Re: Phalanx update please!
Selon Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, Here are the final lists of the modules dependencies. This time I grouped the modules by their respective distribution name. I forgot to say that these lists were made by reading the META.yml when available, or by parsing Makefile.PL or Build.PL otherwise (borrowed the code from Thomas Klausner's Module::CPANTS::Generator::Prereq). Therefore they represent the dependencies of a large part of the CPAN. -- Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni Close the world, txEn eht nepO.
Re: Phalanx update please!
Hi! On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 12:33:36AM +0100, S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote: Oops! I didn't include the list on my first reply. But on the other hand I have completed the analysis. So here is the final list: http://rafb.net/paste/results/p4hveb43.html I haven't got any time in the last months to spend on CPANTS, but similar data is available here: http://cpants.dev.zsi.at/ from the cpants.db (sqlite) sqlite select requires,count(requires) as cnt from prereq group by requires order by cnt desc limit 30; requires cnt -- Test::More992 Carp 274 perl 255 DBI 222 File::Spec202 Data::Dumper 159 Digest::MD5 156 LWP::UserAgent151 Storable 151 Test::Simple 121 URI 116 Scalar::Util 105 XML::Parser 97 Tk97 IO::File 95 Template 94 Time::HiRes 93 POE 93 MIME::Base64 88 File::Basename80 Params::Validate 80 File::Temp72 DateTime 71 CGI 70 LWP 67 Error 62 HTML::Parser 62 Kwiki 62 POSIX 60 HTTP::Request 60 -- #!/usr/bin/perl http://domm.zsi.at for(ref bless{},just'another'perl'hacker){s-:+-$-gprint$_.$/}
Re: Phalanx update please!
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 11:04:15PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote: I'm working on an article for perl.com on the Phalanx project. Those of you involved, can you please give a summary of what you've done? Or better yet, give me a summary and update the wiki as well? Don't know if you saw Maddingue's update of his analysis of how many modules depend on module X. Maddingue http://nopaste.snit.ch:8001/1458 -- using Module::CoreList and checking against 5.8.0 That's just for what has META.yml which leaves out about 5500 distributions. He's working on extending it for the rest. Also some of them should be aggrigated together (ie. URI and URI::URL are the same distribution, LWP, LWP::Simple and HTTP::Request, etc...). There's the circle jerk or nepotism score to be taken into account. ie. Dependencies from modules of the same author should carry less weight. For example, Kwiki has a lot of dependencies. But before you weigh its importance you must consider many of the modules that depend on Kwiki were written by Ingy and Autrijus. So another metric to look at is not just how many dependents a module has but how many different authors depend on it. Finally, you can do a deep dependency scan. The how much will break when this breaks score. Taking into account not just what depends on a given module but what depends on that, and on that and so on down the line. For example. In Maddingue's list Class::DBI has 32 dependencies. Class::DBI depends on Ima::DBI but Ima::DBI doesn't even show up on the list. If Ima::DBI breaks, Class::DBI and everything it depends on breaks. So all of Class::DBI's dependencies can be weighted towards Ima::DBI. I think all of this can be derived from a list of Module: Dependency1, Dependency 2, etc... -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Commence simultaneous panic on my mark.
Re: Phalanx update please!
Oops! I didn't include the list on my first reply. But on the other hand I have completed the analysis. So here is the final list: http://rafb.net/paste/results/p4hveb43.html Michael G Schwern wrote: On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 11:04:15PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote: I'm working on an article for perl.com on the Phalanx project. Those of you involved, can you please give a summary of what you've done? Or better yet, give me a summary and update the wiki as well? Don't know if you saw Maddingue's update of his analysis of how many modules depend on module X. Here is the current version of my script if anyone wants to play it: http://rafb.net/paste/results/mQIw3x42.html It generates a simple text file with the name of each prereq module on each line. Then I use the following script prereqs2score.pl to generate the score list http://rafb.net/paste/results/DjokqD87.html Maddingue http://nopaste.snit.ch:8001/1458 -- using Module::CoreList and checking against 5.8.0 Here is a new version of the list: http://rafb.net/paste/results/1jHQhu17.html It includes only modules from A to M. This time, I used Module::Depends::Intrusive to gather more information, so it contains the dependencies of nearly all the modules up to this. Currently, I also record all the distributions that are buggy or that have a Makefile.PL too interactive for Module::Depends::Intrusive in order to skip them for next run. Some just die() or exit() and must also be skipped in order Also some of them should be aggrigated together (ie. URI and URI::URL are the same distribution, LWP, LWP::Simple and HTTP::Request, etc...). There's the circle jerk or nepotism score to be taken into account. ie. Dependencies from modules of the same author should carry less weight. For example, Kwiki has a lot of dependencies. But before you weigh its importance you must consider many of the modules that depend on Kwiki were written by Ingy and Autrijus. So another metric to look at is not just how many dependents a module has but how many different authors depend on it. Finally, you can do a deep dependency scan. The how much will break when this breaks score. Taking into account not just what depends on a given module but what depends on that, and on that and so on down the line. For example. In Maddingue's list Class::DBI has 32 dependencies. Class::DBI depends on Ima::DBI but Ima::DBI doesn't even show up on the list. If Ima::DBI breaks, Class::DBI and everything it depends on breaks. So all of Class::DBI's dependencies can be weighted towards Ima::DBI. I think all of this can be derived from a list of Module: Dependency1, Dependency 2, etc... I'll add more information to the dependency list once I have sorted out all the distributions that prevent any automated running of these scripts. Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni -- - --- -- - -- - --- -- - --- -- - --[ http://maddingue.org ] Close the world, txEn eht nepO
Phalanx update please!
I'm working on an article for perl.com on the Phalanx project. Those of you involved, can you please give a summary of what you've done? Or better yet, give me a summary and update the wiki as well? I want to be able to say SouthFlorida PM has improved the coverage of Wango::Tango from 60% to 90%, and Chicago.PM has found and fixed three bugs in HTML::Googah. Thanks, xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
Re: Phalanx update
On 2004-12-02, Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've reorganized all the trees in http://svn.perl.org/phalanx. A description of how things should be is at http://svn.perl.org/phalanx/structure.pod. I think I missed something. This clearly has something to do with SVN hosting and the Phalanx project, but what's the big picture here? Mark -- http://mark.stosberg.com/
Re: Phalanx update
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:27:47AM +, Mark Stosberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On 2004-12-02, Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've reorganized all the trees in http://svn.perl.org/phalanx. A description of how things should be is at http://svn.perl.org/phalanx/structure.pod. I think I missed something. This clearly has something to do with SVN hosting and the Phalanx project, but what's the big picture here? PMers who are Phalanxing modules can use svn.perl.org to host their code so that all can collaborate easily. xoxo, andy -- Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance