Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-19 Thread Robert Treat
On Monday 04 February 2008 10:48, vincent wrote:
  Christopher Browne wrote:
 
  Personally I'm surprised that the last couple responses seem to center
  around not being able to make much money off of it. I agree that it
  would require some time investment, but so did building PG in the first
  place. Countless people have already sacrificed hours upon hours of
  their time with no return on their investment except pride in their work
  and a better overall product for everybody to use. I'm not a talented
  enough programmer to contribute to the code, but in this way I can do
  something to give back to the pg community.
 
  --
  Tom Hart

 +1

 It seems there's a stalemate, apparently PgSQL needs to be more popular
 before authors want to write for it, and the public doesn't want to commit
 to a database that has only a handfull of books available.


Just to clarify, the market needs to expand to get publishers on board, not 
authors. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-14 Thread Tom Hart

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:50:41 -0500 (EST)
Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
I could help out with the initial setup, you could just have somebody 
internally do the install and let me have an account when it's ready, 
whatever makes sense for you.  I have two articles I can submit as 
examples of a good format for people to use to push some initial

content in there, I may turn those into a template or something.  Let
me know what I can do to help get this going.



I just got back from scale, let me talk to the guys and see which
machine this needs to go on and I will get back with you.

Joshua D. Drake



- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit


  

Are we still waiting on this, or did the discussion move off list?

--
Tom Hart
IT Specialist
Cooperative Federal
723 Westcott St.
Syracuse, NY 13210
(315) 471-1116 ext. 202
(315) 476-0567 (fax)


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-14 Thread Greg Smith

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Tom Hart wrote:


Are we still waiting on this, or did the discussion move off list?


Waiting--all involved are distracted doing the organization work for the 
East conference this week.


--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-11 Thread Erik Jones


On Feb 11, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Greg Smith wrote:


On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Joshua D. Drake wrote:


On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:07:37 -0500 (EST)
Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Can anyone think of another place a community docs wiki could go at?


CMD will host anything you need.


Basically all it would take to get this off the ground is a host  
running PHP 5.0+ and PostgreSQL 8.1+ (with tsearch2) that the  
current Mediawiki distribution could be installed into; PHP 5.1 and  
PG 8.2 would be preferred.  The main install instructions are at  
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Installing_MediaWiki and I  
know they're good because I fixed the parts that weren't when I  
last installed one of these.


The main open question for initial post-install configuration is  
how to deal with edit privledges.  I think this one would be OK  
with letting anyone sign up for an account in an automated way,  
rather than requiring a human approval like the Developer's wiki  
does, but only allow registered accounts to edit.  That will give  
some defense against the spammers while not making life difficult  
for the person who just wants to submit something at random one day.


Also, a few volunteers to receive notifications of edits for some  
basic QA just to make sure that what's added is correct.


Erik Jones

DBA | Emma®
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate  market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com




---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-11 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:50:41 -0500 (EST)
Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I could help out with the initial setup, you could just have somebody 
 internally do the install and let me have an account when it's ready, 
 whatever makes sense for you.  I have two articles I can submit as 
 examples of a good format for people to use to push some initial
 content in there, I may turn those into a template or something.  Let
 me know what I can do to help get this going.

I just got back from scale, let me talk to the guys and see which
machine this needs to go on and I will get back with you.

Joshua D. Drake



- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHsOH2ATb/zqfZUUQRAq2YAKCGObN2kEDM+k+JhtdlHUK2Wlpb2QCfWlzH
CfYgYQQlxGM7HOt4kFtrgMc=
=5+Uc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-11 Thread Greg Smith

On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Joshua D. Drake wrote:


On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:07:37 -0500 (EST)
Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Can anyone think of another place a community docs wiki could go at?


CMD will host anything you need.


Basically all it would take to get this off the ground is a host running 
PHP 5.0+ and PostgreSQL 8.1+ (with tsearch2) that the current Mediawiki 
distribution could be installed into; PHP 5.1 and PG 8.2 would be 
preferred.  The main install instructions are at 
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Installing_MediaWiki and I know 
they're good because I fixed the parts that weren't when I last installed 
one of these.


The main open question for initial post-install configuration is how to 
deal with edit privledges.  I think this one would be OK with letting 
anyone sign up for an account in an automated way, rather than requiring a 
human approval like the Developer's wiki does, but only allow registered 
accounts to edit.  That will give some defense against the spammers while 
not making life difficult for the person who just wants to submit 
something at random one day.


I could help out with the initial setup, you could just have somebody 
internally do the install and let me have an account when it's ready, 
whatever makes sense for you.  I have two articles I can submit as 
examples of a good format for people to use to push some initial content 
in there, I may turn those into a template or something.  Let me know what 
I can do to help get this going.


--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
  subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-06 Thread Erik Jones


On Feb 5, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Guy Rouillier wrote:


Greg Smith wrote:

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Dave Page wrote:

We intentionally have not done that as we wanted to ensure that all
documentation published under postgresql.org was appropriately
moderated first.
OK, so hosting a probably inaccurate in many ways (at first)  
community documentation project wiki is inappropriate for a  
postgresql.org page; completely understandable.  That moderated  
first thing is part of the problem with using Techdocs I already  
mentioned.

Can anyone think of another place a community docs wiki could go at?


I definitely think it should go on the official PostgreSQL site  
somewhere - that's where the community is.  The documentation page  
already lists versions of the official docs with comments.  Isn't  
this  an expansion of that?  Anyone with a community account is  
free to post a comment.


If all those comments are moderated, then I'd suggest either adding  
a Community Version directly on that page, or adding one to the  
community page off of Techdocs.


Something along those lines has already been suggested and the  
problem there is that comments in the reference manual are not the  
appropriate place for howtos, beginner's tutorials and the like.  A  
public wiki, possibly with a couple volunteer editors to make sure  
that nothing blatantly wrong stays up for long, pretty much exactly  
fits the bill.  I, for one, don't want to see the manual turn into  
something like the php manual in that the manual should have nothing  
but the facts without any chance of misinformation being included there.


Erik Jones

DBA | Emma®
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate  market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com




---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-06 Thread vincent

 On Feb 5, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Guy Rouillier wrote:

 Greg Smith wrote:
 On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Dave Page wrote:
 We intentionally have not done that as we wanted to ensure that all
 documentation published under postgresql.org was appropriately
 moderated first.
 OK, so hosting a probably inaccurate in many ways (at first)
 community documentation project wiki is inappropriate for a
 postgresql.org page; completely understandable.  That moderated
 first thing is part of the problem with using Techdocs I already
 mentioned.
 Can anyone think of another place a community docs wiki could go at?

 I definitely think it should go on the official PostgreSQL site
 somewhere - that's where the community is.  The documentation page
 already lists versions of the official docs with comments.  Isn't
 this  an expansion of that?  Anyone with a community account is
 free to post a comment.

 If all those comments are moderated, then I'd suggest either adding
 a Community Version directly on that page, or adding one to the
 community page off of Techdocs.

 Something along those lines has already been suggested and the
 problem there is that comments in the reference manual are not the
 appropriate place for howtos, beginner's tutorials and the like.  A
 public wiki, possibly with a couple volunteer editors to make sure
 that nothing blatantly wrong stays up for long, pretty much exactly
 fits the bill.  I, for one, don't want to see the manual turn into
 something like the php manual in that the manual should have nothing
 but the facts without any chance of misinformation being included there.

 Erik Jones


+5
The manual should be a a reference document, that contains the dry facts
of PostgreSQL, like what syntax is allowed, which functions exist etc.
The Wiki should focus on how to use PgSQL in the real world.

I'm a regular on a dutch website called PHPFreakz and we use our wiki as a
real-world-reference document. People ask questions on a forum and the
most interesting, recurring or just plain interesting ones are enterd into
the wiki, very much like Varlena's tidbits. Moderators keep an eye on what
comes in and organize the information into categories. That kind of
information is pure gold. We add a few read-along adventures every now and
then and that works extremely well to educate people.

PgSQL could use a wiki to gather information, and when a document seems
complete, it could be checked by moderators and copied to the official
website.



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org/


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-06 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:07:37 -0500 (EST)
Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Can anyone think of another place a community docs wiki could go at?
 I don't have any good web hosting facilities here right now.  I just
 took a look at buying a cheap host somewhere, but I feel it would be 
 inappropriate to host a PostgreSQL documentation wiki on a shared
 host where the underlying database was *censored*.
 

CMD will host anything you need.

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-06 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:16:50 -0500 (EST)
Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think the market for a PostgreSQL book is limited by a few things:
 
 1) There just aren't that many potential buyers (yet!)

As someone who *still* gets royalty checks for his 6 year old book, I
disagree.

 2) The included documentation is too good

I could buy into this one to a degree.

 3) There's way too much community-generated material like the mailing 
 lists available

Yep.

 4) Multiple earlier free books are already floating around
 

Bingo! The reality is for the majority of intro topics even the 6 year
old book is more than relevant. Where Practical falls down is talking
about things like background writer or vacuum. Those particular topics
are covered ad-naseum in the docs.

Joshua D. Drake 

-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-06 Thread Tom Hart

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:07:37 -0500 (EST)
Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

Can anyone think of another place a community docs wiki could go at?
I don't have any good web hosting facilities here right now.  I just
took a look at buying a cheap host somewhere, but I feel it would be 
inappropriate to host a PostgreSQL documentation wiki on a shared

host where the underlying database was *censored*.




CMD will host anything you need.

Joshua D. Drake

  
So who wants to volunteer taking the lead and setting up a wiki on CMD 
hosting? All we need is one person to get this going, and then the 
community can have at it


--
Tom Hart
IT Specialist
Cooperative Federal
723 Westcott St.
Syracuse, NY 13210
(315) 471-1116 ext. 202
(315) 476-0567 (fax)


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-05 Thread Greg Smith

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Dave Page wrote:


We intentionally have not done that as we wanted to ensure that all
documentation published under postgresql.org was appropriately
moderated first.


OK, so hosting a probably inaccurate in many ways (at first) community 
documentation project wiki is inappropriate for a postgresql.org page; 
completely understandable.  That moderated first thing is part of the 
problem with using Techdocs I already mentioned.


Can anyone think of another place a community docs wiki could go at?  I 
don't have any good web hosting facilities here right now.  I just took a 
look at buying a cheap host somewhere, but I feel it would be 
inappropriate to host a PostgreSQL documentation wiki on a shared host 
where the underlying database was *censored*.


The 8.3 launch yesterday gave me a perfect example of why this would be 
helpful.  I was blasting away in the Slashdot FUD about the release (with 
Dave Fetter and Neil) and somebody stopped me cold with a comment about 
their last eval of PostgreSQL.  They'd ended up so confused by the initial 
config they said the default install iirc uses unix users to authenticate 
into their own databases, whereas mysql has its own internal user 
database (completely understandable mistake given the old defaul auth 
setup) and their comment on the big manual was I can never find what I'm 
looking for.


When I sat down to write about the parts they were missing, it was all in 
the manual, but boy did it take me a while to assemble it all.  Open the 
manual and think like a newbie one day and you'll see what I mean--Chapter 
15, Installation Instructions, are not what people expect, and the 
pieces I think most people need are scattered.  I don't think this is a 
problem to fix in the manual, it's just that the manual's audience and 
the newbie requirements are really far apart.


The response I wrote is at 
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=441604cid=22301248 It struck me that 
what I'd just written would make a nice first draft for a Getting started 
with PostgreSQL page for the UNIX CLI crowd, and if I could dump that 
into a reusable, upgradable form easily I'd have just made a more 
permanent improvement to the community.  The way pages like this get to be 
really good, though, is by being a wiki where people who find them not 
enough can improve them after they figure out the part that wasn't obvious 
when they first read it.


--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-05 Thread Guy Rouillier

Greg Smith wrote:

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Dave Page wrote:


We intentionally have not done that as we wanted to ensure that all
documentation published under postgresql.org was appropriately
moderated first.


OK, so hosting a probably inaccurate in many ways (at first) community 
documentation project wiki is inappropriate for a postgresql.org page; 
completely understandable.  That moderated first thing is part of the 
problem with using Techdocs I already mentioned.


Can anyone think of another place a community docs wiki could go at?


I definitely think it should go on the official PostgreSQL site 
somewhere - that's where the community is.  The documentation page 
already lists versions of the official docs with comments.  Isn't this 
 an expansion of that?  Anyone with a community account is free to post 
a comment.


If all those comments are moderated, then I'd suggest either adding a 
Community Version directly on that page, or adding one to the 
community page off of Techdocs.


--
Guy Rouillier

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-04 Thread Dave Page
On Feb 4, 2008 3:48 PM, vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 So, let's do it community-style: wiki. Lots of people have a little time
 to write a small piece, all we need is a few good men (or women) to
 oversee the whole thing.

Thats what techdocs is for.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs

Feel free to write new articles or improve what is there already.

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org/


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-04 Thread vincent
 Christopher Browne wrote:

 Personally I'm surprised that the last couple responses seem to center
 around not being able to make much money off of it. I agree that it
 would require some time investment, but so did building PG in the first
 place. Countless people have already sacrificed hours upon hours of
 their time with no return on their investment except pride in their work
 and a better overall product for everybody to use. I'm not a talented
 enough programmer to contribute to the code, but in this way I can do
 something to give back to the pg community.

 --
 Tom Hart


+1

It seems there's a stalemate, apparently PgSQL needs to be more popular
before authors want to write for it, and the public doesn't want to commit
to a database that has only a handfull of books available.

So, let's do it community-style: wiki. Lots of people have a little time
to write a small piece, all we need is a few good men (or women) to
oversee the whole thing. Later we can paste all the content together in a
PDF. We could arrange a 'print on demand' service and there we are; a book
with uptodate firsthand knowledge.


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-04 Thread Tom Hart

Christopher Browne wrote:

On Jan 31, 2008 4:40 PM, Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Robert Treat wrote:



Just so you know, I approached OReally about writing a PostgreSQL Cookbook,
and they turned it down. They did offer me some other titles, but those don't
seem to have gone anywhere.
  

As someone else pointed out in this thread, very much of what you need
to know has been previously discussed at one point; the hard part is
finding it.

What we need is for some of the people with the big brains ;) to come up
with some new kind of hyperbook.  That would be the documentation in
some form similar to what it is today, but somehow connected to the
discussions that happen in the mailing lists.  That way, when something
really insightful or helpful gets said in the mailing lists, it can get
connected to a particular place in the documentation.  Then over time,
the doc maintainers can take the best of those and incorporate them
directly into the docs at the appropriate place.



The trouble is that this is nearly as much trouble as actually writing
a book, and doesn't provide a clear incentive for people to put in the
effort of making it happen.

There's the problem (and it is, to a degree, truly a problem) that the
postgreSQL book market hasn't been lucrative enough to draw people
into writing books.  And honestly, it *needs* to be more lucrative.
If I'm thinking about alternative uses for my spare time, writing does
not appear to be a particularly profitable use.

Finding a poor man's way to generate a hyperbook actually needs
much the same sorts of skills and efforts, even though it probably
provides those that provide the effort with *less* benefits.
  
Personally I'm surprised that the last couple responses seem to center 
around not being able to make much money off of it. I agree that it 
would require some time investment, but so did building PG in the first 
place. Countless people have already sacrificed hours upon hours of 
their time with no return on their investment except pride in their work 
and a better overall product for everybody to use. I'm not a talented 
enough programmer to contribute to the code, but in this way I can do 
something to give back to the pg community.


--
Tom Hart
IT Specialist
Cooperative Federal
723 Westcott St.
Syracuse, NY 13210
(315) 471-1116 ext. 202
(315) 476-0567 (fax)


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

  http://archives.postgresql.org/


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-04 Thread Christopher Browne
On Feb 4, 2008 3:31 PM, Tom Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Christopher Browne wrote:
  On Jan 31, 2008 4:40 PM, Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Robert Treat wrote:
 
 
  Just so you know, I approached OReally about writing a PostgreSQL 
  Cookbook,
  and they turned it down. They did offer me some other titles, but those 
  don't
  seem to have gone anywhere.
 
  As someone else pointed out in this thread, very much of what you need
  to know has been previously discussed at one point; the hard part is
  finding it.
 
  What we need is for some of the people with the big brains ;) to come up
  with some new kind of hyperbook.  That would be the documentation in
  some form similar to what it is today, but somehow connected to the
  discussions that happen in the mailing lists.  That way, when something
  really insightful or helpful gets said in the mailing lists, it can get
  connected to a particular place in the documentation.  Then over time,
  the doc maintainers can take the best of those and incorporate them
  directly into the docs at the appropriate place.
 
 
  The trouble is that this is nearly as much trouble as actually writing
  a book, and doesn't provide a clear incentive for people to put in the
  effort of making it happen.
 
  There's the problem (and it is, to a degree, truly a problem) that the
  postgreSQL book market hasn't been lucrative enough to draw people
  into writing books.  And honestly, it *needs* to be more lucrative.
  If I'm thinking about alternative uses for my spare time, writing does
  not appear to be a particularly profitable use.
 
  Finding a poor man's way to generate a hyperbook actually needs
  much the same sorts of skills and efforts, even though it probably
  provides those that provide the effort with *less* benefits.
 
 Personally I'm surprised that the last couple responses seem to center
 around not being able to make much money off of it. I agree that it
 would require some time investment, but so did building PG in the first
 place. Countless people have already sacrificed hours upon hours of
 their time with no return on their investment except pride in their work
 and a better overall product for everybody to use. I'm not a talented
 enough programmer to contribute to the code, but in this way I can do
 something to give back to the pg community.

It's not all purely charity, and the point was never about trying to
make as much money as possible off of it.

And I think the frequency of no return on their investment is rather
lower than you do.  It is typical for people to add features to free
software systems *that they find useful.*  There are quite a number of
people paid to work on PG; the people that pay them *DO* expect a
return on this investment.

There is a deep, fundamental problem with documentation:

- Those people that *UNDERSTAND* things well enough to be able to
write something worth reading need to be about as knowledgeable as the
deep in the weeds developers.

- It's regarded as being much easier than that.

GOOD documentation (as opposed to whatever crud we might put up at
some web page) isn't easy to get, and requires a substantial
investment of time and effort.

Given that people have many things competing for their time, I don't
think it's at all strange to expect that this investment lead to some
kind of substantial benefit.
-- 
http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and
expecting different results.  -- assortedly attributed to Albert
Einstein, Benjamin Franklin, Rita Mae Brown, and Rudyard Kipling

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org/


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-04 Thread Dave Page
On Feb 4, 2008 6:12 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How hard would it be to clone the configuration of the developer's wiki
 and make a new page like it for this purpose, something like
 userdocs.postgresql.org?

We intentionally have not done that as we wanted to ensure that all
documentation published under postgresql.org was appropriately
moderated first.

/D

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-04 Thread Greg Smith

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Dave Page wrote:


On Feb 4, 2008 3:48 PM, vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

So, let's do it community-style: wiki.


Thats what techdocs is for.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs
Feel free to write new articles or improve what is there already.


Techdocs is a functional site to post completed articles.  The level of 
work and administration involved in making even simple edits, combined 
with the lack of tools for managing what other people are doing, make it 
dramatically less productive for collaborative projects than true Wiki 
tools like the Mediawiki used on the developer's site.  Examples of issues 
that slow things down considerably are the whole save before preview model 
of techdocs and problems that creep in if you switch between its limited 
WYSIWIG editor and the HTML editor extensively (just the fact that there 
is such a distinction is its own problem, and if you do all your work in 
the HTML version you are forced to switch between then).  The main thing 
it's completely missing is a trivial to use diff and revert.  Sadly some 
people just don't know what they should and shouldn't be changing, and 
it's highly useful for tracking what the other good people are doing once 
the pages get bigger if you want to keep general progress going forward in 
a consistant way.


It may be possible to build some new community-generated not the manual 
documentation on a real Wiki platform.  I think hobbling it with the 
restrictions of techdocs would be a fatal to such a project.


How hard would it be to clone the configuration of the developer's wiki 
and make a new page like it for this purpose, something like 
userdocs.postgresql.org?


--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-03 Thread Christopher Browne
On Jan 31, 2008 4:40 PM, Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Robert Treat wrote:

  Just so you know, I approached OReally about writing a PostgreSQL Cookbook,
  and they turned it down. They did offer me some other titles, but those 
  don't
  seem to have gone anywhere.

 As someone else pointed out in this thread, very much of what you need
 to know has been previously discussed at one point; the hard part is
 finding it.

 What we need is for some of the people with the big brains ;) to come up
 with some new kind of hyperbook.  That would be the documentation in
 some form similar to what it is today, but somehow connected to the
 discussions that happen in the mailing lists.  That way, when something
 really insightful or helpful gets said in the mailing lists, it can get
 connected to a particular place in the documentation.  Then over time,
 the doc maintainers can take the best of those and incorporate them
 directly into the docs at the appropriate place.

The trouble is that this is nearly as much trouble as actually writing
a book, and doesn't provide a clear incentive for people to put in the
effort of making it happen.

There's the problem (and it is, to a degree, truly a problem) that the
postgreSQL book market hasn't been lucrative enough to draw people
into writing books.  And honestly, it *needs* to be more lucrative.
If I'm thinking about alternative uses for my spare time, writing does
not appear to be a particularly profitable use.

Finding a poor man's way to generate a hyperbook actually needs
much the same sorts of skills and efforts, even though it probably
provides those that provide the effort with *less* benefits.
-- 
http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and
expecting different results.  -- assortedly attributed to Albert
Einstein, Benjamin Franklin, Rita Mae Brown, and Rudyard Kipling

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-02-01 Thread Greg Smith

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Robert Treat wrote:


Just so you know, I approached OReally about writing a PostgreSQL Cookbook,
and they turned it down. They did offer me some other titles, but those don't
seem to have gone anywhere.


I think the market for a PostgreSQL book is limited by a few things:

1) There just aren't that many potential buyers (yet!)
2) The included documentation is too good
3) There's way too much community-generated material like the mailing 
lists available

4) Multiple earlier free books are already floating around

You almost have to go out of your way to cover material that isn't in the 
manual to get something that's worth buying in book form, but then it's 
hard to find a market for that--so much of the popular material is already 
in there.



I have thought of going the self-publishing route, but the reason against it
is the same one as you don't see a lot of book publishers working on PG
books; the sales just aren't that strong.


For publishing a book to make sense, you have to get more in sales than 
the author could have made doing other work rather than working on the 
book.  That's still tough for anyone qualified to write about PostgreSQL.


I think there's enormous potential for an online book that referenced the 
existing manual heavily, serving more as an tutorial index to help guide 
people through that document.  Potential from the perspective of being 
useful, not so much as a way for the author to get much out of spending 
that time.


--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-31 Thread Erik Jones


On Jan 31, 2008, at 12:51 AM, Gregory Williamson wrote:


Bruce Momjian said:

 Tom Hart wrote:
  I definitely think that the lists are one of the shining stars for
  postgresql support. I've learned some good reference stuff from  
online
  docs/google but the really tricky questions were only answered  
here, and
  amazingly enough, quickly and with good humor. Perhaps what we  
really

  need is somebody to comb through the archives looking for common
  problems or exceptional solutions and compile them into a book.

 The good and bad news is that the best way to do things often  
changes

 from release to release, hence the need to get the most current
 information from the mailing lists.

Although I have solved almost every problem I have come up against  
in learning, partly with archives, I've often had to resort to  
asking the list because finding relevant missives in the archives  
can be hard if you don't know what month to look at, and even then  
the search results can produce a lot incidental wanderings to get  
to the solutions.


It seems that some intermediate ground (TWIKI or a document in some  
format) might help with some of these questions, perhaps with  
sections based on release.




That's an interesting idea.  Is there a general audience/ 
participation wiki for Postgres?  I know the developers have one, but  
a user-oriented sister wiki would probably be a good way to get lots  
of different people involved.


Erik Jones

DBA | Emma®
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate  market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com




---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-31 Thread Vivek Khera


On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:14 AM, Erik Jones wrote:

That's an interesting idea.  Is there a general audience/ 
participation wiki for Postgres?  I know the developers have one,  
but a user-oriented sister wiki would probably be a good way to get  
lots of different people involved.


I'm of the opinion that the documentation should provide guidance like  
best practices in addition to just being a reference.  To that end,  
the interactive online docs seem like a great place for people to  
make suggestions and recommendations like this, and these comments can  
be folded into the next release of the docs.


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-31 Thread Robert Treat
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 02:54, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
 On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:16 +, Dave Page wrote:
  On Jan 29, 2008 6:16 PM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I try to be reasonable (no laughing people :)).
 
  Oh it's hard, so very, very hard!

 But seriously, I've ranted on this some time ago( and you can tell that
 I'm about to start again)

 rant
 One of the worst aspect of PG is the documentation, or the lack of it in
 terms of traditional house. The Manual is fine and all, but in most
 cases, what I find that it lacks is actually examples. Either examples
 to show what it a particular field/query means but also as a way to show
 exactly how a particular problem can be solved.

 When I played with both MSSQL and MySQL, I had loads of books (and I
 bought a bit of it too, didn't bother subscribing to safari, it just
 ain't a book!) to be used as reference and what not.

 In PG, all there is, is the manual, a book by Robert Treat, the Book
 from Joshua, 1 or 2 other books authored by someone I can't remember etc
 and that's about it.

 Then I would have to go hunt(via google) for any bit of blog/
 presentation slides from a meetup/talk etc for ways to find out how to
 do a particular thing. (Thanks Bruce M, Thanks Robert T - excellent
 partitioning talk!, Thanks PgCon!) and pore over those.

 Other than that, it's more or less, Bang you head here and send email
 to the list and hope someone answers

 I hang on to my O'reilly SQL Hacks book tightly as it gives me
 examples on how to solve a problem and even how other DBs solve it.

 I wish there was a book like MySQL Cookbook (which I have a copy)
 /rant

Just so you know, I approached OReally about writing a PostgreSQL Cookbook, 
and they turned it down. They did offer me some other titles, but those don't 
seem to have gone anywhere. 

I have thought of going the self-publishing route, but the reason against it 
is the same one as you don't see a lot of book publishers working on PG 
books; the sales just aren't that strong. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-31 Thread Guy Rouillier

Robert Treat wrote:

Just so you know, I approached OReally about writing a PostgreSQL Cookbook, 
and they turned it down. They did offer me some other titles, but those don't 
seem to have gone anywhere. 


As someone else pointed out in this thread, very much of what you need 
to know has been previously discussed at one point; the hard part is 
finding it.


What we need is for some of the people with the big brains ;) to come up 
with some new kind of hyperbook.  That would be the documentation in 
some form similar to what it is today, but somehow connected to the 
discussions that happen in the mailing lists.  That way, when something 
really insightful or helpful gets said in the mailing lists, it can get 
connected to a particular place in the documentation.  Then over time, 
the doc maintainers can take the best of those and incorporate them 
directly into the docs at the appropriate place.


This would not only benefit those looking for information, but also 
those hearty and knowledgeable souls (like Tom) who patiently provide it 
repeatedly as the same questions pop up every couple weeks/months. 
Plus, the documentation would grow and become much more useful over 
time.  Then, instead of repeating answers to repeating questions, we can 
just point to the appropriate place in the docs.  The unattached 
discussions could identify sections lacking in the docs; i.e., if enough 
unattached discussions accumulate for a particular topic, then that 
probably indicates the need for a new section in the docs on that topic.


To be honest, I think a hyperbook would be easier to implement with 
forums than with mailing lists.  The former are permanently resident in 
a known place, while the latter are out there in the ether (or in some 
unorganized archive that is notoriously hard to link to.)


--
Guy Rouillier

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Dave Page
On Jan 30, 2008 11:35 AM, Raymond O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 30/01/2008 11:27, Gregory Stark wrote:

  In fact I think most of the features you'll look for examples of will be 
  from
  the last 1-2 years. When 8.3 comes out people will be looking for whole 
  books
  on XML functionality, tsearch implementations, etc, and there will be 
  nothing
  aside from the manual since they're all brand new features.

 Isn't this the idea of the interactive online docs? People can add stuff
 they find useful for others. The PHP docs have tons of extra snippets
 added by users - some dross, granted, but there's a lot of good stuff
 there too.

It most certainly is, please, add away! The comments are moderated, so
hopefully there's not too much dross in ours!

/D

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Raymond O'Donnell

On 30/01/2008 11:27, Gregory Stark wrote:


In fact I think most of the features you'll look for examples of will be from
the last 1-2 years. When 8.3 comes out people will be looking for whole books
on XML functionality, tsearch implementations, etc, and there will be nothing
aside from the manual since they're all brand new features.


Isn't this the idea of the interactive online docs? People can add stuff 
they find useful for others. The PHP docs have tons of extra snippets 
added by users - some dross, granted, but there's a lot of good stuff 
there too.


Ray.

---
Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

  http://archives.postgresql.org/


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Gregory Stark
Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 rant
 One of the worst aspect of PG is the documentation, or the lack of it in
 terms of traditional house. The Manual is fine and all, but in most
 cases, what I find that it lacks is actually examples. Either examples
 to show what it a particular field/query means but also as a way to show
 exactly how a particular problem can be solved.

I always thought one of the best things about the manual was that it has tons
of examples. Arguably too many examples for a reference manual but personally
I find it easier to learn from examples than reference text anyways so I
appreciate it.

 When I played with both MSSQL and MySQL, I had loads of books (and I
 bought a bit of it too, didn't bother subscribing to safari, it just
 ain't a book!) to be used as reference and what not.

 In PG, all there is, is the manual, a book by Robert Treat, the Book
 from Joshua, 1 or 2 other books authored by someone I can't remember etc
 and that's about it.

Actually there are several other books, but they're mostly out of date. This
is the biggest source of the problem you're complaining about I think. Most of
the features you're looking for documentation for will be from the last 2-3
years and it takes about that long for books to get into print.

In fact I think most of the features you'll look for examples of will be from
the last 1-2 years. When 8.3 comes out people will be looking for whole books
on XML functionality, tsearch implementations, etc, and there will be nothing
aside from the manual since they're all brand new features.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB  http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Jason Topaz
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:54 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: 
 rant
 One of the worst aspect of PG is the documentation, or the lack of it in
 terms of traditional house. The Manual is fine and all, but in most
 cases, what I find that it lacks is actually examples. Either examples
 to show what it a particular field/query means but also as a way to show
 exactly how a particular problem can be solved.

With respect, I have to disagree here.  The strength of PG's
documentation is, in fact, one of the key reasons I switched my company
completely off a commercial RDBMS and onto PostgreSQL.  In my opinion,
PostgreSQL has, hands-down, the best documentation of any FOSS package
I've used, and it's better than much commercial documentation too.  The
development group seems to be be uncompromising in its dedication to
keeping the documentation up-to-date, accurate, and thorough.

You should see what some of these commercial vendors try to pass off as
documentation!  It's awful.  

I don't disagree with your point that it's not robust with examples of
exactly how a particular problem can be solved.  But I think there are
enough, and more importantly, I don't think problem-solving is an
important focus for a manual (that's why 3rd party books exist).  The
manual needs to be *the* reference document so that end users don't need
to read source code in order to understand how the system works.
Example-oriented documentation has a tendency to skimp on the reference
material and leave big gaping holes, in my experience.  I like the
reference focus of the existing PostgreSQL manual very much.

--
Jason Topaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:27:20 +
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  rant
  One of the worst aspect of PG is the documentation, or the lack
  of it in terms of traditional house. The Manual is fine and
  all, but in most cases, what I find that it lacks is actually
  examples. Either examples to show what it a particular
  field/query means but also as a way to show exactly how a
  particular problem can be solved.
 
 I always thought one of the best things about the manual was that
 it has tons of examples. Arguably too many examples for a reference
 manual but personally I find it easier to learn from examples than
 reference text anyways so I appreciate it.

Evil is in the details. Some examples don't really show off the power
of postgresql.
Sometimes you look at an example, you know other related stuff and
say... mmm I know I can push this further but how?

How/where is it possible to submit doc patches? Even for older
versions?
There were things I didn't find so easy to understand/guess in the
manual, no rocket science, I took note of them or I just found
external pages that actually explained how to do that and I think
their place should actually be in the manual.

BTW examples are a sort of specification too. I wouldn't
underestimate their more formal value. So I think they should be part
of *the* reference documentation with example output as well.
They shouldn't be of the kind how-to but of the kind you can't
push the syntax further and this is what you'd expect as an output.
Many things are already there in the VI Reference section but some
are not, especially in the V Server programming part.


-- 
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Raymond O'Donnell

On 30/01/2008 12:12, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:


Many things are already there in the VI Reference section but some
are not, especially in the V Server programming part.


+1

The Server Programming section is where we really need lots of examples.

Ray.

---
Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Peter Wilson

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

Tom Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[...]

I find that the best way to get what you need, is to read the fine
manual from postgresql. Yes, its massive, unwieldy and in a lot of
ways counter-intuitive (to a newbie) but if you have the terminology
down you aren't going to find a more comprehensive text.
  
I find the manual answers just about everything I've needed to answer. 
Personally though I find

the on-line version somewhat slow/cumbersome to find what I'm looking for.

Using Windows as my desktop machine (servers running Linux) I found the 
most accessible form
of the manual was that distributed with pgAdminIII. Until recently they 
shipped a fully

searchable Windows Help version of the latest manual which was fantastic.

Unfortunately pgAdmin has now removed that section of the manual and 
simply links to the
Postgres web-site. I can understand it was some work to put it in each 
time - but it was
very useful. So much so when I get a chance I intend to find an older 
copy of pgAdmin and

install just the manual from it.

Has anyone else generated a Windows Help version of the manual?

Is there a source version of the files used to generate it (pgAdmin 
people?)? I'd be interested in
the amount of work needed to create the file - if not excessive I might 
volunteer to get it done

again if people other than me might find it useful.

Pete

Plus, when you find things that don't quite make sense you can submit
a doc patch to make the docs that much better.

Sincerely,


Joshua D. Drake
 



- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHn2oKATb/zqfZUUQRAtgCAKCOigLpBd9/EcYVPF/QsDvCYS3JugCggtS9
9QK5xte33f0/2+N/0pWOQvY=
=ioXq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
  



--

Peter Wilson
T: 01707 891840
M: 07796 656566
http://www.yellowhawk.co.uk 	The information in this email is 
confidential and is intended for the addressee/s only. Access to this 
email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information 
contained in or attached to this email.



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Dave Page
On Jan 30, 2008 12:45 PM, Peter Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Has anyone else generated a Windows Help version of the manual?

We distribute it with PostgreSQL - it's just not integrated with the
pgAdmin help any more. You can even tell pgAdmin to use that if you
don''t wish to use the online help.

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread vincent
 On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:27:20 +
 Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 BTW examples are a sort of specification too. I wouldn't
 underestimate their more formal value. So I think they should be part
 of *the* reference documentation with example output as well.
 They shouldn't be of the kind how-to but of the kind you can't
 push the syntax further and this is what you'd expect as an output.

In the manual yes, but I think there's definately a need for a howto
document, something that demonstrates how to handle typical database
functionality in PgSQL. Many of the people I've convinced to start using
PostgeSQL spend the first week or so asking me questions on how to do
basic things in PostgreSQL. When I say that there's a manual, the
complaint usually is what I've noticed myself: the manual is great for
looking up individual facts, but your problem may consist of 15 facts and
it's up to you to connect the dots.

This can be very confusing and discouraging to the average MySQL migrator 
(ugh, I said the M word :) )  What people like about the books is that the
books usually tackle reallife problems from start to finish.

Shurely the PgSQL community must be able to piece together something like
that? It doesn't have to be a paper-book, although there are companies
that print on demand and ship directly to the customer.

Isn't there a wiki somewhere that we can fill with reallife stuff? Then
all 8.3 stuff could be added there to, even before 8.3 is released.


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org/


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 schrieb Raymond O'Donnell:
 Isn't this the idea of the interactive online docs? People can add stuff
 they find useful for others.

Well, not really, for better or worse.  Each release, we take the comments and 
either fold them into the main documentation or delete them.  So 
the interactive feature is more of an easier way to submit additions or 
corrections; it is not meant to add a user-edited extra dimension to the 
documentation material.

The well-hidden techdocs section of the web site is supposed to allow users to 
submit tips, articles, and the like, but I'm not sure how accessible that is.  

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Peter Wilson

Dave Page wrote:

On Jan 30, 2008 1:34 PM, Peter Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

 Dave Page wrote:

 On Jan 30, 2008 12:45 PM, Peter Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Has anyone else generated a Windows Help version of the manual?


 Is it only distributed with the Window distribution?



Yes, at present. I guess it's something we could add to the website though.

/D
  

That would get my vote - maybe as an extra column on the following page
   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/

Pete

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

  



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

  http://archives.postgresql.org/


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Dave Page
On Jan 30, 2008 1:34 PM, Peter Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Dave Page wrote:

  On Jan 30, 2008 12:45 PM, Peter Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



  Has anyone else generated a Windows Help version of the manual?

  We distribute it with PostgreSQL - it's just not integrated with the
 pgAdmin help any more. You can even tell pgAdmin to use that if you
 don''t wish to use the online help.

  Hi Dave,
  good to know it still exists.

  Is it only distributed with the Window distribution?

Yes, at present. I guess it's something we could add to the website though.

/D

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Peter Wilson

Dave Page wrote:

On Jan 30, 2008 12:45 PM, Peter Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

Has anyone else generated a Windows Help version of the manual?



We distribute it with PostgreSQL - it's just not integrated with the
pgAdmin help any more. You can even tell pgAdmin to use that if you
don''t wish to use the online help.
  

Hi Dave,
good to know it still exists.

Is it only distributed with the Window distribution?

I only run Postgres on Linux boxes, but use a Windows desktop machine.

Is there a place where I can just download the .chm file without having 
to install Postgres on Windows?


All the best
Pete

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

  



--

Peter Wilson
T: 01707 891840
M: 07796 656566
http://www.yellowhawk.co.uk 	The information in this email is 
confidential and is intended for the addressee/s only. Access to this 
email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information 
contained in or attached to this email.




Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 schrieb Peter Wilson:
 Has anyone else generated a Windows Help version of the manual?

It can be built from the source code using the make htmlhelp target in 
doc/src/sgml/.  I don't know how to get from there to the final format, 
though.  I understand it is proprietary.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 schrieb Ivan Sergio Borgonovo:
 How/where is it possible to submit doc patches?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The process is mostly the same as for normal 
code.  The Developer section of the web site gives you more information.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Tom Lane
vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 In the manual yes, but I think there's definately a need for a howto
 document, something that demonstrates how to handle typical database
 functionality in PgSQL. Many of the people I've convinced to start using
 PostgeSQL spend the first week or so asking me questions on how to do
 basic things in PostgreSQL. When I say that there's a manual, the
 complaint usually is what I've noticed myself: the manual is great for
 looking up individual facts, but your problem may consist of 15 facts and
 it's up to you to connect the dots.

Surely even a book that's a little out-of-date can serve fine for that
kind of introduction?

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Tom Hart

Tom Lane wrote:

vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  

In the manual yes, but I think there's definately a need for a howto
document, something that demonstrates how to handle typical database
functionality in PgSQL. Many of the people I've convinced to start using
PostgeSQL spend the first week or so asking me questions on how to do
basic things in PostgreSQL. When I say that there's a manual, the
complaint usually is what I've noticed myself: the manual is great for
looking up individual facts, but your problem may consist of 15 facts and
it's up to you to connect the dots.



Surely even a book that's a little out-of-date can serve fine for that
kind of introduction?

regards, tom lane
  
I agree that it would be useful as an introduction, but I have 4 years 
of mySQL experience (I know, I'm sorry) and I've been working with 
postgres for the past 3-4 months during which time I've built a data 
mine by hand, and set up a few different web apps running against it 
(drupal, openreports, etc.) so I think I'm past the introduction phase. 
What I was looking for was an intermediate level (call me presumptuous) 
book with more performance tips and advanced techniques/functions. Even 
though this book may have some sort of this information in it, it's 
going to be based on 7.x and the entire thing is available online (as 
well as the docs, which personally I like).


And on the subject of beginner's documentation, I think I learned a lot 
more playing/hacking/reading docs/posting here (of course that's always 
been my preferred learning method) then I would have with a book. 
Everybody has their own learning style and different things work well 
for different people. The key here is that when it's up to you to 
connect the dots then you learn what the dots are, how they relate to 
each other, and what each of them is for. That gives you a lot better 
understanding then Just run SELECT count(*) FROM a LEFT JOIN


Of course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong :-)

--
Tom Hart
IT Specialist
Cooperative Federal
723 Westcott St.
Syracuse, NY 13210
(315) 471-1116 ext. 202
(315) 476-0567 (fax)


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:20:58 -0500
Tom Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  regards, tom lane

 I agree that it would be useful as an introduction, but I have 4
 years of mySQL experience (I know, I'm sorry) and I've been working
 with postgres for the past 3-4 months during which time I've built a
 data mine by hand, and set up a few different web apps running
 against it (drupal, openreports, etc.) so I think I'm past the
 introduction phase. What I was looking for was an intermediate level
 (call me presumptuous) book with more performance tips and advanced
 techniques/functions. Even though this book may have some sort of
 this information in it, it's going to be based on 7.x and the entire
 thing is available online (as well as the docs, which personally I
 like).

The above sounds like you want a cookbook not a manual. In proper
open source fashion perhaps you could start documenting the things you
learn and post them to Techdocs :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHoMJ4ATb/zqfZUUQRAh5mAKCsjIbE7dw+fljZitcMpw0t7vd1vQCdHh9g
i/I1lcXst6i+FfO5+JpKVrs=
=cSfc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread vincent
 Tom Lane wrote:
 vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 Surely even a book that's a little out-of-date can serve fine for that
 kind of introduction?

I guess the point is that using older books is the only option, there
simple are no uptodate books available. People who want to use a book (and
many do) are forced to learn PgSQL the way it was a few years ago.

  regards, tom lane


 The key here is that when it's up to you to
 connect the dots then you learn what the dots are, how they relate to
 each other, and what each of them is for.

True, but that only works for experienced 'nerds' who get a kick out of
connecting dots. Joe Average want's a bit more assistance, a bit more
guidance.

In short; I think PgSQL needs a beginnersbook, an advanced-nerdy book, and
a bible... oh yeah, we need a PgSQL bible, no doubt! :) Cookbooks are also
nice, but I guess from a growth point of view a beginnersbook is
definately a must-have.



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Glyn Astill

--- vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:27:20 +
  Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  BTW examples are a sort of specification too. I wouldn't
  underestimate their more formal value. So I think they should be
 part
  of *the* reference documentation with example output as well.
  They shouldn't be of the kind how-to but of the kind you can't
  push the syntax further and this is what you'd expect as an
 output.
 
 In the manual yes, but I think there's definately a need for a
 howto
 document, something that demonstrates how to handle typical
 database
 functionality in PgSQL. Many of the people I've convinced to start
 using
 PostgeSQL spend the first week or so asking me questions on how to
 do
 basic things in PostgreSQL. When I say that there's a manual, the
 complaint usually is what I've noticed myself: the manual is great
 for
 looking up individual facts, but your problem may consist of 15
 facts and
 it's up to you to connect the dots.
 

More documentation would be nice, but surely it's more down to
getting the type of user base that write your average how to books?
 The O'Reilly books seem to cover postgres quite nicely, however I've
only had a flick through in shops.

One thing's for sure, 2 months ago I signed up to the most common
postgresql and m*sql lists when I was trying to decide what was best
for our backend. At the time m*sql was my 1st choice, and it took me
less than a day to drop those toys in the street and decide
postgresql was the way forward.


  ___
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good 
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Tom Hart

Glyn Astill wrote:


More documentation would be nice, but surely it's more down to
getting the type of user base that write your average how to books?
 The O'Reilly books seem to cover postgres quite nicely, however I've
only had a flick through in shops.

One thing's for sure, 2 months ago I signed up to the most common
postgresql and m*sql lists when I was trying to decide what was best
for our backend. At the time m*sql was my 1st choice, and it took me
less than a day to drop those toys in the street and decide
postgresql was the way forward.


  ___
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good 
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/

  
I definitely think that the lists are one of the shining stars for 
postgresql support. I've learned some good reference stuff from online 
docs/google but the really tricky questions were only answered here, and 
amazingly enough, quickly and with good humor. Perhaps what we really 
need is somebody to comb through the archives looking for common 
problems or exceptional solutions and compile them into a book.


--
Tom Hart
IT Specialist
Cooperative Federal
723 Westcott St.
Syracuse, NY 13210
(315) 471-1116 ext. 202
(315) 476-0567 (fax)


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
vincent wrote:

 True, but that only works for experienced 'nerds' who get a kick out of
 connecting dots. Joe Average want's a bit more assistance, a bit more
 guidance.

Have you read the Tutorial section of the docs?  What do you feel it is
missing?  Can you contribute to it?

-- 
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:55:12 -0500
Tom Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I definitely think that the lists are one of the shining stars for 
 postgresql support. I've learned some good reference stuff from
 online docs/google but the really tricky questions were only answered
 here, and amazingly enough, quickly and with good humor. Perhaps what
 we really need is somebody to comb through the archives looking for
 common problems or exceptional solutions and compile them into a
 book.
 

/me looks hard at Tom Hart...

Yep, looks like a volunteer to me said Bob.

Joshua D. Drake

- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHoMnOATb/zqfZUUQRAjKPAJsEnY/OHS74AcRM3WoEdkIXWwChaACgnbcU
VkU7J4iZfCiwcL8k0OqicgU=
=bg/L
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org/


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread vincent
 vincent wrote:

 True, but that only works for experienced 'nerds' who get a kick out of
 connecting dots. Joe Average want's a bit more assistance, a bit more
 guidance.

 Have you read the Tutorial section of the docs?  What do you feel it is
 missing?  Can you contribute to it?


Yes I have.
What's missing... well there are quite a few relatively basic things like
sequences and it doesn't touch stored-procedures and triggers. I guess I
could write something up in the 2.76 seconds of spare time I have every
week :)


But what I think would be really helpful is to get some organisation in
the sources of information. Techdocs for example. Can't we gather all that
information, validate it agains 8.2/8.3 and stick it into one big document
and call it the PgSQL big book of wonders? Give it an exhaustive intro
on every major aspect of PgSQL and that should setup users for life.


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Tom Hart

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:55:12 -0500
Tom Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
I definitely think that the lists are one of the shining stars for 
postgresql support. I've learned some good reference stuff from

online docs/google but the really tricky questions were only answered
here, and amazingly enough, quickly and with good humor. Perhaps what
we really need is somebody to comb through the archives looking for
common problems or exceptional solutions and compile them into a
book.




/me looks hard at Tom Hart...

Yep, looks like a volunteer to me said Bob.

Joshua D. Drake

- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHoMnOATb/zqfZUUQRAjKPAJsEnY/OHS74AcRM3WoEdkIXWwChaACgnbcU
VkU7J4iZfCiwcL8k0OqicgU=
=bg/L
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


  

/me misses the good old days :-)

I'm definitely willing to participate in this, or maybe just start it 
and pass it off, but as much as I'd love to put something like this 
together, I currently have no internet at home (I thought nerds weren't 
supposed to be dead poor) and doing this all at work wouldn't be my 
boss's idea of high productivity, though admittedly he is the one who 
got me into postgreSQL and is definitely open-source friendly. I just 
don't think he'll want to be paying me wages to create postgreSQL docs.


Is there anybody else out there who is interested in working with me on 
a project like this? I think it'd be an excellent way to contribute back 
to the list/community for the assistance we've received here that 
wouldn't have been given anywhere else (especially not free of charge). 
My e-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you're interested.


--
Tom Hart
IT Specialist
Cooperative Federal
723 Westcott St.
Syracuse, NY 13210
(315) 471-1116 ext. 202
(315) 476-0567 (fax)


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Ow Mun Heng

On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 20:47 +0900, Jason Topaz wrote:

 I don't disagree with your point that it's not robust with examples of
 exactly how a particular problem can be solved.  But I think there are
 enough, and more importantly, I don't think problem-solving is an
 important focus for a manual (that's why 3rd party books exist). 

Which is also the cause of the original rant. There is very few 3rd
party books.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Hart wrote:
 I definitely think that the lists are one of the shining stars for 
 postgresql support. I've learned some good reference stuff from online 
 docs/google but the really tricky questions were only answered here, and 
 amazingly enough, quickly and with good humor. Perhaps what we really 
 need is somebody to comb through the archives looking for common 
 problems or exceptional solutions and compile them into a book.

The good and bad news is that the best way to do things often changes
from release to release, hence the need to get the most current
information from the mailing lists.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-30 Thread Gregory Williamson
Bruce Momjian said:

 Tom Hart wrote:
  I definitely think that the lists are one of the shining stars for 
  postgresql support. I've learned some good reference stuff from online 
  docs/google but the really tricky questions were only answered here, and 
  amazingly enough, quickly and with good humor. Perhaps what we really 
  need is somebody to comb through the archives looking for common 
  problems or exceptional solutions and compile them into a book.
 
 The good and bad news is that the best way to do things often changes
 from release to release, hence the need to get the most current
 information from the mailing lists.

Although I have solved almost every problem I have come up against in learning, 
partly with archives, I've often had to resort to asking the list because 
finding relevant missives in the archives can be hard if you don't know what 
month to look at, and even then the search results can produce a lot incidental 
wanderings to get to the solutions.

It seems that some intermediate ground (TWIKI or a document in some format) 
might help with some of these questions, perhaps with sections based on 
release. 

Personally, I found it very hard to get going with PL/pgSQL based on existing 
documentation; an older book on PostgreSQL had enough examples that I got over 
that hump and can usually find my way now with the documentation, lists and 
archives.

My $0.02 (inflating ? devalued 'cause it's US currency ?) ...

Greg Williamson
Senior DBA
GlobeXplorer LLC, a DigitalGlobe company


[GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-29 Thread Tom Hart
Hey everybody. I was just informed that our organization has a credit at 
amazon.com and asked if I had any books I wanted. I've been thinking 
about getting a postgresql book, and from what I've seen and read 
Practical PostgreSQL seems to be the standard (as well as co-authored by 
Joshua Drake, somebody that has helped me many times on this very list) 
but the fact that it's based on 7.x worries me. I started using 
postgresql with 8.x on windows and I'm wondering if this book and it's 
teachings will help me or if I should look at something targeted at 8.x 
or windows. What do you guys think?


--
Tom Hart
IT Specialist
Cooperative Federal
723 Westcott St.
Syracuse, NY 13210
(315) 471-1116 ext. 202
(315) 476-0567 (fax)


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-29 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:53:25 -0500
Tom Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hey everybody. I was just informed that our organization has a credit
 at amazon.com and asked if I had any books I wanted. I've been
 thinking about getting a postgresql book, and from what I've seen and
 read Practical PostgreSQL seems to be the standard (as well as
 co-authored by Joshua Drake, somebody that has helped me many times
 on this very list) but the fact that it's based on 7.x worries me. I
 started using postgresql with 8.x on windows and I'm wondering if
 this book and it's teachings will help me or if I should look at
 something targeted at 8.x or windows. What do you guys think?

Pratical PostgreSQL is still a good reference but you can use the free
web version as a reference. It lacks a lot of information that
is very useful (ex, the books has zero idea of pg_stat_*). The Korry
Douglas book is still reasonably relevant (as it covers 8) and is also
a good book.

I find that the best way to get what you need, is to read the fine
manual from postgresql. Yes, its massive, unwieldy and in a lot of
ways counter-intuitive (to a newbie) but if you have the terminology
down you aren't going to find a more comprehensive text.

Plus, when you find things that don't quite make sense you can submit
a doc patch to make the docs that much better.

Sincerely,


Joshua D. Drake
 


- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHn2oKATb/zqfZUUQRAtgCAKCOigLpBd9/EcYVPF/QsDvCYS3JugCggtS9
9QK5xte33f0/2+N/0pWOQvY=
=ioXq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-29 Thread Tom Hart

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:53:25 -0500
Tom Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

Hey everybody. I was just informed that our organization has a credit
at amazon.com and asked if I had any books I wanted. I've been
thinking about getting a postgresql book, and from what I've seen and
read Practical PostgreSQL seems to be the standard (as well as
co-authored by Joshua Drake, somebody that has helped me many times
on this very list) but the fact that it's based on 7.x worries me. I
started using postgresql with 8.x on windows and I'm wondering if
this book and it's teachings will help me or if I should look at
something targeted at 8.x or windows. What do you guys think?



Pratical PostgreSQL is still a good reference but you can use the free
web version as a reference. It lacks a lot of information that
is very useful (ex, the books has zero idea of pg_stat_*). The Korry
Douglas book is still reasonably relevant (as it covers 8) and is also
a good book.

I find that the best way to get what you need, is to read the fine
manual from postgresql. Yes, its massive, unwieldy and in a lot of
ways counter-intuitive (to a newbie) but if you have the terminology
down you aren't going to find a more comprehensive text.

Plus, when you find things that don't quite make sense you can submit
a doc patch to make the docs that much better.

Sincerely,


Joshua D. Drake
 



- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit
  
I've checked out the docs online, and they've helped me a great deal. 
I've also read excerpts from the free online version of practical. I'll 
stick with my current strategy of online docs/mailing list for now.


BTW, thanks for not completely plugging your book. Have you guys 
considered authoring another on 8.x?


--
Tom Hart
IT Specialist
Cooperative Federal
723 Westcott St.
Syracuse, NY 13210
(315) 471-1116 ext. 202
(315) 476-0567 (fax)


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

  http://archives.postgresql.org/


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-29 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:03:29 -0500
Tom Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've checked out the docs online, and they've helped me a great deal. 
 I've also read excerpts from the free online version of practical.
 I'll stick with my current strategy of online docs/mailing list for
 now.
 
 BTW, thanks for not completely plugging your book. Have you guys 
 considered authoring another on 8.x?

I try to be reasonable (no laughing people :)). It's on the list, just
like everything else. I doubt I would ever publish through a
traditional house those. Something more along the lines of Lulu where
the book can give the most use to the community.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHn22MATb/zqfZUUQRArn9AJ9gsuTcu7JUn8Y8Wf0eA6Dz2wluigCfbCzD
YkpbHErXPvzkSUaToYy8lro=
=uGIt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-29 Thread Dave Page
On Jan 29, 2008 6:16 PM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I try to be reasonable (no laughing people :)).

Oh it's hard, so very, very hard!

:-)

/D

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [GENERAL] postgresql book - practical or something newer?

2008-01-29 Thread Ow Mun Heng

On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:16 +, Dave Page wrote:
 On Jan 29, 2008 6:16 PM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I try to be reasonable (no laughing people :)).
 
 Oh it's hard, so very, very hard!
 

But seriously, I've ranted on this some time ago( and you can tell that
I'm about to start again)

rant
One of the worst aspect of PG is the documentation, or the lack of it in
terms of traditional house. The Manual is fine and all, but in most
cases, what I find that it lacks is actually examples. Either examples
to show what it a particular field/query means but also as a way to show
exactly how a particular problem can be solved.

When I played with both MSSQL and MySQL, I had loads of books (and I
bought a bit of it too, didn't bother subscribing to safari, it just
ain't a book!) to be used as reference and what not.

In PG, all there is, is the manual, a book by Robert Treat, the Book
from Joshua, 1 or 2 other books authored by someone I can't remember etc
and that's about it.

Then I would have to go hunt(via google) for any bit of blog/
presentation slides from a meetup/talk etc for ways to find out how to
do a particular thing. (Thanks Bruce M, Thanks Robert T - excellent
partitioning talk!, Thanks PgCon!) and pore over those.

Other than that, it's more or less, Bang you head here and send email
to the list and hope someone answers

I hang on to my O'reilly SQL Hacks book tightly as it gives me
examples on how to solve a problem and even how other DBs solve it.

I wish there was a book like MySQL Cookbook (which I have a copy)
/rant

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Book?

2000-12-08 Thread Bruce Momjian

 What's going on with Bruce' PostgreSQL book?  It says on the amazon.com
 website that it is due on December 1, 2000.  That was last Friday!

I would love to know myself.  I received my first copy on Wednesday, so
it should be going out soon.  No idea what is delaying it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026



RE: R: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL book

2000-10-12 Thread Peter Mount

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Robert D. Nelson wrote:

Heaven help you if you order it from Amazon with a real email address.
 
After about a year and a half of trying to get them to stop spamming
 me, I
  simply gave up and dropped the email account.
 
 I've always used a disposable email address with them (and most other
 companies I deal with).  But you might want to take another look at
 their privacy policy before you order.  Not too long ago they declared
 that their customer info is an asset.
 
 Customer info as an asset aside, I've never been spammed by amazon, and I 
 use the same email as I'm using now. I'm more worried about limiting the 
 number of credit cards I use online :)

I have to admit that I've never been spammed by amazon at all. So far (and
now I say it it will change :-( ) I don't get that much spam anyhow.

 If nothing else, Amazon and BN both over large pools of reader reviews that 
 I usually scan before buying any book. Why not be informed, even slightly?

It's always wise to check the reviews. I've saved a lot of money by not
buying books based on them. One that comes to mind was where the author
himself slated his own book...

Peter

-- 
Peter T Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/





Re: R: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL book

2000-10-11 Thread Roderick A. Anderson

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

 Wow, that is terrible.  That and their "one-click" licensing patent have
 made me use Barnes and Noble almost exclusively (bn.com).  Actually, BN
 has a much larger catalog of out-of-print books.

And they are accepting pre-orders.  I did mine about two weeks ago.


Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Altoplanos Information Systems, Inc.
Voice: 208.765.6149212 S. 11th Street, Suite 5
FAX: 208.664.5299  Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814




Re: R: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL book

2000-10-11 Thread mjp


..not to mention that it is now Amazon's official policy
to use/share personal information they now/will have on
you, arguably, any way they wish:

http://www.amazon.com/privacy-notice

Morey Parang
Oak Ridge National Lab


On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 12:42:17PM -0600, Steve Wolfe wrote:
  While ordering a book from Amazon, I found that they already have it
  available to pre-order, including a photo of the cover.
 
   Heaven help you if you order it from Amazon with a real email address.
 
   After about a year and a half of trying to get them to stop spamming me, I
 simply gave up and dropped the email account.
 
 steve
 



Re: R: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL book

2000-10-11 Thread Mitch Vincent

No matter where you choose to buy it, do buy it and support Bruce,
PostgreSQL and the publisher for allowing it to be electronically
published!!

-Mitch

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Steve Wolfe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: R: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL book



 ..not to mention that it is now Amazon's official policy
 to use/share personal information they now/will have on
 you, arguably, any way they wish:

 http://www.amazon.com/privacy-notice

 Morey Parang
 Oak Ridge National Lab





Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL book completed though chapter 10

2000-05-19 Thread Richard Smith

Bruce Momjian wrote:
 
 I have completed the first draft of my book through chapter 10.
 
 New chapters include:
 
 Chapter 7, Numbering rows:  OID's, sequences
 
 Chapter 8, Combining Selects:  UNION, subqueries
 
 Chapter 9, Data Types:  types, functions, operators, arrays
 
 Chapter 10,Transactions and Locks:  transactions, locking
 
 The books is accessible at:
 
 http://www.postgresql.org/docs/awbook.html
 
 Comments welcomed.
 
 --
   Bruce Momjian|  http://www.op.net/~candle
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 853-3000
   +  If your life is a hard drive, |  830 Blythe Avenue
   +  Christ can be your backup.|  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

I just Finished reading your book, I did work along with the text up to
chapter
4. I hope to finish that up when I get the time.  It is looking great. 
I am a pgsql beginner and this book has help me out a lot.  

I know that data modeling is a huge subject, but you might want to add a
small chapter on that subject.

I look forward to reading more drafts, and thank you for the great work
so far.

Richrad



[GENERAL] PostgreSQL book clarification

2000-03-30 Thread Steve . Anglin

To PostgreSQL experts --

Macmillan USA SAMS seeks your expertise to author our book on Linux Database 
Development with PostgreSQL.  If interested and available, please reply to me at the 
following email address for more information:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Thanks,
Steve Anglin, Linux Editor
Macmillan USA (SAMS)








[GENERAL] PostgreSQL Book

2000-03-29 Thread Jeff MacDonald

If anyone else is interested in writing a PostgreSQL book please contact

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jeff MacDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]