Re: PathTools 3.10 released
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:39:46PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote: > >I thought I supplied an implementation with that. > > Yes - your implementation worked for everything except "/.." -> "/", so > I just added one line that did that. The rest of the implementation is > yours verbatim. Oh, ok. The wording of your original post made it sound like you had to implement the whole thing. > I'm not sure why I needed to add that case & you didn't see a failure > on your side, though. Cuz I didn't check for it? :) -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern Life is like a sewer - what you get out of it depends on what you put into it. - Tom Lehrer
Re: PathTools 3.10 released
On Sep 12, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:39:46PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote: I thought I supplied an implementation with that. Yes - your implementation worked for everything except "/.." -> "/", so I just added one line that did that. The rest of the implementation is yours verbatim. Oh, ok. The wording of your original post made it sound like you had to implement the whole thing. Yeah, you're right. I think when I wrote that summary I had forgotten how the exchange went, but "prospective" was the wrong word to use. -Ken
Re: PathTools 3.10 released
On Sep 11, 2005, at 6:05 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 08:25:24AM -0500, Ken Williams wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:31:03PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote: I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN. Should be hitting mirrors now. Which prospective tests were those? The canonpath(foo/..) stuff on Win32, I guess. I thought I supplied an implementation with that. Yes - your implementation worked for everything except "/.." -> "/", so I just added one line that did that. The rest of the implementation is yours verbatim. I'm not sure why I needed to add that case & you didn't see a failure on your side, though. -Ken
Re: PathTools 3.10 released
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 08:25:24AM -0500, Ken Williams wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:31:03PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote: > >>I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests > >>that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN. Should > >>be hitting mirrors now. > > > >Which prospective tests were those? > > The canonpath(foo/..) stuff on Win32, I guess. I thought I supplied an implementation with that. -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern Life is like a sewer - what you get out of it depends on what you put into it. - Tom Lehrer
Re: PathTools 3.10 released
On Sep 10, 2005, at 11:31 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:31:03PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote: I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN. Should be hitting mirrors now. Which prospective tests were those? The canonpath(foo/..) stuff on Win32, I guess. -Ken
Re: PathTools 3.10 released
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:31:03PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote: > I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests > that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN. Should > be hitting mirrors now. Which prospective tests were those? -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
Re: PathTools 3.10 released
On Aug 27, 2005, at 7:35 PM, Ken Williams wrote: On Aug 27, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: Thanks, integrated to blead as change #25534. Note: File::Spec::Mac in bleadperl has local changes (typos in documentation) that you haven't integrated yet. Thanks, I'll patch that into my local copy and it'll be fixed when I release next. Actually, I'll release a 3.11 now, because apparently some people don't like the fact that the version number 3.10 looks a lot like 3.1. -Ken
Re: PathTools 3.10 released
On Aug 27, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: Thanks, integrated to blead as change #25534. Note: File::Spec::Mac in bleadperl has local changes (typos in documentation) that you haven't integrated yet. Thanks, I'll patch that into my local copy and it'll be fixed when I release next. -Ken
Re: PathTools 3.10 released
On 8/26/05, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests > that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN. Should > be hitting mirrors now. Thanks, integrated to blead as change #25534. Note: File::Spec::Mac in bleadperl has local changes (typos in documentation) that you haven't integrated yet.
PathTools 3.10 released
Hi, I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN. Should be hitting mirrors now. -Ken