Re: To get K30/2.8 ?
I don't know, I think so but then I'm biased, also I think I got a bargain when I picked the one I have up for under $200.00 USD. At 03:30 AM 12/16/2002 -0800, you wrote: I am thinking about getting a K30/2.8. But its price could let me have also-good K35/3.5 and K28/3.5 plus remaining money in my pocket. I am not a collector. Is it still reasonable to have K30? _ Weight Loss products, Herbal Viagra, and much more!http://www.VitaDepot.com _ Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get [EMAIL PROTECTED] w/No Ads, 6MB, POP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag
RE: To get K30/2.8 ?
this guy's prices are insane. I've picked up many of the lenses he lists for 1/3 to 1/2 his quotes on ebay. JCO > -Original Message- > From: Paul Franklin Stregevsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 7:26 AM > To: 'Pentax-Discuss' > Subject: Re: To get K30/2.8 ? > > > There's a 30/2.8K in Mint- for $375 at http://www.kevincameras.com . > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
Re: To get K30/2.8 ?
There's a 30/2.8K in Mint- for $375 at http://www.kevincameras.com . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: To get K30/2.8 ?
If you can handle the cost, it can be an excellent strategy to purchase one "in-between" focal length in place of two. I was going nuts choosing between my Zenitar 20/2.5K and my Pentax SMC 24/2.8K. I sold both when I found a Carl Zeiss Jena 20/2.8K that's more like 22mm. (The Jena is actually an M42 screwmount to which someone has permanently fitted a K mount. It has the Auto/Manual switch and the view grows dim when you stop down in Manual.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] <>
Re: To get K30/2.8 ?
I am thinking about getting a K30/2.8. But its price could let me have also-good K35/3.5 and K28/3.5 plus remaining money in my pocket. I am not a collector. Is it still reasonable to have K30? Tough choice. First I thought it's better to have two lenses and choose the focal lenght according to the needs of the moment. But 2.8 is 2/3 of stop faster than 3.5 and 30mm is a good compromise, almost a 28mm... But what others said stands, so wait for a better priced 30mm and then sell the 28mm and/or the 35mm to pay for it. Andre --
Re: To get K30/2.8 ?
I am not a collector but I own a 30/2.8 which immediatly became my second most used lens. I was not really happy with the K 28/3.5 which I found a little too big and heavy for what it was. If you buy it from KEH, $450 is a bit pricey though... Thibault Grouas. « Frankie Lee » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > I am thinking about getting a K30/2.8. But its price could let me have > also-good K35/3.5 and K28/3.5 plus remaining money in my pocket. > > I am not a collector. Is it still reasonable to have K30?
Re: To get K30/2.8 ?
Frankie, I sold a SMC Pentax-M 35mm f/2.0 and SMC K Pentax 28mm f/3.5 to purchase a SMC Pentax K 30mm f/2.8 and have not regretted the decision. I did not perform any formal tests, but I feel the images the K 30mm produces are superior to the M 35mm and K 28mm. If you can find a K 30mm at a reasonable price, I would recommend you purchase it... Regards, Jose R. Rodriguez > > From: Frankie Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2002/12/16 Mon AM 05:30:20 CST > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: To get K30/2.8 ? > > I am thinking about getting a K30/2.8. But its price could let me have also-good >K35/3.5 and K28/3.5 plus remaining money in my pocket. > > I am not a collector. Is it still reasonable to have K30? > > _ > Weight Loss products, Herbal Viagra, and much more!http://www.VitaDepot.com > > _ > Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get [EMAIL PROTECTED] w/No Ads, 6MB, >POP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag > >
Re: To get K30/2.8 ?
--- Frankie Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am thinking about getting a K30/2.8. But its price > could let me have also-good K35/3.5 and K28/3.5 plus > remaining money in my pocket. > > I am not a collector. Is it still reasonable to have > K30? Keh has a couple of K28/3.5s at ~$100 and $80 (EX+ and EX condition). They've got an EX+ 30/2.8 for ~$450. I think it would be far wiser to the K35/3.5 and K28/3.5 (or M version of that one) and wait until you can find a good deal on the 30/2.8. Mark __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Re: To get K30/2.8 ?
Hi Frankie, I have all three and would not part with any of them. The choice is yours and the fact that the 30s are hard to find and expensive, I would go after either the 28 or 35mm. Actually, any of the three will be hard to find. Bob Rapp - Original Message - From: "Frankie Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:30 PM Subject: To get K30/2.8 ? > I am thinking about getting a K30/2.8. But its price could let me have also-good K35/3.5 and K28/3.5 plus remaining money in my pocket. > > I am not a collector. Is it still reasonable to have K30? > > _ > Weight Loss products, Herbal Viagra, and much more!http://www.VitaDepot.com > > _ > Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get [EMAIL PROTECTED] w/No Ads, 6MB, POP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag >
