Re: Photographer a Week (Forsyth)

2004-02-25 Thread mike.wilson
Hi,

Abano wrote:
 I din't knew him. Gorgeous work, I like the style. It
 reminds me a bit to Doisneau.

He's not at all famous and probably never will be.  But what he's done,
for me, eclipses the works of greater photographers.  He lived in the
community, the community funded his photography by buying his pictures
and he has documented in great detail a tiny part of British culture
that has now disappeared.

I suspect that there are many others who have done this but only a few,
like Frank Sutcliffe as well as Doisneau, gain any recognition and that
is often by accident.  Much of the work done by these people ends up
lost, destroyed or dispersed.  I also suspect that applying the word
style to his work would amuse him.  He was never anything but
extremely poor (during his active photographic life) and his work looks
the way it does due to his use of whatever was available at the time. 
Paradoxically, he is probably now (still alive, last I heard) richer
than he has ever been, although I think he has had to give up working
due to failing eyesight.

mike



Re: Photographer a Week (Forsyth)

2004-02-25 Thread Albano Garcia

Hi Mike,
Thanks for the data. With style I referred to his way
to photograph people posing smiley and happy to do so,
looking friendly and proud of their existences. I like
this kind of portraits, no matter if they are more or
less documentary than no posed ones.
Regards

Albano


--- mike.wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Abano wrote:
  I din't knew him. Gorgeous work, I like the style.
 It
  reminds me a bit to Doisneau.
 
 He's not at all famous and probably never will be. 
 But what he's done,
 for me, eclipses the works of greater
 photographers.  He lived in the
 community, the community funded his photography by
 buying his pictures
 and he has documented in great detail a tiny part of
 British culture
 that has now disappeared.
 
 I suspect that there are many others who have done
 this but only a few,
 like Frank Sutcliffe as well as Doisneau, gain any
 recognition and that
 is often by accident.  Much of the work done by
 these people ends up
 lost, destroyed or dispersed.  I also suspect that
 applying the word
 style to his work would amuse him.  He was never
 anything but
 extremely poor (during his active photographic life)
 and his work looks
 the way it does due to his use of whatever was
 available at the time. 
 Paradoxically, he is probably now (still alive, last
 I heard) richer
 than he has ever been, although I think he has had
 to give up working
 due to failing eyesight.
 
 mike
 


=
Albano Garcia
El Pibe Asahi

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools



Re: Photographer a Week (Forsyth)

2004-02-25 Thread Lasse Karlsson
Thanks for the link, Mike. I enjoyed watching his pictures immensly.
See also below.

From: mike.wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 He's not at all famous and probably never will be.  But what he's done,
 for me, eclipses the works of greater photographers.  He lived in the
 community, the community funded his photography by buying his pictures
 and he has documented in great detail a tiny part of British culture
 that has now disappeared.
 
 I suspect that there are many others who have done this but only a few,
 like Frank Sutcliffe as well as Doisneau, gain any recognition and that
 is often by accident.  Much of the work done by these people ends up
 lost, destroyed or dispersed.  I also suspect that applying the word
 style to his work would amuse him.  He was never anything but
 extremely poor (during his active photographic life) and his work looks
 the way it does due to his use of whatever was available at the time. 
 Paradoxically, he is probably now (still alive, last I heard) richer
 than he has ever been, although I think he has had to give up working
 due to failing eyesight.
 mike

Sorry for the long quote, but I just like hearing this kind of down to earth relation 
of an important photographical achievement.

At
http://www.amber-online.com/gallery/exhibition19/notes19.html

Jimmy Forsyth:
Plans were in the air for knocking Scotswood Road down. When they knocked down the 
Infirmary in 1954 a curious crowd gathered to watch. It was then that I realised 
someone should make a record of what was left of the community. For posterity's sake. 
I had nothing to do, why not make a record of Scottie Road to pass the time? It would 
show future generations what we looked like and how we lived.

I wonder how I ever made the pictures, I was only on a couple of pounds Assistance 
then.
Anyway, I picked up a cheap folding camera in one of the pawn shops. There wasn't much 
to adjust, just as well, because I've never known what to do. I still can't understand 
exposures and things like depth of field after all these years, not really. I'm just 
an amateur, I was never interested in photography, not really.
When you're taking a photography you're recording something that will never happen 
again, catching a moment in time, I was just capturing what I knew was going to 
disappear.
People say to me today, How did you get all those fancy shades? but I wasn't looking 
for fancy shades, I was just taking what was there, the things I was interested in and 
the things I liked, and tried to make them look real. All the developing was done at 
the chemist's. I could only afford contact prints. I had to wait twenty years before I 
ever saw the negatives enlarged or printed properly.' 

Lasse 




Re: Photographer a Week (Forsyth)

2004-02-25 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Great stuff, Mike.  The story is especially compelling. 
Haven't had a chance to see all the photos yet, but the
story really touches me ... having to wait twenty years to
see the prints!

Lasse Karlsson wrote:

 From: mike.wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  He's not at all famous and probably never will be.  But what he's done,
  for me, eclipses the works of greater photographers.  He lived in the
  community, the community funded his photography by buying his pictures
  and he has documented in great detail a tiny part of British culture
  that has now disappeared.
 
  I suspect that there are many others who have done this but only a few,
  like Frank Sutcliffe as well as Doisneau, gain any recognition and that
  is often by accident.  Much of the work done by these people ends up
  lost, destroyed or dispersed.  I also suspect that applying the word
  style to his work would amuse him.  He was never anything but
  extremely poor (during his active photographic life) and his work looks
  the way it does due to his use of whatever was available at the time.
  Paradoxically, he is probably now (still alive, last I heard) richer
  than he has ever been, although I think he has had to give up working
  due to failing eyesight.
  mike



Re: Photographer a Week (Forsyth)

2004-02-25 Thread mike wilson
Hi Albano,

Albano Garcia wrote:
 
 Hi Mike,
 Thanks for the data. With style I referred to his way
 to photograph people posing smiley and happy to do so,
 looking friendly and proud of their existences. I like
 this kind of portraits, no matter if they are more or
 less documentary than no posed ones.
 Regards

I understand.  I also like his pictures, especially those of the
children who seem to be enjoying the novel situation of being
photographed.

An aside: how likely would his pictures have been to survive if it was a
collection of CDs rather than the more obvious prints and negatives?

mike