Re: OT: Epson R800 or R1800

2006-10-11 Thread Adam Maas
I've compared prints from the R800 to my R320. They're indistinguishable 
(On Premium Luster paper with Epson ink). I'd not bother with either the 
R800 or 1800. Get a 220 or 320 for 8.5x11 and the R2400 for larger.

-Adam


Paul Sorenson wrote:
> Marnie -
> 
> I have the R800 and am very happy w/it.  I seldom have the need to print 
> anything larger than 8x10, so it fits my needs well  I haven't branched 
> out into papers other than the Epson series so I can't report how it 
> works w/other vendors papers.  Epson just updated the paper profiles for 
> the R800 so be sure to download the latest from their web site if you go 
> w/the R800.  BTW, both the R800 and R1800 use the same inkset.  I've 
> never had a problem w/clogging print heads, just be sure you turn it off 
> using its own switch when you're not using it.
> 
> Best Buy's walk-in prices are about a buck cheaper than anywhere else if 
> they have them in stock.  They may be available cheaper on the 'net.  If 
> you give OfficeMax an empty cartridge when you make a $3.00 or greater 
> purchase they'll either give you a free ream of paper or knock $3.00 of 
> the price of your purchase.
> 
> -P
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>>My Epson 925 is getting a bit elderly. Still works fine but technology has 
>>passed it by.
>>
>>I am contemplating entering a local art show. Various types of art, but also 
>>one can enter photography. It's a show/sale actually, I'd have to pay $10 for 
>>six feet of wall, which strikes me as not bad. A local civic arts program 
>>that 
>>is truly excellent. I don't really think I'd sell anything, but I think it 
>>would be sort of fun to do and it would also help support the program.
>>
>>Which means printing. I've been eyeing the Epson R1800, but not sure I really 
>>need to print 11x14s that often. I mean I am really attracted, but it's 
>>somewhat expensive. The R800 is $200 cheaper. Then there's the whole factor 
>>that 
>>the inks can run to a lot, although both used 8 cartridges, so one doesn't 
>>need 
>>to replace all the cartridges at one time, one can replace as needed. That I 
>>like.
>>
>>Anyone have experience with the R1800? Or the R800? Do you like it? What do 
>>you like? What do you not like?
>>
>>Thanks, Marnie 
>>
> 
> 
> 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Epson R800 or R1800

2006-10-11 Thread Paul Sorenson
Marnie -

I have the R800 and am very happy w/it.  I seldom have the need to print 
anything larger than 8x10, so it fits my needs well  I haven't branched 
out into papers other than the Epson series so I can't report how it 
works w/other vendors papers.  Epson just updated the paper profiles for 
the R800 so be sure to download the latest from their web site if you go 
w/the R800.  BTW, both the R800 and R1800 use the same inkset.  I've 
never had a problem w/clogging print heads, just be sure you turn it off 
using its own switch when you're not using it.

Best Buy's walk-in prices are about a buck cheaper than anywhere else if 
they have them in stock.  They may be available cheaper on the 'net.  If 
you give OfficeMax an empty cartridge when you make a $3.00 or greater 
purchase they'll either give you a free ream of paper or knock $3.00 of 
the price of your purchase.

-P

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My Epson 925 is getting a bit elderly. Still works fine but technology has 
> passed it by.
> 
> I am contemplating entering a local art show. Various types of art, but also 
> one can enter photography. It's a show/sale actually, I'd have to pay $10 for 
> six feet of wall, which strikes me as not bad. A local civic arts program 
> that 
> is truly excellent. I don't really think I'd sell anything, but I think it 
> would be sort of fun to do and it would also help support the program.
> 
> Which means printing. I've been eyeing the Epson R1800, but not sure I really 
> need to print 11x14s that often. I mean I am really attracted, but it's 
> somewhat expensive. The R800 is $200 cheaper. Then there's the whole factor 
> that 
> the inks can run to a lot, although both used 8 cartridges, so one doesn't 
> need 
> to replace all the cartridges at one time, one can replace as needed. That I 
> like.
> 
> Anyone have experience with the R1800? Or the R800? Do you like it? What do 
> you like? What do you not like?
> 
> Thanks, Marnie 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: OT: Epson R800 or R1800

2006-10-11 Thread Mat Maessen
On 10/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My Epson 925 is getting a bit elderly. Still works fine but technology has
> passed it by.

Heh, I know the feeling.

> Anyone have experience with the R1800? Or the R800? Do you like it? What do
> you like? What do you not like?

My local photo club has an R1800 in their digital "darkroom." I've
used it a couple of times. I haven't yet printed anything larger than
8x10 on it, but the output looked at least as good as my Epson 820's.
I'm still up in the air about the replacement for my 820, whether or
not I should get a wide-carriage printer. I don't print that large
very often, and chances are I can use the club's R1800 when I do.

-Mat

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net