Re: Nike again

1994-03-06 Thread Anthony D'Costa

Your book's title appears familiar "The End of Economics".  Have you seen 
"The End of Economics? Ethics and Disorder of Progress" by Cristovan 
Buareque?  It might be useful.

Anthony D'Costa
U of Washington

On Fri, 4 Mar 1994, Michael Perelman wrote:

 Yes, Nike is a marketing company.  Keep in mind that as companies rely more and
 more on fixed capital to replace labor, they, in effect, increase their
 ratio of marketing to production.  For example, automobile manufacturers become
 mere assemblers and marketers.  More and more of the value added is in
 oursourced parts.
 
 With respect to John Maurice Clark, much of his concern about overhead costs
 was implicit in his fathers work.  Although J.B. and many of the leading
 lights of economics wrote text books on perfect competition, they recommended
 policies based on the idea that large fixed capital costs made competition
 destructive.
 
 I have a piece in the Summer issue of the Journal of Economic Perspectives
 (in Joe Persky's column) on this subject.  It is also in a new book that I am
 completing called The End of Economics.
 
 Michael Perelman
 -- 
 Michael Perelman
 Economics Department
 California State University
 Chico, CA 95929
 
 Tel. 916-898-5321
  916-898-6141 messages
 E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



Nike again

1994-03-04 Thread Michael Perelman

Yes, Nike is a marketing company.  Keep in mind that as companies rely more and
more on fixed capital to replace labor, they, in effect, increase their
ratio of marketing to production.  For example, automobile manufacturers become
mere assemblers and marketers.  More and more of the value added is in
oursourced parts.

With respect to John Maurice Clark, much of his concern about overhead costs
was implicit in his fathers work.  Although J.B. and many of the leading
lights of economics wrote text books on perfect competition, they recommended
policies based on the idea that large fixed capital costs made competition
destructive.

I have a piece in the Summer issue of the Journal of Economic Perspectives
(in Joe Persky's column) on this subject.  It is also in a new book that I am
completing called The End of Economics.

Michael Perelman
-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 916-898-5321
 916-898-6141 messages
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Nike, again

1994-03-02 Thread Doug Henwood

Sometimes the automated prelies don't work too good.





-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 15:17:46 -0500
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown

   - Transcript of session follows -
While talking to curlew.cs.man.ac.uk:
 RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 550 Unknown local user 'PEN-L%EDU.CSUCHICO.ECST.BOBBY'
550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown

   - Unsent message follows -
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 15:16:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Doug Henwood dhenwood
Subject: Re: Running further with those shoes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

They may be a relatively small portion of overall costs, but they're the
easiest ones to cut. Can't cut debt service, land costs, the price of raw
materials, etc., by 90% the way you can by moving from a unionized
plant in Ontario or a non-unionized one in Tennessee to one staffed by
transient teenage women in Malaysia.

Doug

Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)


On Wed, 2 Mar 1994 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If labour costs were such a small proportion of overall costs why
 relocate production at all?
 
 Maybe like a lot of "global goods" there's a world wide marketing price
 policy so the price is perhaps falling in places like German (to counteract
 revaluation of Mark or recession) but not in the US. I'd opt for  closer
 scrutiny of the extent of the market and the price of running in different
 currency areas.
 
 I'm bored with running myself.
 Penny Ciancanelli
 Manchester







Re: Nike, again

1994-03-02 Thread Anthony D'Costa

I am not sure what Doug means by "transient" teenage women.  Malaysia is 
largely an Islamic nation, with other ethnic groups like the Indians and 
Chinese.  By transient it implies that family structures are loose and 
women are significantly mobile.  I think both of these implied 
characterizations of Malaysian society are false.  While it is true that 
female wage rates are lower in South East Asia and other 
developing economies than in North America being "transient" has little 
to do with them.  Capitalist development has brought about social changes 
but at the same time time strengthened indigenous movements, witness the 
Bumiputra policies in Malaysia.

Anthony D'Costa
U of Washington


 on top of that it is women are 
who are 

On Wed, 2 Mar 1994, Doug Henwood wrote:

 Sometimes the automated prelies don't work too good.
 
 
 
 
 
 -- Forwarded message --
 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 15:17:46 -0500
 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
 
- Transcript of session follows -
 While talking to curlew.cs.man.ac.uk:
  RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  550 Unknown local user 'PEN-L%EDU.CSUCHICO.ECST.BOBBY'
 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown
 
- Unsent message follows -
   (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Wed, 2 
Mar 1994 15:17:46 -0500
 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 15:16:06 -0500 (EST)
 From: Doug Henwood dhenwood
 Subject: Re: Running further with those shoes
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
 
 They may be a relatively small portion of overall costs, but they're the
 easiest ones to cut. Can't cut debt service, land costs, the price of raw
 materials, etc., by 90% the way you can by moving from a unionized
 plant in Ontario or a non-unionized one in Tennessee to one staffed by
 transient teenage women in Malaysia.
 
 Doug
 
 Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Left Business Observer
 212-874-4020 (voice)
 212-874-3137 (fax)
 
 
 On Wed, 2 Mar 1994 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  If labour costs were such a small proportion of overall costs why
  relocate production at all?
  
  Maybe like a lot of "global goods" there's a world wide marketing price
  policy so the price is perhaps falling in places like German (to counteract
  revaluation of Mark or recession) but not in the US. I'd opt for  closer
  scrutiny of the extent of the market and the price of running in different
  currency areas.
  
  I'm bored with running myself.
  Penny Ciancanelli
  Manchester
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: Nike, again

1994-03-02 Thread Doug Henwood

Damn, folks are so sensitive. By transient I meant high labor turnover.
Sorry. I didn't mean they were irresponsible or sluttish or anything like
that.

Doug

Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)



On Wed, 2 Mar 1994, Anthony D'Costa wrote:

 I am not sure what Doug means by "transient" teenage women.  Malaysia is 
 largely an Islamic nation, with other ethnic groups like the Indians and 
 Chinese.  By transient it implies that family structures are loose and 
 women are significantly mobile.  I think both of these implied 
 characterizations of Malaysian society are false.  While it is true that 
 female wage rates are lower in South East Asia and other 
 developing economies than in North America being "transient" has little 
 to do with them.  Capitalist development has brought about social changes 
 but at the same time time strengthened indigenous movements, witness the 
 Bumiputra policies in Malaysia.
 
 Anthony D'Costa
 U of Washington
 
 
  on top of that it is women are 
 who are 
 
 On Wed, 2 Mar 1994, Doug Henwood wrote:
 
  Sometimes the automated prelies don't work too good.
  
  
  
  
  
  -- Forwarded message --
  Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 15:17:46 -0500
  From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
  
 - Transcript of session follows -
  While talking to curlew.cs.man.ac.uk:
   RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   550 Unknown local user 'PEN-L%EDU.CSUCHICO.ECST.BOBBY'
  550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown
  
 - Unsent message follows -
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Wed, 2 
Mar 1994 15:17:46 -0500
  Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 15:16:06 -0500 (EST)
  From: Doug Henwood dhenwood
  Subject: Re: Running further with those shoes
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Mime-Version: 1.0
  Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
  
  They may be a relatively small portion of overall costs, but they're the
  easiest ones to cut. Can't cut debt service, land costs, the price of raw
  materials, etc., by 90% the way you can by moving from a unionized
  plant in Ontario or a non-unionized one in Tennessee to one staffed by
  transient teenage women in Malaysia.
  
  Doug
  
  Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Left Business Observer
  212-874-4020 (voice)
  212-874-3137 (fax)
  
  
  On Wed, 2 Mar 1994 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   If labour costs were such a small proportion of overall costs why
   relocate production at all?
   
   Maybe like a lot of "global goods" there's a world wide marketing price
   policy so the price is perhaps falling in places like German (to counteract
   revaluation of Mark or recession) but not in the US. I'd opt for  closer
   scrutiny of the extent of the market and the price of running in different
   currency areas.
   
   I'm bored with running myself.
   Penny Ciancanelli
   Manchester
  
  
  
  
  
  





Nike, again

1994-03-02 Thread Doug Henwood

Sometimes the automated prelies don't work too good.





-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 15:17:46 -0500
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown

   - Transcript of session follows -
While talking to curlew.cs.man.ac.uk:
 RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 550 Unknown local user 'PEN-L%EDU.CSUCHICO.ECST.BOBBY'
550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown

   - Unsent message follows -
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 15:16:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Doug Henwood dhenwood
Subject: Re: Running further with those shoes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

They may be a relatively small portion of overall costs, but they're the
easiest ones to cut. Can't cut debt service, land costs, the price of raw
materials, etc., by 90% the way you can by moving from a unionized
plant in Ontario or a non-unionized one in Tennessee to one staffed by
transient teenage women in Malaysia.

Doug

Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)


On Wed, 2 Mar 1994 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If labour costs were such a small proportion of overall costs why
 relocate production at all?
 
 Maybe like a lot of "global goods" there's a world wide marketing price
 policy so the price is perhaps falling in places like German (to counteract
 revaluation of Mark or recession) but not in the US. I'd opt for  closer
 scrutiny of the extent of the market and the price of running in different
 currency areas.
 
 I'm bored with running myself.
 Penny Ciancanelli
 Manchester








Re: Nike, again

1994-03-02 Thread Anthony D'Costa

I am not sure what Doug means by "transient" teenage women.  Malaysia is 
largely an Islamic nation, with other ethnic groups like the Indians and 
Chinese.  By transient it implies that family structures are loose and 
women are significantly mobile.  I think both of these implied 
characterizations of Malaysian society are false.  While it is true that 
female wage rates are lower in South East Asia and other 
developing economies than in North America being "transient" has little 
to do with them.  Capitalist development has brought about social changes 
but at the same time time strengthened indigenous movements, witness the 
Bumiputra policies in Malaysia.

Anthony D'Costa
U of Washington


 on top of that it is women are 
who are 

On Wed, 2 Mar 1994, Doug Henwood wrote:

 Sometimes the automated prelies don't work too good.
 
 
 
 
 
 -- Forwarded message --
 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 15:17:46 -0500
 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
 
- Transcript of session follows -
 While talking to curlew.cs.man.ac.uk:
  RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  550 Unknown local user 'PEN-L%EDU.CSUCHICO.ECST.BOBBY'
 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown
 
- Unsent message follows -
   (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Wed, 2 
Mar 1994 15:17:46 -0500
 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 15:16:06 -0500 (EST)
 From: Doug Henwood dhenwood
 Subject: Re: Running further with those shoes
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
 
 They may be a relatively small portion of overall costs, but they're the
 easiest ones to cut. Can't cut debt service, land costs, the price of raw
 materials, etc., by 90% the way you can by moving from a unionized
 plant in Ontario or a non-unionized one in Tennessee to one staffed by
 transient teenage women in Malaysia.
 
 Doug
 
 Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Left Business Observer
 212-874-4020 (voice)
 212-874-3137 (fax)
 
 
 On Wed, 2 Mar 1994 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  If labour costs were such a small proportion of overall costs why
  relocate production at all?
  
  Maybe like a lot of "global goods" there's a world wide marketing price
  policy so the price is perhaps falling in places like German (to counteract
  revaluation of Mark or recession) but not in the US. I'd opt for  closer
  scrutiny of the extent of the market and the price of running in different
  currency areas.
  
  I'm bored with running myself.
  Penny Ciancanelli
  Manchester