[GENERAL] news.postgresql.org down

2006-11-01 Thread Trewern, Ben
Does anyone know what's happened to the news.postgresql.org server?  I
haven't been able to access it now for a couple of days.

Regards,

Ben 


CARILLION VALUES

Openness - Collaboration - Mutual Dependency - Professional Delivery 
-Sustainable Profitable Growth - Innovation

**

This e-mail transmission, including any attachments, is confidential to the 
intended recipient. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If 
you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] You must not disclose its contents to anyone, retain, copy, 
distribute or take action in reliance upon it. 

Carillion may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails. By replying to this e-mail 
you give your consent to such monitoring.

Carillion plc: Registered in England No. 3782379 Registered Office: Birch 
Street Wolverhampton WV1 4HY.

This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl 
http://www.blackspider.com/, however, Carillion does not accept any 
responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise 
check this e-mail and any attachments.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


RE: [GENERAL] Outer joins

2001-07-13 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] Outer joins





Postgres 7.1 does support Left, right  outer joins. Functions are similar to stored procedures but they cannot return rows. I think that this limitation is being worked on for the next release (7.2).

By the way should there be a 'Postgres Features' page on the website. This would save a large amount of these queries and reduce the amount of e-mails on this list. I'm sure that lots of interest is being raised because of the 'Redhat Database' Announcement. Some of these people will just want to know what Postgres is capable of.

Regards


Ben


 -Original Message-
 From: eddie iannuccelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 13 July 2001 18:51
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [GENERAL] Outer joins
 
 
 Can anyone confirm me that Postgres 7.1 does not support outer join ?
 Are functions similar to classical stored procedure ?
 
 thanks
 -- 
 **
 Eddie IANNUCCELLI - tel: 05 61 28 54 44
 INRA, Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire
 Chemin de Borde Rouge - Auzeville -BP27
 31326 Castanet Tolosan
 **
 
 
 
 ---(end of 
 broadcast)---
 TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
 (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 


Sorry about the footer it's automatic.




*
This email and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the sender and do not store, copy or disclose the content
to any other person.

It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that opening this
message and/or any of its attachments will not adversely affect
its systems. No responsibility is accepted by the Company.
*



RE: [GENERAL] Kylix, dbexpress PostgreSql

2001-05-29 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] Kylix, dbexpress  PostgreSql





Try using ZeosDBO at http://www.zeoslib.org/ this has just been ported to Kylix. Not sure how stable it is but the windows version is great :).

Regards


Ben


 -Original Message-
 From: Denis Gasparin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 May 2001 16:39
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [GENERAL] Kylix, dbexpress  PostgreSql
 
 
 Hi to all!
  I searched all the pgsql mailing list (and the 
 internet) to find if there 
 is a dbexpress driver or some way to get pgsql into Borland 
 Kylix. The only 
 solution i've found is the beta driver from EasySoft 
 dbExpress Gateway to 
 ODBC.
  Is there another way or is there any plan to support 
 Kylix  dbExpress?
 
 Please, let me know: i'm going to develop a program in kylix and i'm 
 considering what db platform to use. If isn't there another 
 way i've to 
 choose Interbase instead of pgsql (with very very much regret...).
 
 Thank to all,
 Denis Gasparin
 ---
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ---(end of 
 broadcast)---
 TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
 
 http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
 




*
This email and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the sender and do not store, copy or disclose the content
to any other person.

It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that opening this
message and/or any of its attachments will not adversely affect
its systems. No responsibility is accepted by the Company.
*



RE: [GENERAL] Starting postgresql on startup

2001-03-30 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] Starting postgresql on startup





'linuxconf' on Mandrake 7.1 should be able to set postgres to run at boot time as long as you set Postgresql up from an rpm. If you got to 'Control Panel' - 'Control service activity' - 'postgresql'. Set Startup to automatic and select the run levels you want Postgresql to run in, usually 3  5.

If you compiled Postgresql from source then I think there is a script in /contrib (There is in 7.1 Beta :-) ) which sets-up an rc script. This should then make postgresql available in linuxconf.

Regards


Ben


P.S. This works in Mandrake 7.0  7.2 so hopefully 7.1 


 -Original Message-
 From: Zak McGregor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 30 March 2001 05:05
 To: antken
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Starting postgresql on startup
 
 
 On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:05:55 +0100
 antken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  how would i go about making postgresql start when linux boots?
  i dont understand what the install document is going on about either
  i am running linux mandrake 7.1 and postgres 7.0.3
 
 The easiest way is to run ntsysv as root... if that doesn't 
 work, you'll
 need to look at your rc scripts.
 
 Cheers
 
 Zak
 
 ---(end of 
 broadcast)---
 TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
 





RE: [GENERAL] PostGreSql 7.1

2001-03-30 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] PostGreSql 7.1





http://www.postgresql.org/sites.html has a list of mirrors try one of them near you and the RPMs should be in directory dev/test-rpms

Regards


Ben



 -Original Message-
 From: Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 30 March 2001 04:14
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [GENERAL] PostGreSql 7.1
 
 
 Hi, All
 
 Where can I get a PostGreSQL 7.1 lattest beta version with RPM installation?
 
 JACK




*
This email and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the sender and do not store, copy or disclose the content
to any other person.

It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that opening this
message and/or any of its attachments will not adversely affect
its systems. No responsibility is accepted by the Company.
*



RE: [GENERAL] I wonder why I don't get an exception on delphi?

2001-03-16 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] I wonder why I don't get an exception on delphi?





Have you tried the following components:


http://www.zeos.dn.ua/download/zeosdbo-5.2.3-beta.zip


They seem to work more reliably and much more quickly than the ODBC drivers. They also give the required errors ;-)


Regards


Ben


P.S. Very New Home Page http://www.zeoslib.org



 -Original Message-
 From: Ligia M. Pimentel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 14 March 2001 23:30
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [GENERAL] I wonder why I don't get an exception on delphi?
 
 
 I'm using Delphi (windows) to develop a database application 
 using Postgres
 7.1 in linux.
 When I use delphi with other databases and I try to insert a 
 record that
 violates referential integrity I get an exception, but with postgres I
 don't, I tried to insert the same record on PSQL and I get an 
 error, could
 it be the ODBC driver?
 
 Please help me, if you know...
 
 
 Thank you.
 
 Ligia
 
 
 
 ---(end of 
 broadcast)---
 TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
 subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
 message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
 





RE: [GENERAL] Data types?

2001-03-08 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] Data types? 





I thought:


\dT


This should do it


Ben


 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 08 March 2001 01:00
 To: Christopher Sawtell
 Cc: Flemming Frøkjær; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Data types? 
 
 
 Christopher Sawtell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  On Thu, 08 Mar 2001 12:29, Flemming Frøkjær wrote:
  How do i find out what data types are available in PostgreSQL.
 
  Look in the regression tests. Interesting stuff.
 
 And there's always select * from pg_type ... not to mention 
 the source
 code ...
 
regards, tom lane
 
 ---(end of 
 broadcast)---
 TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
 
 http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
 





RE: [GENERAL] Convert to upper

2001-03-02 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] Convert to upper





It may be better using a trigger. You don't then get the error message (from the constraint) the record is just updated with the uppercase version of what was inserted.

Regards


Ben 


 -Original Message-
 From: Peter Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 02 March 2001 16:16
 To: Matthias Teege
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Convert to upper
 
 
 Matthias,
 
 the easiest way is to use CHECK constraints. see example below.
 
 Servus,
 Peter
 
 Matthias Teege wrote:
  is there any way to limit values to upper case strings?
  Somthing like:
  
  name char(15) DEFAULT (upper(name))
  
  or must I use triggers?
 
 test=# create table bla(bb char(10) CHECK (bb =UPPER(bb)));
 CREATE
 test=# \d bla
 Table bla
 Attribute | Type | Modifier
 ---+---+--
 bb | character(10) |
 Constraint: ((bb)::text = upper((bb)::text))
 
 test=# insert into bla values ('OTTO');
 INSERT 381409 1
 test=# insert into bla values ('otto');
 ERROR: ExecAppend: rejected due to CHECK constraint bla_bb
 ERROR: ExecAppend: rejected due to CHECK constraint bla_bb
 test=# select * from bla;
 bb
 
 OTTO
 (1 row)
 
 ---(end of 
 broadcast)---
 TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
 (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 





RE: [GENERAL] Does PostgreSQL support Constant Expression (Alias Name)?

2001-03-02 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] Does PostgreSQL support Constant Expression (Alias Name)?







Try SELECT fname as First Name, lname as Last Name FROM aTable;


Regards


Ben


 -Original Message-
 From: Raymond Chui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 02 March 2001 14:30
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [GENERAL] Does PostgreSQL support Constant Expression (Alias
 Name)?


 If a table has columns fname, lname.
 I want to do query like

 SELECT fname First Name, lname Last Name FROM aTable;

 This SELECT statement is fine in Oracle, Sybase and Informix.
 But I get an error message in PostgreSQL

 Because I want the output like

 First Name | Last Name
 --
 fn | ln

 instead default like

 fname | lname
 ---
 fn | ln

 What is the correct way doing this in PostgreSQL?
 Thank you very much in advance!



 --Raymond

 





RE: [GENERAL] postgresql-tcl-7.03 requires libtcl8.0.so

2001-02-27 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] postgresql-tcl-7.03 requires libtcl8.0.so





Mandrake 7.2 includes tcl-8.3.2-4mdk. Make sure this is installed then, as long as thats the only remaining dependency, install postgresql-tcl-7.0.3-2mdk with --nodeps and all seems to work ;-)

Regards


Ben


 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 27 February 2001 09:59
 To: pg-general
 Subject: [GENERAL] postgresql-tcl-7.03 requires libtcl8.0.so
 
 
 
 
 
 The required library comes from tcl8.0 and I have been
 all over the web looking for it. Does anyone have a
 URL for this?
 
 Would like to run pgaccess. Downloading that one,
 however, leads me into another mess looking for
 'main.tcl'.
 
 Running Mandrake 7.2.
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 -Bill
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
 





RE: [GENERAL] Re: ALTER DROP COLUMN

2001-02-13 Thread Trewern, Ben

Is there any chance of adding a note about this to the docs?  It does not
seem to be documented anywhere!  Maybe a note in ALTER TABLE
(sql-altertable.htm) and changing the FAQ slightly to mention what happen to
triggers, views, constraints etc.

Regards

Ben

 -Original Message-
 From: Fred Yankowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 12 February 2001 21:41
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [GENERAL] Re: ALTER DROP COLUMN
 
 
 I just tried this recommended procedure with a little test.  It copied
 over the Attribute and Type information and the primary key index, but
 left everything else behind:  not-null constraints, defaults,
 references constraints, check constraints, sequence generated for
 'serial' type -- to name a few.
 
 So how is this useful for anything beyond a toy database?
 
 This inability to drop a column makes it hard to follow an "extreme
 programming" style of development, where one designs only as much into
 the database schema as is needed at the moment (DTSTTCPW, YAGNI).
 When I do that I often find that I need to drop columns (in favor of
 other columns of different types) as I evolve the schema to support
 ever more complex applications.  PostgreSQL makes this a bit harder
 than it needs to be.
 
 On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 12:34:20PM -0800, Brent R. Matzelle wrote:
  I know it's a pain, but it isn't all that bad.  Just rename your
  table like so:
  
  ALTER TABLE old_name RENAME TO another_name
  
 
  Then re-create the old table without the deleted column(s):
  
  SELECT col1, col2, col4 INTO TABLE old_name FROM
  another_name
  
  Then delete the old table:
  
  DROP TABLE another_name
 
 -- 
 Fred Yankowski   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  tel: +1.630.879.1312
 Principal Consultant www.OntoSys.com   fax: +1.630.879.1370
 OntoSys, Inc 38W242 Deerpath Rd, Batavia, IL 60510, USA
 



RE: [GENERAL] 7.0 configuration

2001-02-05 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] 7.0 configuration 





On occasions I have had similar errors when starting up. I'm using Mandrake 7.0.3-2mdk RPMs on Mandrake 7.2. The server still starts and runs OK.

Have done a complete reinstall since the last time I had this error so can be of little more help.


Regards


Ben


 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 03 February 2001 20:18
 To: Belcher, Jim
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 configuration 
 
 
 Belcher, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  When the system boots, and Postgres is attempting to 
  start, I get the following error: 564, unary operator expected.
 
 I don't believe any part of Postgres itself issues such an error code.
 Perhaps the message is coming out of your shell, which would suggest
 some portability problem in the pg_ctl shell script. Try running
 pg_ctl by hand and/or inserting debugging echo commands to see if you
 can narrow down where the problem is. 
 
 What platform are you on, anyway?
 
regards, tom lane
 





RE: [GENERAL] How to see a RULE definition?

2001-01-11 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] How to see a RULE definition?





You can use:
pgdump -s  outfile


which will dump all the schema for the database.
It should be in there somewhere ;)


Regards


Ben


 -Original Message-
 From: Josh Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 11 January 2001 16:16
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [GENERAL] How to see a RULE definition?
 
 
 
  I am a Postgresql convert from MySQL so I am fairly new to this
 system but I am catching on quick. I had a question that I 
 couldn't find
 in any of the docs or in the FAQ's. I was creating a rule on 
 a view and
 was wondering if there was a way to look at the rule 
 definition once it
 has been saved?
 
  I envision myself creating a few rules here and there but if I
 move off this DB project and someone else takes over I would 
 like them to
 have a way to see what I did. I was able to figure out that 
 all the rules
 for a particular DB are stored in the pg_rewrite table but that seems
 almost unreadable for a human. What I would like is a 
 command that spits
 out the create syntax I used when the rule was first created. On that
 same line of thinking, is there a command to get a list of 
 all rules that
 have been put on a table?
 
  I guess if all else fails I will just have to pull up a good old
 text editor and detail exactly what rules I build in.
 
 
 Thanks,
 Josh Goodman
 
 
 





Recall: [GENERAL] How to see a RULE definition?

2001-01-11 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: Recall: [GENERAL] How to see a RULE definition?





Trewern, Ben would like to recall the message, [GENERAL] How to see a RULE definition?.





RE: [GENERAL] How to see a RULE definition?

2001-01-11 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: RE: [GENERAL] How to see a RULE definition?





You can use:
pg_dump -s dbase  outfile


which will dump all the schema for the database.
It should be in there somewhere ;)


Regards


Ben


 -Original Message-
 From: Josh Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 11 January 2001 16:16
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [GENERAL] How to see a RULE definition?
 
 
 
  I am a Postgresql convert from MySQL so I am fairly new to this
 system but I am catching on quick. I had a question that I 
 couldn't find
 in any of the docs or in the FAQ's. I was creating a rule on 
 a view and
 was wondering if there was a way to look at the rule 
 definition once it
 has been saved?
 
  I envision myself creating a few rules here and there but if I
 move off this DB project and someone else takes over I would 
 like them to
 have a way to see what I did. I was able to figure out that 
 all the rules
 for a particular DB are stored in the pg_rewrite table but that seems
 almost unreadable for a human. What I would like is a 
 command that spits
 out the create syntax I used when the rule was first created. On that
 same line of thinking, is there a command to get a list of 
 all rules that
 have been put on a table?
 
  I guess if all else fails I will just have to pull up a good old
 text editor and detail exactly what rules I build in.
 
 
 Thanks,
 Josh Goodman
 
 
 





RE: [GENERAL] Updating pg_attribute - Permission denied

2000-10-23 Thread Trewern, Ben

Looks like I have turned off usecatupd in pg_shadow. Doh!  Was mucking
around with permissions some time ago but not had any trouble up till now.

Any ideas how to switch it back? Update pg_shadow SET usecatupd .  gives
me Permission denied!!!

Ben.

 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 22 October 2000 04:08
 To: Trewern, Ben
 Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Updating pg_attribute - Permission denied 
 
 
 "Trewern, Ben" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I was trying to update attnotnull = 't' in the pg_attribute 
 to add Not Null
  constraint to a table.  It gave me a Permission denied.
  Is this standard? Am I not allowed to change system 
 catalogues (I am using
  the postgres superuser!)
 
 I don't believe it --- are you *sure* you were superuser?  Or perhaps
 you'd turned off pg_shadow's usecatupd for yourself?
 
 I get this behavior:
 
 play= update pg_attribute set attnotnull = 't' where 
 attrelid =  334893 and
 play- attname = 'f1';
 ERROR:  pg_attribute: Permission denied.
 play= \c - postgres
 You are now connected as new user postgres.
 play=# update pg_attribute set attnotnull = 't' where 
 attrelid =  334893 and
 play-# attname = 'f1';
 UPDATE 1
 play=#
 
  Or can you only change attnotnull to false i.e. remove a not null
  constraint?  I suppose this would make some kind of sense, as there
  could already be Nulls in the field.
 
 It's up to you to worry about that sort of consistency issue if you
 reach in and hack pg_attribute directly.  Certainly the permission
 check is not concerned with it.
 
   regards, tom lane
 



[GENERAL] INHERITANCE

2000-08-31 Thread Trewern, Ben
Title: INHERITANCE





I have just been trying out


Create Table .. Inherits ( ..);


Am I right in saying you create a table that inherits fields  default values, but not triggers.


I have not tried rules or anything else yet. Where can I read more about inheritance and where to use it.


Thanks in advance,


Ben Trewern