Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Linux/Unix

2006-02-05 Thread August Zajonc
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
 Hi,
 
 As you know, many databases that run on Linux / Unix systems have a GUI
 installer which make installation easier and more attractive for some
 people.
 
 Our Windows Installer is very attractive, for example. 
 
 Now, I and Burcu Guzel, who is a Senior Programmer, decided to launch a
 new project: pgnixinstaller : 
 
 http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgnixinstaller/

 We are actively looking for developers for the project. Please drop me
 an e-mail if you want to join this project. We will use Python, so you
 need to be a Python guy to join the project. We are in planning phase,
 if you join us earlier, we will be able to share more ideas. 
 
 Regards,

Thanks to Devrim for the RPM stuff.

On Windows, we expect the installer, no question about that.

On Linux, virtually everyone including many beginners become familiar
with their package management system, be it yum or apt etc. Many of the
readme's, how-to's etc tie into it. The package management tools are
packaged with every distro. There is no environment to setup. Whether
you are using a headless box or a gnome desktop, there is usually an
interface into them.

The beginner just tries yum install xxx. I think folks would be
surprised that for many folks this is basically IT for them in terms of
package installation. Compiling from source, while theoretically
sometimes as easy, doesn't happen nearly as often.

And if you work with a client, the packaging system is what they know as
well. Please, can't you set it up so everything comes from an RPM?

I'm one of those people now.

I used to compile everything from source, from apache, through php and
my database. Had custom build scripts, and the whole works. But I threw
it away and use RPM wherever I can.

When I see postgresql packaged as an RPM, I'm pretty sure the file paths
have been modified to work with my system (they are) and the startup and
shutdown scripts tie in nicely (they do). Especially when I just want to
play with something, I want the simplest approach possible. And the
approach the most folks are familiar with is their package management
system.

So, what's the point of this rambling? Props to Devrim (and others) for
hand-holding us beginners (or lazy ones) with his existing packaging
work. It is tremendously appreciated and lowers the barrier to entry
more then they release.

And I wonder if an effort to take advantage of these existing
infrastructures that everyone (including in my mind beginners) are
familiar with, might yield good results.

- For example, packaging the pgadmin adminpack as an rpm/deb and more of
the pgfoundry items would do this.

- Or a postgresql repository for apt/yum etc, making
upgrading/installing even easier?

If this new installer plays nice with existing packaging systems, and
has the rules in place to custom compile lots of options, it seems close
to providing something in this area already out of necessity.

Perhaps a win-win for both areas with a bit of extension (ie, the
installer is backed by a repo that other users can use with other tools?)

- August

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Dave Page
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tino 
 Wildenhain
 Sent: 31 January 2006 07:55
 To: Rick Gigger
 Cc: Marc G. Fournier; Joshua D. Drake; Christopher Browne; 
 pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI 
 Installer for
 
 As was said, a gui to produce postgresql.conf files (off host)
 can be of value. 

pgAdmin?

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 20:41 -0800, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:

 How will you do an orderly upgrade from one revision to the next,
 including all the dependencies?

We are still in planning phase, any ideas of how to do that is welcome.

 How will you distribute security updates?

We are still in planning phase, any ideas of how to do that is welcome.

 I predict this form of installation will cause a great many support
 headaches as users report problems which are caused by oddball
 compilers, strange CFLAGS, unreleased or strangely patched versions of
 shared libraries and headers, and so forth.

I can't see a problem in here. We already have platform test results in
pgbuildfarm and we have the knowledbase about the configure options,
flags etc. in that platforms.

 Obviously anybody is welcome and able to just write whatever software
 they feel is needed, but go ahead and count me among the skeptics.

The world is not turning around us, and please don't be skeptic on a
piece of software that you won't use but some people will.

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 19:35 -0800, Christopher Browne wrote:
  We are actively looking for developers for the project. Please drop me
  an e-mail if you want to join this project. We will use Python, so you
  need to be a Python guy to join the project. We are in planning phase,
  if you join us earlier, we will be able to share more ideas. 
 
 You'd better define the purpose pretty clearly, as I don't see any
 purpose that's of value, yet.

I agree with Joshua's points here. Think of people who do not want an
installation via command line.

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 09:15 +, Dave Page wrote:

  As was said, a gui to produce postgresql.conf files (off host)
  can be of value. 
 
 pgAdmin?

Installer should produce a postgresql.conf, based on some selections
via the interface. Then we will use pgAdmin to edit, improve, etc.
postgresql.conf.

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Dave Page
 

 -Original Message-
 From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 31 January 2006 09:25
 To: Dave Page
 Cc: Tino Wildenhain; Rick Gigger; Marc G. Fournier; Joshua D. 
 Drake; Christopher Browne; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Burcu GUZEL
 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI 
 Installer for
 
 Hi,
 
 On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 09:15 +, Dave Page wrote:
 
   As was said, a gui to produce postgresql.conf files (off host)
   can be of value. 
  
  pgAdmin?
 
 Installer should produce a postgresql.conf, based on some selections
 via the interface. Then we will use pgAdmin to edit, improve, etc.
 postgresql.conf.

Yeah, that's pretty much how pgInstaller works - we let initdb create
the config file, then tweak some values using some C code. The user can
then use pgAdmin (or a text editor) to tweak to taste.

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 08:34 +0100, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
  
  http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgnixinstaller/
  
  We are actively looking for developers for the project. Please drop me
  an e-mail if you want to join this project. We will use Python, so you
  need to be a Python guy to join the project. We are in planning phase,
  if you join us earlier, we will be able to share more ideas. 
 
 Might be fun of course. But on unix you usually have some kind
 of package system anyway - how is the installer supposed to
 play nicely with them?

Yes,

We will try to stick the file locations of those package managers. We
already have that KB.

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Tino Wildenhain

Dave Page schrieb:
 

...

As was said, a gui to produce postgresql.conf files (off host)
can be of value. 



pgAdmin?


Well, strictly spoken a gui text editor is a gui... but I rather
had in mind something guided with buttons, select boxes and stuff
and references to documentation, calculations and the like.

 :-)

Tino

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Dave Page
 

 -Original Message-
 From: Tino Wildenhain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 31 January 2006 10:53
 To: Dave Page
 Cc: Rick Gigger; Marc G. Fournier; Joshua D. Drake; 
 Christopher Browne; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI 
 Installer for
 
 Dave Page schrieb:
   
 ...
 As was said, a gui to produce postgresql.conf files (off host)
 can be of value. 
  
  
  pgAdmin?
 
 Well, strictly spoken a gui text editor is a gui... but I rather
 had in mind something guided with buttons, select boxes and stuff
 and references to documentation, calculations and the like.
 
   :-)

Err, yes. pgAdmin? It's somewhat more than a simple text editor.

:-)

/D

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Tino Wildenhain

Dave Page schrieb:
...


Well, strictly spoken a gui text editor is a gui... but I rather
had in mind something guided with buttons, select boxes and stuff
and references to documentation, calculations and the like.

 :-)



Err, yes. pgAdmin? It's somewhat more than a simple text editor.


Ah, right ;) Didnt see it in action before :-) Now when I actually
load a postgresql.conf file I see what you mean. Nice job :-)

Figuring out the correct values for some of the buffers and costs
is still a bit tough. Otoh, I guess there is no easy way to predict
all these.

Regards
Tino


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Andreas Pflug

Tino Wildenhain wrote:



Figuring out the correct values for some of the buffers and costs
is still a bit tough. Otoh, I guess there is no easy way to predict
all these.


pgAdmin has a mechanism to suggest values (currently for autovacuum and 
listen_address only), which waits for expansion :-) I could think of a 
wizard that asks decent questions, resulting in proposals.


Whether implemented as GUI or not, a questionaire and suggested 
algorithms to calculate settings (eyeballed from Core) would be a good 
starting point.


Regards,
Andreas

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Christopher Browne
 Hi,

 On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 19:35 -0800, Christopher Browne wrote:
  We are actively looking for developers for the project. Please
  drop me an e-mail if you want to join this project. We will use
  Python, so you need to be a Python guy to join the project. We
  are in planning phase, if you join us earlier, we will be able to
  share more ideas.
 
 You'd better define the purpose pretty clearly, as I don't see any
 purpose that's of value, yet.

 I agree with Joshua's points here. Think of people who do not want
 an installation via command line.

When virtually every flavour of Unix has its own package manager, I
have difficulty distinguishing this from the badness of how Oracle's
installer handles things.

The people I imagine would be of interest as plausible new users are
the ones that don't want to be troubled with configuring pretty well
anything at all, command line or no.

The sort of thing that would get PostgreSQL much more widely deployed
would be (for instance) for applications like GnuCash or components of
GNOME/KDE to adopt it as their storage mechanism.  Their developers
are not particularly interested in doing a lot of DBA work, e.g. -
setting up users, pg_hba.conf, and such.  (The need for this is one of
the reasons the GnuCash people have been biasing towards SQLite...)

It's worth noting that GNOME/KDE projects have NOT attempted to build
their own GUI installers except in the forms of very platform-specific
things.  In that regard, they let each platform have its own set of
idioms.
-- 
let name=cbbrowne and tld=gmail.com in String.concat @ [name;tld];;
http://cbbrowne.com/info/slony.html
CBS News report on Fort Worth tornado damage:
Eight major downtown buildings were severely damaged and 1,000 homes
were damaged, with 95 uninhabitable.  Gov. George W. Bush declared
Tarrant County a disaster area.  Federal Emergency Management Agency
workers are expected to arrive sometime next week after required
paperwork is completed.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Richard Huxton

Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 19:35 -0800, Christopher Browne wrote:

We are actively looking for developers for the project. Please drop me
an e-mail if you want to join this project. We will use Python, so you
need to be a Python guy to join the project. We are in planning phase,
if you join us earlier, we will be able to share more ideas. 

You'd better define the purpose pretty clearly, as I don't see any
purpose that's of value, yet.


I agree with Joshua's points here. Think of people who do not want an
installation via command line.


Surely the only people installing from the command-line are those that 
want to. There's synaptic or yum or whatever to let you search for 
postgresql and handle all your dependencies for you.


I mean *I* compile from source when I'm testing betas or want to 
backport and there's no package but I can't imagine most Ubuntu users 
bother.


Now something to let you install extra modules, tune your 
postgresql.conf and pg_hba.conf - that's useful. If it can explain as it 
goes along, all the better (like bastille linux?)


--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

  http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Bricklen Anderson

J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
snip
A graphical installer for Unix is fine, but please, do not make it  
anything like Oracle's graphical installer.  Oracle's graphical  install 
process gives command line installs a good name for ease of use.



J. Andrew Rogers


I heartily second that!

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Rick Gigger

On Jan 31, 2006, at 12:54 AM, Tino Wildenhain wrote:


Rick Gigger schrieb:
I don't see why anyone has a problem with this.  I am certainly  
never  going to use it but if it helps someone who isn't a linux  
person to  use it on a project when they would have used something  
else (like  mysql) or if it convinces someone to run postgres on  
linux instead of  windows because they now have a graphical  
installer on linux then it  seems like a good thing to me.  More  
users = bigger community =  larger potential pool of people to  
help out.  Even if people can't  code they can answer newbie (or  
advanced) questions on the mailing  lists or write documentation  
or even just tell their dba friends  about it.
The more people using postgres the better.  If this will help  
then  I'm all for it.  Just because I would rather do a ./ 
configure make  make install doesn't mean that thats the best  
route for everyone.


As was said, a gui to produce postgresql.conf files (off host)
can be of value. Also for the tune-people a package builder
can be useful too.

For other people - if they dont learn a bit about their package system
on their choosen system - they will run into other problems soon or
later.


Why would the necessarily have to run into problem with their  
packaging system.  If someone installs from source it doesn't cause  
problems with packaging systems.  Why should this have to be any  
different?




---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

  http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 08:53:54PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
 If I could install Oracle on Debian/AMD64 with a shell script, I'd drop
 Postgresql in a heartbeat.
 
 Obviously anybody is welcome and able to just write whatever software
 they feel is needed, but go ahead and count me among the skeptics.
   
 The installer is for the 98% not the 2%. You are in the 2%.

I've yet to find *anyone* who likes the Oracle installer. It's
absolutely the last thing I would use as a point of reference.

Come to think of it, the DB2 installer was a pile of crap as well...

My concern with this installer is that people are going to show up in
-general or on IRC in droves with dependancy related problems with the
installer. IMO it would be *much* better if we instead focused on
something that made it easy to install stuff out of contrib and/or
pgFoundry (and prefferably could be used without a GUI).

But, OSS works by people scratching itches, so if there's folks who want
to scratch this itch...
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pervasive Software  http://pervasive.comwork: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf   cell: 512-569-9461

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:46:03AM +, Andreas Pflug wrote:
 Tino Wildenhain wrote:
 
 
 Figuring out the correct values for some of the buffers and costs
 is still a bit tough. Otoh, I guess there is no easy way to predict
 all these.
 
 pgAdmin has a mechanism to suggest values (currently for autovacuum and 
 listen_address only), which waits for expansion :-) I could think of a 
 wizard that asks decent questions, resulting in proposals.
 
 Whether implemented as GUI or not, a questionaire and suggested 
 algorithms to calculate settings (eyeballed from Core) would be a good 
 starting point.

PostgreSQL *desperately* needs a better means of dealing with
configuration (though I guess I shouldn't be pushing too hard for this
since the current state of affairs brings me business). Any improvement
in this area would be very welcome.
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/configurator/ is something worth looking
at.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pervasive Software  http://pervasive.comwork: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf   cell: 512-569-9461

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 13:02 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
 On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:46:03AM +, Andreas Pflug wrote:
  Tino Wildenhain wrote:
  
  
  Figuring out the correct values for some of the buffers and costs
  is still a bit tough. Otoh, I guess there is no easy way to predict
  all these.
  
  pgAdmin has a mechanism to suggest values (currently for autovacuum and 
  listen_address only), which waits for expansion :-) I could think of a 
  wizard that asks decent questions, resulting in proposals.
  
  Whether implemented as GUI or not, a questionaire and suggested 
  algorithms to calculate settings (eyeballed from Core) would be a good 
  starting point.
 
 PostgreSQL *desperately* needs a better means of dealing with
 configuration (though I guess I shouldn't be pushing too hard for this
 since the current state of affairs brings me business). Any improvement
 in this area would be very welcome.
 http://pgfoundry.org/projects/configurator/ is something worth looking
 at.

An ideal facility would be a program that analyzes the workload at
runtime and adjusts accordingly.  That doesn't sound too hard, within
some unambitious boundary.  If anyone would like to work on this, I'd be
happy to contribute.

-jwb

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


[HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Linux/Unix systems

2006-01-30 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

As you know, many databases that run on Linux / Unix systems have a GUI
installer which make installation easier and more attractive for some
people.

Our Windows Installer is very attractive, for example. 

Now, I and Burcu Guzel, who is a Senior Programmer, decided to launch a
new project: pgnixinstaller : 

http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgnixinstaller/

We are actively looking for developers for the project. Please drop me
an e-mail if you want to join this project. We will use Python, so you
need to be a Python guy to join the project. We are in planning phase,
if you join us earlier, we will be able to share more ideas. 

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for Linux/Unix systems

2006-01-30 Thread Christopher Browne
 We are actively looking for developers for the project. Please drop me
 an e-mail if you want to join this project. We will use Python, so you
 need to be a Python guy to join the project. We are in planning phase,
 if you join us earlier, we will be able to share more ideas. 

You'd better define the purpose pretty clearly, as I don't see any
purpose that's of value, yet.

On my Debian systems, I can install PostgreSQL quite readily via the
command apt-get install postgresql-8.1, which can get GUIed at least
somewhat if I run aptitude, synaptic, or such...

I could see there being some value in a GUI for managing postmaster
config files...
-- 
let name=cbbrowne and tld=gmail.com in String.concat @ [name;tld];;
http://cbbrowne.com/info/linuxdistributions.html
High-level languages are a pretty good indicator that all else is
seldom equal. - Tim Bradshaw, comp.lang.lisp

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake



On my Debian systems, I can install PostgreSQL quite readily via the
command apt-get install postgresql-8.1, which can get GUIed at least
somewhat if I run aptitude, synaptic, or such...
 


Yes Christopher, you can... I can, and Devrim can

As more and more people come on board people are going to want to 
download a .exe (a metaphor),
double click and have it open an installer, they will then want to click 
next, next, continue, finish.


You don't get that with apt-get install.

There is a reason that even Oracle has a graphical installer on Linux, 
because most people installing

the software:

A. Don't know how to use it
B. Probably don't know how to use Linux
C. Don't want to.

Joshua D. Drake

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Marc G. Fournier

On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:




On my Debian systems, I can install PostgreSQL quite readily via the
command apt-get install postgresql-8.1, which can get GUIed at least
somewhat if I run aptitude, synaptic, or such...


Yes Christopher, you can... I can, and Devrim can

As more and more people come on board people are going to want to download a 
.exe (a metaphor),
double click and have it open an installer, they will then want to click 
next, next, continue, finish.


You don't get that with apt-get install.

There is a reason that even Oracle has a graphical installer on Linux, 
because most people installing

the software:

A. Don't know how to use it
B. Probably don't know how to use Linux
C. Don't want to.


i can't agree more ... I don't care whether you are running FreeBSD or 
Linux or Solaris ... if you want broader adoption of non-Microsoft OSs, 
you have to make it simplier for 'the masses' to make use of ... and GUIs 
tend to follow KISS very closely ...



Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Yahoo!: yscrappy  ICQ: 7615664

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Rick Gigger
I don't see why anyone has a problem with this.  I am certainly never  
going to use it but if it helps someone who isn't a linux person to  
use it on a project when they would have used something else (like  
mysql) or if it convinces someone to run postgres on linux instead of  
windows because they now have a graphical installer on linux then it  
seems like a good thing to me.  More users = bigger community =  
larger potential pool of people to help out.  Even if people can't  
code they can answer newbie (or advanced) questions on the mailing  
lists or write documentation or even just tell their dba friends  
about it.


The more people using postgres the better.  If this will help then  
I'm all for it.  Just because I would rather do a ./configure make  
make install doesn't mean that thats the best route for everyone.


Rick


On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:58 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:


On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:


On my Debian systems, I can install PostgreSQL quite readily via the
command apt-get install postgresql-8.1, which can get GUIed at  
least

somewhat if I run aptitude, synaptic, or such...

Yes Christopher, you can... I can, and Devrim can

As more and more people come on board people are going to want to  
download a .exe (a metaphor),
double click and have it open an installer, they will then want to  
click next, next, continue, finish.


You don't get that with apt-get install.

There is a reason that even Oracle has a graphical installer on  
Linux, because most people installing

the software:

A. Don't know how to use it
B. Probably don't know how to use Linux
C. Don't want to.


i can't agree more ... I don't care whether you are running FreeBSD  
or Linux or Solaris ... if you want broader adoption of non- 
Microsoft OSs, you have to make it simplier for 'the masses' to  
make use of ... and GUIs tend to follow KISS very closely ...



Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http:// 
www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Yahoo!: yscrappy  ICQ:  
7615664


---(end of  
broadcast)---

TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster




---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 19:52 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
 
 
 On my Debian systems, I can install PostgreSQL quite readily via the
 command apt-get install postgresql-8.1, which can get GUIed at least
 somewhat if I run aptitude, synaptic, or such...
   
 
 Yes Christopher, you can... I can, and Devrim can
 
 As more and more people come on board people are going to want to 
 download a .exe (a metaphor),
 double click and have it open an installer, they will then want to click 
 next, next, continue, finish.

There is such a thing as best practices.  If you install postgresql in
this glorious graphical manner, what will prevent you from accidentally
upgrading a shared library which postgresql depends upon?  Nothing,
really, unless this installer is going to be able to customize, build,
and install a native package on all the target operating systems.

How will you do an orderly upgrade from one revision to the next,
including all the dependencies?  How will you distribute security
updates?

I predict this form of installation will cause a great many support
headaches as users report problems which are caused by oddball
compilers, strange CFLAGS, unreleased or strangely patched versions of
shared libraries and headers, and so forth.

 You don't get that with apt-get install.

Right, with apt-get install you get a package built with a known-good
compiler, known-sane configure flags, and a method of pinning the
dependencies, which passes at the very least a smoketest on Alpha,
AMD64, ARM, HPPA, x86, IA64, 640x0, MIPS, PowerPC, S/390, and SPARC.

 There is a reason that even Oracle has a graphical installer on Linux, 
 because most people installing
 the software:
 
 A. Don't know how to use it
 B. Probably don't know how to use Linux
 C. Don't want to.

Oracle's graphical installer is a material impediment to Oracle
adoption.  The installer only works on systems where particular versions
of Java and Motif libraries are available.  On 64-bit Opteron systems it
only works with the peculiar 32-bit thunking tree favored by Red Hat and
hardly anybody else.

If I could install Oracle on Debian/AMD64 with a shell script, I'd drop
Postgresql in a heartbeat.

Obviously anybody is welcome and able to just write whatever software
they feel is needed, but go ahead and count me among the skeptics.

-jwb


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Tony Caduto

Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

Have you looked at AutoPackage?

http://autopackage.org

screen shots.

http://autopackage.org/gallery.html

Has a GUI wizard if X windows is available and a command line wizard if 
no X is available.



Using autopackage is similar to using MSI,Wise,Inno etc on Windows.

Later,

--
Tony Caduto
AM Software Design
Home of PG Lightning Admin for Postgresql
http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
  subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake



Oracle's graphical installer is a material impediment to Oracle
adoption.  The installer only works on systems where particular versions
of Java and Motif libraries are available.  On 64-bit Opteron systems it
only works with the peculiar 32-bit thunking tree favored by Red Hat and
hardly anybody else.

If I could install Oracle on Debian/AMD64 with a shell script, I'd drop
Postgresql in a heartbeat.

Obviously anybody is welcome and able to just write whatever software
they feel is needed, but go ahead and count me among the skeptics.
  

The installer is for the 98% not the 2%. You are in the 2%.

Joshua D. Drake


-jwb


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
  



--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 20:53 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
  Oracle's graphical installer is a material impediment to Oracle
  adoption.  The installer only works on systems where particular versions
  of Java and Motif libraries are available.  On 64-bit Opteron systems it
  only works with the peculiar 32-bit thunking tree favored by Red Hat and
  hardly anybody else.
 
  If I could install Oracle on Debian/AMD64 with a shell script, I'd drop
  Postgresql in a heartbeat.
 
  Obviously anybody is welcome and able to just write whatever software
  they feel is needed, but go ahead and count me among the skeptics.

 The installer is for the 98% not the 2%. You are in the 2%.

Right, and it would make FAR more sense if Oracle just shipped the whole
thing, operating system and the works, on a single installer image.

So why don't you just do that with Postgres?  You could call it
Bootable PostgreSQL.  It would be a big hit.  When a new version comes
out, you can just mail out a new DVD.

That would be a lot better than pretending to know how to fit in, best
practices and the works, with all the various Unix systems out there.

-jwb


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Josh Berkus

Jeff,


So why don't you just do that with Postgres?  You could call it
Bootable PostgreSQL.  It would be a big hit.  When a new version comes
out, you can just mail out a new DVD.


Actually, we have these.  We give them out at conferences.

--Josh

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Steve Atkins


On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:48 PM, Tony Caduto wrote:


Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

Have you looked at AutoPackage?

http://autopackage.org

screen shots.

http://autopackage.org/gallery.html

Has a GUI wizard if X windows is available and a command line  
wizard if no X is available.



Using autopackage is similar to using MSI,Wise,Inno etc on Windows.


If that's the one that uses aptools it looks _excellent_. Until you try
and use it. It looked as though it would solve many of my packaging
problems, not least deploying on older platforms than the build box,
but simply didn't work on anything more complex than toy code.

I suspect that if you were just using it as a general installer, rather
than any of the portability magic, it might be worth a look.

Cheers,
  Steve

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Tino Wildenhain

Devrim GUNDUZ schrieb:

Hi,

As you know, many databases that run on Linux / Unix systems have a GUI
installer which make installation easier and more attractive for some
people.


If you think of the *racle-GUI-Installer, most people find it very
s*cking ;)

Our Windows Installer is very attractive, for example. 


Now, I and Burcu Guzel, who is a Senior Programmer, decided to launch a
new project: pgnixinstaller : 


http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgnixinstaller/

We are actively looking for developers for the project. Please drop me
an e-mail if you want to join this project. We will use Python, so you
need to be a Python guy to join the project. We are in planning phase,
if you join us earlier, we will be able to share more ideas. 


Might be fun of course. But on unix you usually have some kind
of package system anyway - how is the installer supposed to
play nicely with them?

Regards
Tino

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Tino Wildenhain

Joshua D. Drake schrieb:
...
As more and more people come on board people are going to want to 
download a .exe (a metaphor),
double click and have it open an installer, they will then want to click 
next, next, continue, finish.


You don't get that with apt-get install.


Well you can use a frontend and search and click as well. I see no
problem - and it really works, as opposed to:

There is a reason that even Oracle has a graphical installer on Linux, 
because most people installing

the software:

A. Don't know how to use it
B. Probably don't know how to use Linux
C. Don't want to.

Hehehe. Did you actually use this installer? I did! And lets tell you,
you dont come by w/o any linux/unix knowledge.

Regards
Tino

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Tino Wildenhain

Rick Gigger schrieb:
I don't see why anyone has a problem with this.  I am certainly never  
going to use it but if it helps someone who isn't a linux person to  use 
it on a project when they would have used something else (like  mysql) 
or if it convinces someone to run postgres on linux instead of  windows 
because they now have a graphical installer on linux then it  seems like 
a good thing to me.  More users = bigger community =  larger potential 
pool of people to help out.  Even if people can't  code they can answer 
newbie (or advanced) questions on the mailing  lists or write 
documentation or even just tell their dba friends  about it.


The more people using postgres the better.  If this will help then  I'm 
all for it.  Just because I would rather do a ./configure make  make 
install doesn't mean that thats the best route for everyone.


As was said, a gui to produce postgresql.conf files (off host)
can be of value. Also for the tune-people a package builder
can be useful too.

For other people - if they dont learn a bit about their package system
on their choosen system - they will run into other problems soon or
later.


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [HACKERS] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread J. Andrew Rogers

On Jan 30, 2006, at 7:52 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
There is a reason that even Oracle has a graphical installer on  
Linux, because most people installing

the software:

A. Don't know how to use it
B. Probably don't know how to use Linux
C. Don't want to.



Except that the Oracle graphical installer usually requires a non- 
trivial amount of command line kung-fu that alone is more complex  
than the entirety of the command line installation of PostgreSQL.   
Oracle installation is an unpleasant and painful process even under  
the best of circumstances, and I've never had one that required less  
effort than Postgres for a vanilla install.  And I always install  
postgres from source.  If ./configure; make; make install scares  
away people, sorting out the dependency hell getting the Oracle  
installer to even run on nominally supported platforms will  
definitely scare them away.


A graphical installer for Unix is fine, but please, do not make it  
anything like Oracle's graphical installer.  Oracle's graphical  
install process gives command line installs a good name for ease of use.



J. Andrew Rogers


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster