Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:01:24PM +0200, vinny wrote: > Now, I'm not saying the mailinglists should go, I'm saying there should be > an easier way > to access them. It should be possible to register on the site, post a > message and read replies, > without having to subscribe to the list and setup a way of dealing with the > influx of messages > that are, for the most post, simply not interesting to the average user. > > I'd love to have an RSS feed that contains only new questions, so I can just > watch the popup > on my screen the way I do with the rest of the world, and not have to deal > with replies to topics that I don't care about anyway. You might want to look at PgLife, which gives you a read-only view of what's currently happening in the Postgres community: http://pglife.momjian.us/ -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:44:55 -0700, "David G. Johnston" wrote: >A mailing list configuration that will automatically add on the OP to any >email in a message thread lacking the OP would work-around those list >respondents who would use "Reply" instead of "Reply All". Keeping track of >all respondents and adding them would be something to consider as well. > >The above would address the problem of our inability to provide a limited >engagement channel for people seeking help without forcing them onto the >-bugs list. That seems like a good idea. But having no experience with mailing list administration or available software, I don't know how easy it would be to implement. >A second problem is how to easily allow people to join (both read-only and >read-write) an ongoing conversation that isn't in their inbox. Asking for >a "forum" seems to be expressing a problem of this nature. I'm deferring >consideration of this problem-area for some other time. That's [partly] what digest mailings are for ... to alert people to interesting discussions they aren't following. Unfortunately, most lists don't provide digests by default. George -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:19 PM, George Neuner wrote: > > >So the question is, what is the problem we are trying to solve? > > How to support BOTH quick and dirty questions:answers AND complex > technical discussions that require significant time from their > participants. > > The problem of self-interest - people want to be able to ask their questions and get responses to those questions without being inundated with lots of other people asking questions that they don't have any intent to answer. Our bug reporting mechanism works pretty well in this regard - which is why people choose to use it instead of -general. Most (all) respondents on -bugs will remember to Reply-All which is a critical element of making it work in a two-way flow. I don't know how much effort is spent moderating that list... A mailing list configuration that will automatically add on the OP to any email in a message thread lacking the OP would work-around those list respondents who would use "Reply" instead of "Reply All". Keeping track of all respondents and adding them would be something to consider as well. The above would address the problem of our inability to provide a limited engagement channel for people seeking help without forcing them onto the -bugs list. I don't think that "quick and dirty" vs. "complex" is necessarily addressed here though likely the vast majority of posts would be of the former style. Maybe so much so that directing that traffic to a separate "-questions" list would let people discriminate their participation between the different traffic profiles there and on -general. A second problem is how to easily allow people to join (both read-only and read-write) an ongoing conversation that isn't in their inbox. Asking for a "forum" seems to be expressing a problem of this nature. I'm deferring consideration of this problem-area for some other time. David J.
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:57:23 -0700, "Joshua D. Drake" wrote: >Stack Overflow (as an example) is a collaboration platform. Stack >understands the problem and is very, very good at solving it. It is why >they are successful. Stack Overflow *is* successful ... at driving people away because any complicated question that could lead to a lengthy discussion gets closed by the moderators. Hardly an example of "collaborative" behavior. >Another example of a very good platform (that I can't stand) is Slack. >It has become so completely dominant in the growth space that even >Google is changing Hangouts because people were leaving in droves. Slack is only slightly better. IRC and other synchronous "rendezvous" instant messaging methods are great for *simple* questions, but they are *not* conducive to complex technical discussions. If you take time to craft a message [e.g., one lacking spelling or grammatical errors], to gather information for someone trying to help, or to try out someone's suggestion, very quickly you find yourself inundated with "are you still there?" messages. >So the question is, what is the problem we are trying to solve? How to support BOTH quick and dirty questions:answers AND complex technical discussions that require significant time from their participants. George -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:39:17 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: >On 4/5/2017 11:30 AM, George Neuner wrote: >> This makes it difficult to follow a discussion via email, and Google's >> list handling is flawed - it sometimes breaks the underlying list >> threading [while keeping its own GUI correct], and broken threads can >> be hard to follow even with a decent news reader. > >near as I can tell, gmail ignores the threading headers, and just >threads based on subjects. In my experience it isn't consistent - I suspect Google's server configurations are not uniform. I follow a number of lists routinely, but I see the threading problems only occasionally, and it seems to follow certain participants. George -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 04/05/2017 11:46 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Joshua D. Drake mailto:j...@commandprompt.com>> wrote: Stackoverflow gives back by providing an interface people want to use. It is free (as in beer) and is hugely popular. I think one of the greatest things that Stackoverflow brins isn't actually the interface (I for one can't stand it, but I'm clearly not the target group here), but it's the fact that they have the *userbase* of people. We have a userbase of "people already using postgres and many of them having done so for some time because there's a threshold to get over to join this mailinglist thing". Stackoverflow has a userbase that is orders of magnitude higher, because they provide a venue for people to ask questions about *anything* -- so they can use the same venue to ask about their programming language, their framework-du-jour, their database, their operating system etc etc. I would agree with that. This is one reason why I don't think having PostgreSQL dedicated web forums would actually be very interesting today. Those people who prefer to use the web as their media are more likely to already be using other platforms which bring them *more value* than a PostgreSQL dedicated forum ever would. And they don't have to sing up for Yet Another Account. And they can work on whatever credit-style-kickback their favorite platform does. Which is a reasonable opinion and why my point is more about interfacing with those external communities in some positive fashion (vs propping our own infrastructure). We need to be embracing these external communities because it is where our growth is. I run into people every single week that absolutely refuse to join these lists. They want nothing to do with email and they have good reason. Fully agreed. And I think we're better off doing that than to try to rebuild our own version of those communities. +1 Thanks, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 03/24/2017 11:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> John R Pierce writes: >> >>> On 3/24/2017 9:49 PM, Yuri Budilov wrote: >>> >> > They are uniformly unfriendly when viewed from this end of the >> relationship. nabble for instance reposts stuff into the mailing lists >> that is missing critical portions. stackoverflow doesn't seem to think >> they have any responsibility to give back at all. >> > > Stackoverflow gives back by providing an interface people want to use. It > is free (as in beer) and is hugely popular. > I think one of the greatest things that Stackoverflow brins isn't actually the interface (I for one can't stand it, but I'm clearly not the target group here), but it's the fact that they have the *userbase* of people. We have a userbase of "people already using postgres and many of them having done so for some time because there's a threshold to get over to join this mailinglist thing". Stackoverflow has a userbase that is orders of magnitude higher, because they provide a venue for people to ask questions about *anything* -- so they can use the same venue to ask about their programming language, their framework-du-jour, their database, their operating system etc etc. This is one reason why I don't think having PostgreSQL dedicated web forums would actually be very interesting today. Those people who prefer to use the web as their media are more likely to already be using other platforms which bring them *more value* than a PostgreSQL dedicated forum ever would. And they don't have to sing up for Yet Another Account. And they can work on whatever credit-style-kickback their favorite platform does. > We need to be embracing these external communities because it is where our > growth is. I run into people every single week that absolutely refuse to > join these lists. They want nothing to do with email and they have good > reason. > Fully agreed. And I think we're better off doing that than to try to rebuild our own version of those communities. Personally, I couldn't stand going through StackOverflow on a regular basis trying to check if Postgres related questions are answered or not etc. Luckily, we have other community members who *are* willing to do that, and they make that platform work. So I'm very grateful for those people doing it, even better that it's not me. And also, if somebody wants to take another stab at trying to make web forums for PostgreSQL, I say let them try. I don't think it would work, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:05:39 -0500, John McKown wrote: > : >I don't mind an "archive" web site which records all of the >emails. And it it properly threads them, that is even better. I have that >on a number of my lists. And you can even post through them. The post goes >directly to the web site, which then "fakes up" an "email" which looks like >it came in via the regular email channel and sends it back out via the >normal email channel.? But there are some which don't do this "echoing". > : And then there are sites - e.g., Google - which maintain their own internal threading of the discussion, but F_ up sending posts to the list channel and breaking other's views of the discussion. George -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 4/5/2017 11:30 AM, George Neuner wrote: This makes it difficult to follow a discussion via email, and Google's list handling is flawed - it sometimes breaks the underlying list threading [while keeping its own GUI correct], and broken threads can be hard to follow even with a decent news reader. near as I can tell, gmail ignores the threading headers, and just threads based on subjects. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:31:59 -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote: >On 04/05/2017 09:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> This has been tried a number of times. I'ts been a couple of years since >> I last saw one, but multiple people have set up forums, either mirrored >> or not. They have all died because of either lack of usage or because >> the person who did it disappeared. > >Mostly, because they did not work well and the folks on this end of the >process had to do more work to get the information necessary to answer >the question. I know I eventually stopped responding to the questions >from those sources because it was difficult to follow the information >flow. Namely you had to crawl back up to the forum to get information >and then the email thread had mix of information that made it through on >its own and some subset of information that dedicated people pulled in >from the forum. That mix depended on dedication level and time available. That's the same observation I made about list participants who subscribe through Google Groups ... they often don't [think to] make the effort to quote or attribute properly because *they* can simply look back up the thread to see what was written and by whom. This makes it difficult to follow a discussion via email, and Google's list handling is flawed - it sometimes breaks the underlying list threading [while keeping its own GUI correct], and broken threads can be hard to follow even with a decent news reader. [Postgresql lists are available through NNTP: e.g., at Gmane.org]. YMMV, George -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 04/05/2017 10:57 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: On 04/05/2017 10:45 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 04/05/2017 10:26 AM, Tim Clarke wrote: +1 Joshua, that's the best reason I've heard so far and it seems very powerful to me. The more readers we have and the easier they can communicate with us (doesn't matter if they are "wrong") then the better all round for Postgres. This implies that ease of communication = quality of communication and I am not buying it. Exhibit A, Twitter. Adrian, I am afraid that you misunderstand the problem. The idea that you would use Twitter as the example is a perfect illustration of this. Twitter is *not* a collaboration platform. It is a promotion platform and it does it very well. More a commentary on ease of use trumping content. Stack Overflow (as an example) is a collaboration platform. Stack understands the problem and is very, very good at solving it. It is why they are successful. Another example of a very good platform (that I can't stand) is Slack. It has become so completely dominant in the growth space that even Google is changing Hangouts because people were leaving in droves. So the question is, what is the problem we are trying to solve? I posed that the problem is that we are hostile toward communities that don't communicate and collaborate in the way we feel is "correct". Not being hostile to other communities, just pointing out the reality. When push comes to shove and the other methods of collaboration fail, said communities then refer the OP to this list or others in the Postgres mailing list galaxy to get an answer. Seems to me folks would save a lot of time and effort just joining the list instead of hopping around looking for a quick answer. Reminds me of college where I saw people spend more time looking for the 'cheats' instead of just studying the material. The material is here, the people that know the material are here, get over your bias and use the resource. You have proved that the way I posed the problem is accurate. Thank you for your participation, JD -- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 04/05/2017 10:45 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 04/05/2017 10:26 AM, Tim Clarke wrote: +1 Joshua, that's the best reason I've heard so far and it seems very powerful to me. The more readers we have and the easier they can communicate with us (doesn't matter if they are "wrong") then the better all round for Postgres. This implies that ease of communication = quality of communication and I am not buying it. Exhibit A, Twitter. Adrian, I am afraid that you misunderstand the problem. The idea that you would use Twitter as the example is a perfect illustration of this. Twitter is *not* a collaboration platform. It is a promotion platform and it does it very well. Stack Overflow (as an example) is a collaboration platform. Stack understands the problem and is very, very good at solving it. It is why they are successful. Another example of a very good platform (that I can't stand) is Slack. It has become so completely dominant in the growth space that even Google is changing Hangouts because people were leaving in droves. So the question is, what is the problem we are trying to solve? I posed that the problem is that we are hostile toward communities that don't communicate and collaborate in the way we feel is "correct". You have proved that the way I posed the problem is accurate. Thank you for your participation, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
Op 05/04/2017 om 19:26 schreef Tim Clarke: On 05/04/17 18:22, Joshua D. Drake wrote: Stackoverflow gives back by providing an interface people want to use. It is free (as in beer) and is hugely popular. We need to be embracing these external communities because it is where our growth is. I run into people every single week that absolutely refuse to join these lists. They want nothing to do with email and they have good reason. JD +1 Joshua, that's the best reason I've heard so far and it seems very powerful to me. The more readers we have and the easier they can communicate with us (doesn't matter if they are "wrong") then the better all round for Postgres. Tim +1 This is what I was getting at before. I need to learn to phrase things better :-) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 04/05/2017 10:26 AM, Tim Clarke wrote: On 05/04/17 18:22, Joshua D. Drake wrote: Stackoverflow gives back by providing an interface people want to use. It is free (as in beer) and is hugely popular. We need to be embracing these external communities because it is where our growth is. I run into people every single week that absolutely refuse to join these lists. They want nothing to do with email and they have good reason. JD +1 Joshua, that's the best reason I've heard so far and it seems very powerful to me. The more readers we have and the easier they can communicate with us (doesn't matter if they are "wrong") then the better all round for Postgres. This implies that ease of communication = quality of communication and I am not buying it. Exhibit A, Twitter. Tim -- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 03/24/2017 09:49 PM, Yuri Budilov wrote: Hello everyone Can these forums be moved to internet ? All these emails is so 1990s. So hard to follow, so hard to search for historical answers. We really need to be able to post via browser. best regards to everyone You are going to find that the .Org community is generally hostile toward non-email centric communication. My recommendation is to look toward these very useful external communities: * https://plus.google.com/communities/116371937400081693174 * https://www.facebook.com/groups/postgres/ * http://www.stackoverflow.com/ * http://reddit.com/r/postgresql If you would like a highly dynamic environment, you may try IRC. Yes it is an old school protocol but over 1000 people hangout on that channel and there are a lot of them that try to help. IRC: * Server: irc.freenode.net * Channel: #postgresql Other collaborative platforms: * https://gitter.im/postgresmen/postgresql If you are looking for an awesome interface to the IRC channel, you can try Riot: * https://riot.im/app/#/room/#freenode_#postgresql:matrix.org Thanks for trying to participate, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 05/04/17 18:22, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Stackoverflow gives back by providing an interface people want to use. > It is free (as in beer) and is hugely popular. > > We need to be embracing these external communities because it is where > our growth is. I run into people every single week that absolutely > refuse to join these lists. They want nothing to do with email and > they have good reason. > > JD > +1 Joshua, that's the best reason I've heard so far and it seems very powerful to me. The more readers we have and the easier they can communicate with us (doesn't matter if they are "wrong") then the better all round for Postgres. Tim smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 03/24/2017 11:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote: John R Pierce writes: On 3/24/2017 9:49 PM, Yuri Budilov wrote: They are uniformly unfriendly when viewed from this end of the relationship. nabble for instance reposts stuff into the mailing lists that is missing critical portions. stackoverflow doesn't seem to think they have any responsibility to give back at all. Stackoverflow gives back by providing an interface people want to use. It is free (as in beer) and is hugely popular. We need to be embracing these external communities because it is where our growth is. I run into people every single week that absolutely refuse to join these lists. They want nothing to do with email and they have good reason. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Steve Litt wrote: > > > > In addition, once you subscribe to a mailing list, all info comes to > you. No password necessary. Read, reply, lightning quick. > > Contrast this with forums, where you have to remember to go out to each > and every forum you're interested in, put in the password, and then > operate within the work-flow of the forum. > > I'm subscribed to mailing lists of 20 LUGs. Can you imagine the > inconvenience if I had to go out to each one and put in a password just > to see if there's anything new? With mailing lists, the information > comes to you, instead of making you go out to it. > This is exactly my thought on the subject, but phrased better that I could have done it. I don't mind an "archive" web site which records all of the emails. And it it properly threads them, that is even better. I have that on a number of my lists. And you can even post through them. The post goes directly to the web site, which then "fakes up" an "email" which looks like it came in via the regular email channel and sends it back out via the normal email channel. But there are some which don't do this "echoing". In those, I end up just ignoring people because it is too difficult for me to bother with going to the site to reply. > > SteveT > > Steve Litt > April 2017 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques > of the Successful Technologist > http://www.troubleshooters.com/techniques > > -- "Irrigation of the land with seawater desalinated by fusion power is ancient. It's called 'rain'." -- Michael McClary, in alt.fusion Maranatha! <>< John McKown
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:31:59 -0700 Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 04/05/2017 09:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > > > This has been tried a number of times. I'ts been a couple of years > > since I last saw one, but multiple people have set up forums, > > either mirrored or not. They have all died because of either lack > > of usage or because the person who did it disappeared. > > Mostly, because they did not work well and the folks on this end of > the process had to do more work to get the information necessary to > answer the question. I know I eventually stopped responding to the > questions from those sources because it was difficult to follow the > information flow. Namely you had to crawl back up to the forum to get > information and then the email thread had mix of information that > made it through on its own and some subset of information that > dedicated people pulled in from the forum. That mix depended on > dedication level and time available. In addition, once you subscribe to a mailing list, all info comes to you. No password necessary. Read, reply, lightning quick. Contrast this with forums, where you have to remember to go out to each and every forum you're interested in, put in the password, and then operate within the work-flow of the forum. I'm subscribed to mailing lists of 20 LUGs. Can you imagine the inconvenience if I had to go out to each one and put in a password just to see if there's anything new? With mailing lists, the information comes to you, instead of making you go out to it. SteveT Steve Litt April 2017 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/techniques -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 04/05/2017 09:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > >> This has been tried a number of times. I'ts been a couple of years since >> I last saw one, but multiple people have set up forums, either mirrored >> or not. They have all died because of either lack of usage or because >> the person who did it disappeared. >> > > Mostly, because they did not work well and the folks on this end of the > process had to do more work to get the information necessary to answer the > question. I know I eventually stopped responding to the questions from > those sources because it was difficult to follow the information flow. > Namely you had to crawl back up to the forum to get information and then > the email thread had mix of information that made it through on its own and > some subset of information that dedicated people pulled in from the forum. > That mix depended on dedication level and time available. > > Most likely things like that yes -- which indicates that it really wasn't enough people who preferred that format to actually reach critical mass. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 04/05/2017 09:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: This has been tried a number of times. I'ts been a couple of years since I last saw one, but multiple people have set up forums, either mirrored or not. They have all died because of either lack of usage or because the person who did it disappeared. Mostly, because they did not work well and the folks on this end of the process had to do more work to get the information necessary to answer the question. I know I eventually stopped responding to the questions from those sources because it was difficult to follow the information flow. Namely you had to crawl back up to the forum to get information and then the email thread had mix of information that made it through on its own and some subset of information that dedicated people pulled in from the forum. That mix depended on dedication level and time available. Not saying it can't be tried again, but in the previous attempts it certainly hasn't been "many users". It could be that whomever set them up did a bad job of course, I can't judge that as I didn't personally use them more than take a look every now and then. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:14 PM, vinny wrote: > On 2017-04-05 15:11, Vincent Veyron wrote: > >> On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:01:24 +0200 >> vinny wrote: >> >>> >>> Every time I tell someone about the mailinglists I then have to explain >>> how they can subscribe, how to create folders, filters etc. And more >>> often than not >>> they just say forget it and go to some forum. >>> >> >> On forums, all you see is the header for the discussion, and the >> number of messages attached to it. >> >> It makes it much more difficult to follow discussions, because you >> don't know if there are new messages or not, unless you memorized how >> many were there the last time you looked at it. And even then, you >> can't tell whether you even read them previously or not, which a >> mailing list will tell you, because the messages are marked. >> > > It depends entirely on which forum software you use. > If keeping track of read messages is a requirement then you would obviously > use a forum that does that for you. > > But again, I'm not saying the mailinglist should be replaced by a forum. > What I'm saying is that many users find forums a lot easier to use and > give the choice, > they will opt for the forum. Hence it makes sense to provide something for > those users, > if there is the manpower to do so. This has been tried a number of times. I'ts been a couple of years since I last saw one, but multiple people have set up forums, either mirrored or not. They have all died because of either lack of usage or because the person who did it disappeared. Not saying it can't be tried again, but in the previous attempts it certainly hasn't been "many users". It could be that whomever set them up did a bad job of course, I can't judge that as I didn't personally use them more than take a look every now and then. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 04/05/2017 07:14 AM, vinny wrote: On 2017-04-05 15:11, Vincent Veyron wrote: On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:01:24 +0200 vinny wrote: Every time I tell someone about the mailinglists I then have to explain how they can subscribe, how to create folders, filters etc. And more often than not they just say forget it and go to some forum. On forums, all you see is the header for the discussion, and the number of messages attached to it. It makes it much more difficult to follow discussions, because you don't know if there are new messages or not, unless you memorized how many were there the last time you looked at it. And even then, you can't tell whether you even read them previously or not, which a mailing list will tell you, because the messages are marked. It depends entirely on which forum software you use. If keeping track of read messages is a requirement then you would obviously use a forum that does that for you. But again, I'm not saying the mailinglist should be replaced by a forum. What I'm saying is that many users find forums a lot easier to use and give the choice, they will opt for the forum. Hence it makes sense to provide something for those users, if there is the manpower to do so. Can you expect Joe Average to do something like that if they want to get more involved in PgSQL? How hard is it to subscribe, create a folder and a filter? If that is too involved, I don't see how they can get involved in postgres anyway. That might be true if you are talking about contributors, sure, but we're not. Or at least, I'm not, and I guess that's where I'm mistaking. Perhaps the mailinglists are the way they are to encourage the more serious users to use them, and keep everyday questions out a little. Everyday questions appear here all the time, so that is not the motivation. It is more that Postgres is a complex piece of software and questions/answers work better in the mailing list work flow then a forum. The added benefit is that the list is a tremendous resource and you will find many of your questions answered by just monitoring the list. There are days that the --general is really busy, but most times it very manageable, especially if you apply the eyeball filter to topics:) If someone wants to just drop in for a single question there is the IRC channel: https://www.postgresql.org/community/irc/ or Stackoverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/postgresql That would be fine too, but don't put it like "if you this is too much work, you shouldn't be using postgresql". -- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 2017-04-05 15:11, Vincent Veyron wrote: On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:01:24 +0200 vinny wrote: Every time I tell someone about the mailinglists I then have to explain how they can subscribe, how to create folders, filters etc. And more often than not they just say forget it and go to some forum. On forums, all you see is the header for the discussion, and the number of messages attached to it. It makes it much more difficult to follow discussions, because you don't know if there are new messages or not, unless you memorized how many were there the last time you looked at it. And even then, you can't tell whether you even read them previously or not, which a mailing list will tell you, because the messages are marked. It depends entirely on which forum software you use. If keeping track of read messages is a requirement then you would obviously use a forum that does that for you. But again, I'm not saying the mailinglist should be replaced by a forum. What I'm saying is that many users find forums a lot easier to use and give the choice, they will opt for the forum. Hence it makes sense to provide something for those users, if there is the manpower to do so. Can you expect Joe Average to do something like that if they want to get more involved in PgSQL? How hard is it to subscribe, create a folder and a filter? If that is too involved, I don't see how they can get involved in postgres anyway. That might be true if you are talking about contributors, sure, but we're not. Or at least, I'm not, and I guess that's where I'm mistaking. Perhaps the mailinglists are the way they are to encourage the more serious users to use them, and keep everyday questions out a little. That would be fine too, but don't put it like "if you this is too much work, you shouldn't be using postgresql". -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:01:24 +0200 vinny wrote: > > Every time I tell someone about the mailinglists I then have to explain > how they can subscribe, how to create folders, filters etc. And more > often than not > they just say forget it and go to some forum. On forums, all you see is the header for the discussion, and the number of messages attached to it. It makes it much more difficult to follow discussions, because you don't know if there are new messages or not, unless you memorized how many were there the last time you looked at it. And even then, you can't tell whether you even read them previously or not, which a mailing list will tell you, because the messages are marked. > Can you expect Joe > Average to do something like that > if they want to get more involved in PgSQL? > How hard is it to subscribe, create a folder and a filter? If that is too involved, I don't see how they can get involved in postgres anyway. -- Bien à vous, Vincent Veyron https://marica.fr Logiciel de gestion des contentieux juridiques, des contrats et des sinistres d'assurance -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
Greetings, * Robin St.Clair (ro...@robinstclair.net) wrote: > Please do not encrypt what does not need to be encrypted. Signing > communications to a mailing list probably isn't required? Signing communications demonstrates that the message was, indeed, from me. You are certainly welcome to ignore it. Thanks! Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
Greetings Vinny, * vinny (vi...@xs4all.nl) wrote: > I meant it as "in an ideal world". It's a bit like buying a car > and finding out that they have not put the wheels on. It's not > difficult to put them on yourself, > but you kind of expect that the people who want you to user their > car would do that for you. There's a bit of a difference between buying a car and using a service which is provided for free from a team of volunteers. I agree that the "in an ideal world" wording is better. :) Thanks! Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 2017-04-04 15:04, Stephen Frost wrote: Greetings, * vinny (vi...@xs4all.nl) wrote: And yes, I can probably setup my email to do something like that, the point is that I shouldn't have to. I'm all for improving things and adding automation where it'll help, but the infrastructure is basically run by volunteers. Making statements like "I shouldn't have to" isn't the best approach to getting the changes you'd like to see happen done. I meant it as "in an ideal world". It's a bit like buying a car and finding out that they have not put the wheels on. It's not difficult to put them on yourself, but you kind of expect that the people who want you to user their car would do that for you. Anyway, thanks for the response! Thanks! Stephen -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
Greetings, * vinny (vi...@xs4all.nl) wrote: > The thing is; mailinglists are far from userfiendly if you are not > used to them. > Even in this thread several people have explained how much work they > have done to get it > into a state where they can easily work with it. Can you expect Joe > Average to do something like that > if they want to get more involved in PgSQL? I don't actually feel that it's really all that unreasonable, no. I've explained that we use mailing lists to a few different groups at different colleges I've spoken at and while there's been a bit of grousing from a few individuals, I don't recall anyone not knowing what a mailing list is or having all that bad of a reaction. I'll be speaking later this month again at GMU, so I'll make it a point to discuss it with the group there. > Now, I'm not saying the mailinglists should go, I'm saying there > should be an easier way > to access them. It should be possible to register on the site, post > a message and read replies, > without having to subscribe to the list and setup a way of dealing > with the influx of messages > that are, for the most post, simply not interesting to the average user. I don't think there's anyone who is particularly against that idea, but it's far from trivial to do and to address the possible spam which will result from that. All of the website code is open-source and improvements to it would be greatly welcomed, as long as they don't create a significant increase in the maintenance burden for the pginfra team. > I'd love to have an RSS feed that contains only new questions, so I > can just watch the popup > on my screen the way I do with the rest of the world, and not have > to deal with replies to topics that I don't care about anyway. I don't see any reason, off-hand at least, that this couldn't be provided. We already provide RSS feeds for other things and it's reasonably straight-forward. Replying to the RSS feed would require an email client though, at least for now. Perhaps that could be integrated into the 'whole mbox' download option though or something along those lines so you can pull the email/thread into your client easily to reply. > And yes, I can probably setup my email to do something like that, > the point is that I shouldn't have to. I'm all for improving things and adding automation where it'll help, but the infrastructure is basically run by volunteers. Making statements like "I shouldn't have to" isn't the best approach to getting the changes you'd like to see happen done. Thanks! Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
vinny schrieb am 04.04.2017 um 12:01: > I'd love to have an RSS feed that contains only new questions, so I can just > watch the popup > on my screen the way I do with the rest of the world, and not have to deal > with replies to topics that I don't care about anyway. You can read them as a newsgroup provided by news.gmane.org - I do it that way. Thunderbird works quite well with that. Thomas -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 2017-03-27 23:23, Steve Litt wrote: On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:31:02 +0900 Michael Paquier wrote: If you have subscribed to more mailing lists than -general, having one subfolder per list can also help a lot, grouping as well some of those having a low activity, for example: - one folder for -hackers and -hackers-cluster. - one folder for -general. - one folder for -jdbc and -odbc. - one for -bugs and -docs. - one for -jobs and -announce, etc. Something like that will make your hacking activity way easier to handle. I would bet that a lot of people around here do that. I sure do. I have a heck of a lot of email in a heck of a lot of folders, all stored in a nice, easy to drill down hierarchy. That hierarchy is maintained by the Dovecot IMAP server that runs on my desktop computer. I'm not against mailinglists at all, but I am for ease of use, especially for newcomers. Every time I tell someone about the mailinglists I then have to explain how they can subscribe, how to create folders, filters etc. And more often than not they just say forget it and go to some forum. When it comes to having a lively group discussion that focuses all minds into a supermind greater than the sum of the parts, a mailing list is the best tool. Well, in the end, it's not the fact that it's a mailinglist that makes the community great, it's just the fact that the active members share a methodof communication that they all like to use. Getting notifications of new messages is probably the single most important feature to keep discussions going and email provides that. The thing is; mailinglists are far from userfiendly if you are not used to them. Even in this thread several people have explained how much work they have done to get it into a state where they can easily work with it. Can you expect Joe Average to do something like that if they want to get more involved in PgSQL? Now, I'm not saying the mailinglists should go, I'm saying there should be an easier way to access them. It should be possible to register on the site, post a message and read replies, without having to subscribe to the list and setup a way of dealing with the influx of messages that are, for the most post, simply not interesting to the average user. I'd love to have an RSS feed that contains only new questions, so I can just watch the popup on my screen the way I do with the rest of the world, and not have to deal with replies to topics that I don't care about anyway. And yes, I can probably setup my email to do something like that, the point is that I shouldn't have to. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:31:02 +0900 > > > On every successful mailing list, somebody inevitably suggests > replacing it with "a forum" or "a facebook page" or some > proprietary website that acts as a middleman (Google, Meetup and > Linkedin are three of the usual suspects). Such suggestions usually go > nowhere, and when they're followed, communication usually ceases and > the the community becomes a ghost town. When it comes to having a > lively group discussion that focuses all minds into a supermind greater > than the sum of the parts, a mailing list is the best tool. Especially > if those who use it trim properly and make sure they're not being > ambiguous. > Very true. The main reason that I like email is that I get an easy to see notification about a new message. And I only need to go to _one_ place to find it. > > Another mailing list benefit: Most of these other types of "community > communicators" sooner or later disappear from the Internet, just like > mailing lists. But with mailing lists, individuals can keep their own > archives. I have archives from my first LUG, even though that LUG's > mailing list went defunct in 2002. > so, you're saying you're a LUG nut? [ I just couldn't stop myself. It's a disease! ] > > Because my email folder hierarchy was designed by me, I can usually > find emails of any age very quickly. Responding is as easy as replying > to an email. > Another plus. > > One assertion in the original post was that email communication is "so > 1990's". That's neither a compliment nor an insult, and has prompted me > to write an essay, for which I'll provide the URL when it's finished. > Agree. I guess the OP doesn't every use paper or pen/pencil for anything. Bottom line though, don't mess with success. > 'cause you'll end up a mess! > > SteveT > > Steve Litt > March 2017 featured book: Troubleshooting: Why Bother? > http://www.troubleshooters.com/twb > > > -- "Irrigation of the land with seawater desalinated by fusion power is ancient. It's called 'rain'." -- Michael McClary, in alt.fusion Maranatha! <>< John McKown
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:31:02 +0900 Michael Paquier wrote: > If you have subscribed to more mailing lists than -general, having one > subfolder per list can also help a lot, grouping as well some of those > having a low activity, for example: > - one folder for -hackers and -hackers-cluster. > - one folder for -general. > - one folder for -jdbc and -odbc. > - one for -bugs and -docs. > - one for -jobs and -announce, etc. > Something like that will make your hacking activity way easier to > handle. I would bet that a lot of people around here do that. I sure do. I have a heck of a lot of email in a heck of a lot of folders, all stored in a nice, easy to drill down hierarchy. That hierarchy is maintained by the Dovecot IMAP server that runs on my desktop computer. On every successful mailing list, somebody inevitably suggests replacing it with "a forum" or "a facebook page" or some proprietary website that acts as a middleman (Google, Meetup and Linkedin are three of the usual suspects). Such suggestions usually go nowhere, and when they're followed, communication usually ceases and the the community becomes a ghost town. When it comes to having a lively group discussion that focuses all minds into a supermind greater than the sum of the parts, a mailing list is the best tool. Especially if those who use it trim properly and make sure they're not being ambiguous. Another mailing list benefit: Most of these other types of "community communicators" sooner or later disappear from the Internet, just like mailing lists. But with mailing lists, individuals can keep their own archives. I have archives from my first LUG, even though that LUG's mailing list went defunct in 2002. Because my email folder hierarchy was designed by me, I can usually find emails of any age very quickly. Responding is as easy as replying to an email. One assertion in the original post was that email communication is "so 1990's". That's neither a compliment nor an insult, and has prompted me to write an essay, for which I'll provide the URL when it's finished. Bottom line though, don't mess with success. SteveT Steve Litt March 2017 featured book: Troubleshooting: Why Bother? http://www.troubleshooters.com/twb -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 3/25/2017 10:31 PM, George Neuner wrote: >> >> I also dislike having my email full of list posts. > > I have a 'postgres' folder in Thunderbird, and all posts "To:" or CC: > pgsql-*@postgresql.org get moved there, that way they are together, and > don't clutter my other email.I have similar folders for the various > other email lists I'm on. If you have subscribed to more mailing lists than -general, having one subfolder per list can also help a lot, grouping as well some of those having a low activity, for example: - one folder for -hackers and -hackers-cluster. - one folder for -general. - one folder for -jdbc and -odbc. - one for -bugs and -docs. - one for -jobs and -announce, etc. Something like that will make your hacking activity way easier to handle. I would bet that a lot of people around here do that. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 3/25/2017 10:31 PM, George Neuner wrote: I also dislike having my email full of list posts. I have a 'postgres' folder in Thunderbird, and all posts "To:" or CC: pgsql-*@postgresql.org get moved there, that way they are together, and don't clutter my other email.I have similar folders for the various other email lists I'm on. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 16:37:00 +, Tim Clarke wrote: >On 25/03/17 16:25, David G. Johnston wrote: >> >> One constraint is that the current email based flow cannot be >> disrupted. Adding on a fully integrated forum-like GUI does have some >> demand. I don't see it being met if the it needs to be custom >> written. Therefore, do you have any suggestions and examples of >> communities using such a system? >> >> As it stands we have a kind of read-only forum in our archives. It >> would be nice if there were a form at the bottom of the page that >> would let you post - or even "send email to me so I can respond". >> >> In short, there is always room for usability improvements. You'll get >> a better response if you focus on those since and explain why. >> >> David J. > >google groups would support both methods of access imho > >I'm not suggesting its a good thing - perfectly happy with just email >myself and searching the list archives if need be. Google Groups rather routinely screws up message attribution so you don't know to whom a GG user was responding. Also [IME, anyway] GG users tend to forget to expand and quote the material to which they are responding because in the web UI they can just look back and see it. Trying to follow a group through email, or by way of a list<>news bridge, it is easy to lose the flow of a discussion when some of its participants are on Google. That said ... I also dislike having my email full of list posts. I prefer to follow groups and lists through NNTP (net news) whenever possible. Many (all?) of the Postgresql lists are available via Gmane[*]. For historical (hysterical?) reasons, I use Forte Agent as my reader on Windows, but Thunderbird and SeaMonkey both work well for news and are cross platform. YMMV, George [*] Gmane is one of the list<>news bridges. They currently are in the midst of rehosting and changing maintainers. The NNTP servers (news.gmane.org) are working, but the web site (http://gmane.org/) is offline. No account is necessary to use Gmane itself, but membership in a list is needed to post messages. Join with the same email address used by your NN reader to access Gmane. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Saturday, March 25, 2017, Tim Clarke wrote: > On 25/03/17 16:25, David G. Johnston wrote: > > > > One constraint is that the current email based flow cannot be > > disrupted. Adding on a fully integrated forum-like GUI does have some > > demand. I don't see it being met if the it needs to be custom > > written. Therefore, do you have any suggestions and examples of > > communities using such a system? > > > > As it stands we have a kind of read-only forum in our archives. It > > would be nice if there were a form at the bottom of the page that > > would let you post - or even "send email to me so I can respond". > > > > In short, there is always room for usability improvements. You'll get > > a better response if you focus on those since and explain why. > > > > David J. > > google groups would support both methods of access imho > > I'm not suggesting its a good thing - perfectly happy with just email > myself and searching the list archives if need be. > > Becomming reliant on a third-party host is a non-starter. Nothing about the present system is so deficient that status-quo would be a less appealing option. David J.
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 25/03/17 16:25, David G. Johnston wrote: > > One constraint is that the current email based flow cannot be > disrupted. Adding on a fully integrated forum-like GUI does have some > demand. I don't see it being met if the it needs to be custom > written. Therefore, do you have any suggestions and examples of > communities using such a system? > > As it stands we have a kind of read-only forum in our archives. It > would be nice if there were a form at the bottom of the page that > would let you post - or even "send email to me so I can respond". > > In short, there is always room for usability improvements. You'll get > a better response if you focus on those since and explain why. > > David J. google groups would support both methods of access imho I'm not suggesting its a good thing - perfectly happy with just email myself and searching the list archives if need be. Tim smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Friday, March 24, 2017, Yuri Budilov wrote: > Hello everyone > Can these forums be moved to internet ? > All these emails is so 1990s. > So hard to follow, so hard to search for historical answers. > We really need to be able to post via browser. > > One constraint is that the current email based flow cannot be disrupted. Adding on a fully integrated forum-like GUI does have some demand. I don't see it being met if the it needs to be custom written. Therefore, do you have any suggestions and examples of communities using such a system? As it stands we have a kind of read-only forum in our archives. It would be nice if there were a form at the bottom of the page that would let you post - or even "send email to me so I can respond". In short, there is always room for usability improvements. You'll get a better response if you focus on those since and explain why. David J.
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 04:49:33AM +, Yuri Budilov wrote: > Can these forums be moved to internet ? Last I looked, SMTP generally works on the Internet. You mean "the web", which is a part of but not all of the Internet. > So hard to follow, so hard to search for historical answers. Why do you find it hard to follow? The list is pretty well-ordered and tends to thread nicely, so you can use any threaded mail reader (or reader in threaded mode) and you should have some success. I note from the headers on your mail that you appear to be using both MS Exchange and MS Outlook. I haven't looked since the early 2000s, so things might be better, but I recall Outlook having really bad threading support at the time. Maybe you need to switch to gmail for reading the postgres lists. It threads ok, and meets your stated requirement of being in a browser. As for historical answers, I'm not exactly sure what you want but you will find at https://www.postgresql.org/list/ a "search archives" function and an "advanced" search function at https://www.postgresql.org/search/?m=1. It's as good as most online forum search tools I've ever used, though not as good as Google. Which, I note, works well too. > We really need to be able to post via browser. Why? What does "post via browser" get you that sending an email doesn't? I can think of somethign it does _not_ get you, however, and that is the attention of some of the key contributors to Postgres, who appear to work mostly in a mode where email makes things easy for them and logging into a new forum tool makes things harder. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@crankycanuck.ca -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
John R Pierce writes: > On 3/24/2017 9:49 PM, Yuri Budilov wrote: >> Can these forums be moved to internet ? > go ahead and start a forum. good luck. Think it's been done already, multiple times ... nabble and stackoverflow already provide forums that are loosely linked to the PG mailing lists. And probably some others that I'm not remembering at the moment. They are uniformly unfriendly when viewed from this end of the relationship. nabble for instance reposts stuff into the mailing lists that is missing critical portions. stackoverflow doesn't seem to think they have any responsibility to give back at all. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 3/24/2017 11:27 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 3/24/2017 9:49 PM, Yuri Budilov wrote: Hello everyone Can these forums be moved to internet ? go ahead and start a forum. good luck. sorry, that was a little terse. I tried to move a couple thriving communities I'd created as email lists to forums. the communities died. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
On 3/24/2017 9:49 PM, Yuri Budilov wrote: Hello everyone Can these forums be moved to internet ? go ahead and start a forum. good luck. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] browser interface to forums please?
Hi 2017-03-25 5:49 GMT+01:00 Yuri Budilov : > Hello everyone > Can these forums be moved to internet ? > It is on internet > All these emails is so 1990s. > And it is working well - there is not spam and ballast > So hard to follow, so hard to search for historical answers. > We really need to be able to post via browser. > why? there is a fulltexted archive https://www.postgresql.org/list/group/2/ https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-general/ You can use http://stackoverflow.com/ too Regards Pavel > best regards to everyone > >
