Re: PAW: beach log

2004-04-06 Thread Paul Stenquist
Overall, I like this. The horizon line is what should define your 
rotation, and you're quite close on that. You might be able to improve 
it slightly with a 1/2 degree rotation. The overwhelming question is 
whether or not the log is sufficiently interesting to support the rest 
of the rather empty landscape. To my mind, it is. But that's a 
subjective call.
Paul


From: Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW: beach log
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:13:14 -0500
Here's mine for the week, taken in CT last weekend.

http://www.sunny16.net/photos/paw/2004-03-21.html

Thoughts are appreciated.

Amita

_
Free yourself from those irritating pop-up ads with MSn
Premium. Get 2months
FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage=byoa/premxAPID=1994;
DI=1034SU=http://hotmail.com/encaHL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines






Re: PAW: beach log

2004-03-27 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi!

DM I think the whole bottom left quarter is a bit empty but overall I'm
DM quite fond of it.  It came out quite nicely on paper.

I must say that the person on the shore completes the image and makes
it rather full in my eyes...

DM I thought about using this for my next PAW but I've already used it for
DM PUG :)

Actually by mistake I submitted one of my PAWs to PUG... I hope I
ain't gonna get banished for that g...

Cheers.

Boris
([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED])



RE: PAW: beach log

2004-03-23 Thread Amita Guha
 Amita, may I say that the previous pictures of yours that I 
 commented on, on list or off list were stronger...
 
 You see, the log is in a sense piece of rubbish on the beach. 
 It shouldn't be there, really. As such it stands out of the 
 crowd of little rocks and other background pieces but this is 
 where it ends.
 
 The log points somewhere but as eye follows it, it does not 
 find anything of interest...
 
 It feels like an empty shot of an empty beach. May be you 
 felt a little empty that moment, and this you shown to us. 
 But as I said, I saw much stronger works of yours.
 
 As usual, it is my honest humble opinion. I don't intend to 
 offend you and to discourage you...
 
 Hope I've been of use here and hope I did not break any rules 
 of courtesy this time.

Thanks for the comments, Boris.

This shot was the best of a batch that I took of the log. It was indeed
a bleak day; it was very cold and the beach itself was not what we had
expected, I guess. It was at an Audobon center and I guess I thought it
would be more lively or interesting. The tide was out and everything
looked kind of yucky. Maybe this shot reflects that. We were hoping for
another good day of shooting (like the day before) after being mostly
indoors for a couple of months.

Anyway, no offense taken...I post shots here to get honest feedback on
them. :)

Amita



Re: PAW: beach log

2004-03-23 Thread David Mann
On Mar 24, 2004, at 09:47, Amita Guha wrote:

Anyway, no offense taken...I post shots here to get honest feedback on
them. :)
Your photo reminded me of one I took a couple of years ago.

http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/beach-600.jpg

I think the whole bottom left quarter is a bit empty but overall I'm 
quite fond of it.  It came out quite nicely on paper.

I thought about using this for my next PAW but I've already used it for 
PUG :)

Cheers,

- Dave

http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/



RE: PAW: beach log

2004-03-20 Thread Amita Guha
Thanks for being honest, Frank. I appreciate it. :) The DOF looks
slightly different in the print; the front of the log is sharper than
the back. I tried to get the same look in the scan but I had a hard time
with it.

I experimented with rotating the scan a degree or two. It was hard to
judge because of the strip of beach in the middle distance. I settled
for making the log look level, but I know that's a compromise.

Anyway, thanks for the comments!

Amita

 -Original Message-
 From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:41 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: PAW: beach log
 
 
 I must be honest, Amita;  this one doesn't do much for me.
 
 I think there's too much brown in it.  Brown log, brown sand 
 - it just seems 
 very dull.
 
 And, as Bill said, it either needs much wider or much 
 narrower DOF.  The 
 background is blurry enough that I'm straining to see it, but 
 not so much so 
 to become almost abstract, and snap the foreground to my attention.
 
 And, just a niggling thing, but the horizon seems just a tad tilted.
 
 Comp is nice, but it's lost in all the brown, IMHO.
 
 And, the focus on the log is nice and sharp - I can almost 
 count the rings!
 
 I feel bad that I can't be more positive, especially after 
 you said such 
 nice things about my PAW this week - but I have to be honest, 
 right?  :-(
 
 cheers,
 frank
 
 The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. 
  The pessimist 
 fears it is true.  -J. Robert Oppenheimer
 
 
 
 
 From: Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: PAW: beach log
 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:13:14 -0500
 
 Here's mine for the week, taken in CT last weekend.
 
 http://www.sunny16.net/photos/paw/2004-03-21.html
 
 Thoughts are appreciated.
 
 Amita
 
 
 _
 Free yourself from those irritating pop-up ads with MSn 
 Premium. Get 2months 
 FREE*  
 http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage=byoa/premxAPID=1994;
 DI=1034SU=http://hotmail.com/encaHL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
 
 



RE: PAW: beach log

2004-03-20 Thread frank theriault
Amita,

I know what you mean by the print looking better than the scan.  I can never 
get the scans right...

I'm glad you took my comments in the spirit in which they were intended.  
Whew!  vbg

cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.  The pessimist 
fears it is true.  -J. Robert Oppenheimer




From: Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PAW: beach log
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 08:38:23 -0500
Thanks for being honest, Frank. I appreciate it. :) The DOF looks
slightly different in the print; the front of the log is sharper than
the back. I tried to get the same look in the scan but I had a hard time
with it.
I experimented with rotating the scan a degree or two. It was hard to
judge because of the strip of beach in the middle distance. I settled
for making the log look level, but I know that's a compromise.
Anyway, thanks for the comments!

Amita

_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN Premium   
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage=byoa/premxAPID=1994DI=1034SU=http://hotmail.com/encaHL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines