Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-12-03 Thread mike wilson

Dario Bonazza wrote:


K-7 manual, page 192:


Mark!

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-12-03 Thread Boris Liberman
Yes indeed. Apparently I wasn't sufficiently thorough :-). Corrected 
that little bugger :-). There is another interesting option on the same 
menu page. It says how WB behaves when flash is attached. Default is - AWB.


Boris

On 12/3/2010 1:04 AM, Miserere wrote:

I think you might be unpleasantly surprised :-D



On 02/12/2010, Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com  wrote:

On 12/1/2010 10:01 PM, Miserere wrote:

Boris,

This is the issue:

http://shutterfinger.typepad.com/shutterfinger/2010/08/automation-strikes-again.html

Igor might want to run a test similar to Gordon's to make sure his
camera is fine, but I suspect it is. This is simply a case of Pentax
trying to outsmart us, but they're going to have to try harder!


Hmmm... /Scratches his head/ Oh well, I will verify what kind of value I
assigned to this option when I was passing over the menus once I got the
camera... I may be up to a surprise...

Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-12-02 Thread Boris Liberman

On 12/1/2010 10:01 PM, Miserere wrote:

Boris,

This is the issue:

http://shutterfinger.typepad.com/shutterfinger/2010/08/automation-strikes-again.html

Igor might want to run a test similar to Gordon's to make sure his
camera is fine, but I suspect it is. This is simply a case of Pentax
trying to outsmart us, but they're going to have to try harder!


Hmmm... /Scratches his head/ Oh well, I will verify what kind of value I 
assigned to this option when I was passing over the menus once I got the 
camera... I may be up to a surprise...


Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-12-02 Thread Miserere
I think you might be unpleasantly surprised :-D



On 02/12/2010, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 12/1/2010 10:01 PM, Miserere wrote:
 Boris,

 This is the issue:

 http://shutterfinger.typepad.com/shutterfinger/2010/08/automation-strikes-again.html

 Igor might want to run a test similar to Gordon's to make sure his
 camera is fine, but I suspect it is. This is simply a case of Pentax
 trying to outsmart us, but they're going to have to try harder!

 Hmmm... /Scratches his head/ Oh well, I will verify what kind of value I
 assigned to this option when I was passing over the menus once I got the
 camera... I may be up to a surprise...

 Boris

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.



-- 
—M.

\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com

http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-12-01 Thread Boris Liberman

On 11/30/2010 5:42 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

Bob and Boris: I usually shoot with AWB (and RAW), but this time I fixed
it the WB to minimize necessity for corrections, as the light was very
consistent and the flash was not allowed at all.


Igor, is it at all possible then to have you make a controlled 
experiment? Because if you do, you may have enough data to present to 
your Pentax service if you would have to send the camera in. Here, 
sometimes, you essentially need to prove to the service clerk that the 
camera is broken. As a side effect of this experiment, you may establish 
an interesting procedure and add yet another bit of knowledge for the 
common good.


Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-12-01 Thread Dario Bonazza

Boris Liberman wrote:


On 11/30/2010 5:42 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

Bob and Boris: I usually shoot with AWB (and RAW), but this time I fixed
it the WB to minimize necessity for corrections, as the light was very
consistent and the flash was not allowed at all.


Igor, is it at all possible then to have you make a controlled experiment? 
Because if you do, you may have enough data to present to your Pentax 
service if you would have to send the camera in. Here, sometimes, you 
essentially need to prove to the service clerk that the camera is broken. 
As a side effect of this experiment, you may establish an interesting 
procedure and add yet another bit of knowledge for the common good.


Uh? Why do you suppose Igor's camera to be broken when Igor himself agreed 
on my suggestion to just change the set WB from go where you like (Pentax 
default) to fixed? Let's wait and see if such a menu setting is enough to 
solve the problem.


Dario 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-12-01 Thread Boris Liberman

On 12/1/2010 11:05 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:

Uh? Why do you suppose Igor's camera to be broken when Igor himself
agreed on my suggestion to just change the set WB from go where you
like (Pentax default) to fixed? Let's wait and see if such a menu
setting is enough to solve the problem.

Dario


Sorry, Dario (and Igor). I didn't /suggest/ or /suppose/ that Igor's 
camera may be actually /broken/. I did suggest that Igor makes a 
controlled experiment. I don't think Igor would want to change the 
settings and go out shooting effectively /hoping/ that the settings 
change did solve his problem. I think it has to be tried before. And 
/if/ as a /result/ of such experiment Igor figures out that his camera 
is not functioning right, he'd be able to discuss this with Pentax 
service more easily as he would have an evidence and knowledge to 
support him. Or alternatively, as a result of the above experiment, Igor 
might be able to learn more about this specific aspect of his camera and 
/know/ where the limitations are so that his work with the camera will 
benefit from that.


Boris

P.S. Recently I tried to use focus test technique suggested by Paul 
Stenquist and I found it to be most useful for my two most recent shoots 
as I went out /knowing/ that despite the focusing precision issues with 
my Sigma 24-60/2.8, the camera was properly /dialed in/ and I had no 
focus issues with the lens whatsoever.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-12-01 Thread Miserere
On 1 December 2010 03:57, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 11/30/2010 5:42 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

 Bob and Boris: I usually shoot with AWB (and RAW), but this time I fixed
 it the WB to minimize necessity for corrections, as the light was very
 consistent and the flash was not allowed at all.

 Igor, is it at all possible then to have you make a controlled experiment?
 Because if you do, you may have enough data to present to your Pentax
 service if you would have to send the camera in. Here, sometimes, you
 essentially need to prove to the service clerk that the camera is broken. As
 a side effect of this experiment, you may establish an interesting procedure
 and add yet another bit of knowledge for the common good.

 Boris

Boris,

This is the issue:

http://shutterfinger.typepad.com/shutterfinger/2010/08/automation-strikes-again.html

Igor might want to run a test similar to Gordon's to make sure his
camera is fine, but I suspect it is. This is simply a case of Pentax
trying to outsmart us, but they're going to have to try harder!


   —M.

\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com

http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-30 Thread Joseph McAllister
On Nov 29, 2010, at 23:15 , Dario Bonazza wrote:

 Strong means the camera compensates for the warm cast, perfoming a 
 white-balanced (neutral) shot.


The default is strong which looking at the proof sheet of the dancers 
submitted is what the camera tried to do on some of the shots, leaving the 
majority of them with a tungsten yellow caste. Is that right?

Anyone run any test with a user set WB on a sheet of paper under any lighting 
conditions to see if the camera does it's own thing with the WB once and a 
while?

Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com

The Big Bang was silent, and  invisible in it's beginning moments.
— from the Pentaxian's thoughts on particle physics, so far.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-30 Thread Boris Liberman

Igor,

On 11/29/2010 5:39 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

Has anybody experienced anything of this sort?
What could be the reason (besides some malfunction of the camera)?


I will have to look in my collection but I am fairly certain that all 
three cameras I've been shooting with (*istD, K10D, K-7) exhibited this 
kind of behavior. I usually shoot in AWB mode, but get significantly 
different color casts of my pictures from time to time. Although each 
camera did improve on AWB stability and K-7 did improve significantly 
here, they did not hammer the issue out completely.


I haven't looked any further into this. Simply I correct WB in post when 
necessary and if I cannot salvage the shot (even by B/W conversion) I 
discard it.


I wonder if K-7 and/or K-5 have WB bracketing function that perhaps can 
be used along with high-speed continuous mode (7 fps of K-5 sound 
particularly impressive here) to work around this issue. Though, if you 
were shooting with flash, it would have to be some rather special flash 
or its power supply, methinks.


Boris


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-30 Thread Igor Roshchin

Mon Nov 29 16:00:51 CST 2010
Dario Bonazza wrote:

Charles Robinson wrote:

  On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:46, Dario Bonazza wrote:
 
  Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to 
  [Fixed]?
 
  If not, that could explain that behaviour. Don't ask me why one
  should 
  select a given white balance and then allow the camera to change it,
  but 
  Pentax thinks of it as a good idea!
 
 
  Isn't this all about being able to fine-tune all of the WB settings?
  Not 
  the camera doing it, but the user making adjustments.
 
 K-7 manual, page 192:
 
 The camera automatically performs fine-tuning even when the light
 source is 
 specified. The color temperature of the light source is fixed when [11.  WB 
 Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2]] menu (p.85) is set to 
 [Fixed].
 
 AUTOMATICALLY, even when the light source is specified.
 
 Perhaps there are instances where such operation makes sense, but... to
 me, 
 it looks a lot like that mad idea of allowing you to select SEL for AF 
 points selector and then reverting back to auto select, which was the 
 behaviour of the AF selector before a firmware fix.
 
 Dario 

Dario, 
I think you are right. I just checked the menu settings, and it was set
to the default value, Adjustable Range, instead of Fixed.
I suspect that this setting was the culprit for what I observed.

Thank you to all who responded with the ideas and suggestions!


Some clarifications and comments to responses:

Even though in the thumbnail list I showed, most of the shots were with the
yellow cast, as I wrote earlier, - most of the shots (about 800 shots)
were without this yellow cast.
I just chose the part where the dancers were exactly in the same spot,
so that it would be obvious that the light conditions didn't change at
all.

For the sake of completeness: the setting c2 - 12 AWB under Tungsten
light was set to Subtle, but I suspect this is only relevant to
when the WB is set to AWB. At least the manual (page 85) says so:
12. AWB in Tungsten light.
Sets whether to leave or adjust the tungsten light color tone when the
white balance is set to _AWB_.

Bob and Boris: I usually shoot with AWB (and RAW), but this time I fixed 
it the WB to minimize necessity for corrections, as the light was very
consistent and the flash was not allowed at all. 

Joseph: It's a hotel ball/meeting room (Omni) rented for the event 
(the wooden floor is rented/installed on top of the carpet).
Bob and Charles, - Mark is correct, - it is definitely tungsten. 
(I saw the bulbs, and checked the WB initially, when I started shooting)

Joseph: I saw that the actual WB of the shots was changing as 
I was shooting (I didn't discover it later),
but I didn't bother to start changing anything during the performance. 
There were two reasons: it was shot in RAW anyway 
(hence I knew I could correct it later), and I didn't want to miss
something interesting. Besides, at the time I had no idea what else 
might affecting the WB.

A rather interesting thing is that the yellow cast in these shots is not as
redish as the one that would have been if I left the WB set to AWB.

Again, thanks to all who responded.

Igor


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-30 Thread Margus Männik

Hi,

I've experienced the same problem and it seems that Tungsten WB is not 
fixed WB setting. Instead, it tries to adopt to lighting conditions.
Shooting JPEG, try fixed K value instead - for me it have been worked 
fine. Of course, RAW would be the best (but a bit more time-consuming) 
solution.


BR, Margus


On 11/29/2010 9:18 PM, P N Stenquist wrote:

On Nov 29, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:


Mon Nov 29 09:52:30 CST 2010
P N Stenquist wrote:


On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:


Hi All,

While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend
I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the
right
color, some considerable number of shots had a distinctive.
It was not as red as it would have been if I left the WB to be on
Auto,
but still yellow.

All the shots were taken under the same condition: in the same room,
from the same point, with no light changing, just the couple moving.
More over,- some series of shots were made with the the couple in
place ,-
and some have the WB alright, and some - are yellow.

Has anybody experienced anything of this sort?
What could be the reason (besides some malfunction of the camera)?

What fills the frame affects white balance. If the dancers were blocking
some of the light on some shots and more fully lit on others, you'll get
some variation of color temp. Easy enough to correct during conversion.
Paul


Paul,

Yes, that could do it in principle, but it doesn't make sense in the
current situation. Since I _fixed_ the WB to a particular setting,
very slight changes shouldn't affect the WB.

To better illustrate what I observe, - let me show you this image:
http://komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2010/WB-problem-2010-11-27.jpg

No WB or exposure settings were changed in this sequence.
These photos were not modified.

Yes, one can correct the WB, but it is not how it should work, isn't it?

Igor


You're right. Something is out of whack here. I never shoot anything expect AWB 
and RAW, so I can't tell you if my camera shares this problem. When I have 
time, I'll give it a try under some tungsten lighting.
Paul


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-30 Thread Dario Bonazza

Margus Männik wrote:

I've experienced the same problem and it seems that Tungsten WB is not 
fixed WB setting. Instead, it tries to adopt to lighting conditions.
Shooting JPEG, try fixed K value instead - for me it have been worked 
fine. Of course, RAW would be the best (but a bit more time-consuming) 
solution.


Strange but true, no Pentax WB setting is fixed by default. However, you can 
make it fixed by setting the appropriate menu item.


Dario 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Igor Roshchin

Hi All,

While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend 
I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the right
color, some considerable number of shots had a distinctive.
It was not as red as it would have been if I left the WB to be on Auto,
but still yellow.

All the shots were taken under the same condition: in the same room, 
from the same point, with no light changing, just the couple moving.
More over,- some series of shots were made with the the couple in place ,- 
and some have the WB alright, and some - are yellow.

Has anybody experienced anything of this sort?
What could be the reason (besides some malfunction of the camera)?

Igor

(Sorry for the duplicated message, - the previous one had a corrupted 
Subject/header)


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread P N Stenquist

On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

 
 Hi All,
 
 While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend 
 I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
 I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the right
 color, some considerable number of shots had a distinctive.
 It was not as red as it would have been if I left the WB to be on Auto,
 but still yellow.
 
 All the shots were taken under the same condition: in the same room, 
 from the same point, with no light changing, just the couple moving.
 More over,- some series of shots were made with the the couple in place ,- 
 and some have the WB alright, and some - are yellow.
 
 Has anybody experienced anything of this sort?
 What could be the reason (besides some malfunction of the camera)?

What fills the frame affects white balance. If the dancers were blocking some 
of the light on some shots and more fully lit on others, you'll get some 
variation of color temp. Easy enough to correct during conversion.
Paul

 
 Igor
 
 (Sorry for the duplicated message, - the previous one had a corrupted 
 Subject/header)
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Igor Roshchin

Mon Nov 29 09:52:30 CST 2010
P N Stenquist wrote:

 On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
 
  
  Hi All,
  
  While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend 
  I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
  I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the
  right
  color, some considerable number of shots had a distinctive.
  It was not as red as it would have been if I left the WB to be on
  Auto,
  but still yellow.
  
  All the shots were taken under the same condition: in the same room, 
  from the same point, with no light changing, just the couple moving.
  More over,- some series of shots were made with the the couple in
  place ,- 
  and some have the WB alright, and some - are yellow.
  
  Has anybody experienced anything of this sort?
  What could be the reason (besides some malfunction of the camera)?
 
 What fills the frame affects white balance. If the dancers were blocking
 some of the light on some shots and more fully lit on others, you'll get
 some variation of color temp. Easy enough to correct during conversion.
 Paul
 

Paul, 

Yes, that could do it in principle, but it doesn't make sense in the
current situation. Since I _fixed_ the WB to a particular setting,
very slight changes shouldn't affect the WB.

To better illustrate what I observe, - let me show you this image:
http://komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2010/WB-problem-2010-11-27.jpg

No WB or exposure settings were changed in this sequence.
These photos were not modified.
 
Yes, one can correct the WB, but it is not how it should work, isn't it?

Igor


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread P N Stenquist

On Nov 29, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

 
 Mon Nov 29 09:52:30 CST 2010
 P N Stenquist wrote:
 
 On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
 
 
 Hi All,
 
 While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend 
 I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
 I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the
 right
 color, some considerable number of shots had a distinctive.
 It was not as red as it would have been if I left the WB to be on
 Auto,
 but still yellow.
 
 All the shots were taken under the same condition: in the same room, 
 from the same point, with no light changing, just the couple moving.
 More over,- some series of shots were made with the the couple in
 place ,- 
 and some have the WB alright, and some - are yellow.
 
 Has anybody experienced anything of this sort?
 What could be the reason (besides some malfunction of the camera)?
 
 What fills the frame affects white balance. If the dancers were blocking
 some of the light on some shots and more fully lit on others, you'll get
 some variation of color temp. Easy enough to correct during conversion.
 Paul
 
 
 Paul, 
 
 Yes, that could do it in principle, but it doesn't make sense in the
 current situation. Since I _fixed_ the WB to a particular setting,
 very slight changes shouldn't affect the WB.
 
 To better illustrate what I observe, - let me show you this image:
 http://komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2010/WB-problem-2010-11-27.jpg
 
 No WB or exposure settings were changed in this sequence.
 These photos were not modified.
 
 Yes, one can correct the WB, but it is not how it should work, isn't it?
 
 Igor
 
You're right. Something is out of whack here. I never shoot anything expect AWB 
and RAW, so I can't tell you if my camera shares this problem. When I have 
time, I'll give it a try under some tungsten lighting.
Paul


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Bob Sullivan
Shooting RAW and AWB I know the colors will shade differently in the
same light as composition changes.
The Synch function in lightroom is your friend in such cases.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:

 Mon Nov 29 09:52:30 CST 2010
 P N Stenquist wrote:

 On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

 
  Hi All,
 
  While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend
  I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
  I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the
  right
  color, some considerable number of shots had a distinctive.
  It was not as red as it would have been if I left the WB to be on
  Auto,
  but still yellow.
 
  All the shots were taken under the same condition: in the same room,
  from the same point, with no light changing, just the couple moving.
  More over,- some series of shots were made with the the couple in
  place ,-
  and some have the WB alright, and some - are yellow.
 
  Has anybody experienced anything of this sort?
  What could be the reason (besides some malfunction of the camera)?

 What fills the frame affects white balance. If the dancers were blocking
 some of the light on some shots and more fully lit on others, you'll get
 some variation of color temp. Easy enough to correct during conversion.
 Paul


 Paul,

 Yes, that could do it in principle, but it doesn't make sense in the
 current situation. Since I _fixed_ the WB to a particular setting,
 very slight changes shouldn't affect the WB.

 To better illustrate what I observe, - let me show you this image:
 http://komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2010/WB-problem-2010-11-27.jpg

 No WB or exposure settings were changed in this sequence.
 These photos were not modified.

 Yes, one can correct the WB, but it is not how it should work, isn't it?

 Igor


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Christine Nielsen
I have experienced the same thing with my k-7!  Here is an example:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/23028...@n04/sets/72157625120080220/

Two photos, same subject  framing, same WB,  exposure settings.
Correctable in post, but, still odd.

-c

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:

 Hi All,

 While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend
 I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
 I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the right
 color, some considerable number of shots had a distinctive.
 It was not as red as it would have been if I left the WB to be on Auto,
 but still yellow.

 All the shots were taken under the same condition: in the same room,
 from the same point, with no light changing, just the couple moving.
 More over,- some series of shots were made with the the couple in place ,-
 and some have the WB alright, and some - are yellow.

 Has anybody experienced anything of this sort?
 What could be the reason (besides some malfunction of the camera)?

 Igor

 (Sorry for the duplicated message, - the previous one had a corrupted
 Subject/header)


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Bob Sullivan
I wonder if some of this isn't connected to flourescent lighting and
the new energy efficient bulbs that are replacing incandescents.  I
wonder if these bulbs flicker at a 60 cycle per second rate and
deliver different color temperatures in different parts of the cycle.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
 I have experienced the same thing with my k-7!  Here is an example:
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/23028...@n04/sets/72157625120080220/

 Two photos, same subject  framing, same WB,  exposure settings.
 Correctable in post, but, still odd.

 -c

 On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:

 Hi All,

 While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend
 I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
 I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the right
 color, some considerable number of shots had a distinctive.
 It was not as red as it would have been if I left the WB to be on Auto,
 but still yellow.

 All the shots were taken under the same condition: in the same room,
 from the same point, with no light changing, just the couple moving.
 More over,- some series of shots were made with the the couple in place ,-
 and some have the WB alright, and some - are yellow.

 Has anybody experienced anything of this sort?
 What could be the reason (besides some malfunction of the camera)?

 Igor

 (Sorry for the duplicated message, - the previous one had a corrupted
 Subject/header)


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Charles Robinson
On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:38, Bob Sullivan wrote:

 I wonder if some of this isn't connected to flourescent lighting and
 the new energy efficient bulbs that are replacing incandescents.  I
 wonder if these bulbs flicker at a 60 cycle per second rate and
 deliver different color temperatures in different parts of the cycle.

That would be my guess too - that the lighting in the room wasn't truly 
tungsten.

 -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Dario Bonazza

Igor Roshchin wrote


While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend
I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the
right
color, some considerable number of shots had a distinctive.
It was not as red as it would have been if I left the WB to be on
Auto,
but still yellow.

All the shots were taken under the same condition: in the same room,
from the same point, with no light changing, just the couple moving.
More over,- some series of shots were made with the the couple in
place ,- and some have the WB alright, and some - are yellow.

Has anybody experienced anything of this sort?
What could be the reason (besides some malfunction of the camera)?


Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to 
[Fixed]?


If not, that could explain that behaviour. Don't ask me why one should 
select a given white balance and then allow the camera to change it, but 
Pentax thinks of it as a good idea!


Dario 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Charles Robinson
On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:46, Dario Bonazza wrote:
 
 Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to [Fixed]?
 
 If not, that could explain that behaviour. Don't ask me why one should select 
 a given white balance and then allow the camera to change it, but Pentax 
 thinks of it as a good idea!
 

Isn't this all about being able to fine-tune all of the WB settings?  Not the 
camera doing it, but the user making adjustments.

 -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Mark Roberts
Charles Robinson wrote:

On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:38, Bob Sullivan wrote:

 I wonder if some of this isn't connected to flourescent lighting and
 the new energy efficient bulbs that are replacing incandescents.  I
 wonder if these bulbs flicker at a 60 cycle per second rate and
 deliver different color temperatures in different parts of the cycle.

That would be my guess too - that the lighting in the room wasn't truly 
tungsten.

That's the first thing I thought, too: It looks as if the lighting is
running at 60Hz and the shutter is catching it at various points in
the cycle, BUT... the coloration clearly looks like tungsten, which
wouldn't do this. Or shouldn't. Baffling. 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Dario Bonazza

Charles Robinson wrote:


On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:46, Dario Bonazza wrote:


Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to 
[Fixed]?


If not, that could explain that behaviour. Don't ask me why one should 
select a given white balance and then allow the camera to change it, but 
Pentax thinks of it as a good idea!




Isn't this all about being able to fine-tune all of the WB settings?  Not 
the camera doing it, but the user making adjustments.


K-7 manual, page 192:

The camera automatically performs fine-tuning even when the light source is 
specified. The color temperature of the light source is fixed when [11. WB 
Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2]] menu (p.85) is set to 
[Fixed].


AUTOMATICALLY, even when the light source is specified.

Perhaps there are instances where such operation makes sense, but... to me, 
it looks a lot like that mad idea of allowing you to select SEL for AF 
points selector and then reverting back to auto select, which was the 
behaviour of the AF selector before a firmware fix.


Dario 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Dario Bonazza

I wrote:

it looks a lot like that mad idea of allowing you to select SEL for AF 
points selector and then reverting back to auto select, which was the 
behaviour of the AF selector before a firmware fix.


Please read it as:

it looks a lot like that mad idea of allowing you to set the AF points 
selector on SEL (manual selection) and then reverting the arrow keys back to 
functions other than AF point selection all the time (which was the odd 
behaviour of the AF selector before a firmware fix).


Dario


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Charles Robinson
On Nov 29, 2010, at 16:00, Dario Bonazza wrote:

 Charles Robinson wrote:
 
 On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:46, Dario Bonazza wrote:
 
 Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to 
 [Fixed]?
 
 If not, that could explain that behaviour. Don't ask me why one should 
 select a given white balance and then allow the camera to change it, but 
 Pentax thinks of it as a good idea!
 
 
 Isn't this all about being able to fine-tune all of the WB settings?  Not 
 the camera doing it, but the user making adjustments.
 
 K-7 manual, page 192:
 
 The camera automatically performs fine-tuning even when the light source is 
 specified. The color temperature of the light source is fixed when [11. WB 
 Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2]] menu (p.85) is set to [Fixed].
 
 AUTOMATICALLY, even when the light source is specified.
 

Well now, that's just nuts.

 -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Joseph McAllister
On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:24 , Charles Robinson wrote:

 On Nov 29, 2010, at 16:00, Dario Bonazza wrote:
 
 Charles Robinson wrote:
 
 On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:46, Dario Bonazza wrote:
 
 Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to 
 [Fixed]?
 
 If not, that could explain that behaviour. Don't ask me why one should 
 select a given white balance and then allow the camera to change it, but 
 Pentax thinks of it as a good idea!
 
 
 Isn't this all about being able to fine-tune all of the WB settings?  Not 
 the camera doing it, but the user making adjustments.
 
 K-7 manual, page 192:
 
 The camera automatically performs fine-tuning even when the light source is 
 specified. The color temperature of the light source is fixed when [11. WB 
 Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2]] menu (p.85) is set to 
 [Fixed].
 
 AUTOMATICALLY, even when the light source is specified.
 
 
 Well now, that's just nuts.
 
 -Charles

A. My K-20, and now my K-7 exhibit a similar problem in AWB. And now I know 
why..  Except it seems like the cameras jump to a whole different type of 
light, not just make subtle corrections (see B.)

B. Custom 12) Subtle or Strong variations in AWB or fixed should definitely be 
on Subtle to prevent the very wrong shift in your photos.

C. Dance practice halls I've ever been in have always had overhead fluorescent 
banks of 4 tubes per. Never seen one lit with tungsten. But I'm sure you know 
what you saw. Another checkmark for chimping, at least for starters. In your 
example you would have had to chimp the first 5 or 6 to realize something was 
wrong.

D. Please let us know what you find out abut the session. May give some more 
clues.


Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com

There is no off position to the genius switch.
Genius can, however, be observed as insanity.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Miserere
I'm pretty sure it's what Dario is saying. When I received the K-5
last week the first thing I did was go through the Custom menu and
change stuff like this. I don't understand why the default setting is
to allow the camera to change WB when on AutoWB, but it is.



On 29/11/2010, Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
 Charles Robinson wrote:

 On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:46, Dario Bonazza wrote:

 Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to
 [Fixed]?

 If not, that could explain that behaviour. Don't ask me why one should
 select a given white balance and then allow the camera to change it, but
 Pentax thinks of it as a good idea!


 Isn't this all about being able to fine-tune all of the WB settings?  Not
 the camera doing it, but the user making adjustments.

 K-7 manual, page 192:

 The camera automatically performs fine-tuning even when the light source is
 specified. The color temperature of the light source is fixed when [11. WB
 Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2]] menu (p.85) is set to
 [Fixed].

 AUTOMATICALLY, even when the light source is specified.

 Perhaps there are instances where such operation makes sense, but... to me,
 it looks a lot like that mad idea of allowing you to select SEL for AF
 points selector and then reverting back to auto select, which was the
 behaviour of the AF selector before a firmware fix.

 Dario


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.



-- 
—M.

\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com

http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread John Sessoms

From: Igor Roshchin


Yes, that could do it in principle, but it doesn't make sense in the
current situation. Since I _fixed_ the WB to a particular setting,
very slight changes shouldn't affect the WB.

To better illustrate what I observe, - let me show you this image:
http://komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2010/WB-problem-2010-11-27.jpg

No WB or exposure settings were changed in this sequence.
These photos were not modified.

Yes, one can correct the WB, but it is not how it should work, isn't it?



My $0.02 ...

It looks like the series were shot with daylight WB, and that in a few 
instances (the ones that are not yellow) you caught the room while it 
was illuminated by someone else's flash (or someone's flash went off 
while your shutter was open).


Not saying that's what it is, just that it looks like that to me.

I can easily get that yellow cast by shooting with daylight WB under 
mixed tungsten  fluorescent light.


And the ones that are not yellow look like daylight WB  flash.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: White Balance on K-7

2010-11-29 Thread Dario Bonazza

Joseph McAllister wrote:

B. Custom 12) Subtle or Strong variations in AWB or fixed should 
definitely be on Subtle to prevent the very wrong shift in your photos.


No, that's another solution, for a problem other than the one we are 
discussing here and, in case, it's the other way round.
That Subtle/Strong correction does not affect AWB and only deals with the 
type of correction you ask for when shooting under tungsten light.
Subtle means the camera does some minor compensation for the warm cast of 
the tungsten light, while keeping its distinctive mood.
Strong means the camera compensates for the warm cast, perfoming a 
white-balanced (neutral) shot.


Dario 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.