RE: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-23 Thread Paul Ewins
The possums in my area are all ringtails, however one of my friends is
looking after an orphaned brushtail. They're very cute when young, but
like most Australian wildlife will make good use of their claws when
older. He also has a juvenile wombat, and the family resemblance between
possums, wombats and kangaroos is quite noticeable when they are young.
As they mature the head changes shape, but when young they are quite
similar.

Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia

-Original Message-
From: Christian Skofteland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, 23 June 2003 11:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, species.

For Virginia opossum: Kingdom: Animalia, Phylum: Chordata, (sub-phylum:
Vertebrata), Class: Mamalia, Order: Marsupalia, Family: Didelphidae,
Genus:
Didelphis, species: virginiana.

For Brushtail possum:  Kingdom: Animalia, Phylum: Chordata, (sub-phylum:
Vertebrata), Class: Mamalia, Order: Marsupalia, Family: Phalangeridae,
Genus: Trichosurus, species: vulpecula.

The opossums in your yard in California are Virginia opossums that were
introduced there.  They are not native, but quite happy to terrorize
the
countryside.

Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)


 Are the 'possums I see in my backyard, here in So. Calif., also
Virginia
'possums?

 No, seriously!

 Christian wrote:
 
 [. . .]

  To be clear: Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana - N. America) is
a
  different species from Brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula -
Australia).
  They are in the same order of mammals: marsupalia,  but different
families.
  Incidentally, there are several species of possums in Australia, and
at
  least three species of opossum in North and South America (only one
in
North
  America).

 How's it parse out?
 My book says Mammalia are classes of Vertebrates, which is one of
the
 sub-phyla of Chordata, which in turn belongs to the sub-kingdom of
 Metazoa, kingdom of animals.
 Where does species fit?

 That's what I was trying to say before, but didn't know how to split
up
 the classification.
 Interesting to know opposums are not just one species. Never knew
that.

 keith

  It's true that in North America, i.e.: the United States, some
people,
in a
  regional dialect, call it a 'possum, but they are refering to the
Virginia
  opossum which is its correct common name.  Just like some people
call
  raccoons, 'coons, etc, etc.
 
  Christian


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.488 / Virus Database: 287 - Release Date: 5/06/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.488 / Virus Database: 287 - Release Date: 5/06/2003
 



Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-21 Thread Lon Williamson
I'm with him too.  Best OT post so far.
A shutter speed of 1/2000 or greater should be sufficient.
Jostein wrote:
Hey, Dan!
I'm with you. We should make some buttons and T-shirts.
Jostein
- Original Message - 
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)



STOP PLATE TECTONICS!



Back in 1970, I had a geology professor who, at that time, was not

convinced

of plate tectonics.








Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-21 Thread Steve Desjardins
All I know about opossums is that they're ugly son of a bitches and
they're good to eat.


The correct plural is sons of bitches.  I team teach a course with a
colleague of mine, and I always remind students of this before they fill
out the course evaluations. 8^)



Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread jerome
 The Virginia opossum is a true
 marsupial with a well developed pouch.  It is the only 
 North American marsupial.  There are several in South 
 America, which at one point, was attached to Australia 
 and floating free in the Pacific ocean until they 
 separated and S. America joined N. America via Central America.  

I find it amazing that both raccoons and opossums (neither of which are native 
to north america) have done so will on this continent. As many of these 
critters as you say, it's hard to believe that they're not from 'round these 
parts. But the further north you go, the more evident it becomes when you 
study these animals that they are not made for north american winters. You 
can see very ugly signs of frostbite and remnants of harsh winters all over 
them (ears, tails, and extremities in particular)... or maybe I'm just getting 
too damn close g.

Armadillos are a distant third in the successful migration to N.A. category... 
but it seems like more and more of them are making their way thru the south 
east. I was totally amazed at how many of these I saw on the highway while 
driving from GA to LA about a month ago.



Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Andre Langevin
Yep.  Didelphis virginiana (Virginia opossum).  note that it is opossum with
an o unlike the Aussie possum (no o).  The Virginia opossum is a true
marsupial with a well developed pouch.  It is the only North American
marsupial.  There are several in South America, which at one point, was
attached to Australia and floating free in the Pacific ocean until they
separated and S. America joined N. America via Central America.  When this
happened, S. American mammals (mostly marsupials) headed north and N.
American mammals (mostly placentals) headed south.  In the end, the
placental mammals faired much better in both regions so there are fewer
marsupial in the Americas.  (If you believe in that sort of thing, what with
plate tectonics, evolution, etc)
Christian
I met only one person who did not believe in plate tectonics.  I 
don't think it is a question of believing.  It is simply the best 
theory available, as with Bering Straight migration as the main 
source of migrants.  As an inside, there was an Argentinian 
paleontologist who said he could prove that man appeared first in 
Argentina but could never show his bony proofs.  In that case it was 
a question of believing...

Andre
--


Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Bill Owens
 There are several in South America, which at one point, was
 attached to Australia and floating free in the Pacific ocean until they
 separated and S. America joined N. America via Central America. 

IIRC that woud have been Gondwanaland (sp).

I knew studying geology would be helpful sometime

Bill



Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Bill Owens
 I met only one person who did not believe in plate tectonics.  I
 don't think it is a question of believing.  It is simply the best
 theory available, as with Bering Straight migration as the main
 source of migrants.  As an inside, there was an Argentinian
 paleontologist who said he could prove that man appeared first in
 Argentina but could never show his bony proofs.  In that case it was
 a question of believing...

 Andre

Back in 1970, I had a geology professor who, at that time, was not convinced
of plate tectonics.

Bill




Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread T Rittenhouse
Actually, the theory I like is: The earth was once a moon of Jupiter that
got hit by a giant nickel iron meteor which smashed into the core of that
moon raising the temperature to the point where meteor melted. The collision
knocked the earth out of its orbit around Jupiter and it finally stabilized
in its present orbit. Since the planet is now much larger than it was before
the collision the surface broke up and the land masses are spread out
farther apart than before. Also since the mass of the planet is more than
twice what it was prior to collision the gravity is also more than it was
back then. The increased gravity broke the backs of all the dinosaurs
causing them to become extinct. The lower gravity was the reason the
dinosaurs could be large.

Then about 50-100 thousand years ago, a giant spaceship parked in orbit
around the earth. There was a mutiny and all the crew was stranded down here
and are out ancestors.

Strangely, I find the above no more unbelievable than I do plate tectonics
or genesis.

Points to anyone who can name the books these theories came from.

Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto


- Original Message -
From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)


 Yep.  Didelphis virginiana (Virginia opossum).  note that it is opossum
with
 an o unlike the Aussie possum (no o).  The Virginia opossum is a true
 marsupial with a well developed pouch.  It is the only North American
 marsupial.  There are several in South America, which at one point, was
 attached to Australia and floating free in the Pacific ocean until they
 separated and S. America joined N. America via Central America.  When
this
 happened, S. American mammals (mostly marsupials) headed north and N.
 American mammals (mostly placentals) headed south.  In the end, the
 placental mammals faired much better in both regions so there are fewer
 marsupial in the Americas.  (If you believe in that sort of thing, what
with
 plate tectonics, evolution, etc)
 
 Christian

 I met only one person who did not believe in plate tectonics.  I
 don't think it is a question of believing.  It is simply the best
 theory available, as with Bering Straight migration as the main
 source of migrants.  As an inside, there was an Argentinian
 paleontologist who said he could prove that man appeared first in
 Argentina but could never show his bony proofs.  In that case it was
 a question of believing...

 Andre
 --





Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Dr E D F Williams
Oh for goodness sake! There is good solid evidence in support of plate
tectonics. The edges of the plates we can get at have the same rock
formation, minerals and fossils as the matching ones now very far away. Do
you believe that mountain ranges were pushed up? Look at the folded ones.
You can see irrefutable evidence that they were. Why is the surface of the
earth rising in places and falling in others? Mountains still growing
upwards? Land still sinking? Because the crust of the earth is floating
about on a molten sea. This makes the inhabitants of San Francisco very
nervous.

In other words, Plate Tectonics is science. Genesis is a chapter in a very
silly story-book.

I'm not going to go on with this.

Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002


- Original Message -
From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)


 Actually, the theory I like is: The earth was once a moon of Jupiter that
 got hit by a giant nickel iron meteor which smashed into the core of that
 moon raising the temperature to the point where meteor melted. The
collision
 knocked the earth out of its orbit around Jupiter and it finally
stabilized
 in its present orbit. Since the planet is now much larger than it was
before
 the collision the surface broke up and the land masses are spread out
 farther apart than before. Also since the mass of the planet is more than
 twice what it was prior to collision the gravity is also more than it was
 back then. The increased gravity broke the backs of all the dinosaurs
 causing them to become extinct. The lower gravity was the reason the
 dinosaurs could be large.

 Then about 50-100 thousand years ago, a giant spaceship parked in orbit
 around the earth. There was a mutiny and all the crew was stranded down
here
 and are out ancestors.

 Strangely, I find the above no more unbelievable than I do plate tectonics
 or genesis.

 Points to anyone who can name the books these theories came from.

 Ciao,
 Graywolf
 http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto


 - Original Message -
 From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:22 AM
 Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)


  Yep.  Didelphis virginiana (Virginia opossum).  note that it is opossum
 with
  an o unlike the Aussie possum (no o).  The Virginia opossum is a
true
  marsupial with a well developed pouch.  It is the only North American
  marsupial.  There are several in South America, which at one point, was
  attached to Australia and floating free in the Pacific ocean until they
  separated and S. America joined N. America via Central America.  When
 this
  happened, S. American mammals (mostly marsupials) headed north and N.
  American mammals (mostly placentals) headed south.  In the end, the
  placental mammals faired much better in both regions so there are fewer
  marsupial in the Americas.  (If you believe in that sort of thing, what
 with
  plate tectonics, evolution, etc)
  
  Christian
 
  I met only one person who did not believe in plate tectonics.  I
  don't think it is a question of believing.  It is simply the best
  theory available, as with Bering Straight migration as the main
  source of migrants.  As an inside, there was an Argentinian
  paleontologist who said he could prove that man appeared first in
  Argentina but could never show his bony proofs.  In that case it was
  a question of believing...
 
  Andre
  --
 






Re: (o)possums

2003-06-20 Thread Caveman
As the church told us and it couldn't be wrong because it was spreading 
 God's word, the earth was initially flat. Than some prankster made it 
round, apparently with no other purpose than pissing off the inquisition 
 and making the kangaroos stand upside down. The foldings are 
inevitable when you try to wrap a plane sheet on a round shaped body - 
try wrapping a ball with a sheet of paper and see what happens.

cheers,
caveman
Dr E D F Williams wrote:
Oh for goodness sake! There is good solid evidence in support of plate
tectonics. The edges of the plates we can get at have the same rock
formation, minerals and fossils as the matching ones now very far away. Do
you believe that mountain ranges were pushed up? Look at the folded ones.
You can see irrefutable evidence that they were. Why is the surface of the
earth rising in places and falling in others? Mountains still growing
upwards? Land still sinking? Because the crust of the earth is floating
about on a molten sea. This makes the inhabitants of San Francisco very
nervous.
In other words, Plate Tectonics is science. Genesis is a chapter in a very
silly story-book.
I'm not going to go on with this.

Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
- Original Message -
From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)


Actually, the theory I like is: The earth was once a moon of Jupiter that
got hit by a giant nickel iron meteor which smashed into the core of that
moon raising the temperature to the point where meteor melted. The
collision

knocked the earth out of its orbit around Jupiter and it finally
stabilized

in its present orbit. Since the planet is now much larger than it was
before

the collision the surface broke up and the land masses are spread out
farther apart than before. Also since the mass of the planet is more than
twice what it was prior to collision the gravity is also more than it was
back then. The increased gravity broke the backs of all the dinosaurs
causing them to become extinct. The lower gravity was the reason the
dinosaurs could be large.
Then about 50-100 thousand years ago, a giant spaceship parked in orbit
around the earth. There was a mutiny and all the crew was stranded down
here

and are out ancestors.

Strangely, I find the above no more unbelievable than I do plate tectonics
or genesis.
Points to anyone who can name the books these theories came from.

Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)


Yep.  Didelphis virginiana (Virginia opossum).  note that it is opossum
with

an o unlike the Aussie possum (no o).  The Virginia opossum is a
true

marsupial with a well developed pouch.  It is the only North American
marsupial.  There are several in South America, which at one point, was
attached to Australia and floating free in the Pacific ocean until they
separated and S. America joined N. America via Central America.  When
this

happened, S. American mammals (mostly marsupials) headed north and N.
American mammals (mostly placentals) headed south.  In the end, the
placental mammals faired much better in both regions so there are fewer
marsupial in the Americas.  (If you believe in that sort of thing, what
with

plate tectonics, evolution, etc)

Christian
I met only one person who did not believe in plate tectonics.  I
don't think it is a question of believing.  It is simply the best
theory available, as with Bering Straight migration as the main
source of migrants.  As an inside, there was an Argentinian
paleontologist who said he could prove that man appeared first in
Argentina but could never show his bony proofs.  In that case it was
a question of believing...
Andre
--









Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Bill Owens
Not to mention that South America and Africa, and Africa and Madagascar fit
together like a jigsaw.  IIRC, the theory is that eventually Los Angeles
will be a neighboring city of Anchorage.

Bill

- Original Message - 
From: Dr E D F Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)


 Oh for goodness sake! There is good solid evidence in support of plate
 tectonics. The edges of the plates we can get at have the same rock
 formation, minerals and fossils as the matching ones now very far away. Do
 you believe that mountain ranges were pushed up? Look at the folded ones.
 You can see irrefutable evidence that they were. Why is the surface of the
 earth rising in places and falling in others? Mountains still growing
 upwards? Land still sinking? Because the crust of the earth is floating
 about on a molten sea. This makes the inhabitants of San Francisco very
 nervous.

 In other words, Plate Tectonics is science. Genesis is a chapter in a very
 silly story-book.

 I'm not going to go on with this.

 Don
 ___
 Dr E D F Williams
 http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
 Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
 Updated: March 30, 2002


 - Original Message -
 From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:01 PM
 Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)


  Actually, the theory I like is: The earth was once a moon of Jupiter
that
  got hit by a giant nickel iron meteor which smashed into the core of
that
  moon raising the temperature to the point where meteor melted. The
 collision
  knocked the earth out of its orbit around Jupiter and it finally
 stabilized
  in its present orbit. Since the planet is now much larger than it was
 before
  the collision the surface broke up and the land masses are spread out
  farther apart than before. Also since the mass of the planet is more
than
  twice what it was prior to collision the gravity is also more than it
was
  back then. The increased gravity broke the backs of all the dinosaurs
  causing them to become extinct. The lower gravity was the reason the
  dinosaurs could be large.
 
  Then about 50-100 thousand years ago, a giant spaceship parked in orbit
  around the earth. There was a mutiny and all the crew was stranded down
 here
  and are out ancestors.
 
  Strangely, I find the above no more unbelievable than I do plate
tectonics
  or genesis.
 
  Points to anyone who can name the books these theories came from.
 
  Ciao,
  Graywolf
  http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:22 AM
  Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)
 
 
   Yep.  Didelphis virginiana (Virginia opossum).  note that it is
opossum
  with
   an o unlike the Aussie possum (no o).  The Virginia opossum is a
 true
   marsupial with a well developed pouch.  It is the only North American
   marsupial.  There are several in South America, which at one point,
was
   attached to Australia and floating free in the Pacific ocean until
they
   separated and S. America joined N. America via Central America.  When
  this
   happened, S. American mammals (mostly marsupials) headed north and N.
   American mammals (mostly placentals) headed south.  In the end, the
   placental mammals faired much better in both regions so there are
fewer
   marsupial in the Americas.  (If you believe in that sort of thing,
what
  with
   plate tectonics, evolution, etc)
   
   Christian
  
   I met only one person who did not believe in plate tectonics.  I
   don't think it is a question of believing.  It is simply the best
   theory available, as with Bering Straight migration as the main
   source of migrants.  As an inside, there was an Argentinian
   paleontologist who said he could prove that man appeared first in
   Argentina but could never show his bony proofs.  In that case it was
   a question of believing...
  
   Andre
   --
  
 
 







Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Andre Langevin
In other words, Plate Tectonics is science. Genesis is a chapter in a very
silly story-book.
I'm not going to go on with this.

Don
Genesis, I'd rather say, is myth of origin in a very popular 
moralistic book.  Science has its own myth of origin, the Big Bang, 
constantly evolving though...  which make it more interesting.  Other 
myths of origin (in some amazonian cultures at least) are also 
evolving.

Andre
--


Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
STOP PLATE TECTONICS!


 Back in 1970, I had a geology professor who, at that time, was not convinced
 of plate tectonics.



Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Keith Whaley
Don't hold to that belief too strongly, Christian.
Most of the time, back when writers respected English language roots,
they spelled opossum like 'possum, because the o was dropped in speech.
That's called an 'aphesis.' 
Look it up. 

Both are the same creature. 
Some folks spell him differently, depending on where they came from! smile

keith whaley

Christian Skofteland wrote:
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  BTW are American opossums marsupials?  The possums of Oceania definitely
  are.
 
  regards,
  Anthony Farr
 
 Yep.  Didelphis virginiana (Virginia opossum).  note that it is opossum with
 an o unlike the Aussie possum (no o).  The Virginia opossum is a true
 marsupial with a well developed pouch.  It is the only North American
 marsupial.  There are several in South America, which at one point, was
 attached to Australia and floating free in the Pacific ocean until they
 separated and S. America joined N. America via Central America.  When this
 happened, S. American mammals (mostly marsupials) headed north and N.
 American mammals (mostly placentals) headed south.  In the end, the
 placental mammals faired much better in both regions so there are fewer
 marsupial in the Americas.  (If you believe in that sort of thing, what with
 plate tectonics, evolution, etc)
 
 Christian



Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Anthony Farr
I've seen pictures of opossums, and they look different enough to Aussie
possums to have prompted my original question

regards,
Anthony Farr

- Original Message - 
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Don't hold to that belief too strongly, Christian.
 Most of the time, back when writers respected English language roots,
 they spelled opossum like 'possum, because the o was dropped in speech.
 That's called an 'aphesis.'
 Look it up.

 Both are the same creature.
 Some folks spell him differently, depending on where they came from!
smile

 keith whaley




Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Paul Stenquist
All I know about opossums is that they're ugly son of a bitches and
they're good to eat.
Paul

Keith Whaley wrote:
 
 Are the 'possums I see in my backyard, here in So. Calif., also Virginia 'possums?
 
 No, seriously!
 
 Christian wrote:
 
 [. . .]
 
  To be clear: Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana - N. America) is a
  different species from Brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula - Australia).
  They are in the same order of mammals: marsupalia,  but different families.
  Incidentally, there are several species of possums in Australia, and at
  least three species of opossum in North and South America (only one in North
  America).
 
 How's it parse out?
 My book says Mammalia are classes of Vertebrates, which is one of the
 sub-phyla of Chordata, which in turn belongs to the sub-kingdom of
 Metazoa, kingdom of animals.
 Where does species fit?
 
 That's what I was trying to say before, but didn't know how to split up
 the classification.
 Interesting to know opposums are not just one species. Never knew that.
 
 keith
 
  It's true that in North America, i.e.: the United States, some people, in a
  regional dialect, call it a 'possum, but they are refering to the Virginia
  opossum which is its correct common name.  Just like some people call
  raccoons, 'coons, etc, etc.
 
  Christian



Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Steve Larson
Hey Bill,
 That Gondwanaland thing always stumped me (doesn`t take much).
 If all the continents were on one side of the Earth, they`re trying to tell
me that on the other side it was only water? There had to be other
continents
that subducted on the other side, no?  Just trying to figure it out.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California


- Original Message - 
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)


 There are several in South America, which at one point, was
  attached to Australia and floating free in the Pacific ocean until they
  separated and S. America joined N. America via Central America.

 IIRC that woud have been Gondwanaland (sp).

 I knew studying geology would be helpful sometime

 Bill




Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)

2003-06-20 Thread Steve Larson
 I had a geology professor in 1976 that said we would be able to predict
earthquakes in about 10 years. Hehe.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California


- Original Message - 
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: (o)possums (was: Agfa Competition)


 STOP PLATE TECTONICS!


  Back in 1970, I had a geology professor who, at that time, was not
convinced
  of plate tectonics.