Re: PAW: tasteful nudity
In a message dated 2/27/2004 10:18:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2168146size=lg I like this one, BTW. Interesting with candle light. Subtle. Very pleasing in shape and shadow. Marnie aka Doe Oh, yeah, and tasteful, as well. :-)
Re: PAW: tasteful nudity
Thanks for all the comments. I'm going to delete the file now. I told the model I would post it only long enough for the forum members to see it. She doesn't want to be a permanent internet attraction. Paul On Feb 28, 2004, at 11:17 AM, Cotty wrote: On 28/2/04, PAT WHITE disgorged: What an elegant image! It's nude, but non-carnal You speak for yourself mate! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads http://www.macads.co.uk
Re: PAW: tasteful nudity
- Original Message - From: Cotty Subject: Re: PAW: tasteful nudity On 28/2/04, PAT WHITE disgorged: What an elegant image! It's nude, but non-carnal You speak for yourself mate! Bloody Brits and their bum fetishes. William Robb
Re: PAW: tasteful nudity
I must have some brit ancestors. On Feb 28, 2004, at 2:02 PM, William Robb wrote: Bloody Brits and their bum fetishes. William Robb
Re: PAW: tasteful nudity
On 27 Feb 2004 at 19:10, Paul Stenquist wrote: I'm quite pleased with this shot. It was done by candle light with the Pentax 6x7 and 105/2.4 lens. It displays full rear nudity, but I doubt that any adults would consider it offensive. I've posted it here because I think it's a nice example of what can be done with unusual lighting. Of course one candle would not have been sufficient here, but six served quite nicely. I'm going to delete his photo tomorrow, but I think most will enjoy seeing it in the meantime. Paul http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2168146size=lg I like it, the only negative distraction (to me) are the hard lines caused by the lighting of her hand. A little a more light on the lower legs would have been good too but not necessary. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
Re: PAW: tasteful nudity
Nicely done, I agree with Rob, the hand doesn't seem to fit itdon't like the tan line as well. Norm Rob Studdert wrote: I like it, the only negative distraction (to me) are the hard lines caused by the lighting of her hand. A little a more light on the lower legs would have been good too but not necessary.
Re: PAW: tasteful nudity
I kind of like the tan lines. In any case, there wasn't much I could do about them. Tan lines in December in Michigan. That takes some work :-) I think the hand is overlit, but I like it's placement. I tried some shots where I moved the candles to achieve different lighting, but the overall effect was better with the candles in a symmetrical pattern. On Feb 27, 2004, at 7:43 PM, Norm Baugher wrote: Nicely done, I agree with Rob, the hand doesn't seem to fit itdon't like the tan line as well. Norm Rob Studdert wrote: I like it, the only negative distraction (to me) are the hard lines caused by the lighting of her hand. A little a more light on the lower legs would have been good too but not necessary.
Re: PAW: tasteful nudity
Nicely done, Paul. The only distraction to my eye is the bright reflection of the candle on the far left - sort of breaks up a the nice repetition of the others. But that's pretty minor... - MCC At 07:10 PM 2/27/2004 -0500, you wrote: I'm quite pleased with this shot. It was done by candle light with the Pentax 6x7 and 105/2.4 lens. It displays full rear nudity, but I doubt that any adults would consider it offensive. I've posted it here because I think it's a nice example of what can be done with unusual lighting. Of course one candle would not have been sufficient here, but six served quite nicely. I'm going to delete his photo tomorrow, but I think most will enjoy seeing it in the meantime. Paul http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2168146size=lg - Mark Cassino Photography Kalamazoo, MI http://www.markcassino.com -
Re: PAW: tasteful nudity
On Feb 27, 2004, at 8:52 PM, Mark Cassino wrote: Nicely done, Paul. The only distraction to my eye is the bright reflection of the candle on the far left - sort of breaks up a the nice repetition of the others. But that's pretty minor... Yeah, I couldn't get them to burn even. That one on the left was a real torch. I should have moved it to the right where I could have used more light. Paul
Re: PAW: tasteful nudity
What an elegant image! It's nude, but non-carnal, showing pleasing lines and form. The tan line's a little distracting, but overall, it's a nice shot. Pat White
Re: PAW: tasteful nudity
Lovely tones and you were right it was very tasteful. Damn and I was hoping... Paul Stenquist wrote: I'm quite pleased with this shot. It was done by candle light with the Pentax 6x7 and 105/2.4 lens. It displays full rear nudity, but I doubt that any adults would consider it offensive. I've posted it here because I think it's a nice example of what can be done with unusual lighting. Of course one candle would not have been sufficient here, but six served quite nicely. I'm going to delete his photo tomorrow, but I think most will enjoy seeing it in the meantime. Paul http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2168146size=lg
