RE: Scanning VELVIA slides with the HP S20
Very, very nice shots. How the slides look will to some extend depend on the light you see it through/send through it. So judgemnet is somewhat subjective. Perhaps you could use a 5000 Kelvin light box to view the slides. Add then there's the secreen and printer I'm not an expert at all in colour management. But I know it's very tricky - you must have the whole system calibrated to the same profiles etc. Takle a look at this: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/understanding-series/und-print-m gmt.shtml or this: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/digital1.shtml This is a local company, who made colour management their business: http://www.pixl.dk/index.htm All the best Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: arie07 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 24. januar 2005 15:08 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Scanning VELVIA slides with the HP S20 Scanning Velvia 100 Slides with HP S20 I am scanning a bunch of Slides from a trip to the US SouthWest and have been having trouble matching colors lightness to look on the screen as they look in the slide. http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=466206. I tried the original HP scanning software and Hamrick's Vuescan. Have any of you any tips for me? Thanks Leo - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 6:28 AM Subject: pentax-discuss-d Digest V05 #99 -- Content-Type: text/plain pentax-discuss-d Digest Volume 05 : Issue 99 Today's Topics: Re: PP: Digital Grain [ William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] RE: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one [ Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one [ William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] RE: MZ-S: what is a good price ? [ Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Scanner Comparison[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Digital anguish [ David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PP: Digital Grain [ Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Scanner Comparison[ David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] RE: Camera Lust! [ Antti-Pekka Virjonen antti-pekka ] Re: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one [ Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PP: Digital Grain [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PESO:nLet's Bar B Q [ Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Digital grain and dogmatism [ Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PESO:nLet's Bar B Q [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Digital grain and dogmatism [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] AW: AW: Digital anguish [ Michael Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] AW: :Re: 135mm lenses - quality ? [ Michael Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Dogmatism: what is allowed? [ Michael Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed? [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] -- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:23:38 -0600 From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: PP: Digital Grain Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit - Original Message - From: Rob Studdert Subject: Re: PP: Digital Grain I'd love to be proven wrong but I suspect the prints you speak of though resolute would look pretty bad up against prints produced using studio MF digital work-flows these days. Paul? Can you help us out here? I do wonder how much of the errors you speak of would actually be measurable by any means short of a microdensitometer. For all that, there is a lushness to large film contact prints that I find hard to describe in words, but once you see it, you no longer need the explanation. William Robb -- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:32:36 +0100 From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one ? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The good thing about shooting didgatal is that, if the exposure is wrong, you''l find out. About Tamrons success: Since autofocus have prevailed, the sale of Adaptall lenses(mounts must have declined dramatictly. I am buying the KA adapter from Jim,, so I'll get a chance to check it out on my 'ist D before relying on it for film cameras. Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: m.s.gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 23. januar 2005 14:27 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one ? i have two tamron adapters K
RE: Scanning VELVIA slides with the HP S20
Perhaps this was made for You: http://www.charlottecamera.com/detail.asp?p=23721 Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: arie07 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 24. januar 2005 15:08 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Scanning VELVIA slides with the HP S20 Scanning Velvia 100 Slides with HP S20 I am scanning a bunch of Slides from a trip to the US SouthWest and have been having trouble matching colors lightness to look on the screen as they look in the slide. http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=466206. I tried the original HP scanning software and Hamrick's Vuescan. Have any of you any tips for me? Thanks Leo - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 6:28 AM Subject: pentax-discuss-d Digest V05 #99 -- Content-Type: text/plain pentax-discuss-d Digest Volume 05 : Issue 99 Today's Topics: Re: PP: Digital Grain [ William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] RE: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one [ Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one [ William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] RE: MZ-S: what is a good price ? [ Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Scanner Comparison[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Digital anguish [ David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PP: Digital Grain [ Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Scanner Comparison[ David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] RE: Camera Lust! [ Antti-Pekka Virjonen antti-pekka ] Re: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one [ Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PP: Digital Grain [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PESO:nLet's Bar B Q [ Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Digital grain and dogmatism [ Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PESO:nLet's Bar B Q [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Digital grain and dogmatism [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] AW: AW: Digital anguish [ Michael Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] AW: :Re: 135mm lenses - quality ? [ Michael Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Dogmatism: what is allowed? [ Michael Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed? [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] -- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:23:38 -0600 From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: PP: Digital Grain Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit - Original Message - From: Rob Studdert Subject: Re: PP: Digital Grain I'd love to be proven wrong but I suspect the prints you speak of though resolute would look pretty bad up against prints produced using studio MF digital work-flows these days. Paul? Can you help us out here? I do wonder how much of the errors you speak of would actually be measurable by any means short of a microdensitometer. For all that, there is a lushness to large film contact prints that I find hard to describe in words, but once you see it, you no longer need the explanation. William Robb -- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:32:36 +0100 From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one ? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The good thing about shooting didgatal is that, if the exposure is wrong, you''l find out. About Tamrons success: Since autofocus have prevailed, the sale of Adaptall lenses(mounts must have declined dramatictly. I am buying the KA adapter from Jim,, so I'll get a chance to check it out on my 'ist D before relying on it for film cameras. Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: m.s.gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 23. januar 2005 14:27 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one ? i have two tamron adapters K and KA and long list of tamron lenses.Whenever i put prime/zooms with KA adapter on MZ5 lens locked at minimum AE, received over exposure in programme mode the reason combination of aperture leafes and shutter. Few years back Tamron introduced a P adapter for program Carl Zeiss contax bodies. At that time i had AX and was willing to purchase this adapter but in another forum this P adapter was discussed in detail but results were the same overexposure in P and SP mode. For instance Contax MM lenses function in all mode on their P bodies but Yashica lenses (a subsidiary of Kyocera) only do AE/M modes. It is
RE: Scanning VELVIA slides with the HP S20
I use Eye One - with more or less success: http://world.i1color.com/Perhaps Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: arie07 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 24. januar 2005 15:08 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Scanning VELVIA slides with the HP S20 Scanning Velvia 100 Slides with HP S20 I am scanning a bunch of Slides from a trip to the US SouthWest and have been having trouble matching colors lightness to look on the screen as they look in the slide. http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=466206. I tried the original HP scanning software and Hamrick's Vuescan. Have any of you any tips for me? Thanks Leo - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 6:28 AM Subject: pentax-discuss-d Digest V05 #99 -- Content-Type: text/plain pentax-discuss-d Digest Volume 05 : Issue 99 Today's Topics: Re: PP: Digital Grain [ William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] RE: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one [ Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one [ William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] RE: MZ-S: what is a good price ? [ Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Scanner Comparison[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Digital anguish [ David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PP: Digital Grain [ Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Scanner Comparison[ David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] RE: Camera Lust! [ Antti-Pekka Virjonen antti-pekka ] Re: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one [ Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PP: Digital Grain [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PESO:nLet's Bar B Q [ Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Digital grain and dogmatism [ Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: More Dog Stuff[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PESO:nLet's Bar B Q [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Digital grain and dogmatism [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] AW: AW: Digital anguish [ Michael Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] AW: :Re: 135mm lenses - quality ? [ Michael Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Dogmatism: what is allowed? [ Michael Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed? [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] -- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:23:38 -0600 From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: PP: Digital Grain Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit - Original Message - From: Rob Studdert Subject: Re: PP: Digital Grain I'd love to be proven wrong but I suspect the prints you speak of though resolute would look pretty bad up against prints produced using studio MF digital work-flows these days. Paul? Can you help us out here? I do wonder how much of the errors you speak of would actually be measurable by any means short of a microdensitometer. For all that, there is a lushness to large film contact prints that I find hard to describe in words, but once you see it, you no longer need the explanation. William Robb -- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:32:36 +0100 From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one ? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The good thing about shooting didgatal is that, if the exposure is wrong, you''l find out. About Tamrons success: Since autofocus have prevailed, the sale of Adaptall lenses(mounts must have declined dramatictly. I am buying the KA adapter from Jim,, so I'll get a chance to check it out on my 'ist D before relying on it for film cameras. Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: m.s.gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 23. januar 2005 14:27 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one ? i have two tamron adapters K and KA and long list of tamron lenses.Whenever i put prime/zooms with KA adapter on MZ5 lens locked at minimum AE, received over exposure in programme mode the reason combination of aperture leafes and shutter. Few years back Tamron introduced a P adapter for program Carl Zeiss contax bodies. At that time i had AX and was willing to purchase this adapter but in another forum this P adapter was discussed in detail but results were the same overexposure in P and SP mode. For instance Contax MM lenses function in all mode on their P bodies but Yashica lenses (a subsidiary of Kyocera) only do AE/M modes. It is obvious
Re: Scanning VELVIA slides with the HP S20
arie07 wrote on 24.01.05 15:07: I am scanning a bunch of Slides from a trip to the US SouthWest and have been having trouble matching colors lightness to look on the screen as they look in the slide. http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=466206. I tried the original HP scanning software and Hamrick's Vuescan. Have any of you any tips for me? [BIG CUT...] Could you please cut off all of the digest in your future posts please??? Thank you. -- Balance is the ultimate good... Best Regards Sylwek
Re: Scanning VELVIA slides with the HP S20
- Original Message - From: arie07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 8:07 AM Subject: Scanning VELVIA slides with the HP S20 Scanning Velvia 100 Slides with HP S20 I am scanning a bunch of Slides from a trip to the US SouthWest and have been having trouble matching colors lightness to look on the screen as they look in the slide. http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=466206. I tried the original HP scanning software and Hamrick's Vuescan. Have any of you any tips for me? Thanks Leo Sure, find a website dedicated to the art and science of film scanning, and quote entire digests there. another digest snipped for brevity. Some people have no manners William Robb End of pentax-discuss-d Digest V05 Issue #99
