I estimate the final size?

JD> Jack

JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=139

JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> Hello Jack,
>> 
>> It looks a bit better in regards to sharpening.  I do like the image.
>> I routinely post my images at 800 pixels on the long edge and almost
>> never go above 200k - I'm wondering why you are having a struggle?
>> What level of compression are you using?
>> 
>> The reason I ask, is because I think this photo will continue to get
>> even better, the bigger it can be viewed.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Bruce
>> 
>> 
>> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 5:58:08 AM, you wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> JD> @ 72 dpi: (It's too early)
>> 
>> JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136
>> 
>> JD> Jack
>> 
>> JD> __
>> JD> Do You Yahoo!?
>> JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> 




JD> __
JD> Do You Yahoo!?
JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-18 Thread Jack Davis
Bruce,
I'll just go ahead and embarrass myself (my life long challenge) by
saying that I don't have any idea. 
I'm going to try a much larger upload. 
I desaturated the green, but the image still has a green look about it.
I think, it's simply do to the expanse of grass.
I set the image size, but when attached, it's seriously compressed.(??)
How do I estimate the final size?

Jack

http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=139

--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello Jack,
> 
> It looks a bit better in regards to sharpening.  I do like the image.
> I routinely post my images at 800 pixels on the long edge and almost
> never go above 200k - I'm wondering why you are having a struggle?
> What level of compression are you using?
> 
> The reason I ask, is because I think this photo will continue to get
> even better, the bigger it can be viewed.
> 
> -- 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 5:58:08 AM, you wrote:
> 
> 
> JD> @ 72 dpi: (It's too early)
> 
> JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136
> 
> JD> Jack
> 
> JD> __
> JD> Do You Yahoo!?
> JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 




__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-18 Thread Bruce Dayton
Hello Jack,

It looks a bit better in regards to sharpening.  I do like the image.
I routinely post my images at 800 pixels on the long edge and almost
never go above 200k - I'm wondering why you are having a struggle?
What level of compression are you using?

The reason I ask, is because I think this photo will continue to get
even better, the bigger it can be viewed.

-- 
Bruce


Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 5:58:08 AM, you wrote:


JD> @ 72 dpi: (It's too early)

JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136

JD> Jack

JD> __
JD> Do You Yahoo!?
JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-18 Thread Jack Davis
No excuse, but I, too, felt it was somewhat too green and confirmed it
by com parring it to the site image. Since I was into up-sizing the
image, went with that goal rather than color correction. My excuse,
abject laziness.
Since there have been multiple uploads for this thing, will probably
not do it again, but completely agree with you.
Thanks for comments.

Jack

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> In a message dated 7/18/2006 6:06:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> @ 72 dpi: (It's too early)
> 
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136
> 
> Jack
> 
> It's a very nice image, but it looks too green to me. I know the
> grass is 
> green and the wood is green-colored, so maybe it's not too green
> (i.e. in reality 
> it was green). Maybe it just needs more color contrast for me,
> personally, 
> for it to be a tad more interesting.
> 
> But it's a nice image.
> 
> Marnie aka Doe 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch III

2006-07-18 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 7/18/2006 6:06:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
@ 72 dpi: (It's too early)

http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136

Jack

It's a very nice image, but it looks too green to me. I know the grass is 
green and the wood is green-colored, so maybe it's not too green (i.e. in 
reality 
it was green). Maybe it just needs more color contrast for me, personally, 
for it to be a tad more interesting.

But it's a nice image.

Marnie aka Doe 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch II

2006-07-18 Thread Jack Davis
At 72 dpi:

http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID-136

Jack

--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> At 300K, you should be able to get far larger dimensions than what  
> you've posted. Resolution above 72 dpi accomplishes nothing on the
> web. 
> Size it for a substantial dimension, like 12 inches on the long side,
> 
> at 72 dpi.
> Paul
> On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:27 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> 
> > This is a moderately larger upload. I'm limited to 300K and if I
> pump
> > it any further, pixels become a factor.
> > I took this from my site as I have no back-up scan at this point.
> > I see a restrained sharpening.
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=135
> >
> > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I like the composition. It appears to be very sharp and detailed,
> >> although it's hard to tell with such a small image. Pump it up!
> >> Paul
> >> On Jul 17, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=133
> >>>
> >>> __
> >>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>
> >>> -- 
> >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>> PDML@pdml.net
> >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> PDML@pdml.net
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch II

2006-07-18 Thread Paul Stenquist
At 300K, you should be able to get far larger dimensions than what  
you've posted. Resolution above 72 dpi accomplishes nothing on the web. 
Size it for a substantial dimension, like 12 inches on the long side, 
at 72 dpi.
Paul
On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:27 PM, Jack Davis wrote:

> This is a moderately larger upload. I'm limited to 300K and if I pump
> it any further, pixels become a factor.
> I took this from my site as I have no back-up scan at this point.
> I see a restrained sharpening.
>
> Jack
>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=135
>
> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I like the composition. It appears to be very sharp and detailed,
>> although it's hard to tell with such a small image. Pump it up!
>> Paul
>> On Jul 17, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=133
>>>
>>> __
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch II

2006-07-17 Thread Jack Davis
This is a moderately larger upload. I'm limited to 300K and if I pump
it any further, pixels become a factor.
I took this from my site as I have no back-up scan at this point.
I see a restrained sharpening.

Jack

http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=135

--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I like the composition. It appears to be very sharp and detailed,  
> although it's hard to tell with such a small image. Pump it up!
> Paul
> On Jul 17, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=133
> >
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch II

2006-07-17 Thread Bruce Dayton
Hello Jack,

I think I like it.  I would like to see it a bit bigger.  As it stands
now, it seems a bit over sharpened to me

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Monday, July 17, 2006, 4:29:06 PM, you wrote:





JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=133

JD> __
JD> Do You Yahoo!?
JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch II

2006-07-17 Thread Paul Stenquist
I like the composition. It appears to be very sharp and detailed,  
although it's hard to tell with such a small image. Pump it up!
Paul
On Jul 17, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Jack Davis wrote:

>
>
>
>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=133
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net