Re: When good photographers do bad things
I prefer B by a narrow margin, but like them both very much. Paul On Oct 11, 2004, at 11:29 PM, Chris Brogden wrote: I love A. Not crazy about B. T, OTOH... :) Chris On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:20:45 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Caveman Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Just for the fun of it: http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/_IGP5595a.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/_IGP5595b.jpg Say Bill do you like the Cave-filtermatic ? I like b more than a. b..
RE: When good photographers do bad things
I figured you were. It's OK, I get it a lot. Dave -Original Message- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 11:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things I was just funnin' you. I've been through Boise, seemed like a nice town. Lovely scenery close by. Met a very nice family from there last month. William Robb
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Yea, yea, yea, and the check is in the mail. Dario Bonazza wrote: Software will fix that, removing noise, red-eye, moles, flaws, tattoos, eyeballs, hair and moustache from pictures, depending on your chosen settings :-) Dario - Original Message - From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:52 PM Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Caveman wrote on 11.10.04 17:51: While you're probably right on the MP figure, looking at current trends I suspect no one would ever bother to address the noise issues. Who knows? Technology changes fast. Maybe someone will develop CCD (or CMOS or whatever) manufacturing technology that will reduce noise significantly? -- Best Regards Sylwek -- I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Bill's in Canada, OSHA isn't allowed to operate there, for which he should be eternally thankful. Graywolf wrote: The girl on the ladder should have been wearing steel toed boots. OSHA will be by to fine you for workplace safety violations. -- William Robb wrote: Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb -- I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke
Re: When good photographers do bad things
More Cavo filtering: http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf1.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf2.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf3.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf4.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf5.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf6.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf7.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf8.jpg Based on original images from Bill's recent gallery. Yes I like that hat. Cheers !
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Some of these are improvements on the originals. I rather like cf1 an cf2. On the other hand someone has way too much time on his hands... Caveman wrote: More Cavo filtering: http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf1.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf2.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf3.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf4.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf5.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf6.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf7.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf8.jpg Based on original images from Bill's recent gallery. Yes I like that hat. Cheers ! -- I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Peter J. Alling wrote: Some of these are improvements on the originals. I rather like cf1 an cf2. Then you'll probably like: http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cf9.jpg too. (just uploaded it). On the other hand someone has way too much time on his hands... I can do this all day long. Only problem is that Wheatfield Willie uploaded them at dismall size. To aggravate it, he also framed quite low, so I need to crop the space above the model's head. So I get something like 400 pixels tall images to start with. Say Bill any chance that I could get some decent res like 1024x768 ? Cheers !
Re: When good photographers do bad things
- Original Message - From: Caveman Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things More Cavo filtering: Cool. b...
Re: When good photographers do bad things
- Original Message - From: Caveman Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Say Bill any chance that I could get some decent res like 1024x768 ? Nope. Sorry. William Robb
Re: When good photographers do bad things
The literal minded sure know how to screw up a joke. -- Peter J. Alling wrote: Bill's in Canada, OSHA isn't allowed to operate there, for which he should be eternally thankful. Graywolf wrote: The girl on the ladder should have been wearing steel toed boots. OSHA will be by to fine you for workplace safety violations. -- William Robb wrote: Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb -- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
Re: When good photographers do bad things
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:15:38 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb Keeps timing out on me. It seems that I'm missing out on some naughty bits? Dear me... -frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Re: When good photographers do bad things
so, it is true: istD *is* a chick magnet! mishka On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:15:38 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb
Re: When good photographers do bad things
I find some of them quite nice. The topless girl with the black hat is stunning. Some lovely pics of her. Paul On Oct 11, 2004, at 1:15 AM, William Robb wrote: Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb
Re: When good photographers do bad things
On 10/10/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ OK Robb, that does it. Now I officially hate you. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _
Re: When good photographers do bad things
- Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things I find some of them quite nice. The topless girl with the black hat is stunning. Some lovely pics of her. Thanks Paul. Bill
Re: When good photographers do bad things
- Original Message - From: Peter J. Alling Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Just started to look but shouldn't that be When good things happen to bad photographers? After seeing my gobo sitting there big as life in some of the shots, the term bad photographer takes on a whole new meaning. I forgot to mention in my first post that these are straight from the camera files, resized for the web. William Robb
Re: When good photographers do bad things
- Original Message - From: Mishka Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things so, it is true: istD *is* a chick magnet! Yup, and that slow buffer that I have been cursing has become a bit of a friend. William (Pigboy) Robb
Re: When good photographers do bad things
I may move back to Canada to study wild life. Regards, Bob... --- No mans life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in session. -- Mark Twain From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Mishka said: so, it is true: istD *is* a chick magnet! well it certainly attracted some of the list wimmen to buy it ... ERN
Re: When good photographers do bad things
I like the look of the girl in: IGP5534 IGP5554, etc. as well as the girl in: gp5323, etc. I think some of the shots presented here would benefit from a bit of cropping that would move the models a bit off center of the picture. (I also must admit to finding the many tattoos quite a bit distracting or disturbing.) Thanks, Lasse - Original Message - From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 8:15 AM Subject: When good photographers do bad things Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb
Re: When good photographers do bad things
And my wife is already after it. I'm not sure she can be described as a chick, though :-) As a side note, that's very good news, because when in 2009 or so Pentax will finally introduce a high end DSLR, I can quickly get it and pass my *istD to the wife. Dario - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 3:54 PM Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Mishka said: so, it is true: istD *is* a chick magnet! well it certainly attracted some of the list wimmen to buy it ... ERN
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Dario Bonazza wrote on 11.10.04 17:22: As a side note, that's very good news, because when in 2009 or so Pentax will finally introduce a high end DSLR, I can quickly get it and pass my *istD to the wife. Are you sure Margherita would want this outdated (then) camera? By that time the cheapest compact digicams will have 16MPix with noise at iso3200 equal to that at iso200 in *istD :-) -- Best Regards Sylwek
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Lasse Karlsson wrote: I think some of the shots presented here would benefit from a bit of cropping that would move the models a bit off center of the picture. N ! Editorial space is good ;-) (just waiting for Cotty to use it ;-) (I also must admit to finding the many tattoos quite a bit distracting or disturbing.) Duh. You getting too old. Say Bill any chance of some tatoos close-ups ? ;-)
Re: When good photographers do bad things
While you're probably right on the MP figure, looking at current trends I suspect no one would ever bother to address the noise issues. Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: By that time the cheapest compact digicams will have 16MPix with noise at iso3200 equal to that at iso200 in *istD :-)
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Caveman wrote on 11.10.04 17:51: While you're probably right on the MP figure, looking at current trends I suspect no one would ever bother to address the noise issues. Who knows? Technology changes fast. Maybe someone will develop CCD (or CMOS or whatever) manufacturing technology that will reduce noise significantly? -- Best Regards Sylwek
Re: When good photographers do bad things
I'm not going to make any specific ccomments, most of these are more than acceptable for pose and expression, there were many that I thought that the composition could be improved by getting closer to the subject, and not centering the center of attention. But as Cotty said, I now officially hate you. William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: Peter J. Alling Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Just started to look but shouldn't that be When good things happen to bad photographers? After seeing my gobo sitting there big as life in some of the shots, the term bad photographer takes on a whole new meaning. I forgot to mention in my first post that these are straight from the camera files, resized for the web. William Robb -- I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Sure I won't tell her :-) Dario - Original Message - From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:47 PM Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Dario Bonazza wrote on 11.10.04 17:22: As a side note, that's very good news, because when in 2009 or so Pentax will finally introduce a high end DSLR, I can quickly get it and pass my *istD to the wife. Are you sure Margherita would want this outdated (then) camera? By that time the cheapest compact digicams will have 16MPix with noise at iso3200 equal to that at iso200 in *istD :-) -- Best Regards Sylwek
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Software will fix that, removing noise, red-eye, moles, flaws, tattoos, eyeballs, hair and moustache from pictures, depending on your chosen settings :-) Dario - Original Message - From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:52 PM Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Caveman wrote on 11.10.04 17:51: While you're probably right on the MP figure, looking at current trends I suspect no one would ever bother to address the noise issues. Who knows? Technology changes fast. Maybe someone will develop CCD (or CMOS or whatever) manufacturing technology that will reduce noise significantly? -- Best Regards Sylwek
Re: When good photographers do bad things
i like the eyeballs option. mishka On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:05:44 +0200, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Software will fix that, removing noise, red-eye, moles, flaws, tattoos, eyeballs, hair and moustache from pictures, depending on your chosen settings :-) Dario - Original Message - From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:52 PM Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Caveman wrote on 11.10.04 17:51: While you're probably right on the MP figure, looking at current trends I suspect no one would ever bother to address the noise issues. Who knows? Technology changes fast. Maybe someone will develop CCD (or CMOS or whatever) manufacturing technology that will reduce noise significantly? -- Best Regards Sylwek
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Good stuff, Bill. I love the ones with the flag in the background. I guess for commerical purposes it's good to leave a lot of space for the copywriters to do their thing, but I'm partial to closer shots myself. Looks like it was a pretty fun day. :) How'd you swing the job? I didn't know you advertised your services. Chris On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:15:38 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb
Re: When good photographers do bad things
N ! Editorial space is good ;-) (just waiting for Cotty to use it ;-) hopefully not mark. i can imagine: and now for ms. frankenstein: what dremel can do for your figure in just 15 minutes... mishka
Re: When good photographers do bad things
On 11/10/04, Caveman, discombobulated, unleashed: N ! Editorial space is good ;-) (just waiting for Cotty to use it ;-) Lack of time! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Noise reduction will be a thing of the past, superseded by Noise removal. However, you'll have to ascertain to set noise removal on (while setting nose removal off :-) I've been told that Pentax is already working on a clothes reduction function, useful for Bill Robb's calendar, but I'm afraid Canon will soon introduce a Clothes Full Removal function (only made possible by their unique hi-performance USM) built in the new EF-CFR series lenses ;°) Dario - Original Message - From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 6:39 PM Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things i like the eyeballs option. mishka On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:05:44 +0200, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Software will fix that, removing noise, red-eye, moles, flaws, tattoos, eyeballs, hair and moustache from pictures, depending on your chosen settings :-) Dario - Original Message - From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:52 PM Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Caveman wrote on 11.10.04 17:51: While you're probably right on the MP figure, looking at current trends I suspect no one would ever bother to address the noise issues. Who knows? Technology changes fast. Maybe someone will develop CCD (or CMOS or whatever) manufacturing technology that will reduce noise significantly? -- Best Regards Sylwek
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Nice hat. I also like the see-through camo in front of the Stars and Bars.
Re: When good photographers do bad things
OSHA has no jurisdiction in Canada. :-) Bill - Original Message - From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 4:13 PM Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things The girl on the ladder should have been wearing steel toed boots. OSHA will be by to fine you for workplace safety violations. -- William Robb wrote: Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb -- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
RE: When good photographers do bad things
Several of these look quite nice. My first big shoot with my istD was with a professional model and I definitely found it easy to take too many photos. -Original Message- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 11:16 PM To: Pentax Discuss Subject: When good photographers do bad things Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb
RE: When good photographers do bad things
Buffers full, just stand there naked for a minute while the camera catches up said the photog, grinning sheepishly. -Original Message- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 7:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things - Original Message - From: Mishka Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things so, it is true: istD *is* a chick magnet! Yup, and that slow buffer that I have been cursing has become a bit of a friend. William (Pigboy) Robb
Re: When good photographers do bad things
- Original Message - From: Dave Madsen Subject: RE: When good photographers do bad things Buffers full, just stand there naked for a minute while the camera catches up said the photog, grinning sheepishly. Woops, were off in bufferland We'll just reast for a minute.. So, you said you are from MooseJaw? WW
Re: When good photographers do bad things
On 11 Oct 2004 at 17:47, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: Are you sure Margherita would want this outdated (then) camera? By that time the cheapest compact digicams will have 16MPix with noise at iso3200 equal to that at iso200 in *istD :-) Har, they will end up including a legacy sensitivity mode using integrated ND filters to simulate IE50 for making those crazy old time shallow focus shots :-) Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Naah, all the craze will be to find on e-bay a *film* camera then find some film then spend the weekend in the bathroom developing it... with smuggled chemicals Rob Studdert wrote: Are you sure Margherita would want this outdated (then) camera? By that time the cheapest compact digicams will have 16MPix with noise at iso3200 equal to that at iso200 in *istD :-) Har, they will end up including a legacy sensitivity mode using integrated ND filters to simulate IE50 for making those crazy old time shallow focus shots
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:15:38 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb Don't mean to rain on your parade, but actually, I expected better. ;( The corners and angles were distracting. The poses were pretty amateur ish. (Inexperienced models doesn't help. I understand that.) The outdoor profile shots showed off her tummy. You've done much better with your models in the past. I know you enjoy ta, but your skills are better than that. (just trying to be helpful practical) Collin You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the relationship the greater the impact. Howard Hendricks
Re: When good photographers do bad things
OK, here some comments from the Cave (quite a few, I don't want to have to explain to cavewoman why I keep looking at naked pics instead of eating the turkey). http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/pages/_IGP5386.html For this to be successful, you need near perfect symmetry, I'd say that you composed/framed quite negligently (yes I know it was digital, it's so easy to press the button without double-checking everything). http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/pages/_IGP5595.html This would work great with some Cavo-filter, like pencil hatches. Would piss off Cotty to death. But I can definitely see that you're on to something promising ;-) http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/pages/_igp5402.html Now here you nearly got something interesting with that background. Unfortunately you were too lazy to crouch and took the shots from your full body height (subsequent pics are even worse). http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/pages/_igp5905.html I like that hat. Maybe used in the previously commented pic ? http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/pages/_igp5977.html Cave idea for that background: have the lady stand on top on rectangular thing, facing the wall. Frame to have just her legs on the support (50% legs 50% support) and the column at right. Nice play of vertical lines. Or even some wild diagonal. Will be back after the turkey. Cheers ! BTW any chance to take a peek at the full res versions ? ;-)
Re: When good photographers do bad things
- Original Message - From: Collin R Brendemuehl Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Don't mean to rain on your parade, but actually, I expected better. ;( Sorry to dissapoint. The corners and angles were distracting. I think with some judicious cropping I can make them work. These are straight off the camera. The poses were pretty amateur ish. (Inexperienced models doesn't help. I understand that.) Inexperienced photographer too. I spend most of my shooting life taking pictures of rocks.. The outdoor profile shots showed off her tummy. BW, but it's a cute tummy. You've done much better with your models in the past. I know you enjoy ta, but your skills are better than that. (just trying to be helpful practical) In this case, I am taking my ta and enjoying it G L8R b...
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Just for the fun of it: http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/_IGP5595a.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/_IGP5595b.jpg Say Bill do you like the Cave-filtermatic ?
RE: When good photographers do bad things
Moose Jaw? Hmmm, no, Boise...Idaho... -Original Message- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things So, you said you are from MooseJaw? WW
Re: When good photographers do bad things
- Original Message - From: Caveman Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Just for the fun of it: http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/_IGP5595a.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/_IGP5595b.jpg Say Bill do you like the Cave-filtermatic ? I like b more than a. b..
Re: When good photographers do bad things
- Original Message - From: Dave Madsen Subject: RE: When good photographers do bad things Moose Jaw? Hmmm, no, Boise...Idaho... I didn't think anyone was from Boise. WW
Re: When good photographers do bad things
I love A. Not crazy about B. T, OTOH... :) Chris On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:20:45 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Caveman Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things Just for the fun of it: http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/_IGP5595a.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/_IGP5595b.jpg Say Bill do you like the Cave-filtermatic ? I like b more than a. b..
Re: When good photographers do bad things
on 10/10/04 10:15 PM, William Robb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb You have some great ones in there...especially considering you were not working with pros (I know how much work that can be). Fortunately the subject matter makes up it. I think you will have a winner of a calendar. By the way...I really like how your use of the hat as a prop...very nice. David
RE: When good photographers do bad things
Anyone on the list, or anyone in general? lol... The funny thing is that this is a photography town in a big way. Idaho Camera has 5 stores in a town of only 60k people they are full service stores with professional gear. One even carries Hasselblad, Mamiya, and, yes even Pentax mdeium format cameras in stock. The #1 selling camera brand in Boise? Pentax! We may not do much in Boise, but we're doing our best to keep Pentax alive. Dave -Original Message- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 9:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things - Original Message - From: Dave Madsen Subject: RE: When good photographers do bad things Moose Jaw? Hmmm, no, Boise...Idaho... I didn't think anyone was from Boise. WW
Re: When good photographers do bad things
- Original Message - From: David Madsen Subject: RE: When good photographers do bad things Anyone on the list, or anyone in general? I was just funnin' you. I've been through Boise, seemed like a nice town. Lovely scenery close by. Met a very nice family from there last month. William Robb
Re: When good photographers do bad things
Just started to look but shouldn't that be When good things happen to bad photographers? William Robb wrote: Or not. Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday. Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat underorganized. Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little in some pictures) clothing. If partial nudity and suggestive posing offends you, don't click the link. http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/ William Robb -- I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke
