Re: Under the microscope (For Mark C.)

2013-03-09 Thread Mark C

Hi Igor -

Thanks for pointing out that gallery - I was out of town till late last 
night and have been off the PDML for a few days. Some other folks do 
really incredible work with a microscope and snow crystals and I've been 
tempted to try it - really would be the ultimate in macro work. But 
that's one project that is still pending...


Mark

On 3/7/2013 11:33 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:


I saw this gallery of snowflakes on weather.com this morning and thought
that overall Mark's photos are much better.

http://www.weather.com/news/science/snowflakes-under-microscope-20130306

What is interesting is the technique used in that case.
It's indeed a micrscope. You can see the last three photos showing the
setup.
I suspect the setup might be responsible for some uneven focus over
the field of view. It looks like the DOF is very shallow.

Igor





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Under the microscope (For Mark C.)

2013-03-09 Thread Bob Sullivan
Mark,
Your snowflakes are a lot prettier and more accomplished looking.
These Weather Channel shots make me really appreciate yours!
It's a simple idea, but the beauty is in the execution of it.
Have you still got a book of these shots out somewhere?
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
 Hi Igor -

 Thanks for pointing out that gallery - I was out of town till late last
 night and have been off the PDML for a few days. Some other folks do really
 incredible work with a microscope and snow crystals and I've been tempted to
 try it - really would be the ultimate in macro work. But that's one project
 that is still pending...

 Mark

 On 3/7/2013 11:33 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:


 I saw this gallery of snowflakes on weather.com this morning and thought
 that overall Mark's photos are much better.

 http://www.weather.com/news/science/snowflakes-under-microscope-20130306

 What is interesting is the technique used in that case.
 It's indeed a micrscope. You can see the last three photos showing the
 setup.
 I suspect the setup might be responsible for some uneven focus over
 the field of view. It looks like the DOF is very shallow.

 Igor




 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Under the microscope (For Mark C.)

2013-03-07 Thread Igor Roshchin


I saw this gallery of snowflakes on weather.com this morning and thought
that overall Mark's photos are much better.

http://www.weather.com/news/science/snowflakes-under-microscope-20130306

What is interesting is the technique used in that case.
It's indeed a micrscope. You can see the last three photos showing the
setup. 
I suspect the setup might be responsible for some uneven focus over 
the field of view. It looks like the DOF is very shallow.

Igor


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Under the microscope (For Mark C.)

2013-03-07 Thread Paul Sorenson
Mark's are better by far.  The photog may be a professor, but he needs 
some lessons in snowflake photography.   : )


-p

On 3/7/2013 10:33 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:



I saw this gallery of snowflakes on weather.com this morning and thought
that overall Mark's photos are much better.

http://www.weather.com/news/science/snowflakes-under-microscope-20130306

What is interesting is the technique used in that case.
It's indeed a micrscope. You can see the last three photos showing the
setup.
I suspect the setup might be responsible for some uneven focus over
the field of view. It looks like the DOF is very shallow.

Igor




--
Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.