Re: Re: Diamonds and colonialism (fwd)

2000-04-07 Thread Jim Devine

At 06:52 PM 4/6/00 -0700, you wrote:
I wouldn't say it's [the New York TIMES] the best paper but certainly the 
best in the US.  Its editorial stance is another matter altogether.

today's TIMES has a front-page story about how Israel's harsh treatment of 
Arabs is mellowing. They never mentioned this harsh treatment, as far as I 
can tell, until it started (slowly) going away. That's the NYT!

Frankly, it's best to get news from a variety of sources. If I had the time 
 money, I'd subscribe to the LE MONDE/MANCHESTER GUARDIAN weekly...

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://liberalarts.lmu.edu/~jdevine




Diamonds and colonialism (fwd)

2000-04-06 Thread Louis Proyect

I really wonder why New York Times and bourgeois sources like
this suddenly rediscover Africa's heritage of colonalism!! Overall, it
does not seem to me more than an "orientalist" sympaty of reconstructing
the "other": we killed the folks, and let's do something to compansate it.

o!!..

Mine

The NY Times is much more complex. There are continual battles going on
over how to report, either in the interests of the truth or in the
interests of the State Department. Raymond Bonner was an honest reporter
who dared to question the Reaganite line on Central America. Finally he was
purged. I think everybody should read the NY Times on a daily basis, either
in print or on the web. It is the best newspaper in the world, regardless
of its editorial stance.

Louis Proyect

(The Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org)




Re: Diamonds and colonialism (fwd)

2000-04-06 Thread Anthony DCosta

I wouldn't say it's the best paper but certainly the best in the US.  Its
editorial stance is another matter altogether.


Anthony P. D'Costa
Associate Professor Ph: (253) 692-4462
Comparative International Development   Fax: (253) 692-5612 
University of WashingtonBox Number: 358436
1900 Commerce Street
Tacoma, WA 98402, USA
xxx

On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Louis Proyect wrote:

 I really wonder why New York Times and bourgeois sources like
 this suddenly rediscover Africa's heritage of colonalism!! Overall, it
 does not seem to me more than an "orientalist" sympaty of reconstructing
 the "other": we killed the folks, and let's do something to compansate it.
 
 o!!..
 
 Mine
 
 The NY Times is much more complex. There are continual battles going on
 over how to report, either in the interests of the truth or in the
 interests of the State Department. Raymond Bonner was an honest reporter
 who dared to question the Reaganite line on Central America. Finally he was
 purged. I think everybody should read the NY Times on a daily basis, either
 in print or on the web. It is the best newspaper in the world, regardless
 of its editorial stance.
 
 Louis Proyect
 
 (The Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org)
 
 




Diamonds and colonialism

2000-04-06 Thread Louis Proyect

From NY Times, April 6, 2000 "Africa's Diamond Wars"

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/africa/040600africa-diamonds.html

Exploiting a Continent 

The miseries of modern Africa are, in many ways, a legacy of its history. 

In the case of both Angola and Congo, colonialism obliterated whatever
political culture may have predated the arrival of Europeans. It invented
huge, largely fictive nations - Angola is the size of Texas, Congo of the
United States east of the Mississippi - roping together people who regarded
one other as foreigners. To make their nation-building pay, colonialists
used force to haul off everything from ivory to rubber to human beings. 

In Congo, the Belgian colonial state was famously greedy and cruel. Its
agents set impossible quotas for production of rubber and ivory, killing or
chopping off the hands of villagers who failed to meet them. The novelist
Joseph Conrad called it "the vilest scramble for loot that ever disfigured
the history of human conscience." 

In Angola, the Portuguese were less brutal, but no less toxic. 

At independence in 1975, several hundred thousand Portuguese residents,
virtually the entire educated population, abandoned the country. Some took
even their doorknobs with them. They left behind a place where almost no
Angolans had any training in statecraft, business or agriculture. 

Then for the better part of the last 50 years, the cold war and the
white-minority governments of southern Africa injected cash and arms into
regional wars. 

The Central Intelligence Agency, for instance, supported Unita in the early
1970's and again in the late 1980's. The Marxist government of Angola
received military assistance from the Soviet Union and up to 50,000 troops
from Cuba. When the C.I.A. was not helping Unita, the rebels got military
backup from white-ruled South Africa. 

Sierra Leone, a small country in West Africa, had a more benign colonial
history under British rule. But since the 1940's, predators who smuggle
diamonds have warped every aspect of the nation's economic and political
life. 

The meddling of colonialists, superpowers and white governments all but
stopped at the start of the 1990's, leaving diamonds, oil and other natural
resources as the primary forage for rebels and governments. 

In those countries where there was nothing to trade for weapons - as in
Mozambique, where post-apartheid South Africa stopped financing rebellion
and post-Communist Eastern Europe stopped financing the government - war
simply fizzled out. 

But Angola, Congo and Sierra Leone had plenty of diamonds left over to
excite greed, fuel war and to buy favors. The United Nations report on the
embargo against Unita described how Mr. Savimbi gave a "passport sized"
packet of diamonds to the president of Togo, Gnassingbe Éyadéma, as payment
for allowing his children to live in Togo and go to school there. Togo has
denied it. 

Mr. Savimbi "sealed" his friendship with the president of Burkina Faso,
Blaise Compaoré, by giving him a number of envelopes full of diamonds, as
well as contributing to his political campaign and helping his government
pay debts, according to the report. In return, it said, Burkina Faso sent
Mr. Savimbi three flights of diesel fuel. The government of Burkina Faso
denies that. 

"Oh, the diamonds, diamonds, diamonds," said a character in Graham Greene's
"The Heart of the Matter," a 1948 novel set in Sierra Leone. "You cannot
understand how many bribes are necessary." 

Manipulating Scarcity 

De Beers created its cartel 110 years ago when the company's founder, Cecil
Rhodes, realized that the sheer abundance of diamonds in southern Africa
would make them virtually worthless. By carefully manipulating scarcity, De
Beers prospered as perhaps the most powerful cartel in the annals of modern
commerce. 

In the process, however, De Beers has run afoul of antitrust laws in the
United States. The company's senior executives dare not enter this country
because of an outstanding antitrust indictment that charges De Beers with
fixing the prices of industrial diamonds. 

The company's grip on the diamond market has slipped a bit from near-total
dominance at mid-century, but it has continued to keep the price of
gem-quality diamonds high by being both aggressive and flexible. Through
the years, it has sponged up periodic floods of diamonds from Russia,
Australia and, until recently, across parts of war-ravaged Africa where it
does not own all the mines. 

Together with the artificial perception of rarity, what makes diamonds
profitable to more than 2.5 million miners, traders, cutters and
wholesalers around the world - and what energizes the $50-billion-a-year
retail diamond jewelry industry - is romance. 

That, for the most part, is also an invention of De Beers. In 1938, De
Beers hired a New York advertising company to convince millions of couples
that the larger the diamond on an engagement ring, the greater their love.
In the 1960's, a similar