RE: Me and Bobby McGee
It's just right on the 3.5" screen of my PDA! Nick -Original Message- From: "Shel Belinkoff"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 26/01/04 19:31:05 To: "PDML"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Me and Bobby McGee Just a little snap from a few nights ago. I'd be interested in how the description appears on your monitors ... is it easily readable, too big/small ... Thanks for looking, IAC ... http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/mcgee.html shel
RE: Me and Bobby McGee
> -Original Message- > From: John Coyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I know, Tom, we've all done it - but they still do nothing to > me emotionally! I guess I see this sort of shot as maybe > being useful for album or CD covers, but that';s about it. > Am I perhaps a bit of a Philistine here? Um. I don't know. They don't do anything for me emotionally either...but I still have this urge to print them at 30x40 on metallic paper. Some things are just pretty. tv
RE: Me and Bobby McGee
I do the occasional blob shot too - http://www.bigdayphoto.com/fuzz/ Sometimes pretty colors are ok! tv > -Original Message- > From: John Coyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 2:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Me and Bobby McGee > > Shel, it's just blobs of light with no meaning conveyed to > me, at least. I prefer something a little more recognisable > in photography - otherwise, I guess it's 'Modern Art', in a > different medium! > > John Coyle > Brisbane, Australia > - Original Message -
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
Absolutely, Mark ... I've been shooting scenes through rain streaked windows and windshields for years. In fact, the very first photos I took, with some kind of little "box" camera, was through the rain spattered windshield of the family car at night ... photographing street lights. They didn't turn out too well. One of the reasons I used the digi that night was because I couldn't get the pics I wanted at the Hotsy Totsy Club, and I needed some instant gratification. Ben & Jerry's would have worked, too, but I was too far from the B&J shoppe shel (wanting ice cream) Mark Cassino wrote: > But seriously - would you have taken that shot with a film camera?
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
Very cool, Shel... especially those white dots under the photo where the caption would normally be (Just funning..) But seriously - would you have taken that shot with a film camera? - MCC At 11:31 AM 1/26/2004 -0800, you wrote: Just a little snap from a few nights ago. I'd be interested in how the description appears on your monitors ... is it easily readable, too big/small ... Thanks for looking, IAC ... http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/mcgee.html shel - Mark Cassino Photography Kalamazoo, MI http://www.markcassino.com -
RE: Me and Bobby McGee
I read down that far and wasn't insulted, you must try harder... At 11:15 PM 1/26/04, you wrote: But, seriously, Folks, And, all joking aside, I can read the test just fine, Shel. And I like the shot, too (even though I know you didn't ask) (and, yes, I know that's just an opinion, not a critique). I was going to change the subject line, adding the letters (OT) for Off-Topic, (NPC) for Non Pentax Camera, (D) for Digital, (C/C) for Comment/Critique, (TQ) for Text Query, and (AIMCN) for Apparently It Made Christian Nauseous. That way, those not interested in those sorts of things needn't have wasted their time. Then I realized that no one of any importance reads my posts anyway... There, now I've insulted everyone who's read down this far - both of you. Off to bed now. cheers, frank "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Me and Bobby McGee Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:28:34 -0500 Shel, They let you drive? _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca I drink to make other people interesting. -- George Jean Nathan
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
Actually, no ... no license, no registration, no insurance ... and a restraining order stating that I must remain 100 yards from a vehicle at all times unless being driven and i am in the back seat, securely buckled in. That's why I only drive at night ... frank theriault wrote: > Shel, > > They let you drive? > > -frank
RE: Me and Bobby McGee
But, seriously, Folks, And, all joking aside, I can read the test just fine, Shel. And I like the shot, too (even though I know you didn't ask) (and, yes, I know that's just an opinion, not a critique). I was going to change the subject line, adding the letters (OT) for Off-Topic, (NPC) for Non Pentax Camera, (D) for Digital, (C/C) for Comment/Critique, (TQ) for Text Query, and (AIMCN) for Apparently It Made Christian Nauseous. That way, those not interested in those sorts of things needn't have wasted their time. Then I realized that no one of any importance reads my posts anyway... There, now I've insulted everyone who's read down this far - both of you. Off to bed now. cheers, frank "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Me and Bobby McGee Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:28:34 -0500 Shel, They let you drive? _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
RE: Me and Bobby McGee
Shel, They let you drive? -frank "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: PDML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Me and Bobby McGee Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:31:05 -0800 Just a little snap from a few nights ago. I'd be interested in how the description appears on your monitors ... is it easily readable, too big/small ... Thanks for looking, IAC ... http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/mcgee.html shel _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/photos&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
Yes, spilling some, that would definitely be alcohol abuse... At 03:40 PM 1/26/04, you wrote: You should never drink while driving ... you might spill some ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > BTW interesting shot.Could be used for an anti-- drink and drive ad . I drink to make other people interesting. -- George Jean Nathan
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
True, yet you passed judgment without an explanation. So, imo, it's not a critique, just an opinion. And there's nothing wrong with expressing an opinion, nothing at all. In fact, you yourself note that your comments were just an opinion. BTW, thanks for you far more in depth critique ... shel Christian wrote: >And If you notice from Shel's origianl post, he was not >directly asking forcritique or opinions on his picture just the text. > > I let him know that the font and text read fine on my monitor and then, as a > free (YES FREE! as in NO CHARGE TO YOU!) service, I provided an honest > opinion of my response (both physical and emotional) to his picture. He > should be thanking me for such a valuable service! ;-) > > Christian > OK, here's a "critique" of Shel's picture: The color, texture and > composition gave me a headache and made me nauseas. ;-) > For rain-through-the-windscreen shots, my favorite so far was in a PUG > gallery a while back. I'd send a link along but the PUG is dead...
RE: Me and Bobby McGee
> Yow! Is it too late to revoke my critique request? :) > Yep.You asked for it.LOL Dave
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
As do I..too:-) Dave BTW interesting shot.Could be used for an anti-- drink and drive ad . > As do I ... ;-)) > > Christian wrote: > > > I can read the description fine > > [...] > > > I feel better now ;-) > > >
RE: Me and Bobby McGee
Yow! Is it too late to revoke my critique request? :) > -Original Message- > From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 2:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Me and Bobby McGee > > > I can read the description fine (I'm running 1600x1200 on a 19" tube). > > The picture gave me a headache and made me nauseas. I have > since closed the > web browser and visited the restroom. I feel better now ;-) > > Christian
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
Looks fine to me, but then I have good eyes. I like the mood of the picture as well. Dead-eye Desjardins Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
It's fine here, Shel. Shel Belinkoff wrote: Just a little snap from a few nights ago. I'd be interested in how the description appears on your monitors ... is it easily readable, too big/small ... Thanks for looking, IAC ... http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/mcgee.html shel -- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com "You might as well accept people as they are, you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
It is a sans serif font on my monitor. Lemme check ... might have screwed up the HTML code. Bruce Dayton wrote: > Hello Shel, > > I can read it ok, but it is not that great. I would rather a sans > serif font or thinner. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > Monday, January 26, 2004, 11:31:05 AM, you wrote: > > SB> Just a little snap from a few nights ago. > SB> I'd be interested in how the description appears > SB> on your monitors ... is it easily readable, too big/small > SB> ... > > SB> Thanks for looking, IAC ... > > SB> http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/mcgee.html > > SB> shel
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
As do I ... ;-)) Christian wrote: > I can read the description fine [...] > I feel better now ;-) >
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
Hello Shel, I can read it ok, but it is not that great. I would rather a sans serif font or thinner. -- Best regards, Bruce Monday, January 26, 2004, 11:31:05 AM, you wrote: SB> Just a little snap from a few nights ago. SB> I'd be interested in how the description appears SB> on your monitors ... is it easily readable, too big/small SB> ... SB> Thanks for looking, IAC ... SB> http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/mcgee.html SB> shel
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
I can read the description fine (I'm running 1600x1200 on a 19" tube). The picture gave me a headache and made me nauseas. I have since closed the web browser and visited the restroom. I feel better now ;-) Christian - Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 2:31 PM Subject: Me and Bobby McGee > Just a little snap from a few nights ago. > I'd be interested in how the description appears > on your monitors ... is it easily readable, too big/small > ... > > Thanks for looking, IAC ... > > http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/mcgee.html > > shel >
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
Me And Bobby McGee was seen, in the description, on an 800x600 portable computer. BTW, a tripod would not have helped. Grin -Lon Shel Belinkoff wrote: Just a little snap from a few nights ago. I'd be interested in how the description appears on your monitors ... is it easily readable, too big/small ... Thanks for looking, IAC ... http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/mcgee.html shel
Re: Me and Bobby McGee
Reads fine but bigger would be better; nicely emotive pic; I'm off to liten to "Pearl" again. Big Brother p.s. I never really fancied visiting SF until you mentioned the Hotsy Totsy club. Now... Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > Just a little snap from a few nights ago. > I'd be interested in how the description appears > on your monitors ... is it easily readable, too big/small > ... > > Thanks for looking, IAC ... > > http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/mcgee.html > > shel
