Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-04 Thread Nick Clark
I have very few problems with the AF360FGZ or AF140C on the *istD. As good as 
with the MZ-S.

Nick

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
My AF400T is reasonably good on TTL with the *istD, although I have to say 
it is a bit better on the LX.
Paul

 



Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-03 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, William Robb wrote:

 Shot within 20 seconds or so of each other..
 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/PDMLtemp/

I have all sympathy for any kind of malfunctioning the camera
suffered. I would have blown a transistor or three in its place.

Not an expert in anything, but I think you have too much space to fill
with the flash. Did you get TTL-flash confirmation in the first one
for example?

The pro in a friend's wedding in October was using a Nikon D. He told
me that flash is all over the place.

Kostas



Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-03 Thread Thibs
Don Sanderson a écrit :
I just took a series of shots using an M type lens at f5.6 and TTL
flash on the D in Manual Mode at 1/150 second and ISO 400.
I was about 4.5ft (1.5M) from the subject.
Used the pop up flash, room was very dimly lit.
At EC settings from -2.5 to +2.5 all of the shots are *uniformly*
overexposed.
What gives, does EC not affect TTL flash in manual?
What does one do in this situation?
TIA
Don


Maybe the prob come from Pentax using only old CW with flash rather than 
modern way of metering light?

--
Thibs


Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-03 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - 
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


Not an expert in anything, but I think you have too much space to 
fill
with the flash. Did you get TTL-flash confirmation in the first one
for example?
I'm not an expert either, but I know that my Metz 60 flash is dead on 
accurate if using it's internal sensor, TTL is not bad with the LX, 
or Super Program, is very good with the MZ-5, and is all over the 
place with the istD.
The situation I was shooting should have been doable with the 
equipment I was using.

William Robb




Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-03 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - 
From: Thibs 
Subject: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


Maybe the prob come from Pentax using only old CW with flash rather 
than modern way of metering light?

Get real.
My 20 year old LX (centre weighted) is more accurate than my istD.
My Super program (centre weighted) was more accurate than my istD.
My wife's MZ-5 (not the newer MZ-5n) is more accurate than my istD.
I am of the opinion that the problem is the new technology isn't as 
reliable as the old.

William Robb 




Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-03 Thread pnstenquist
My AF400T is reasonably good on TTL with the *istD, although I have to say it 
is a bit better on the LX.
Paul


 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
 Subject: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?
 
 
 
  Not an expert in anything, but I think you have too much space to 
  fill
  with the flash. Did you get TTL-flash confirmation in the first one
  for example?
 
 I'm not an expert either, but I know that my Metz 60 flash is dead on 
 accurate if using it's internal sensor, TTL is not bad with the LX, 
 or Super Program, is very good with the MZ-5, and is all over the 
 place with the istD.
 The situation I was shooting should have been doable with the 
 equipment I was using.
 
 William Robb
 
 
 
 



RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-03 Thread Jens Bladt
I have made some test shots (emailed to a list member) with my *ist D and
the AF500FTZ flash, using TTL-flash metering.
I have used P, P(Tv), P(Av) and M settings. And quite frankly, I can't seem
to get one faulty exposure no matter what I do, except perhaps from shots
where the flash is out of range (long distance).
I have even tried to set the camera to Auto Sensivity Correction if out of
range - which means auto ISO setting if necessary. This didn't cause any
bad exposures either - I still got good exposures. All shots were very
usable and the exposure would at the most be perhaps 0.3 or stop or less
off.

How come?
What am I doing wrong here?
What must I do to get some wrong exposures, like everyone else seem to get?
Am I the only one who has a *ist D, that works just like most other Pentax
cameras, manufactured after 1983 (P-series exempted)?

I guess I'll have to do more tests with different flashes.
If I'm lucky I may be able to get bad exposures too.
I would really hate to be the only one on the list who own a Pentax *ist D,
that does TTL-flash flawlessly!

Jens Bladt


mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. december 2004 00:21
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


It does. Z-1/Z1p did too.
I don't understand all this exposure failure talk about the TTL-flash and
the *ist D. My *ist D works pretty much exactly like any other TTL-flash
system I have used (Super A, PZ-1/PZ-1p and MZ-S). I have noticed small
diffrerences depending on which FLASH I use. My AF280T over exposes just a
little, but my all my different Metz flahses hit bulls eye IMO. So I can't
really complanin about the camera. Works fine for me!

Could there be any custom setting, that will influence this - perhaps an
auto sensivity (ISO) setting ?

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 2. december 2004 23:11
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?



- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


I just took a series of shots using an M type lens at f5.6 and TTL
 flash on the D in Manual Mode at 1/150 second and ISO 400.
 I was about 4.5ft (1.5M) from the subject.
 Used the pop up flash, room was very dimly lit.

 At EC settings from -2.5 to +2.5 all of the shots are *uniformly*
 overexposed.
 What gives, does EC not affect TTL flash in manual?
 What does one do in this situation?

Welcome to the wonderful world of TTL flash, Pentax style.

William Robb







RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-03 Thread Christian
Jens, I'm with you.  I have not had one bad exposure (that wasn't my 
fault; out of range, too small an aperture) with the ist D and flash.

-- 
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jens Bladt wrote on 12/3/2004, 2:33 PM:

  I have made some test shots (emailed to a list member) with my *ist D and
  the AF500FTZ flash, using TTL-flash metering.
  I have used P, P(Tv), P(Av) and M settings. And quite frankly, I can't
  seem
  to get one faulty exposure no matter what I do, except perhaps from shots
  where the flash is out of range (long distance).
  I have even tried to set the camera to Auto Sensivity Correction if
  out of
  range - which means auto ISO setting if necessary. This didn't cause any
  bad exposures either - I still got good exposures. All shots were very
  usable and the exposure would at the most be perhaps 0.3 or stop or less
  off.
 
  How come?
  What am I doing wrong here?
  What must I do to get some wrong exposures, like everyone else seem to
  get?
  Am I the only one who has a *ist D, that works just like most other
  Pentax
  cameras, manufactured after 1983 (P-series exempted)?
 
  I guess I'll have to do more tests with different flashes.
  If I'm lucky I may be able to get bad exposures too.
  I would really hate to be the only one on the list who own a Pentax
  *ist D,
  that does TTL-flash flawlessly!
 
  Jens Bladt




RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-03 Thread Jens Bladt
Thank God, Christan!
Jens

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. december 2004 20:40
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


Jens, I'm with you.  I have not had one bad exposure (that wasn't my
fault; out of range, too small an aperture) with the ist D and flash.

--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jens Bladt wrote on 12/3/2004, 2:33 PM:

  I have made some test shots (emailed to a list member) with my *ist D and
  the AF500FTZ flash, using TTL-flash metering.
  I have used P, P(Tv), P(Av) and M settings. And quite frankly, I can't
  seem
  to get one faulty exposure no matter what I do, except perhaps from shots
  where the flash is out of range (long distance).
  I have even tried to set the camera to Auto Sensivity Correction if
  out of
  range - which means auto ISO setting if necessary. This didn't cause any
  bad exposures either - I still got good exposures. All shots were very
  usable and the exposure would at the most be perhaps 0.3 or stop or less
  off.
 
  How come?
  What am I doing wrong here?
  What must I do to get some wrong exposures, like everyone else seem to
  get?
  Am I the only one who has a *ist D, that works just like most other
  Pentax
  cameras, manufactured after 1983 (P-series exempted)?
 
  I guess I'll have to do more tests with different flashes.
  If I'm lucky I may be able to get bad exposures too.
  I would really hate to be the only one on the list who own a Pentax
  *ist D,
  that does TTL-flash flawlessly!
 
  Jens Bladt






RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-03 Thread Don Sanderson
Jens, see what luck you have with the built in flash.
I'll duplicate the tests with the 360 and the 500 and see what happens.
(Thanks for the samples)


Don

 -Original Message-
 From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:34 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


 I have made some test shots (emailed to a list member) with my *ist D and
 the AF500FTZ flash, using TTL-flash metering.
 I have used P, P(Tv), P(Av) and M settings. And quite frankly, I
 can't seem
 to get one faulty exposure no matter what I do, except perhaps from shots
 where the flash is out of range (long distance).
 I have even tried to set the camera to Auto Sensivity Correction
 if out of
 range - which means auto ISO setting if necessary. This didn't cause any
 bad exposures either - I still got good exposures. All shots were very
 usable and the exposure would at the most be perhaps 0.3 or stop or less
 off.

 How come?
 What am I doing wrong here?
 What must I do to get some wrong exposures, like everyone else
 seem to get?
 Am I the only one who has a *ist D, that works just like most other Pentax
 cameras, manufactured after 1983 (P-series exempted)?

 I guess I'll have to do more tests with different flashes.
 If I'm lucky I may be able to get bad exposures too.
 I would really hate to be the only one on the list who own a
 Pentax *ist D,
 that does TTL-flash flawlessly!

 Jens Bladt


 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sendt: 3. december 2004 00:21
 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Emne: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


 It does. Z-1/Z1p did too.
 I don't understand all this exposure failure talk about the TTL-flash and
 the *ist D. My *ist D works pretty much exactly like any other TTL-flash
 system I have used (Super A, PZ-1/PZ-1p and MZ-S). I have noticed small
 diffrerences depending on which FLASH I use. My AF280T over exposes just a
 little, but my all my different Metz flahses hit bulls eye IMO. So I can't
 really complanin about the camera. Works fine for me!

 Could there be any custom setting, that will influence this - perhaps an
 auto sensivity (ISO) setting ?

 Jens Bladt
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sendt: 2. december 2004 23:11
 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Emne: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?



 - Original Message -
 From: Don Sanderson
 Subject: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


 I just took a series of shots using an M type lens at f5.6 and TTL
  flash on the D in Manual Mode at 1/150 second and ISO 400.
  I was about 4.5ft (1.5M) from the subject.
  Used the pop up flash, room was very dimly lit.
 
  At EC settings from -2.5 to +2.5 all of the shots are *uniformly*
  overexposed.
  What gives, does EC not affect TTL flash in manual?
  What does one do in this situation?

 Welcome to the wonderful world of TTL flash, Pentax style.

 William Robb








RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-03 Thread Jens Bladt
I Just tried the RTF: Same result, just a bit greater variations, thoug. I
got one tiny overexposure (still within the acceptable) at f4 (open). This
is not an issue to me. I would never use the RTF for anything else than a
fill in flash. Never as the main light source (I own more TTL flashes than
cameras).

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. december 2004 20:57
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


Jens, see what luck you have with the built in flash.
I'll duplicate the tests with the 360 and the 500 and see what happens.
(Thanks for the samples)


Don

 -Original Message-
 From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:34 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


 I have made some test shots (emailed to a list member) with my *ist D and
 the AF500FTZ flash, using TTL-flash metering.
 I have used P, P(Tv), P(Av) and M settings. And quite frankly, I
 can't seem
 to get one faulty exposure no matter what I do, except perhaps from shots
 where the flash is out of range (long distance).
 I have even tried to set the camera to Auto Sensivity Correction
 if out of
 range - which means auto ISO setting if necessary. This didn't cause any
 bad exposures either - I still got good exposures. All shots were very
 usable and the exposure would at the most be perhaps 0.3 or stop or less
 off.

 How come?
 What am I doing wrong here?
 What must I do to get some wrong exposures, like everyone else
 seem to get?
 Am I the only one who has a *ist D, that works just like most other Pentax
 cameras, manufactured after 1983 (P-series exempted)?

 I guess I'll have to do more tests with different flashes.
 If I'm lucky I may be able to get bad exposures too.
 I would really hate to be the only one on the list who own a
 Pentax *ist D,
 that does TTL-flash flawlessly!

 Jens Bladt


 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sendt: 3. december 2004 00:21
 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Emne: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


 It does. Z-1/Z1p did too.
 I don't understand all this exposure failure talk about the TTL-flash and
 the *ist D. My *ist D works pretty much exactly like any other TTL-flash
 system I have used (Super A, PZ-1/PZ-1p and MZ-S). I have noticed small
 diffrerences depending on which FLASH I use. My AF280T over exposes just a
 little, but my all my different Metz flahses hit bulls eye IMO. So I can't
 really complanin about the camera. Works fine for me!

 Could there be any custom setting, that will influence this - perhaps an
 auto sensivity (ISO) setting ?

 Jens Bladt
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sendt: 2. december 2004 23:11
 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Emne: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?



 - Original Message -
 From: Don Sanderson
 Subject: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


 I just took a series of shots using an M type lens at f5.6 and TTL
  flash on the D in Manual Mode at 1/150 second and ISO 400.
  I was about 4.5ft (1.5M) from the subject.
  Used the pop up flash, room was very dimly lit.
 
  At EC settings from -2.5 to +2.5 all of the shots are *uniformly*
  overexposed.
  What gives, does EC not affect TTL flash in manual?
  What does one do in this situation?

 Welcome to the wonderful world of TTL flash, Pentax style.

 William Robb










Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-02 Thread David Nelson
What gives, does EC not affect TTL flash in manual?
Exactly my experience... however I've found that it's generally pretty 
accurate. It's just those few situations where it refuses to cooperate!

What does one do in this situation?
If you're using the inbuilt flash... cover part of it up or similar. If 
using an off-camera flash, point it partly away for example... pretty 
crude but hey, what's the review screen for (-:



Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-02 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - 
From: Don Sanderson 
Subject: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


I just took a series of shots using an M type lens at f5.6 and TTL
flash on the D in Manual Mode at 1/150 second and ISO 400.
I was about 4.5ft (1.5M) from the subject.
Used the pop up flash, room was very dimly lit.
At EC settings from -2.5 to +2.5 all of the shots are *uniformly*
overexposed.
What gives, does EC not affect TTL flash in manual?
What does one do in this situation?
Welcome to the wonderful world of TTL flash, Pentax style.
William Robb


RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-02 Thread Jens Bladt
It does. Z-1/Z1p did too.
I don't understand all this exposure failure talk about the TTL-flash and
the *ist D. My *ist D works pretty much exactly like any other TTL-flash
system I have used (Super A, PZ-1/PZ-1p and MZ-S). I have noticed small
diffrerences depending on which FLASH I use. My AF280T over exposes just a
little, but my all my different Metz flahses hit bulls eye IMO. So I can't
really complanin about the camera. Works fine for me!

Could there be any custom setting, that will influence this - perhaps an
auto sensivity (ISO) setting ?

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 2. december 2004 23:11
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?



- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


I just took a series of shots using an M type lens at f5.6 and TTL
 flash on the D in Manual Mode at 1/150 second and ISO 400.
 I was about 4.5ft (1.5M) from the subject.
 Used the pop up flash, room was very dimly lit.

 At EC settings from -2.5 to +2.5 all of the shots are *uniformly*
 overexposed.
 What gives, does EC not affect TTL flash in manual?
 What does one do in this situation?

Welcome to the wonderful world of TTL flash, Pentax style.

William Robb





RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-02 Thread Don Sanderson
Jens, have you tried this in Manual mode with
an M lens on the D?
I'll look around in the setup and see what I can find.
I saw NO exposure difference over 5 stops!

Don

 -Original Message-
 From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:21 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


 It does. Z-1/Z1p did too.
 I don't understand all this exposure failure talk about the TTL-flash and
 the *ist D. My *ist D works pretty much exactly like any other TTL-flash
 system I have used (Super A, PZ-1/PZ-1p and MZ-S). I have noticed small
 diffrerences depending on which FLASH I use. My AF280T over exposes just a
 little, but my all my different Metz flahses hit bulls eye IMO. So I can't
 really complanin about the camera. Works fine for me!

 Could there be any custom setting, that will influence this - perhaps an
 auto sensivity (ISO) setting ?

 Jens Bladt
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sendt: 2. december 2004 23:11
 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Emne: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?



 - Original Message -
 From: Don Sanderson
 Subject: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


 I just took a series of shots using an M type lens at f5.6 and TTL
  flash on the D in Manual Mode at 1/150 second and ISO 400.
  I was about 4.5ft (1.5M) from the subject.
  Used the pop up flash, room was very dimly lit.
 
  At EC settings from -2.5 to +2.5 all of the shots are *uniformly*
  overexposed.
  What gives, does EC not affect TTL flash in manual?
  What does one do in this situation?

 Welcome to the wonderful world of TTL flash, Pentax style.

 William Robb






RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-02 Thread Don Sanderson
Just to make sure it wasn't lack of caffiene this
morning, I tried this again.

This time at f8/150th, ISO 400, 10ft (3 Meter) distance.
Built in flash, Manual mode, f8 set via aperture ring.

The histogram at -3.0 EC is virtually identical to the
one at +3.0 EC.
Wierd!

Don


 -Original Message-
 From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:41 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


 Jens, have you tried this in Manual mode with
 an M lens on the D?
 I'll look around in the setup and see what I can find.
 I saw NO exposure difference over 5 stops!

 Don

  -Original Message-
  From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:21 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?
 
 
  It does. Z-1/Z1p did too.
  I don't understand all this exposure failure talk about the
 TTL-flash and
  the *ist D. My *ist D works pretty much exactly like any other TTL-flash
  system I have used (Super A, PZ-1/PZ-1p and MZ-S). I have noticed small
  diffrerences depending on which FLASH I use. My AF280T over
 exposes just a
  little, but my all my different Metz flahses hit bulls eye IMO.
 So I can't
  really complanin about the camera. Works fine for me!
 
  Could there be any custom setting, that will influence this - perhaps an
  auto sensivity (ISO) setting ?
 
  Jens Bladt
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
 
 
  -Oprindelig meddelelse-
  Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sendt: 2. december 2004 23:11
  Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Emne: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Don Sanderson
  Subject: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?
 
 
  I just took a series of shots using an M type lens at f5.6 and TTL
   flash on the D in Manual Mode at 1/150 second and ISO 400.
   I was about 4.5ft (1.5M) from the subject.
   Used the pop up flash, room was very dimly lit.
  
   At EC settings from -2.5 to +2.5 all of the shots are *uniformly*
   overexposed.
   What gives, does EC not affect TTL flash in manual?
   What does one do in this situation?
 
  Welcome to the wonderful world of TTL flash, Pentax style.
 
  William Robb
 
 
 




Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-02 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - 
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


 I don't understand all this exposure failure talk about the 
 TTL-flash and
the *ist D.
Shot within 20 seconds or so of each other..
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/PDMLtemp/
This is typical of how Pentax TTL flash exposure works for me. You 
will note the exposure is correct in one of the four pictures.

William Robb 




Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-02 Thread Graywolf
What's this?
I can't believe my lens.
Wow!
Oh, I'm supposed to be setting the exposure.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---

William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

 I don't understand all this exposure failure talk about the  
TTL-flash and
the *ist D.

Shot within 20 seconds or so of each other..
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/PDMLtemp/
This is typical of how Pentax TTL flash exposure works for me. You will 
note the exposure is correct in one of the four pictures.

William Robb




Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-02 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - 
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?


What's this?
I can't believe my lens.
Wow!
Oh, I'm supposed to be setting the exposure.
Right.
This stupid calender is being both lots of fun, and at the same time, 
one of the dumbest things I have ever been involved in.

William Robb 




Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?

2004-12-02 Thread Doug Franklin
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:42:15 -0600, William Robb wrote:

 You will note the exposure is correct in one of the four pictures.

I could live with two of the exposures.

TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ