Re: Time for a break ... (Time to do something with the list ahmosphere?)

2006-12-18 Thread frank theriault
On 12/17/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 I assume this has happened before. So I'm asking the old timers. What did
 you do to get the list back on track again?
snip

It pretty much rights itself after some time.  The
whiners/trolls/strident ones eventually become fatigued and just go
away or get quiet, and soon enough all's forgotten.

The arguments eventually die down and some sense of normalcy (such as
it is) returns.

Be patient.  Some like to unsub for a couple of weeks or a month while
waiting for the calm.

I prefer just not going to certain threads, deleting them, and neither
reading nor responding to those who I find frustrating.

cheers,
frank

-- 
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Time for a break ... (Time to do something with the list ahmosphere?)

2006-12-18 Thread Eric Featherstone
On 18/12/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 18/12/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I've been thinking.
  I really dislike the free spirit of the list being polluted. What is going
  on is more than the regular friendly spirited flames.
 
  I assume this has happened before. So I'm asking the old timers. What did
  you do to get the list back on track again?
 
  And please folks, don't give me this it is all NN's fault again, that is
  childish and unconstructive.
 
  Please excuse my plain tone. Some times I believe in being strait forward.

 Just try to ignore it and the puss will clear up and it will
 eventually be normal again. If you are having difficulties doing that
 then a filter or two may help, or alternately, put your fingers in
 your ears and shout out na, na na, na... :-)

I've tried that, but my la la fingers went numb a day or two back :-)

I'll try a filter instead.

Eric.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


RE: Time for a break ... (Time to do something with the list ahmosphere?)

2006-12-17 Thread Tim Øsleby
I've been thinking. 
I really dislike the free spirit of the list being polluted. What is going
on is more than the regular friendly spirited flames. 

I assume this has happened before. So I'm asking the old timers. What did
you do to get the list back on track again? 

And please folks, don't give me this it is all NN's fault again, that is
childish and unconstructive. 

Please excuse my plain tone. Some times I believe in being strait forward. 


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Cassino
Sent: 18. desember 2006 01:28
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Time for a break ...

Hear! Hear! Tim.

(That's 19th century English for Yeah, right on!)

For crying out loud - typing in an obscenity or even just a boorish 
remark doesn't do anything. If you think a single person is idiotic, 
well, let them be. Responding to their idiocy just brings in more grief.

This post is probably pointless, but as someone who came back into the 
PDML after being away for a while, I was surprised at how mean spirited 
it has become.

I'll date myself but I'm thinking of a song from a while back -

There ain't no good guys,
There ain't no bad guys,
There's just you and me
And we just disagee.

I probably got the quote wrong. I get most things wrong.

People can disagree without being disagreeable. I don't care who tapped 
who when or what the score is - let's just give this crap a break and 
agree to be civil, and make this list something worth reading.

- MCC

Tim Øsleby wrote:
 Bill and John. 
 Now you are both doing it again, in a thread where the OP was about exact
 this phenomenon. 
 My instinct reaction is being angry at you both. But I'll try to behave
 myself.
 
 Can't the two of you have a PDML duel somewhere in the desert, like real
 men, instead of this constant bitching ;-) 
 Seriously: Can't you simply ignore each other? How about mutual kill
filing?
 Am I asking to much?
 
 
 Tim
 Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
  



-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Time for a break ... (Time to do something with the list ahmosphere?)

2006-12-17 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 18/12/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've been thinking.
 I really dislike the free spirit of the list being polluted. What is going
 on is more than the regular friendly spirited flames.

 I assume this has happened before. So I'm asking the old timers. What did
 you do to get the list back on track again?

 And please folks, don't give me this it is all NN's fault again, that is
 childish and unconstructive.

 Please excuse my plain tone. Some times I believe in being strait forward.

Just try to ignore it and the puss will clear up and it will
eventually be normal again. If you are having difficulties doing that
then a filter or two may help, or alternately, put your fingers in
your ears and shout out na, na na, na... :-)

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Time for a break ... (Time to do something with the list ahmosphere?)

2006-12-17 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
My solution:

   Do photography.
   Ignore the bullshit.

G

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Time for a break ... (Time to do something with the list ahmosphere?)

2006-12-17 Thread Paul Stenquist
Ignore it, and it goes away. Answer the posts, and it continues. Very  
simple.
Paul
On Dec 17, 2006, at 9:01 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:

 I've been thinking.
 I really dislike the free spirit of the list being polluted. What  
 is going
 on is more than the regular friendly spirited flames.

 I assume this has happened before. So I'm asking the old timers.  
 What did
 you do to get the list back on track again?

 And please folks, don't give me this it is all NN's fault again,  
 that is
 childish and unconstructive.

 Please excuse my plain tone. Some times I believe in being strait  
 forward.


 Tim
 Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On  
 Behalf Of Mark
 Cassino
 Sent: 18. desember 2006 01:28
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: Re: Time for a break ...

 Hear! Hear! Tim.

 (That's 19th century English for Yeah, right on!)

 For crying out loud - typing in an obscenity or even just a boorish
 remark doesn't do anything. If you think a single person is idiotic,
 well, let them be. Responding to their idiocy just brings in more  
 grief.

 This post is probably pointless, but as someone who came back into the
 PDML after being away for a while, I was surprised at how mean  
 spirited
 it has become.

 I'll date myself but I'm thinking of a song from a while back -

 There ain't no good guys,
 There ain't no bad guys,
 There's just you and me
 And we just disagee.

 I probably got the quote wrong. I get most things wrong.

 People can disagree without being disagreeable. I don't care who  
 tapped
 who when or what the score is - let's just give this crap a break and
 agree to be civil, and make this list something worth reading.

 - MCC

 Tim Øsleby wrote:
 Bill and John.
 Now you are both doing it again, in a thread where the OP was  
 about exact
 this phenomenon.
 My instinct reaction is being angry at you both. But I'll try to  
 behave
 myself.

 Can't the two of you have a PDML duel somewhere in the desert,  
 like real
 men, instead of this constant bitching ;-)
 Seriously: Can't you simply ignore each other? How about mutual kill
 filing?
 Am I asking to much?


 Tim
 Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)




 -- 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Mark Cassino Photography
 Kalamazoo
 www.markcassino.com
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net





 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Time for a break ... (Time to do something with the list ahmosphere?)

2006-12-17 Thread P. J. Alling
I guess I qualify as an old timer, I don't remember doing anything, it 
just blows over...

eventually.

Tim Øsleby wrote:
 I've been thinking. 
 I really dislike the free spirit of the list being polluted. What is going
 on is more than the regular friendly spirited flames. 

 I assume this has happened before. So I'm asking the old timers. What did
 you do to get the list back on track again? 

 And please folks, don't give me this it is all NN's fault again, that is
 childish and unconstructive. 

 Please excuse my plain tone. Some times I believe in being strait forward. 


 Tim
 Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
  

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
 Cassino
 Sent: 18. desember 2006 01:28
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: Re: Time for a break ...

 Hear! Hear! Tim.

 (That's 19th century English for Yeah, right on!)

 For crying out loud - typing in an obscenity or even just a boorish 
 remark doesn't do anything. If you think a single person is idiotic, 
 well, let them be. Responding to their idiocy just brings in more grief.

 This post is probably pointless, but as someone who came back into the 
 PDML after being away for a while, I was surprised at how mean spirited 
 it has become.

 I'll date myself but I'm thinking of a song from a while back -

 There ain't no good guys,
 There ain't no bad guys,
 There's just you and me
 And we just disagee.

 I probably got the quote wrong. I get most things wrong.

 People can disagree without being disagreeable. I don't care who tapped 
 who when or what the score is - let's just give this crap a break and 
 agree to be civil, and make this list something worth reading.

 - MCC

 Tim Øsleby wrote:
   
 Bill and John. 
 Now you are both doing it again, in a thread where the OP was about exact
 this phenomenon. 
 My instinct reaction is being angry at you both. But I'll try to behave
 myself.

 Can't the two of you have a PDML duel somewhere in the desert, like real
 men, instead of this constant bitching ;-) 
 Seriously: Can't you simply ignore each other? How about mutual kill
 
 filing?
   
 Am I asking to much?


 Tim
 Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
  
 



   


-- 
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net