Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
Sorry bout that, but I'm just a tease. But I AM greateful. You saved my day. Tim Typo Mostly Harmless - Original Message - From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:50 PM Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response What do you mean 'might take me seriously'? Does this mean you were only toying with me, and all those promises were lies? I hate you, you bastard, do you hear? I hate you and I'll never speak to you again as long as I live! -- Bob > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Tim Øsleby > Sent: 08 June 2007 18:02 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > I'd better stop there. > Somebody might take me seriously. > > Just for the record: > I was only expresing my gratitude towards a helpfull list member in a > humourous way. Had absolutely no intentions beyond that. > I rest my case. > > Tim Typo > Mostly Harmless > > - Original Message - > From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:05 PM > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > > > > From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 2007/06/08 Fri PM 12:09:42 GMT > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > Who said horny? > > I was expressing a deaper, more mature, non physical love ;-) > > What's the ASCII art for complete bafflement? > > > > > Tim Typo¨ > > Mostly Harmless > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:51 AM > > Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> Date: 2007/06/05 Tue PM 10:46:03 GMT > > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >> Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > >> > > >> > > >> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to > > >> > > > >fall. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-)) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >Oh, deer. Is this going to be another pun thread? > Let's not get > > >> > stuck > > >> > >in a rut this time. > > >> > > > > >> > >Bob > > >> > > > >> > I know. It gets pretty STAGnant sometimes. > > >> > > > >> > Tom c. > > >> > > > >> > Yes, things of that elk do. > > > > > > Bob better be careful, or he'll have Tim feeling all horny again. > > > > > > > > > - > > > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > > > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > > > > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > PDML@pdml.net > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/834 - Release Date: > > > 05.06.2007 > > > 14:38 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > - > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.11/838 - Release > Date: 07.06.2007 > 14:21 > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/840 - Release Date: 08.06.2007 15:15 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
What do you mean 'might take me seriously'? Does this mean you were only toying with me, and all those promises were lies? I hate you, you bastard, do you hear? I hate you and I'll never speak to you again as long as I live! -- Bob > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Tim Øsleby > Sent: 08 June 2007 18:02 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > I'd better stop there. > Somebody might take me seriously. > > Just for the record: > I was only expresing my gratitude towards a helpfull list member in a > humourous way. Had absolutely no intentions beyond that. > I rest my case. > > Tim Typo > Mostly Harmless > > - Original Message - > From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:05 PM > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > > > > From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 2007/06/08 Fri PM 12:09:42 GMT > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > Who said horny? > > I was expressing a deaper, more mature, non physical love ;-) > > What's the ASCII art for complete bafflement? > > > > > Tim Typo¨ > > Mostly Harmless > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:51 AM > > Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> Date: 2007/06/05 Tue PM 10:46:03 GMT > > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >> Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > >> > > >> > > >> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to > > >> > > > >fall. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-)) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >Oh, deer. Is this going to be another pun thread? > Let's not get > > >> > stuck > > >> > >in a rut this time. > > >> > > > > >> > >Bob > > >> > > > >> > I know. It gets pretty STAGnant sometimes. > > >> > > > >> > Tom c. > > >> > > > >> > Yes, things of that elk do. > > > > > > Bob better be careful, or he'll have Tim feeling all horny again. > > > > > > > > > - > > > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > > > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > > > > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > PDML@pdml.net > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/834 - Release Date: > > > 05.06.2007 > > > 14:38 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > - > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.11/838 - Release > Date: 07.06.2007 > 14:21 > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
I'd better stop there. Somebody might take me seriously. Just for the record: I was only expresing my gratitude towards a helpfull list member in a humourous way. Had absolutely no intentions beyond that. I rest my case. Tim Typo Mostly Harmless - Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:05 PM Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/06/08 Fri PM 12:09:42 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > Who said horny? > I was expressing a deaper, more mature, non physical love ;-) What's the ASCII art for complete bafflement? > > Tim Typo¨ > Mostly Harmless > > - Original Message - > From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:51 AM > Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > > >> > >> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: 2007/06/05 Tue PM 10:46:03 GMT > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > >> > >> > >> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > >> > > > > >> > > > On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> > > > > >> > > > >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to > >> > > > >fall. > >> > > > > >> > > > A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-)) > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >Oh, deer. Is this going to be another pun thread? Let's not get > >> > stuck > >> > >in a rut this time. > >> > > > >> > >Bob > >> > > >> > I know. It gets pretty STAGnant sometimes. > >> > > >> > Tom c. > >> > > >> > Yes, things of that elk do. > > > > Bob better be careful, or he'll have Tim feeling all horny again. > > > > > > - > > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/834 - Release Date: > > 05.06.2007 > > 14:38 > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > - Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.11/838 - Release Date: 07.06.2007 14:21 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
On Jun 8, 2007, at 6:05 AM, mike wilson wrote: > >> >> From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: 2007/06/08 Fri PM 12:09:42 GMT >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" >> Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response >> >> Who said horny? >> I was expressing a deaper, more mature, non physical love ;-) > > What's the ASCII art for complete bafflement? =*^O G > >> >> Tim Typo¨ >> Mostly Harmless >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" >> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:51 AM >> Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> Date: 2007/06/05 Tue PM 10:46:03 GMT >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response >>>> >>>> >>>> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to >>>>>>>> fall. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-)) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, deer. Is this going to be another pun thread? Let's not get >>>>> stuck >>>>>> in a rut this time. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bob >>>>> >>>>> I know. It gets pretty STAGnant sometimes. >>>>> >>>>> Tom c. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, things of that elk do. >>> >>> Bob better be careful, or he'll have Tim feeling all horny again. >>> >>> >>> - >>> Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email >>> Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/834 - Release Date: >>> 05.06.2007 >>> 14:38 >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > - > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
> > From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/06/08 Fri PM 12:09:42 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > Who said horny? > I was expressing a deaper, more mature, non physical love ;-) What's the ASCII art for complete bafflement? > > Tim Typo¨ > Mostly Harmless > > - Original Message - > From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:51 AM > Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > > >> > >> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: 2007/06/05 Tue PM 10:46:03 GMT > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > >> > >> > >> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > >> > > > > >> > > > On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> > > > > >> > > > >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to > >> > > > >fall. > >> > > > > >> > > > A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-)) > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >Oh, deer. Is this going to be another pun thread? Let's not get > >> > stuck > >> > >in a rut this time. > >> > > > >> > >Bob > >> > > >> > I know. It gets pretty STAGnant sometimes. > >> > > >> > Tom c. > >> > > >> > Yes, things of that elk do. > > > > Bob better be careful, or he'll have Tim feeling all horny again. > > > > > > - > > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/834 - Release Date: 05.06.2007 > > 14:38 > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > - Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
Who said horny? I was expressing a deaper, more mature, non physical love ;-) (Note smilie) Tim Typo¨ Mostly Harmless - Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:51 AM Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > >> >> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: 2007/06/05 Tue PM 10:46:03 GMT >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response >> >> >> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response >> > > > >> > > > On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: >> > > > >> > > > >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to >> > > > >fall. >> > > > >> > > > A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-)) >> > > > >> > > >> > >Oh, deer. Is this going to be another pun thread? Let's not get >> > stuck >> > >in a rut this time. >> > > >> > >Bob >> > >> > I know. It gets pretty STAGnant sometimes. >> > >> > Tom c. >> > >> > Yes, things of that elk do. > > Bob better be careful, or he'll have Tim feeling all horny again. > > > - > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/834 - Release Date: 05.06.2007 > 14:38 > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
> > From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/06/05 Tue PM 10:46:03 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > > > > > On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > > > > > > >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to > > > > >fall. > > > > > > > > A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-)) > > > > > > > > > >Oh, deer. Is this going to be another pun thread? Let's not get > > stuck > > >in a rut this time. > > > > > >Bob > > > > I know. It gets pretty STAGnant sometimes. > > > > Tom c. > > > > Yes, things of that elk do. Bob better be careful, or he'll have Tim feeling all horny again. - Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > > > On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > > > > >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to > > > >fall. > > > > > > A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-)) > > > > > > >Oh, deer. Is this going to be another pun thread? Let's not get > stuck > >in a rut this time. > > > >Bob > > I know. It gets pretty STAGnant sometimes. > > Tom c. > > Yes, things of that elk do. Jack > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
> > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > > >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to > > >fall. > > > > A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-)) > > > >Oh, deer. Is this going to be another pun thread? Let's not get stuck >in a rut this time. > >Bob I know. It gets pretty STAGnant sometimes. Tom c. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Cotty > Sent: 05 June 2007 22:04 > To: pentax list > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to > >fall. > > A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-)) > Oh, deer. Is this going to be another pun thread? Let's not get stuck in a rut this time. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to >fall. A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-)) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
There are still a few of us on this list John that appreciate your support. Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to fall. Dave On 6/4/07, Carlson, John___PAIC_SO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To maybe clear the air, one of the judges was in Hawaii for a photo > shoot for some upcoming advertising the week before last (difficult job, > but someone had to do it), and the other was at a Pentax sponsored > college championship sailing event last week (also a difficult job, but > we all make sacrifices:). > > Thanks for your support. > > John > > > -Original Message- > From: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:14 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > Thanks, John. Actually, you may have even noticed yourself that there > has been a bit of speculation about why it now seems to be taking longer > for images to be reviewed. In fact, there are some who feel it has > ceased altogether. That is really what prompted my contact. > I honestly didn't think the Pentax/Hoya thing was having any bearing on > the gallery schedule, but we are an insecure group. > The primary reason I passed along your comments was because of the > gallery activity plans being considered. > Your response was considerate very much appreciated. > > Jack > --- "Carlson, John___PAIC_SO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I typical art gallery can sometimes take months to consider a piece > > for inclusion. With that in mind, the Photo Gallery selection process > > > is relatively fast. And, as we have said many times in various > > discussion groups and forums, the Photo Gallery is a work in progress, > > > is still under development, and still in beta form. Additionally, we > > are still getting a large volume of submissions and we take the time > > to review each picture. We know this volume will only increase when > > the gallery is released publicly, so we are taking steps to streamline > > > the selection process. > > > > We do check in on the forums from time to time, and to be honest, some > > > of the speculation, rumors and conspiracy theories give a pretty good > > chuckle. > > > > Thanks, > > > > John > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: AlunFoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 1:08 PM > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > I agree, Jack. > > > > Here's a quote from the FAQ: > > > > "Q: How will I know if my photos have been accepted for display? How > > long will it take to find out? > > > > A: After you have submitted your photos, please re-visit your account > > over the next 7 days to be alerted of photo submission status." > > > > So they actually promise a review within 7 days. If they can't keep > > their own deadlines, then what I need is accurate information. > > Without > > having to ask. I wouldn't mind if they had longer deadlines, actually, > > > as long as the messages they send are loud and clear. > > > > Jostein > > > > 2007/6/4, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Their response is not in any way a reassurance. Is provided only > > for > > > its human interest value. > > > > > > Jack > > > --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > And you received the obvious answer. Don't worry, everything's > > going > > > > > > fine, no anticipated changes here, though apparently attention > > has > > > > been diverted. > > > > > > > > That may well be the case. I would guess the gallery was never > > > > anyone's fulll time job. > > > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > > >Subject: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > > > > > >I asked the obvious question of Pentax and received the > > following > > > > >response: > > > > > > > > > >Jack, > > > > > > > > > >I can assure you that the delay in images accepted or on hold as > > > > > > >nothing to do with Pentax and Hoya activities in Japan. It is &g
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
Now I'm ashamed for having asked. Poor things..my sympathies. :) Jack --- "Carlson, John___PAIC_SO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To maybe clear the air, one of the judges was in Hawaii for a photo > shoot for some upcoming advertising the week before last (difficult > job, > but someone had to do it), and the other was at a Pentax sponsored > college championship sailing event last week (also a difficult job, > but > we all make sacrifices:). > > Thanks for your support. > > John > > > -Original Message- > From: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:14 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > Thanks, John. Actually, you may have even noticed yourself that there > has been a bit of speculation about why it now seems to be taking > longer > for images to be reviewed. In fact, there are some who feel it has > ceased altogether. That is really what prompted my contact. > I honestly didn't think the Pentax/Hoya thing was having any bearing > on > the gallery schedule, but we are an insecure group. > The primary reason I passed along your comments was because of the > gallery activity plans being considered. > Your response was considerate very much appreciated. > > Jack > --- "Carlson, John___PAIC_SO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I typical art gallery can sometimes take months to consider a piece > > > for inclusion. With that in mind, the Photo Gallery selection > process > > > is relatively fast. And, as we have said many times in various > > discussion groups and forums, the Photo Gallery is a work in > progress, > > > is still under development, and still in beta form. Additionally, > we > > are still getting a large volume of submissions and we take the > time > > to review each picture. We know this volume will only increase > when > > the gallery is released publicly, so we are taking steps to > streamline > > > the selection process. > > > > We do check in on the forums from time to time, and to be honest, > some > > > of the speculation, rumors and conspiracy theories give a pretty > good > > chuckle. > > > > Thanks, > > > > John > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: AlunFoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 1:08 PM > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > I agree, Jack. > > > > Here's a quote from the FAQ: > > > > "Q: How will I know if my photos have been accepted for display? > How > > long will it take to find out? > > > > A: After you have submitted your photos, please re-visit your > account > > over the next 7 days to be alerted of photo submission status." > > > > So they actually promise a review within 7 days. If they can't keep > > > their own deadlines, then what I need is accurate information. > > Without > > having to ask. I wouldn't mind if they had longer deadlines, > actually, > > > as long as the messages they send are loud and clear. > > > > Jostein > > > > 2007/6/4, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Their response is not in any way a reassurance. Is provided only > > for > > > its human interest value. > > > > > > Jack > > > --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > And you received the obvious answer. Don't worry, everything's > > going > > > > > > fine, no anticipated changes here, though apparently attention > > has > > > > been diverted. > > > > > > > > That may well be the case. I would guess the gallery was never > > > > > anyone's fulll time job. > > > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > > >Subject: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > > >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > > > > > >I asked the obvious question of Pentax and received the > > following > > > > >response: > > > > > > > > > >Jack, > > > > > > > > > >I can assure you that the delay in images accepted or on hold > as > > > > > > >
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
That's EXACTLY what he would say if there REALLY WAS a conspiracy. :-) Tom C. > > > > We do check in on the forums from time to time, and to be honest, > > some > > of the speculation, rumors and conspiracy theories give a pretty good > > chuckle. > > > > Thanks, > > > > John > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
To maybe clear the air, one of the judges was in Hawaii for a photo shoot for some upcoming advertising the week before last (difficult job, but someone had to do it), and the other was at a Pentax sponsored college championship sailing event last week (also a difficult job, but we all make sacrifices:). Thanks for your support. John -Original Message- From: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:14 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response Thanks, John. Actually, you may have even noticed yourself that there has been a bit of speculation about why it now seems to be taking longer for images to be reviewed. In fact, there are some who feel it has ceased altogether. That is really what prompted my contact. I honestly didn't think the Pentax/Hoya thing was having any bearing on the gallery schedule, but we are an insecure group. The primary reason I passed along your comments was because of the gallery activity plans being considered. Your response was considerate very much appreciated. Jack --- "Carlson, John___PAIC_SO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I typical art gallery can sometimes take months to consider a piece > for inclusion. With that in mind, the Photo Gallery selection process > is relatively fast. And, as we have said many times in various > discussion groups and forums, the Photo Gallery is a work in progress, > is still under development, and still in beta form. Additionally, we > are still getting a large volume of submissions and we take the time > to review each picture. We know this volume will only increase when > the gallery is released publicly, so we are taking steps to streamline > the selection process. > > We do check in on the forums from time to time, and to be honest, some > of the speculation, rumors and conspiracy theories give a pretty good > chuckle. > > Thanks, > > John > > > -Original Message- > From: AlunFoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 1:08 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > I agree, Jack. > > Here's a quote from the FAQ: > > "Q: How will I know if my photos have been accepted for display? How > long will it take to find out? > > A: After you have submitted your photos, please re-visit your account > over the next 7 days to be alerted of photo submission status." > > So they actually promise a review within 7 days. If they can't keep > their own deadlines, then what I need is accurate information. > Without > having to ask. I wouldn't mind if they had longer deadlines, actually, > as long as the messages they send are loud and clear. > > Jostein > > 2007/6/4, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Their response is not in any way a reassurance. Is provided only > for > > its human interest value. > > > > Jack > > --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > And you received the obvious answer. Don't worry, everything's > going > > > > fine, no anticipated changes here, though apparently attention > has > > > been diverted. > > > > > > That may well be the case. I would guess the gallery was never > > > anyone's fulll time job. > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > >Subject: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > > > >I asked the obvious question of Pentax and received the > following > > > >response: > > > > > > > >Jack, > > > > > > > >I can assure you that the delay in images accepted or on hold as > > > > >nothing to do with Pentax and Hoya activities in Japan. It is > > > business > > > >as usual for us here in the US and we do not anticipate any > changes. > > > > > > > >The judges for the photo gallery have had very busy schedules > and > > > >haven't had the time to look at some of the more recent > submissions. > > > >Additionally, the Photo Gallery is still under development and > not > > > in > > > >its full working version. We are currently in the process of > adding > > > a > > > >artist voting function. This will give the accepted artists in > the > > > > >gallery the opportunity to vote on submissions by other artists > to > > > >
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
Thanks, John. Actually, you may have even noticed yourself that there has been a bit of speculation about why it now seems to be taking longer for images to be reviewed. In fact, there are some who feel it has ceased altogether. That is really what prompted my contact. I honestly didn't think the Pentax/Hoya thing was having any bearing on the gallery schedule, but we are an insecure group. The primary reason I passed along your comments was because of the gallery activity plans being considered. Your response was considerate very much appreciated. Jack --- "Carlson, John___PAIC_SO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I typical art gallery can sometimes take months to consider a piece > for > inclusion. With that in mind, the Photo Gallery selection process is > relatively fast. And, as we have said many times in various > discussion > groups and forums, the Photo Gallery is a work in progress, is still > under development, and still in beta form. Additionally, we are > still > getting a large volume of submissions and we take the time to review > each picture. We know this volume will only increase when the > gallery > is released publicly, so we are taking steps to streamline the > selection > process. > > We do check in on the forums from time to time, and to be honest, > some > of the speculation, rumors and conspiracy theories give a pretty good > chuckle. > > Thanks, > > John > > > -Original Message- > From: AlunFoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 1:08 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > I agree, Jack. > > Here's a quote from the FAQ: > > "Q: How will I know if my photos have been accepted for display? How > long will it take to find out? > > A: After you have submitted your photos, please re-visit your account > over the next 7 days to be alerted of photo submission status." > > So they actually promise a review within 7 days. If they can't keep > their own deadlines, then what I need is accurate information. > Without > having to ask. I wouldn't mind if they had longer deadlines, > actually, > as long as the messages they send are loud and clear. > > Jostein > > 2007/6/4, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Their response is not in any way a reassurance. Is provided only > for > > its human interest value. > > > > Jack > > --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > And you received the obvious answer. Don't worry, everything's > going > > > > fine, no anticipated changes here, though apparently attention > has > > > been diverted. > > > > > > That may well be the case. I would guess the gallery was never > > > anyone's fulll time job. > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > >Subject: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > > >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > > > >I asked the obvious question of Pentax and received the > following > > > >response: > > > > > > > >Jack, > > > > > > > >I can assure you that the delay in images accepted or on hold as > > > > >nothing to do with Pentax and Hoya activities in Japan. It is > > > business > > > >as usual for us here in the US and we do not anticipate any > changes. > > > > > > > >The judges for the photo gallery have had very busy schedules > and > > > >haven't had the time to look at some of the more recent > submissions. > > > >Additionally, the Photo Gallery is still under development and > not > > > in > > > >its full working version. We are currently in the process of > adding > > > a > > > >artist voting function. This will give the accepted artists in > the > > > > >gallery the opportunity to vote on submissions by other artists > to > > > >determine if their images will make it to the final gallery. > Also, > > > we > > > >are working on "skinning" the site in other languages so it is > > > >truly and international community. > > > > > > > >Thank you for your concern, but everything is going well here. > We > > > look > > > >forward to receiving more images. > > > > > > > >John Carlson > > > >Prod
Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
Thanks for responding here, John. Much appreciated. Jostein -- http://www.alunfoto.no http://alunfoto.blogspot.com 2007/6/4, Carlson, John___PAIC_SO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I typical art gallery can sometimes take months to consider a piece for > inclusion. With that in mind, the Photo Gallery selection process is > relatively fast. And, as we have said many times in various discussion > groups and forums, the Photo Gallery is a work in progress, is still > under development, and still in beta form. Additionally, we are still > getting a large volume of submissions and we take the time to review > each picture. We know this volume will only increase when the gallery > is released publicly, so we are taking steps to streamline the selection > process. > > We do check in on the forums from time to time, and to be honest, some > of the speculation, rumors and conspiracy theories give a pretty good > chuckle. > > Thanks, > > John -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
I typical art gallery can sometimes take months to consider a piece for inclusion. With that in mind, the Photo Gallery selection process is relatively fast. And, as we have said many times in various discussion groups and forums, the Photo Gallery is a work in progress, is still under development, and still in beta form. Additionally, we are still getting a large volume of submissions and we take the time to review each picture. We know this volume will only increase when the gallery is released publicly, so we are taking steps to streamline the selection process. We do check in on the forums from time to time, and to be honest, some of the speculation, rumors and conspiracy theories give a pretty good chuckle. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: AlunFoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 1:08 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response I agree, Jack. Here's a quote from the FAQ: "Q: How will I know if my photos have been accepted for display? How long will it take to find out? A: After you have submitted your photos, please re-visit your account over the next 7 days to be alerted of photo submission status." So they actually promise a review within 7 days. If they can't keep their own deadlines, then what I need is accurate information. Without having to ask. I wouldn't mind if they had longer deadlines, actually, as long as the messages they send are loud and clear. Jostein 2007/6/4, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Their response is not in any way a reassurance. Is provided only for > its human interest value. > > Jack > --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And you received the obvious answer. Don't worry, everything's going > > fine, no anticipated changes here, though apparently attention has > > been diverted. > > > > That may well be the case. I would guess the gallery was never > > anyone's fulll time job. > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >Subject: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > >I asked the obvious question of Pentax and received the following > > >response: > > > > > >Jack, > > > > > >I can assure you that the delay in images accepted or on hold as > > >nothing to do with Pentax and Hoya activities in Japan. It is > > business > > >as usual for us here in the US and we do not anticipate any changes. > > > > > >The judges for the photo gallery have had very busy schedules and > > >haven't had the time to look at some of the more recent submissions. > > >Additionally, the Photo Gallery is still under development and not > > in > > >its full working version. We are currently in the process of adding > > a > > >artist voting function. This will give the accepted artists in the > > >gallery the opportunity to vote on submissions by other artists to > > >determine if their images will make it to the final gallery. Also, > > we > > >are working on "skinning" the site in other languages so it is > > >truly and international community. > > > > > >Thank you for your concern, but everything is going well here. We > > look > > >forward to receiving more images. > > > > > >John Carlson > > >Product Manager > > >PENTAX Imaging Company > > >Direct: (303) 728-0187 > > >Fax: (303) 728-0187 > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_ > >___ > > >Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with the > > >Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. > > >http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather > > > > > >-- > > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >PDML@pdml.net > > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > __ > __ Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an > Edge to see what's on, when. > http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- http://www.alunfoto.no http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
I agree, Jack. Here's a quote from the FAQ: "Q: How will I know if my photos have been accepted for display? How long will it take to find out? A: After you have submitted your photos, please re-visit your account over the next 7 days to be alerted of photo submission status." So they actually promise a review within 7 days. If they can't keep their own deadlines, then what I need is accurate information. Without having to ask. I wouldn't mind if they had longer deadlines, actually, as long as the messages they send are loud and clear. Jostein 2007/6/4, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Their response is not in any way a reassurance. Is provided only for > its human interest value. > > Jack > --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And you received the obvious answer. Don't worry, everything's going > > fine, > > no anticipated changes here, though apparently attention has been > > diverted. > > > > That may well be the case. I would guess the gallery was never > > anyone's > > fulll time job. > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >Subject: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > > >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > >I asked the obvious question of Pentax and received the following > > >response: > > > > > >Jack, > > > > > >I can assure you that the delay in images accepted or on hold as > > >nothing to do with Pentax and Hoya activities in Japan. It is > > business > > >as usual for us here in the US and we do not anticipate any changes. > > > > > >The judges for the photo gallery have had very busy schedules and > > >haven't had the time to look at some of the more recent submissions. > > >Additionally, the Photo Gallery is still under development and not > > in > > >its full working version. We are currently in the process of adding > > a > > >artist voting function. This will give the accepted artists in the > > >gallery the opportunity to vote on submissions by other artists to > > >determine if their images will make it to the final gallery. Also, > > we > > >are working on "skinning" the site in other languages so it is truly > > >and international community. > > > > > >Thank you for your concern, but everything is going well here. We > > look > > >forward to receiving more images. > > > > > >John Carlson > > >Product Manager > > >PENTAX Imaging Company > > >Direct: (303) 728-0187 > > >Fax: (303) 728-0187 > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast > > >with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. > > >http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather > > > > > >-- > > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >PDML@pdml.net > > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's > Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. > http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- http://www.alunfoto.no http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
Their response is not in any way a reassurance. Is provided only for its human interest value. Jack --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And you received the obvious answer. Don't worry, everything's going > fine, > no anticipated changes here, though apparently attention has been > diverted. > > That may well be the case. I would guess the gallery was never > anyone's > fulll time job. > > Tom C. > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >Subject: Pentax Photo Gallery Response > >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT) > > > >I asked the obvious question of Pentax and received the following > >response: > > > >Jack, > > > >I can assure you that the delay in images accepted or on hold as > >nothing to do with Pentax and Hoya activities in Japan. It is > business > >as usual for us here in the US and we do not anticipate any changes. > > > >The judges for the photo gallery have had very busy schedules and > >haven't had the time to look at some of the more recent submissions. > >Additionally, the Photo Gallery is still under development and not > in > >its full working version. We are currently in the process of adding > a > >artist voting function. This will give the accepted artists in the > >gallery the opportunity to vote on submissions by other artists to > >determine if their images will make it to the final gallery. Also, > we > >are working on "skinning" the site in other languages so it is truly > >and international community. > > > >Thank you for your concern, but everything is going well here. We > look > >forward to receiving more images. > > > >John Carlson > >Product Manager > >PENTAX Imaging Company > >Direct: (303) 728-0187 > >Fax: (303) 728-0187 > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > >Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast > >with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. > >http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >PDML@pdml.net > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
And you received the obvious answer. Don't worry, everything's going fine, no anticipated changes here, though apparently attention has been diverted. That may well be the case. I would guess the gallery was never anyone's fulll time job. Tom C. >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Pentax Photo Gallery Response >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT) > >I asked the obvious question of Pentax and received the following >response: > >Jack, > >I can assure you that the delay in images accepted or on hold as >nothing to do with Pentax and Hoya activities in Japan. It is business >as usual for us here in the US and we do not anticipate any changes. > >The judges for the photo gallery have had very busy schedules and >haven't had the time to look at some of the more recent submissions. >Additionally, the Photo Gallery is still under development and not in >its full working version. We are currently in the process of adding a >artist voting function. This will give the accepted artists in the >gallery the opportunity to vote on submissions by other artists to >determine if their images will make it to the final gallery. Also, we >are working on "skinning" the site in other languages so it is truly >and international community. > >Thank you for your concern, but everything is going well here. We look >forward to receiving more images. > >John Carlson >Product Manager >PENTAX Imaging Company >Direct: (303) 728-0187 >Fax: (303) 728-0187 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast >with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. >http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
