Re: Parrot and the web (PHP?)

2005-04-13 Thread BÁRTHÁZI András
Hi,
I'm not a UNIX guru, but I don't know an easily installable solution 
for the problem. I would like to run just one Apache, and would like 
to run Perl as an Apache module. Chroot I think is not a solution for 
it. Running the script as CGI or running as much Apaches as much 
client you have is not a solution for me and for a lot of people. PHP 
offer an easy way to solve this problem.
You obviously are talking about a web hosting environment with multiple 
applications and customers.
Yes.
I did not mean that chroot() was the solution, it is however part of the 
solution on the UNIX
environment if you want proper security.
I agree, but it cannot solve the problem (a customer can read the 
other's program), just using a lot of extra resources.

Perl was the most famous web development environment some year ago, 
today PHP is that. I think one of
I disagree. How do you support that blanket statement?
This is my experiment in Hungary about web development. PHP is the most 
famous language, after it Java and .Net comes and Perl is after them. 
Hosting companies have very few "Perl clients", and they don't like them.

We had a meeting (workshop, mini-conference) in Hungary a few months 
ago, and we talked about the Perl vs. PHP thing. We think that people 
choose PHP for web development 'cause it can be easily installed and you 
get results in a short time, plus it's hard to setup a Perl environment 
that's secure.

I don't have any customers using PHP, they either use Java (some J2EE 
container, Oracle, BEA, Websphere, Tomcat) or they use Perl (CGI or 
mod-perl), etc.
I have just PHP customers. ;) :(
I agree with your statement if you are talking about small web-site 
hosting. 30 bucks a month
for a website and you host 100 sites on a single shared server. PHP has 
a large share of that market,
but for medium to large complexity apps, specifically commercial 
enterprise apps, PHP has
very little presence. The marketing dollars are all behind Java and .NET.
Totally agree.
I guess it just goes to show we all swim in different ponds.
I think, you are right. ;)
Anyway, I did not mean to start a tangent, I want to see PHP run well on 
Parrot so we can agree on that.
:)
Anyway, I'm not talking about PHP. I'm talking about how I think Parrot 
and Perl 6 can be sucessful in the web development area.

Bye,
  Andras
ps: And I'm finished it. ;)


Re: Parrot and the web (PHP?)

2005-04-13 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:23:01PM -0400, MrJoltCola wrote:
> >Perl was the most famous web development environment some year ago, today 
> >PHP is that. I think one of
> 
> I disagree. How do you support that blanket statement?

I politely request that we not have a Perl vs PHP popularity discussion here.



Re: Parrot and the web (PHP?)

2005-04-13 Thread MrJoltCola
At 03:49 PM 4/13/2005, BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
I'm not a UNIX guru, but I don't know an easily installable solution for 
the problem. I would like to run just one Apache, and would like to run 
Perl as an Apache module. Chroot I think is not a solution for it. Running 
the script as CGI or running as much Apaches as much client you have is 
not a solution for me and for a lot of people. PHP offer an easy way to 
solve this problem.
You obviously are talking about a web hosting environment with multiple 
applications and customers.

I did not mean that chroot() was the solution, it is however part of the 
solution on the UNIX
environment if you want proper security.

Perl was the most famous web development environment some year ago, today 
PHP is that. I think one of
I disagree. How do you support that blanket statement?
I don't have any customers using PHP, they either use Java (some J2EE 
container, Oracle, BEA, Websphere, Tomcat) or they use Perl (CGI or 
mod-perl), etc.

I agree with your statement if you are talking about small web-site 
hosting. 30 bucks a month
for a website and you host 100 sites on a single shared server. PHP has a 
large share of that market,
but for medium to large complexity apps, specifically commercial enterprise 
apps, PHP has
very little presence. The marketing dollars are all behind Java and .NET.

I guess it just goes to show we all swim in different ponds.
Anyway, I did not mean to start a tangent, I want to see PHP run well on 
Parrot so we can
agree on that.

-Melvin



Re: Parrot and the web (PHP?)

2005-04-13 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:49 PM +0200 4/13/05, BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
Hi,
An other question is, that how can you tell 
to the platform, to limit these features, 
maybe non-modifiable environment variables 
and command line parameters can be the ways 
of it.
For that you need a full-blown quota and 
privilege system. Luckily there are plans for 
one. :)
As far as boxing a VM into a sub-directory, 
etc. UNIX (chroot) and VMS make this a breeze 
since
the mechanisms are builtin to the OS, it is 
Windows where all the work has to be done.
I'm not a UNIX guru, but I don't know an easily 
installable solution for the problem. I would 
like to run just one Apache, and would like to 
run Perl as an Apache module. Chroot I think is 
not a solution for it. Running the script as CGI 
or running as much Apaches as much client you 
have is not a solution for me and for a lot of 
people. PHP offer an easy way to solve this 
problem.
It's important here to note that when I said 
"platform" I meant "Parrot". (That was in there, 
but it's worth being clear about) That is, the 
platform is Parrot, not the OS parrot is running 
on, and Parrot is responsible for any security 
guarantees it makes. Now, it may make them by 
using facilities the OS provides (which makes the 
job easier) but it doesn't have to -- it can and 
will do it with no OS help if need be.
--
Dan

--it's like this---
Dan Sugalski  even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
  teddy bears get drunk


Re: Parrot and the web (PHP?)

2005-04-13 Thread BÁRTHÁZI András
Hi,
An other question is, that how can you tell to the platform, to limit 
these features, maybe non-modifiable environment variables and 
command line parameters can be the ways of it.
For that you need a full-blown quota and privilege system. Luckily 
there are plans for one. :)
As far as boxing a VM into a sub-directory, etc. UNIX (chroot) and VMS 
make this a breeze since
the mechanisms are builtin to the OS, it is Windows where all the work 
has to be done.
I'm not a UNIX guru, but I don't know an easily installable solution for 
the problem. I would like to run just one Apache, and would like to run 
Perl as an Apache module. Chroot I think is not a solution for it. 
Running the script as CGI or running as much Apaches as much client you 
have is not a solution for me and for a lot of people. PHP offer an easy 
way to solve this problem.

Perl was the most famous web development environment some year ago, 
today PHP is that. I think one of the reasons is this. (Anyway, Parrot 
and the Languages should work on all platforms, not just some - a lot of 
people using Windows as development platform).

Bye,
  Andras


Re: Parrot and the web (PHP?)

2005-04-13 Thread MrJoltCola
At 02:33 PM 4/13/2005, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 8:25 PM +0200 4/13/05, BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
An other question is, that how can you tell to the platform, to limit 
these features, maybe non-modifiable environment variables and command 
line parameters can be the ways of it.
For that you need a full-blown quota and privilege system. Luckily there 
are plans for one. :)
As far as boxing a VM into a sub-directory, etc. UNIX (chroot) and VMS make 
this a breeze since
the mechanisms are builtin to the OS, it is Windows where all the work has 
to be done.

Maybe Windows has matured since the last time I looked at this sort of 
thing, but most
sys admins I know still prefer to run their JVMs, app servers, etc. in a 
UNIX environment
just for this reason.

Solaris 10 just took it to a new level with "zones" although there have 
been similar patches
out there for BSD and Linux for a long time.

-Melvin


Re: Parrot and the web (PHP?)

2005-04-13 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:25 PM +0200 4/13/05, BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
An other question is, that how can you tell to 
the platform, to limit these features, maybe 
non-modifiable environment variables and command 
line parameters can be the ways of it.
For that you need a full-blown quota and 
privilege system. Luckily there are plans for 
one. :)
--
Dan

--it's like this---
Dan Sugalski  even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
  teddy bears get drunk


Re: Parrot and the web (PHP?)

2005-04-13 Thread BÁRTHÁZI András
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 8:42 AM -0500 4/13/05, Timm Murray wrote:
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 08:38 am, BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
<>
 I think that web development will be very important in the life of
 Parrot and Perl 6. One of the most important (at least as a server
 administrator) feature of PHP, is that you can lock the programs into a
 directory by defining "open_basedir". If the application try to open a
 file from a directory not defined in it, that there will be an
 exception. It's very useful for a hosting company, that two client's
 program cannot read each other.
<>
I think Parrot is the wrong place to solve this problem.  It's better 
to be
handled by the languages themselves.
Nope, parrot's the right place to solve this problem, otherwise the 
problem's not solved. Security needs to be implemented by the platform 
(which, in this case, would be parrot) if you want it to work.
I agree, that's why I sent this letter to this mailing list. Anyway, I 
think this feature would be very useful for all the scripting languages 
for CGI scripting and for mod_parrot, too (I'm missing this feature from 
Perl 5), and maybe not just for the web, but for console and other type 
of applications.

Let me mention an other feature related to this topic: disabling 
built-in functions, because limiting file access by I/O is not enough, 
if you can use system(), `` and other things.

An other question is, that how can you tell to the platform, to limit 
these features, maybe non-modifiable environment variables and command 
line parameters can be the ways of it.

Bye,
  Andras


Re: Parrot and the web (PHP?)

2005-04-13 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:42 AM -0500 4/13/05, Timm Murray wrote:
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 08:38 am, BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
<>
 I think that web development will be very important in the life of
 Parrot and Perl 6. One of the most important (at least as a server
 administrator) feature of PHP, is that you can lock the programs into a
 directory by defining "open_basedir". If the application try to open a
 file from a directory not defined in it, that there will be an
 exception. It's very useful for a hosting company, that two client's
 program cannot read each other.
<>
I think Parrot is the wrong place to solve this problem.  It's better to be
handled by the languages themselves.
Nope, parrot's the right place to solve this 
problem, otherwise the problem's not solved. 
Security needs to be implemented by the platform 
(which, in this case, would be parrot) if you 
want it to work.
--
Dan

--it's like this---
Dan Sugalski  even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
  teddy bears get drunk


Re: Parrot and the web (PHP?)

2005-04-13 Thread Timm Murray
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 08:38 am, BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
<>
> I think that web development will be very important in the life of
> Parrot and Perl 6. One of the most important (at least as a server
> administrator) feature of PHP, is that you can lock the programs into a
> directory by defining "open_basedir". If the application try to open a
> file from a directory not defined in it, that there will be an
> exception. It's very useful for a hosting company, that two client's
> program cannot read each other.
<>

I think Parrot is the wrong place to solve this problem.  It's better to be 
handled by the languages themselves.


pgpDgS4MhpGdH.pgp
Description: PGP signature