Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-10-19 Thread Zhang Mingli
Hi,

> On Aug 22, 2023, at 17:33, Peter Eisentraut  wrote:
> 
> The list of acknowledgments for the PG16 release notes has been committed.  
> It should show up here sometime: 
> .
>   As usual, please check for problems such as wrong sorting, duplicate names 
> in different variants, or names in the wrong order etc.  (Our convention is 
> given name followed by surname.)
> 
> 

Could you help me with Mingli Zhang ->  Zhang Mingli

Thanks.

Zhang Mingli
HashData https://www.hashdata.xyz



Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-10-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut

On 16.10.23 15:46, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

On 2023-Aug-27, Peter Eisentraut wrote:


On 22.08.23 15:48, Vik Fearing wrote:



I think these might be the same person:

      Zhihong Yu
      Zihong Yu

I did not spot any others.


Fixed.


Hm, I noticed we also list Ted Yu, but that's the same person as Zhihong Yu.


fixed





Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-10-16 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2023-Aug-27, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On 22.08.23 15:48, Vik Fearing wrote:

> > I think these might be the same person:
> > 
> >      Zhihong Yu
> >      Zihong Yu
> > 
> > I did not spot any others.
> 
> Fixed.

Hm, I noticed we also list Ted Yu, but that's the same person as Zhihong Yu.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera   48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/




Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-28 Thread Vik Fearing

On 8/22/23 16:24, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

On 22.08.23 15:29, Tom Lane wrote:

Alvaro Herrera  writes:

Yeah, I've been proposing this kind of thing for many years; the
problem, until not long ago, was that the tooling was unable to process
non-Latin1 characters in all the output formats that we use.  But
tooling has changed and the oldest platforms have disappeared, so maybe
it works now; do you want to inject some Chinese, Cyrillic, Japanese
names and give it a spin?  At least HTML and PDF need to work correctly.


I'm pretty sure the PDF toolchain still fails on non-Latin1 characters.
At least it does the way I have it installed; maybe adding some
non-default dependencies would help?


See here: 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f58a0973-6e06-65de-8fb8-b3b93518b...@2ndquadrant.com


I applied that patch, and it works for Cyrillic text, but not for 
Japanese.  I am trying to figure out how to make it use a secondary 
font, but that might take me a while.

--
Vik Fearing





Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-27 Thread Pavel Borisov
I'm not completely sure what should be in this list, but maybe also
tuplesort extensibility [1]? [1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CALT9ZEHjgO_r2cFr35%3Du9xZa6Ji2e7oVfSEBRBj0Gc%2BtJjTxSg%40mail.gmail.com#201dc4202af38f224a1e3acc78795199




Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut

On 23.08.23 09:13, Denis Laxalde wrote:

Peter Eisentraut a écrit :

The list of acknowledgments for the PG16 release notes has been
committed.  It should show up here sometime:
.
   As usual, please check for problems such as wrong sorting, duplicate
names in different variants, or names in the wrong order etc.  (Our
convention is given name followed by surname.)



"Gabriele Varrazzo" is mentioned in commit 
0032a5456708811ca95bd80a538f4fb72ad0dd20 but it should be "Daniele 
Varrazzo" (per Discussion link in commit message); the later is already 
in the list.


Fixed.




Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut

On 22.08.23 15:48, Vik Fearing wrote:

On 8/22/23 11:33, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The list of acknowledgments for the PG16 release notes has been 
committed.  It should show up here sometime: 
.  As usual, please check for problems such as wrong sorting, duplicate names in different variants, or names in the wrong order etc.  (Our convention is given name followed by surname.)


I think these might be the same person:

     Zhihong Yu
     Zihong Yu

I did not spot any others.


Fixed.




Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-25 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 25 Aug 2023, at 14:22, Magnus Hagander  wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 4:03 PM Joe Conway  wrote:

>> I'm sure we could figure out how to just release the updated docs, but
>> with RC1 a week away, is it really worthwhile?
> 
> We've also been pretty strict to say that we don't *want* unreleased
> docs on the website for any of our stable branches before, so changing
> that would be a distinct policy change as well. And doing such an
> exception for just one commit seems like it's set up for problems --
> you'd then have to do another one as soon as an adjustment is made.
> And in the end, that would mean changing the policy to say that the
> "release branches documentation tracks branch tip instead of
> releases". Which I generally speaking don't think is a good idea,
> because then they don't match what people are running anymore. I think
> it only really makes sense for this one part of the docs -- even other
> changes to the REL16 docs should be excluded until the next release is
> (this time, RC1).
> 
> Bottom line is, definite -1 for doing a one-off change that violates
> the principle we're on.

Based on your reasoning above, I agree.

> Now, if we want a *separate* location where we continuously load
> branch tip docs that's a different thing and certainly something we
> could consider.

That could be useful, seeing changes rendered with the full website style is a
good way to ensure a doc patch didn't break something subtle.  As long as keep
them from being indexed by search engines and clearly separated from /docs/ it
should be fine.

--
Daniel Gustafsson





Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-25 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 4:03 PM Joe Conway  wrote:
>
> On 8/22/23 09:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera  writes:
> >> On 2023-Aug-22, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >>> The list of acknowledgments for the PG16 release notes has been committed.
> >>> It should show up here sometime: 
> >>> .
> >
> >> Hmm, I think these docs would only regenerate during the RC1 release, so
> >> it'll be a couple of weeks, unless we manually poke the doc builder.
> >
> > Yeah.  I could produce a new set of tarballs from the v16 branch tip,
> > but I don't know the process (nor have the admin permissions) to
> > extract the HTML docs and put them on the website.
>
>
> These days the docs update is part of a scripted process for doing an
> entire release.
>
> I'm sure we could figure out how to just release the updated docs, but
> with RC1 a week away, is it really worthwhile?

We've also been pretty strict to say that we don't *want* unreleased
docs on the website for any of our stable branches before, so changing
that would be a distinct policy change as well. And doing such an
exception for just one commit seems like it's set up for problems --
you'd then have to do another one as soon as an adjustment is made.
And in the end, that would mean changing the policy to say that the
"release branches documentation tracks branch tip instead of
releases". Which I generally speaking don't think is a good idea,
because then they don't match what people are running anymore. I think
it only really makes sense for this one part of the docs -- even other
changes to the REL16 docs should be excluded until the next release is
(this time, RC1).

Bottom line is, definite -1 for doing a one-off change that violates
the principle we're on.

Now, if we want a *separate* location where we continuously load
branch tip docs that's a different thing and certainly something we
could consider.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/




Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-24 Thread jian he
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 9:41 PM Vik Fearing  wrote:
>
>
> I am struggling to find documentation on how to build the pdfs with
> meson.  Any pointers?
> --
> Vik Fearing
>
>
>

ninja docs:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Meson#Meson_documentation

ninja alldocs. which take some time, build all kinds of formats, some may fail.

there is another tricky usage:
type "ninja doc" then press Tab for complete twice, you will get all
the available options like following:
docsdoc/src/sgml/man3
doc/src/sgml/errcodes-table.sgmldoc/src/sgml/man7
doc/src/sgml/features-supported.sgmldoc/src/sgml/postgres-A4.fo
doc/src/sgml/features-unsupported.sgml  doc/src/sgml/postgres-A4.pdf
doc/src/sgml/html   doc/src/sgml/postgres.epub
doc/src/sgml/INSTALLdoc/src/sgml/postgres-full.xml
doc/src/sgml/install-html   doc/src/sgml/postgres.html
doc/src/sgml/INSTALL.html   doc/src/sgml/postgres.txt
doc/src/sgml/install-mandoc/src/sgml/postgres-US.fo
doc/src/sgml/INSTALL.xmldoc/src/sgml/postgres-US.pdf
doc/src/sgml/keywords-table.sgmldoc/src/sgml/wait_event_types.sgml
doc/src/sgml/man1




Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-23 Thread Etsuro Fujita
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 6:33 PM Peter Eisentraut  wrote:
>   As usual, please check for problems such as wrong sorting, duplicate
> names in different variants, or names in the wrong order etc.  (Our
> convention is given name followed by surname.)

I went through Japanese names on the list.  I think they are all in
the right order (ie, the given-name-followed-by-surname order).

Thanks!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita




Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-23 Thread Denis Laxalde

Peter Eisentraut a écrit :

The list of acknowledgments for the PG16 release notes has been
committed.  It should show up here sometime:
.
   As usual, please check for problems such as wrong sorting, duplicate
names in different variants, or names in the wrong order etc.  (Our
convention is given name followed by surname.)



"Gabriele Varrazzo" is mentioned in commit 
0032a5456708811ca95bd80a538f4fb72ad0dd20 but it should be "Daniele 
Varrazzo" (per Discussion link in commit message); the later is already 
in the list.From c2e685b51f89d80e6e937afaaa0f8d1231fc4d2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Laxalde 
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:10:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove a wrong name in acknowledgments

---
 doc/src/sgml/release-16.sgml | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-16.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-16.sgml
index db889127fe..3e8106d22b 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/release-16.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-16.sgml
@@ -3968,7 +3968,6 @@ Author: Andres Freund 
 Farias de Oliveira
 Florin Irion
 Franz-Josef Färber
-Gabriele Varrazzo
 Garen Torikian
 Georgios Kokolatos
 Gilles Darold
-- 
2.39.2



Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:03:29AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 8/22/23 09:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera  writes:
> > > On 2023-Aug-22, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > The list of acknowledgments for the PG16 release notes has been 
> > > > committed.
> > > > It should show up here sometime: 
> > > > .
> > 
> > > Hmm, I think these docs would only regenerate during the RC1 release, so
> > > it'll be a couple of weeks, unless we manually poke the doc builder.
> > 
> > Yeah.  I could produce a new set of tarballs from the v16 branch tip,
> > but I don't know the process (nor have the admin permissions) to
> > extract the HTML docs and put them on the website.
> 
> 
> These days the docs update is part of a scripted process for doing an entire
> release.
> 
> I'm sure we could figure out how to just release the updated docs, but with
> RC1 a week away, is it really worthwhile?

You can see the list in my automated build:


https://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-16.html#RELEASE-16-ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  https://momjian.us
  EDB  https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.




Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut

On 22.08.23 15:29, Tom Lane wrote:

Alvaro Herrera  writes:

Yeah, I've been proposing this kind of thing for many years; the
problem, until not long ago, was that the tooling was unable to process
non-Latin1 characters in all the output formats that we use.  But
tooling has changed and the oldest platforms have disappeared, so maybe
it works now; do you want to inject some Chinese, Cyrillic, Japanese
names and give it a spin?  At least HTML and PDF need to work correctly.


I'm pretty sure the PDF toolchain still fails on non-Latin1 characters.
At least it does the way I have it installed; maybe adding some
non-default dependencies would help?


See here: 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f58a0973-6e06-65de-8fb8-b3b93518b...@2ndquadrant.com






Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-22 Thread Joe Conway

On 8/22/23 09:44, Tom Lane wrote:

Alvaro Herrera  writes:

On 2023-Aug-22, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

The list of acknowledgments for the PG16 release notes has been committed.
It should show up here sometime: 
.



Hmm, I think these docs would only regenerate during the RC1 release, so
it'll be a couple of weeks, unless we manually poke the doc builder.


Yeah.  I could produce a new set of tarballs from the v16 branch tip,
but I don't know the process (nor have the admin permissions) to
extract the HTML docs and put them on the website.



These days the docs update is part of a scripted process for doing an 
entire release.


I'm sure we could figure out how to just release the updated docs, but 
with RC1 a week away, is it really worthwhile?


--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com





Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-22 Thread Vik Fearing

On 8/22/23 11:33, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The list of acknowledgments for the PG16 release notes has been 
committed.  It should show up here sometime: 
.  As usual, please check for problems such as wrong sorting, duplicate names in different variants, or names in the wrong order etc.  (Our convention is given name followed by surname.)


I think these might be the same person:

Zhihong Yu
Zihong Yu

I did not spot any others.
--
Vik Fearing





Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-22 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera  writes:
> On 2023-Aug-22, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> The list of acknowledgments for the PG16 release notes has been committed.
>> It should show up here sometime: 
>> .

> Hmm, I think these docs would only regenerate during the RC1 release, so
> it'll be a couple of weeks, unless we manually poke the doc builder.

Yeah.  I could produce a new set of tarballs from the v16 branch tip,
but I don't know the process (nor have the admin permissions) to
extract the HTML docs and put them on the website.

regards, tom lane




Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-22 Thread Vik Fearing

On 8/22/23 15:29, Tom Lane wrote:

Alvaro Herrera  writes:

Yeah, I've been proposing this kind of thing for many years; the
problem, until not long ago, was that the tooling was unable to process
non-Latin1 characters in all the output formats that we use.  But
tooling has changed and the oldest platforms have disappeared, so maybe
it works now; do you want to inject some Chinese, Cyrillic, Japanese
names and give it a spin?  At least HTML and PDF need to work correctly.


I'm pretty sure the PDF toolchain still fails on non-Latin1 characters.
At least it does the way I have it installed; maybe adding some
non-default dependencies would help?


I am struggling to find documentation on how to build the pdfs with 
meson.  Any pointers?

--
Vik Fearing





Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-22 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera  writes:
> Yeah, I've been proposing this kind of thing for many years; the
> problem, until not long ago, was that the tooling was unable to process
> non-Latin1 characters in all the output formats that we use.  But
> tooling has changed and the oldest platforms have disappeared, so maybe
> it works now; do you want to inject some Chinese, Cyrillic, Japanese
> names and give it a spin?  At least HTML and PDF need to work correctly.

I'm pretty sure the PDF toolchain still fails on non-Latin1 characters.
At least it does the way I have it installed; maybe adding some
non-default dependencies would help?

regards, tom lane




Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2023-Aug-22, Vik Fearing wrote:

> On 8/22/23 11:33, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > As usual, please check for problems such as wrong sorting, duplicate
> > names in different variants, or names in the wrong order etc.  (Our
> > convention is given name followed by surname.)
> 
> Not necessarily for this time around, but I would like to see this
> convention be a bit more inclusive of other cultures.  My proposed solution
> is to list them the same way we do now, but also have in parentheses or
> something their name in their native order and script.

Yeah, I've been proposing this kind of thing for many years; the
problem, until not long ago, was that the tooling was unable to process
non-Latin1 characters in all the output formats that we use.  But
tooling has changed and the oldest platforms have disappeared, so maybe
it works now; do you want to inject some Chinese, Cyrillic, Japanese
names and give it a spin?  At least HTML and PDF need to work correctly.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera   48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Pido que me den el Nobel por razones humanitarias" (Nicanor Parra)




Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-22 Thread Vik Fearing

On 8/22/23 11:33, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

As usual, please check for problems such as wrong sorting, duplicate names in 
different variants, or names in the wrong order etc.  (Our convention is given 
name followed by surname.)


Not necessarily for this time around, but I would like to see this 
convention be a bit more inclusive of other cultures.  My proposed 
solution is to list them the same way we do now, but also have in 
parentheses or something their name in their native order and script.

--
Vik Fearing





Re: list of acknowledgments for PG16

2023-08-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2023-Aug-22, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> The list of acknowledgments for the PG16 release notes has been committed.
> It should show up here sometime: 
> .
> As usual, please check for problems such as wrong sorting, duplicate names
> in different variants, or names in the wrong order etc.  (Our convention is
> given name followed by surname.)

Hmm, I think these docs would only regenerate during the RC1 release, so
it'll be a couple of weeks, unless we manually poke the doc builder.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Here's a general engineering tip: if the non-fun part is too complex for you
to figure out, that might indicate the fun part is too ambitious." (John Naylor)
https://postgr.es/m/CAFBsxsG4OWHBbSDM%3DsSeXrQGOtkPiOEOuME4yD7Ce41NtaAD9g%40mail.gmail.com