Re: One more question about condensations

2007-11-17 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi!

You're probably right, Bill. It is just that I don't want to miss shots, 
you know. I am not going to have all too much time there...

But indeed, I may be over-reacting.

Boris


William Robb wrote:
> That works.
> Honestly though Boris, you are obsessing over very little. The climate I 
> have lived in all my life has a temperature range that reaches from 
> around -40ºC to +40ºC, and I have never had a piece of equipment go down to 
> condensation damage in the entire 35 or so years I have been playing at 
> being a photographer.
> The most that has happenned to me is that I have been slightly 
> inconvenienced while waiting for a lens to warm up enough that a film of 
> condensation evaporates.
> 
> William Robb 
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: One more question about condensations

2007-11-17 Thread Bob Sullivan
Boris,
What Bill said...
Inside the coat works too.
Regards,  Bob S.

On 11/17/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Boris Liberman"
> Subject: Re: One more question about condensations
>
>
> > Bill, Bob, I have been given another suggestion.
> >
> > What if I simply keep the camera inside my jacket and take it out to the
> > cold only to take a shot and then immediately shove it back in beneath
> > my jacket...
> >
> > I will probably make a mix of all the suggestions and see how it goes on
> > location.
>
> That works.
> Honestly though Boris, you are obsessing over very little. The climate I
> have lived in all my life has a temperature range that reaches from
> around -40ºC to +40ºC, and I have never had a piece of equipment go down to
> condensation damage in the entire 35 or so years I have been playing at
> being a photographer.
> The most that has happenned to me is that I have been slightly
> inconvenienced while waiting for a lens to warm up enough that a film of
> condensation evaporates.
>
> William Robb
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: One more question about condensations

2007-11-17 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Re: One more question about condensations


> Bill, Bob, I have been given another suggestion.
>
> What if I simply keep the camera inside my jacket and take it out to the
> cold only to take a shot and then immediately shove it back in beneath
> my jacket...
>
> I will probably make a mix of all the suggestions and see how it goes on
> location.

That works.
Honestly though Boris, you are obsessing over very little. The climate I 
have lived in all my life has a temperature range that reaches from 
around -40ºC to +40ºC, and I have never had a piece of equipment go down to 
condensation damage in the entire 35 or so years I have been playing at 
being a photographer.
The most that has happenned to me is that I have been slightly 
inconvenienced while waiting for a lens to warm up enough that a film of 
condensation evaporates.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: One more question about condensations

2007-11-17 Thread Cotty
On 17/11/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:

>What if I simply keep the camera inside my jacket and take it out to the 
>cold only to take a shot and then immediately shove it back in beneath 
>my jacket...

Excellent idea.

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: One more question about condensations

2007-11-17 Thread Cotty
On 17/11/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:

>Don't bother with hair dryers, all they do is blow dust into your camera, 
>have very little effect on drying the harmless exterior condensation, and 
>absolutely no effect on anything that forms on the inside.
>I don't think modern electronic cameras are as prone to condensive moisture 
>damage as older mechanical ones, either.

This may be fine advice with the camera, but have to disagree with
lenses. The hair dryer is not directly having an effect on the
condensation. What it is doing is warming up the glass, plastic and
metal that the lens is made of, which in turn evaporates the condensation.

Admittedly, the majority of non-professional situations will preclude
such drastic action. In my world, it's a seldom used necessity. My video
lenses are a business capital expenditures and will be replaced probably
about once every three or four years. Turning a hair dryer on them is no
worry to em and very effective.

If it were my stills camera and lenses, I wouldn't. I'd take bill's advice.

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: One more question about condensations

2007-11-17 Thread Boris Liberman
Bill, Bob, I have been given another suggestion.

What if I simply keep the camera inside my jacket and take it out to the 
cold only to take a shot and then immediately shove it back in beneath 
my jacket...

I will probably make a mix of all the suggestions and see how it goes on 
location.

Boris



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: One more question about condensations

2007-11-17 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: One more question about condensations


> Hi!
>
> Suppose I hadn't got lucky and condensation did occur.
>
> 1. What to do in case of just external condensation? Wipe it off and go 
> on?
>
> 2. What is internal elements of the lens suffer from condensation?
>
> 3. What about the sensor and the camera internals?
>
> I will probably take with me a small hair-blower (right word?) just in
> case, but still any advise will be appreciated.
>

I've had some experience with this. Condensation on the outside of the 
equipment should be wiped off, although it can also be fairly safely 
ignored, since it will correct itself eventually. Moisture inside the 
equipment can be more problematic, though even that will generally go away 
on it's own fairly soon after the gear warms back up.
This presumes that the gear is only slightly colder than freezing.
The colder the gear is, the more care should be taken to ensure it stays dry 
when taking it into a warm place. Plastic bags are all well and good, but 
wrapping the gear in a towel or an item of clothing such as a jacket will 
help keep water from condensing on the equipment.
Wrap an oversized scarf around your neck when you go outside, and wrap your 
camera in it before you go in. That should take care of most any problems 
you will run in to.
Don't bother with hair dryers, all they do is blow dust into your camera, 
have very little effect on drying the harmless exterior condensation, and 
absolutely no effect on anything that forms on the inside.
I don't think modern electronic cameras are as prone to condensive moisture 
damage as older mechanical ones, either.

William Robb



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: One more question about condensations

2007-11-17 Thread Bob Sullivan
Boris,

Don't obcess about this, just take some 'Baggies' with you and bag the
camera upon entering warm, humid places from the cold.

'Baggies' are a product name here in the US for sandwich bags.  They
are thin plastic film and come in various sizes.  They started in the
sandwich bag size to hold 2 slices of bread and sliced meat.  They
progressed to larger sizes to store leftover food in the refrigerator.

Take 4-5 of these thin film bags that are big enough to store the
whole K10D.  Pop the camera into the bag in warm/wet places and use a
rubberband to seal the top.  You can hold the camera to hurry the
heating up process or just let it sit to reach room temperatures.
Take some of the small baggies along for your spare lens.  A lens in a
baggie in your pocket stays warm and doesn't pickup any pocket dust.

You can wipe condensation off the camera body and front of the lens -
easy to do.  You say 'awe shit' when you look thru the viewfinder and
see it on the mirror and back of the lens.  You can wipe these off
too, but this is less desirable.  You hope to never see it on internal
elements of your lens as this takes time to clear.

>From a scientific basis, most buildings have trouble maintaining a
high level of humidity in minus 25 degree C temperatures.  The inside
of the windows and sometimes even the walls sweat...becoming covered
with moisture.  The inside air is cleared of water vapor as it is
precipatated onto the cold exterior walls/windows.  This can make the
windows frosty and indoor environment very dry and desert like in
winter.

Overall, count on the K10D'sweather sealing to help you thru this...
Regards,  Bob S.

On Nov 16, 2007 11:53 PM, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Suppose I hadn't got lucky and condensation did occur.
>
> 1. What to do in case of just external condensation? Wipe it off and go on?
>
> 2. What is internal elements of the lens suffer from condensation?
>
> 3. What about the sensor and the camera internals?
>
> I will probably take with me a small hair-blower (right word?) just in
> case, but still any advise will be appreciated.
>
> Boris
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: One more question about condensations

2007-11-17 Thread Rick Womer
I've had condensation form in the viewfinder window,
which is a bit of a nuisance.  Like Paul, I've not had
any form inside a lens, but that may be because I
haven't "exercised" the lens (which would draw moist
air inside it) until it has warmed up.

I've done lots of winter shooting in which the camera
got =well= chilled (3 hours shooting ski races, for
example), and have never had a serious condensation
problem, even with cameras (like the (P)Z1-P whose
bodies aren't the least bit sealed.

Rick

--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've experienced condensation many times in the
> summer when going out  
> from a cool, dry air conditioned house into the hot,
> humid backyard.  
> Condensation forms on the front lens element. I
> don't know if I get  
> any inside. I never wipe it. I just let it sit until
> it clears up. It  
> usually only takes about five minutes. Once it took
> twenty minutes.  
> Never caused any problem and left no residue on the
> lens. It's  
> distilled water after all. It should be quite clean.
> I've never seen  
> any condensation on the camera to speak of. If there
> was any, it  
> didn't affect it. That's true of both the K10 and
> the D.
> Paul
> On Nov 17, 2007, at 12:53 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> 
> > Hi!
> >
> > Suppose I hadn't got lucky and condensation did
> occur.
> >
> > 1. What to do in case of just external
> condensation? Wipe it off  
> > and go on?
> >
> > 2. What is internal elements of the lens suffer
> from condensation?
> >
> > 3. What about the sensor and the camera internals?
> >
> > I will probably take with me a small hair-blower
> (right word?) just in
> > case, but still any advise will be appreciated.
> >
> > Boris
> >
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
> link directly above  
> > and follow the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 


http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW


  

Be a better pen pal. 
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.  
http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: One more question about condensations

2007-11-17 Thread Paul Stenquist
I've experienced condensation many times in the summer when going out  
from a cool, dry air conditioned house into the hot, humid backyard.  
Condensation forms on the front lens element. I don't know if I get  
any inside. I never wipe it. I just let it sit until it clears up. It  
usually only takes about five minutes. Once it took twenty minutes.  
Never caused any problem and left no residue on the lens. It's  
distilled water after all. It should be quite clean. I've never seen  
any condensation on the camera to speak of. If there was any, it  
didn't affect it. That's true of both the K10 and the D.
Paul
On Nov 17, 2007, at 12:53 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Suppose I hadn't got lucky and condensation did occur.
>
> 1. What to do in case of just external condensation? Wipe it off  
> and go on?
>
> 2. What is internal elements of the lens suffer from condensation?
>
> 3. What about the sensor and the camera internals?
>
> I will probably take with me a small hair-blower (right word?) just in
> case, but still any advise will be appreciated.
>
> Boris
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
> and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.