Re: Re: 645D Photos (under glass) here

2005-03-17 Thread Ronald Arvidsson
I guess this discussion is going into the most beautiful advertizing ... 
From what I know of medium format cameras its the specs and the 
durability that's the main stuff, not the looks.. well maybe not-- if 
you say its canon and olympus like then its not a camera A canon is 
for the military to make serious noise and confusion, The Olympos is a 
mountatin in Greece where the Greecian gods live. Pentax is tool, 
yearning, complaint, spouse irritator, and hopwfully camera.

Cheers,
Ronald
On 17 Mar 2005 at 13:40, Ronald Arvidsson wrote:
 

Doesn't A look a little bit like the Leica R8?
   

I think maybe it's more like mongrel cross between a Canon IX APS SLR and an 
Oly E-10 :-(

I think the "B" camera is short for Butt-ugly
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
--
 




Re: Re: 645D Photos (under glass) here

2005-03-17 Thread Rob Studdert
On 17 Mar 2005 at 11:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> B looks like it might have an electronic viewfinder.  There is very little 
> space
> for a prism, if you compare it to the other two.  Of the other two, C looks 
> like
> it might be a little cramped for a prism, also.  Difficult to judge on such 
> slim
> evidence but that doesn't usually stop anyone 8-)

It's a relatively big body with a 1.3 crop factor so the prism will be between 
a 35mm and 645 prism, I think there is plenty of room to house a prism in any 
of the bodies.



Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998



Re: Re: 645D Photos (under glass) here

2005-03-17 Thread m.9.wilson

> 
> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/03/17 Thu AM 10:55:04 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: 645D Photos (under glass) here
> 
> The lens gives some sense of scale. All of them seem to be smaller than 
> a Canon 1DS. That could be a very good thing.

B looks like it might have an electronic viewfinder.  There is very little 
space for a prism, if you compare it to the other two.  Of the other two, C 
looks like it might be a little cramped for a prism, also.  Difficult to judge 
on such slim evidence but that doesn't usually stop anyone 8-)

mike

-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information