Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Jason Tishler]

This post is just for closure -- both of the issues below have been
resolved:

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:47:35AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > 1. Cygwin bison needs to be upgraded from 1.35 to 1.75 (i.e.,
> > > 1.50+) to process src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y
> > > successfully.  I will post to the Cygwin mailing list asking the
> > > maintainer for this upgrade.
> > 
> > OK. This shouldn't stop a release though I assume, only a build from
> > CVS.
> 
> Yes.  Nevertheless, I have posted my request:
> 
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg01740.html

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2002-10/msg00016.html

> > > 2. The following fseeko/ftello ifdef in src/include/pg_config.h.in:
> > > 
> > > #ifndef HAVE_FSEEKO
> > > #define fseeko(a, b, c) fseek((a), (b), (c))
> > > #define ftello(a) ftell((a))
> > > #endif
> > > 
> > > conflicts with the following Cygwin /usr/include/stdio.h entries:
> > > 
> > > int _EXFUN(fseeko, (FILE *, off_t, int));
> > > off_t   _EXFUN(ftello, ( FILE *));
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, I'm not sure what is the best way to solve this one
> > > yet. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
> 
> I found a solution to the above which will hopefully find its way into
> the next Cygwin release:
> 
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00042.html

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00089.html

Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Yes, now it is Digital/HP/Compaq.

Updated to existing Tru64 entry.

Ports list updated:

  http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

---

Alessio Bragadini wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 00:40, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Ports list updated:
> > 
> >   http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
> 
> Please note that you have an entry for Digital Unix and one for Compaq
> Tru64 while in fact they are the same OS that went through a whirlwind
> of name changes. Don't know if official name should be now "HP Tru64" or
> some other...
> 
> -- 
> Alessio F. Bragadini  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> APL Financial Serviceshttp://village.albourne.com
> Nicosia, Cyprus   phone: +357-22-755750
> 
> "It is more complicated than you think"
>   -- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925
> 
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Dave Page wrote:
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] 
> > Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18
> > To: Sean Chittenden
> > Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Ports list updated:
> > 
> >   
> > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-pla
> > tforms.html
> 
> Hi Bruce,
> 
> I noticed that you haven't updated the entry for Win32 native
> client-only. That builds OK now thanks to your fixes.

Thanks.  Updated.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Alessio Bragadini]

On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 00:40, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Ports list updated:
> 
>   http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

Please note that you have an entry for Digital Unix and one for Compaq
Tru64 while in fact they are the same OS that went through a whirlwind
of name changes. Don't know if official name should be now "HP Tru64" or
some other...

-- 
Alessio F. Bragadini[EMAIL PROTECTED]
APL Financial Services  http://village.albourne.com
Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-22-755750

"It is more complicated than you think"
-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Dave Page]

> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] 
> Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18
> To: Sean Chittenden
> Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> 
> 
> 
> Ports list updated:
> 
>   
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-pla
> tforms.html

Hi Bruce,

I noticed that you haven't updated the entry for Win32 native
client-only. That builds OK now thanks to your fixes.

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Ports list updated:

  http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

---
Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > >> Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I
> > >> can tell without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is
> > >> wrong because both of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7,
> > >> and I think the pg_regress coding will take the last match.
> > >> Larry, did you actually test the CVS-tip resultmap to make sure
> > >> it picks the right comparison file on your box?
> > 
> > > Yes, just did and it *FAILS*.  you need the order you have below.
> > > Sorry...
> > 
> > Okay, I've updated the CVS tip to look like this:
> > 
> > geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros-bsd
> > geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd4.7=geometry-bsd-precision
> > geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd5=geometry-bsd-precision
> > geometry/alpha.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros
> > 
> > Sean, would you verify this works for you?
> 
> It does, thank you.  I've just updated the -devel port to 7.3b4,
> hopefully the mirrors will pick up the bits soon.  -sc
> 
> -- 
> Sean Chittenden
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Sean Chittenden]

> >> Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I
> >> can tell without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is
> >> wrong because both of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7,
> >> and I think the pg_regress coding will take the last match.
> >> Larry, did you actually test the CVS-tip resultmap to make sure
> >> it picks the right comparison file on your box?
> 
> > Yes, just did and it *FAILS*.  you need the order you have below.
> > Sorry...
> 
> Okay, I've updated the CVS tip to look like this:
> 
> geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros-bsd
> geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd4.7=geometry-bsd-precision
> geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd5=geometry-bsd-precision
> geometry/alpha.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros
> 
> Sean, would you verify this works for you?

It does, thank you.  I've just updated the -devel port to 7.3b4,
hopefully the mirrors will pick up the bits soon.  -sc

-- 
Sean Chittenden

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Ports list updated:

  http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

---
Alessio Bragadini wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > I've committed fixes for the other issues too, so CVS tip should now
> > pass cleanly on your platform.
> 
> I've built the snapshot from CVS tip and now the regression tests pass
> with both GCC 2.95.1 and Compaq C V6.4-216 (dtk) on 
> Digital UNIX V4.0G (Rev. 1530).
> 
> Thank you very much for your help!
> 
> -- 
> Alessio F. Bragadini  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> APL Financial Serviceshttp://village.albourne.com
> Nicosia, Cyprus   phone: +357-22-755750
> 
> "It is more complicated than you think"
>   -- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Jason Tishler]

Peter,

On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:36:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Dave Page writes:
> > Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the
> > binary distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to
> > be listed as supported if no-one disagrees...
> 
> I disagree.  We document as supported those platforms that build out
> of the box, not those that build somehow, somewhere, by someone.
> 
> Rather than advocating methods to manually edit your system headers we
> should try to find out what the problem really is, such as by
> analyzing config.log.

Did you miss the following?

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-10/msg01303.php

As you can see, I have already performed root cause analysis of theses
problems *and* have taken the proper steps to ensure that PostgreSQL
builds OOTB under Cygwin (after the next Cygwin release).

Jason

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Alessio Bragadini]

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> I've committed fixes for the other issues too, so CVS tip should now
> pass cleanly on your platform.

I've built the snapshot from CVS tip and now the regression tests pass
with both GCC 2.95.1 and Compaq C V6.4-216 (dtk) on 
Digital UNIX V4.0G (Rev. 1530).

Thank you very much for your help!

-- 
Alessio F. Bragadini[EMAIL PROTECTED]
APL Financial Services  http://village.albourne.com
Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-22-755750

"It is more complicated than you think"
-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tom Lane]

Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 09:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I can tell
>> without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is wrong because both
>> of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7, and I think the pg_regress
>> coding will take the last match.  Larry, did you actually test the
>> CVS-tip resultmap to make sure it picks the right comparison file on
>> your box?

> Yes, just did and it *FAILS*. 
> you need the order you have below. 
> Sorry...

Okay, I've updated the CVS tip to look like this:

geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros-bsd
geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd4.7=geometry-bsd-precision
geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd5=geometry-bsd-precision
geometry/alpha.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros

Sean, would you verify this works for you?

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Larry Rosenman]

On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 09:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > $ uname -a
> > FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14 
>PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP  i386
> 
> > Looks like the only problem on beta3 is that the geometry bits are
> > failing, but I'm not 100% if they haven't already been solved.  -sc
> 
> Hmm.  Evidently you now have support for minus-zero.  It looks like we
> have an updated comparison file for that case for FreeBSD, but it's only
> being applied for FreeBSD 4.7:
> 
> geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd4.7=geometry-bsd-precision
> geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros-bsd
> geometry/alpha.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros
> 
> Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I can tell
> without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is wrong because both
> of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7, and I think the pg_regress
> coding will take the last match.  Larry, did you actually test the
> CVS-tip resultmap to make sure it picks the right comparison file on
> your box?
Yes, just did and it *FAILS*. 

you need the order you have below. 

Sorry...

 

> 
> We could possibly do
> 
> geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros-bsd
> geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd4.7=geometry-bsd-precision
> geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd5=geometry-bsd-precision
> geometry/alpha.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros
> 
> which is mighty ugly, but I'm hopeful that by the next PG release we'll
> have gotten rid of most of the platform-to-platform geometry variants
> anyway.
> 
>   regards, tom lane
-- 
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tom Lane]

Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14 PST 
>2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP  i386

> Looks like the only problem on beta3 is that the geometry bits are
> failing, but I'm not 100% if they haven't already been solved.  -sc

Hmm.  Evidently you now have support for minus-zero.  It looks like we
have an updated comparison file for that case for FreeBSD, but it's only
being applied for FreeBSD 4.7:

geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd4.7=geometry-bsd-precision
geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros-bsd
geometry/alpha.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros

Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I can tell
without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is wrong because both
of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7, and I think the pg_regress
coding will take the last match.  Larry, did you actually test the
CVS-tip resultmap to make sure it picks the right comparison file on
your box?

We could possibly do

geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros-bsd
geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd4.7=geometry-bsd-precision
geometry/i.86-.*-freebsd5=geometry-bsd-precision
geometry/alpha.*-freebsd=geometry-positive-zeros

which is mighty ugly, but I'm hopeful that by the next PG release we'll
have gotten rid of most of the platform-to-platform geometry variants
anyway.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tom Lane]

I said:
> The alter_table diff is clearly indicative of a bug.  Can you set a
> breakpoint and discover exactly where calloc is blowing up?

Never mind, I see it: psql is doing calloc(0) when presented with a
table of zero columns.  Surprising you're the first to try it on a
platform where that returns NULL.

I've committed fixes for the other issues too, so CVS tip should now
pass cleanly on your platform.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tom Lane]

Alessio Bragadini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 18:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Evidently main.c needs "#include " added. 

> I wonder what have changed since Beta2 that compiled fine...

That is odd.  main.c itself certainly has not changed.

> Done, and now it builds (I've limited the test to native cc compiler for
> now). But it doesn't pass two regression tests, float8 and alter_table.
> The diffs seem to me non-trivial, I've attached the results.

The float8 diff appears to be because new test cases were added to
float8.sql, but not all the float8 output variants were updated to match
:-(.  I will take care of that.

The alter_table diff is clearly indicative of a bug.  Can you set a
breakpoint and discover exactly where calloc is blowing up?  (For lack
of a better idea, I'm going to guess that calloc rejects a zero argument
on your platform.)

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Larry Rosenman]

On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 01:57, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > >>Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports.  The
> > > >>"supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ...
> > > > Good point.  Thomas, can you take that on?
> > > 
> > > No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the 
> > > mailing lists, and so can not coordinate anything :( Not sure when or if 
> > > that will be resolved, but I'll be out of town next week so...
> > 
> > [ Reposted with proper subject line.]
> > 
> > OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it. 
> > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> > number please.
> > 
> > The current platform list is:
> > 
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/supported-platforms.html
> 
> $ uname -a
> 
> FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14 PST 
>2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP  i386
> 
> $ gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 3.2.1 [FreeBSD] 20021009 (prerelease)
> 
> 
> Looks like the only problem on beta3 is that the geometry bits are
> failing, but I'm not 100% if they haven't already been solved.  -sc
Can you check it against the geometry-bsd[i]-precision.out file? 

(depending on whether you've updated since the weekend). 

If it matches, we need to update the resultmap. 

LER


-- 
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Alessio Bragadini]

On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 18:53, Tom Lane wrote:

> Evidently main.c needs "#include " added. 

I wonder what have changed since Beta2 that compiled fine...

> Please add that and see if you get any further.

Done, and now it builds (I've limited the test to native cc compiler for
now). But it doesn't pass two regression tests, float8 and alter_table.

The diffs seem to me non-trivial, I've attached the results.

Any idea?

-- 
Alessio F. Bragadini[EMAIL PROTECTED]
APL Financial Services  http://village.albourne.com
Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-22-755750

"It is more complicated than you think"
-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925

*** ./expected/float8-fp-exception.out	Thu Mar 30 10:46:00 2000
--- ./results/float8.out	Fri Nov  1 10:16:14 2002
***
*** 149,161 
| 1.2345678901234e-200 |0
  (5 rows)
  
  SELECT sqrt(float8 '64') AS eight;
   eight 
  ---
   8
  (1 row)
  
- -- square root 
  SELECT |/ float8 '64' AS eight;
   eight 
  ---
--- 149,194 
| 1.2345678901234e-200 |0
  (5 rows)
  
+ -- ceil
+ select ceil(f1) as ceil_f1 from float8_tbl f;
+ceil_f1
+ --
+ 0
+  1005
+   -34
+  1.2345678901234e+200
+ 1
+ (5 rows)
+ 
+ -- floor
+ select floor(f1) as floor_f1 from float8_tbl f;
+floor_f1   
+ --
+ 0
+  1004
+   -35
+  1.2345678901234e+200
+ 0
+ (5 rows)
+ 
+ -- sign
+ select sign(f1) as sign_f1 from float8_tbl f;
+  sign_f1 
+ -
+0
+1
+   -1
+1
+1
+ (5 rows)
+ 
+ -- square root 
  SELECT sqrt(float8 '64') AS eight;
   eight 
  ---
   8
  (1 row)
  
  SELECT |/ float8 '64' AS eight;
   eight 
  ---

==

*** ./expected/alter_table.out	Sat Oct 19 04:35:43 2002
--- ./results/alter_table.out	Fri Nov  1 10:17:19 2002
***
*** 940,1168 
  alter table atacc1 drop d;
  alter table atacc1 drop b;
  select * from atacc1;
!   
! --
! (1 row)
! 
! drop table atacc1;
! -- test inheritance
! create table parent (a int, b int, c int);
! insert into parent values (1, 2, 3);
! alter table parent drop a;
! create table child (d varchar(255)) inherits (parent);
! insert into child values (12, 13, 'testing');
! select * from parent;
!  b  | c  
! +
!   2 |  3
!  12 | 13
! (2 rows)
! 
! select * from child;
!  b  | c  |d
! ++-
!  12 | 13 | testing
! (1 row)
! 
! alter table parent drop c;
! select * from parent;
!  b  
! 
!   2
!  12
! (2 rows)
! 
! select * from child;
!  b  |d
! +-
!  12 | testing
! (1 row)
! 
! drop table child;
! drop table parent;
! -- test copy in/out
! create table test (a int4, b int4, c int4);
! insert into test values (1,2,3);
! alter table test drop a;
! copy test to stdout;
! 2	3
! copy test(a) to stdout;
! ERROR:  Relation "test" has no column "a"
! copy test("pg.dropped.1") to stdout;
! ERROR:  Relation "test" has no column "pg.dropped.1"
! copy test from stdin;
! ERROR:  copy: line 1, Extra data after last expected column
! lost synchronization with server, resetting connection
! SET autocommit TO 'on';
! select * from test;
!  b | c 
! ---+---
!  2 | 3
! (1 row)
! 
! copy test from stdin;
! select * from test;
!  b  | c  
! +
!   2 |  3
!  21 | 22
! (2 rows)
! 
! copy test(a) from stdin;
! ERROR:  Relation "test" has no column "a"
! copy test("pg.dropped.1") from stdin;
! ERROR:  Relation "test" has no column "pg.dropped.1"
! copy test(b,c) from stdin;
! select * from test;
!  b  | c  
! +
!   2 |  3
!  21 | 22
!  31 | 32
! (3 rows)
! 
! drop table test;
! -- test inheritance
! create table dropColumn (a int, b int, e int);
! create table dropColumnChild (c int) inherits (dropColumn);
! create table dropColumnAnother (d int) inherits (dropColumnChild);
! -- these two should fail
! alter table dropColumnchild drop column a;
! ERROR:  ALTER TABLE: Cannot drop inherited column "a"
! alter table only dropColumnChild drop column b;
! ERROR:  ALTER TABLE: Cannot drop inherited column "b"
! -- these three should work
! alter table only dropColumn drop column e;
! alter table dropColumnChild drop column c;
! alter table dropColumn drop column a;
! create table renameColumn (a int);
! create table renameColumnChild (b int) inherits (renameColumn);
! create table renameColumnAnother (c int) inherits (renameColumnChild);
! -- these three should fail
! alter table renameColumnChild rename column a to d;
! ERROR:  renameatt: inherited attribute "a" may not be renamed
! alter table only renameColumnChild rename column a to d;
! ERROR:  Inherited attribute "a" must be renamed in child tables

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Sean Chittenden]

> > >>Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports.  The
> > >>"supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ...
> > > Good point.  Thomas, can you take that on?
> > 
> > No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the 
> > mailing lists, and so can not coordinate anything :( Not sure when or if 
> > that will be resolved, but I'll be out of town next week so...
> 
> [ Reposted with proper subject line.]
> 
> OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it. 
> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> number please.
> 
> The current platform list is:
> 
>   http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/supported-platforms.html

$ uname -a

FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14 PST 
2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP  i386

$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.2.1 [FreeBSD] 20021009 (prerelease)


Looks like the only problem on beta3 is that the geometry bits are
failing, but I'm not 100% if they haven't already been solved.  -sc


*** ./expected/geometry-positive-zeros-bsd.out  Tue Sep 12 14:07:16 2000
--- ./results/geometry.out  Thu Oct 31 23:53:31 2002
***
*** 114,120 
  | (5.1,34.5) | [(1,2),(3,4)] | (3,4)
  | (-5,-12)   | [(1,2),(3,4)] | (1,2)
  | (10,10)| [(1,2),(3,4)] | (3,4)
! | (0,0)  | [(0,0),(6,6)] | (0,0)
  | (-10,0)| [(0,0),(6,6)] | (0,0)
  | (-3,4) | [(0,0),(6,6)] | (0.5,0.5)
  | (5.1,34.5) | [(0,0),(6,6)] | (6,6)
--- 114,120 
  | (5.1,34.5) | [(1,2),(3,4)] | (3,4)
  | (-5,-12)   | [(1,2),(3,4)] | (1,2)
  | (10,10)| [(1,2),(3,4)] | (3,4)
! | (0,0)  | [(0,0),(6,6)] | (-0,0)
  | (-10,0)| [(0,0),(6,6)] | (0,0)
  | (-3,4) | [(0,0),(6,6)] | (0.5,0.5)
  | (5.1,34.5) | [(0,0),(6,6)] | (6,6)
***
*** 224,233 
   twentyfour |  rotation   
  +-
  | (0,0),(0,0)
! | (0,0),(-20,-20)
! | (0,2),(-14,0)
  | (0,79.2),(-58.8,0)
! | (14,0),(0,-34)
  | (0,40),(0,0)
  | (0,0),(0,0)
  | (-10,-10),(-30,-30)
--- 224,233 
   twentyfour |  rotation   
  +-
  | (0,0),(0,0)
! | (-0,0),(-20,-20)
! | (-0,2),(-14,0)
  | (0,79.2),(-58.8,0)
! | (14,-0),(0,-34)
  | (0,40),(0,0)
  | (0,0),(0,0)
  | (-10,-10),(-30,-30)
***
*** 254,264 
 WHERE (p.f1 <-> point '(0,0)') >= 1;
   twenty | rotation   
   
  
+---
! | (0,0),(-0.2,-0.2)
  | (-0.1,-0.1),(-0.3,-0.3)
  | (-0.25,-0.25),(-0.25,-0.35)
  | (-0.3,-0.3),(-0.3,-0.3)
! | (0.08,0),(0,-0.56)
  | (0.12,-0.28),(0.04,-0.84)
  | (0.26,-0.7),(0.1,-0.82)
  | (0.12,-0.84),(0.12,-0.84)
--- 254,264 
 WHERE (p.f1 <-> point '(0,0)') >= 1;
   twenty | rotation   
   
  
+---
! | (0,-0),(-0.2,-0.2)
  | (-0.1,-0.1),(-0.3,-0.3)
  | (-0.25,-0.25),(-0.25,-0.35)
  | (-0.3,-0.3),(-0.3,-0.3)
! | (0.08,-0),(0,-0.56)
  | (0.12,-0.28),(0.04,-0.84)
  | (0.26,-0.7),(0.1,-0.82)
  | (0.12,-0.84),(0.12,-0.84)
***
*** 266,272 
  | 
(0.0976764836465887,-0.0241724631246608),(0.0325588278821962,-0.0725173893739825)
  | 
(0.109762715208919,-0.0562379754328844),(0.0813970697054906,-0.0604311578116521)
  | 
(0.0976764836465887,-0.0725173893739825),(0.0976764836465887,-0.0725173893739825)
! | (0,0.0828402366863905),(-0.201183431952663,0)
  | 
(-0.100591715976331,0.124260355029586),(-0.301775147928994,0.0414201183431953)
  | 
(-0.251479289940828,0.103550295857988),(-0.322485207100592,0.0739644970414201)
  | 
(-0.301775147928994,0.124260355029586),(-0.301775147928994,0.124260355029586)
--- 266,272 
  | 
(0.0976764836465887,-0.0241724631246608),(0.0325588278821962,-0.0725173893739825)
  | 
(0.109762715208919,-0.0562379754328844),(0.0813970697054906,-0.0604311578116521)
  | 
(0.0976764836465887,-0.0725173893739825),(0.0976764836465887,-0.0725173

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tom Lane]

Alessio Bragadini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
>> number please.

> DOESN'T WORK on Digital Unix/Tru64 4.0g, with both cc or gcc compiler.

Evidently main.c needs "#include " added.  Please add that and
see if you get any further.  There might be other files with the same
problem?

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Alessio Bragadini]

> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> number please.

DOESN'T WORK on Digital Unix/Tru64 4.0g, with both cc or gcc compiler.

Using Compaq C V6.4-216 (dtk) on Digital UNIX V4.0G (Rev. 1530)
Compiler Driver V6.4-013 (dtk) cc Driver:

make[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/postgresql-7.3b3/src/backend/main'
cc -std -O4 -Olimit 2000 -I../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include  -c
-o main.o main.c
cc: Error: main.c, line 83: In this statement, "errno" is not declared.
(undeclared)
fprintf(stderr, gettext("%s: setsysinfo failed: %s\n"),
argv[0], strerror(errno));
--^
make[3]: *** [main.o] Error 1

same with GCC 2.95.1.

make[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/postgresql-7.3b3-gcc/src/backend/main'
gcc  -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
-I../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include  -c -o main.o main.c

main.c: In function `main':
main.c:83: `errno' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[1]: *** [main.o] Error 1

So, errno function is undefined.

This is quite strange, because that section hasn't been changed in the
last few months. It's activated from two different #if: one is 
#if defined(__alpha)
other is 
#if defined(NOFIXADE) || defined(NOPRINTADE)
Maybe is the setting of NOFIXADE or NOPRINTADE to be changed upstream?

-- 
Alessio F. Bragadini[EMAIL PROTECTED]
APL Financial Services  http://village.albourne.com
Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-22-755750

"It is more complicated than you think"
-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

I have reviewed your diff and found that it was either timezone changes
or join.sql which I have recently fixed.  Can you grab current CVS
snapshot and try again?

---

Ian Barwick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:56, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Sorry, Ian, here is the patch I applied.  You can apply this to whatever
> > version you are using and test Irix with that, rather than having to
> > grab CVS.
> 
> OK, I have carried out make check with the updated tests but
> got FAILED on the same four tests (abstime, tinterval, horology, join).
> 
> The failures are subtly different (see here for new regression diff):
> 
> http://home.akademie.de/~IBarwick/IRIX_65_1.regression.diffs
> 
> Having looked at them again I see the following:
> - in horology the timestamp tests seem to have succeeded (presumably
>   the previous failures were triggered by the change to winter time);
> - the tests which are still failing in abstime, tinterval and horology
>   all refer to dates before 1970, where AFAICS they are all out by one hour;
>   possibly this explanation?:
> 
> "Some systems using older time zone libraries fail to apply daylight-saving 
> corrections to dates before 1970, causing pre-1970 PDT times to be displayed 
> in PST instead. This will result in localized differences in the test 
> results."
> 
>   (cf. http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?regress-evaluation.html );
> 
> - the join tests are failing slightly differently; I would suggest that
>   this is because the ORDER BY is still not explicit enough, and for what
>   ever reason under IRIX the undefined result row orderings are in a different
>   order to every other platform...
> 
>   e.g. with this statement:
> 
> SELECT '' AS "xxx", J1_TBL.i, j, t, k
>   FROM J1_TBL LEFT OUTER JOIN J2_TBL USING (i)
>   ORDER BY i;
> 
>  xxx | i | j |   t   | k  
> -+---+---+---+
>  | 0 |   | zero  |   
>  | 1 | 4 | one   | -1
>  | 2 | 3 | two   |  2
>  | 2 | 3 | two   |  4
>  | 3 | 2 | three | -3
>  | 4 | 1 | four  |   
>  | 5 | 0 | five  | -5
>  | 5 | 0 | five  | -5
>  | 6 | 6 | six   |   
>  | 7 | 7 | seven |   
>  | 8 | 8 | eight |   
>  |   | 0 | zero  |   
>  |   |   | null  |   
> (13 rows)
> 
>   the order of the last two rows is not defined. The expected order
>   according to the regression tests is:
> 
>  |   |   | null  |
>  |   | 0 | zero  |   
> 
> 
> 
> Ian Barwick
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Peter Eisentraut]

Dave Page writes:

> Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the binary
> distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to be listed as
> supported if no-one disagrees...

I disagree.  We document as supported those platforms that build out of
the box, not those that build somehow, somewhere, by someone.

Rather than advocating methods to manually edit your system headers we
should try to find out what the problem really is, such as by analyzing
config.log.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Adam Witney]

On 29/10/02 1:50 pm, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Strange.  I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying
>> regression tests passed:
>> 10.2.1, Adam Witney  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> The proper value seems to be:
>> 15.3864610140472
>> or
>> 15.3864610140473
>> in ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out.  Which is it, folks?
> 
> The existing geometry file is exactly correct on my laptop (Powerbook
> G3 using OSX 10.1).  I am not sure whether the differences some users
> have reported are due to hardware or OS version differences.  We need
> to figure that out and refine the resultmap, not just change the
> existing file.

I don't have a lot of experience with this stuff, but let me know what to
try and I will try it. (Using a Powerbook G4 OSX 10.2.1)

Cheers

adam


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tara Piorkowski]

Bruce,

Not sure. I know Tom Lane ran a check on 10.1.x and didn't have any 
errors, so I figured the differences I saw reflected changes made by 
Apple between 10.1.x and 10.2.x. Then, I was surprised when I saw Adam's 
report, so I thought perhaps he was running on a PPC G3 and there were 
differences between G3 and G4 floating point handling (I had run the 
original regression tests on a PowerBook G4/400 MHz). So, I ran the same 
exact scenario on my aging iMac (G3/266 Mhz). Those results corroborated 
my original test (geometry failed; horology cleared up, though, as 
expected). So, something is different between Adam's system and the two 
I have easy access to. I have confirmed that both my systems are running 
10.2.1. Similarly, the tests were both run on 7.3b3 from the full 
tarball on ftp.us.postgresql.org. The new iMac G3 regression.diffs 
output is immediately below. Regardless, it would appear that Mac OS X 
10.2.x is well supported.

Tara


*** ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out  Mon Dec 11 11:45:16 2000
--- ./results/geometry.out  Tue Oct 29 07:59:59 2002
***
*** 127,133 
  | (-5,-12)   | [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
(-1.60487804878049,-4.64390243902439)
  | (10,10)| [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
(2.39024390243902,-6.48780487804878)
  | (0,0)  | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(0.0028402365895872,15.384614860264)
! | (-10,0)| [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-9.99715942258202,15.3864610140472)
  | (-3,4) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-2.99789812267519,15.3851688427303)
  | (5.1,34.5) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(5.09647083221496,15.3836744976925)
  | (-5,-12)   | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-4.99494420845634,15.3855375281616)
--- 127,133 
  | (-5,-12)   | [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
(-1.60487804878049,-4.64390243902439)
  | (10,10)| [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
(2.39024390243902,-6.48780487804878)
  | (0,0)  | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(0.0028402365895872,15.384614860264)
! | (-10,0)| [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-9.99715942258202,15.3864610140473)
  | (-3,4) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-2.99789812267519,15.3851688427303)
  | (5.1,34.5) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(5.09647083221496,15.3836744976925)
  | (-5,-12)   | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-4.99494420845634,15.3855375281616)

==




Bruce Momjian wrote:

Strange.  I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying
regression tests passed:

	 10.2.1, Adam Witney  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The proper value seems to be:

	15.3864610140472

or

	15.3864610140473

in ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out.  Which is it, folks?

---

Tara Piorkowski wrote:

>Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>Bruce Momjian  writes:
>>
>>
>>>Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
>>>number please.
>>
>>
>>I've checked CVS tip on:
>>	HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc
>>	PPC Linux
>>	Mac OS X 10.1
>
>
>Here's the regression.diffs file from Mac OS X 10.2.1 (Jaguar). It
>failed geometry (rounding) and horology (not sure). gcc -v returns
>"Apple Computer, Inc. GCC version 1161, based on gcc version 3.1
>20020420 (prerelease)".
>
>
>*** ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out  Mon Dec 11 11:45:16 2000
>--- ./results/geometry.out  Sun Oct 27 21:27:11 2002
>***
>*** 127,133 
>   | (-5,-12)   | [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]|
>(-1.60487804878049,-4.64390243902439)
>   | (10,10)| [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]|
>(2.39024390243902,-6.48780487804878)
>   | (0,0)  | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] |
>(0.0028402365895872,15.384614860264)
>! | (-10,0)| [(-100,200),(30,-40)] |
>(-9.99715942258202,15.3864610140472)
>   | (-3,4) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] |
>(-2.99789812267519,15.3851688427303)
>   | (5.1,34.5) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] |
>(5.09647083221496,15.3836744976925)
>   | (-5,-12)   | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] |
>(-4.99494420845634,15.3855375281616)
>--- 127,133 
>   | (-5,-12)   | [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]|
>(-1.60487804878049,-4.64390243902439)
>   | (10,10)| [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]|
>(2.39024390243902,-6.48780487804878)
>   | (0,0)  | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] |
>(0.0028402365895872,15.384614860264)
>! | (-10,0)| [(-100,200),(30,-40)] |
>(-9.99715942258202,15.3864610140473)
>   | (-3,4) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] |
>(-2.99789812267519,15.3851688427303)
>   | (5.1,34.5) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] |
>(5.09647083221496,15.3836744976925)
>   | (-5,-12)   | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] |
>(-4.99494420845634,15.3855375281616)
>
>===

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Ian Barwick]

On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:56, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Sorry, Ian, here is the patch I applied.  You can apply this to whatever
> version you are using and test Irix with that, rather than having to
> grab CVS.

OK, I have carried out make check with the updated tests but
got FAILED on the same four tests (abstime, tinterval, horology, join).

The failures are subtly different (see here for new regression diff):

http://home.akademie.de/~IBarwick/IRIX_65_1.regression.diffs

Having looked at them again I see the following:
- in horology the timestamp tests seem to have succeeded (presumably
  the previous failures were triggered by the change to winter time);
- the tests which are still failing in abstime, tinterval and horology
  all refer to dates before 1970, where AFAICS they are all out by one hour;
  possibly this explanation?:

"Some systems using older time zone libraries fail to apply daylight-saving 
corrections to dates before 1970, causing pre-1970 PDT times to be displayed 
in PST instead. This will result in localized differences in the test 
results."

  (cf. http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?regress-evaluation.html );

- the join tests are failing slightly differently; I would suggest that
  this is because the ORDER BY is still not explicit enough, and for what
  ever reason under IRIX the undefined result row orderings are in a different
  order to every other platform...

  e.g. with this statement:

SELECT '' AS "xxx", J1_TBL.i, j, t, k
  FROM J1_TBL LEFT OUTER JOIN J2_TBL USING (i)
  ORDER BY i;

 xxx | i | j |   t   | k  
-+---+---+---+
 | 0 |   | zero  |   
 | 1 | 4 | one   | -1
 | 2 | 3 | two   |  2
 | 2 | 3 | two   |  4
 | 3 | 2 | three | -3
 | 4 | 1 | four  |   
 | 5 | 0 | five  | -5
 | 5 | 0 | five  | -5
 | 6 | 6 | six   |   
 | 7 | 7 | seven |   
 | 8 | 8 | eight |   
 |   | 0 | zero  |   
 |   |   | null  |   
(13 rows)

  the order of the last two rows is not defined. The expected order
  according to the regression tests is:

 |   |   | null  |
 |   | 0 | zero  |   



Ian Barwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Jason Tishler]

Dave,

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:00:20PM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] 
> > Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58
> > 
> > > Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the
> > > binary distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to
> > > be listed as supported if no-one disagrees...
   ^
   *

> > Umm...  Should I disagree? :,)
> 
> Entirely up to you - you do the build :-).

I was meekly trying to voice my concern about who supplies the "support"
mentioned above.

> I'm just pointing out that the line wrt to Cygwin is generally "use
> the standard package", so if we stick to that, as long as you build it
> OK, most people needn't worry 'bout hacking stdio.h.

If my patch gets accepted, then the stdio.h hack won't be necessary for
anyone (after the next Cygwin release).

Jason

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Dave Page]

> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] 
> Sent: 29 October 2002 19:34
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> 
> 
> 
> Attached is a diff to fix the pclose problem.  It turns out 
> there was code in there to make popen/pclose be 
> _popen/_pclose, but it was only in common.c, even in 7.2.3 
> (print.c).  Not sure how it would compile in the past with 
> that.  Maybe it didn't.  Anyway, this is committed and should 
> _help_ with the compile.

Thanks Bruce, builds fine now.

Actually, I'm sure it did just a few weeks ago - We've been developing
pgAdmin III in C++ using libpq on Windows, Linux and FreeBSD for a few
weeks now and we've been using the CVS code.

Regards, Dave

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Dave Page]

> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] 
> Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; 
> Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> 
> > Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the 
> > binary distribution that Jason builds, I would think this 
> is OK to be 
> > listed as supported if no-one disagrees...
> 
> Umm...  Should I disagree? :,)
> 

Entirely up to you - you do the build :-). I'm just pointing out that
the line wrt to Cygwin is generally "use the standard package", so if we
stick to that, as long as you build it OK, most people needn't worry
'bout hacking stdio.h.

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Attached is a diff to fix the pclose problem.  It turns out there was
code in there to make popen/pclose be _popen/_pclose, but it was only in
common.c, even in 7.2.3 (print.c).  Not sure how it would compile in the
past with that.  Maybe it didn't.  Anyway, this is committed and should
_help_ with the compile.

---

Dave Page wrote:
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] 
> > Sent: 29 October 2002 04:24
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I have updated CVS and re-added getopt.c, now in /port, and 
> > updated win32.mak.  That should help.
> 
> Thanks. Unfortunately not quite there though:
> 
> print.c(1038) : warning C4013: 'pclose' undefined; assuming extern
> returning int
> 
> describe.c
> tab-complete.c
> describe.c(1462) : warning C4761: integral size mismatch in argument;
> conversion supplied
> mbprint.c
> link.exe @.\nmc01556.
> print.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _pclose
> .\Release\psql.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'link.exe' : return code '0x460'
> Stop.
> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
> Studio\VC98\bin\nmake.exe"' : return code '0x2'
> Stop.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Regards, Dave.
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Index: src/bin/psql/common.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/bin/psql/common.c,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -c -c -r1.50 common.c
*** src/bin/psql/common.c   24 Oct 2002 01:33:50 -  1.50
--- src/bin/psql/common.c   29 Oct 2002 19:15:38 -
***
*** 6,12 
   * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/bin/psql/common.c,v 1.50 2002/10/24 01:33:50 
momjian Exp $
   */
  #include "postgres_fe.h"
- 
  #include "common.h"
  
  #include 
--- 6,11 
***
*** 27,35 
  
  #ifndef WIN32
  #include /* for ioctl() */
- #else
- #define popen(x,y) _popen(x,y)
- #define pclose(x) _pclose(x)
  #endif
  
  #ifdef HAVE_TERMIOS_H
--- 26,31 
Index: src/bin/psql/common.h
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/bin/psql/common.h,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -c -c -r1.20 common.h
*** src/bin/psql/common.h   23 Oct 2002 19:23:56 -  1.20
--- src/bin/psql/common.h   29 Oct 2002 19:15:38 -
***
*** 42,45 
--- 42,51 
  /* sprompt.h */
  extern char *simple_prompt(const char *prompt, int maxlen, bool echo);
  
+ /* Used for all Win32 popen/pclose calls */
+ #ifdef WIN32
+ #define popen(x,y) _popen(x,y)
+ #define pclose(x) _pclose(x)
+ #endif
+ 
  #endif   /* COMMON_H */


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

I kept Dave and Jason's name on the report.

Ports list updated:

  http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

---
Dave Page wrote:
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] 
> > Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; 
> > Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> > 
> > 
> > I found a solution to the above which will hopefully find its way 
> > into the next Cygwin release:
> > 
> > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00042.html
> > 
> > > Yes, I'm seeing errors with this on my updated Cygwin very early in 
> > > the build. I did think it was my hacked about installation, but I 
> > > guess not!
> > 
> > A quick and *dirty* fix for this problem is to temporarily delete the 
> > above two entries from your stdio.h file.
> 
> Hi Jason,
> 
> All regression tests pass with the above hack on:
> 
> CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9 1.3.14(0.62/3/2) 2002-10-24 10:48 i686 unknown
> 
> Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the binary
> distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to be listed as
> supported if no-one disagrees...
> 
> Regards, Dave.
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Jason Tishler]

Dave,

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:57:58PM -, Dave Page wrote:
> All regression tests pass with the above hack on:
> 
> CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9 1.3.14(0.62/3/2) 2002-10-24 10:48 i686 unknown

Thanks for the above.

> Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the
> binary distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to be
> listed as supported if no-one disagrees...

Umm...  Should I disagree? :,)

Jason

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Robert Treat]

On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 12:16, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but
> > with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I
> > would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4
> > failures: horology,geometry,opr_sanity, and misc
> >
> > This is on alpha running debian 3 linux
> > uname -a = Linux usf-cf-alpha-linux-1 2.2.20 #2 Wed Mar 20 19:57:28
> > EST 2002 alpha unknown
> >
> > regression output can be seen at:
> > http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/regression.diffs
> > http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/regression.out
> >
> > my alpha history is spotty at best, perhaps someone else can help me
> > interpret things.
> >
> > Robert Treat
> 
> I think on Linux Alpha and Sparc alot has to do with the gcc compiler
> version.
> My system is handupgraded from Redhat 6.2, kernel 2.2.x to be using a
> much newer kernel (2.4.X-aaX).
> But it's been working flawlessly with almost any kernel from 2.2 up to
> where i am now, using postgresql from the 6.x days.
> 
> What compiler version are you using?

xzilla@usf-cf-alpha-linux-1:~/postgresql-7.3b3/src/test$ gcc --version
2.95.4

> Is this Debian release a stable branch?
> 

hmm... I'm not an admin on the box, this is one of the boxes from the
sourceforge compile farm. /proc/version reports this as Debian
prerelease, and kernel version reports 2.2.20.  

Robert Treat


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Magnus Naeslund(f)]

Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but
> with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I
> would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4
> failures: horology,geometry,opr_sanity, and misc
>
> This is on alpha running debian 3 linux
> uname -a = Linux usf-cf-alpha-linux-1 2.2.20 #2 Wed Mar 20 19:57:28
> EST 2002 alpha unknown
>
> regression output can be seen at:
> http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/regression.diffs
> http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/regression.out
>
> my alpha history is spotty at best, perhaps someone else can help me
> interpret things.
>
> Robert Treat

I think on Linux Alpha and Sparc alot has to do with the gcc compiler
version.
My system is handupgraded from Redhat 6.2, kernel 2.2.x to be using a
much newer kernel (2.4.X-aaX).
But it's been working flawlessly with almost any kernel from 2.2 up to
where i am now, using postgresql from the 6.x days.

What compiler version are you using?
Is this Debian release a stable branch?

Magnus





---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Dave Page]

> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] 
> Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; 
> Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> 
> 
> I found a solution to the above which will hopefully find its way 
> into the next Cygwin release:
> 
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00042.html
> 
> > Yes, I'm seeing errors with this on my updated Cygwin very early in 
> > the build. I did think it was my hacked about installation, but I 
> > guess not!
> 
> A quick and *dirty* fix for this problem is to temporarily delete the 
> above two entries from your stdio.h file.

Hi Jason,

All regression tests pass with the above hack on:

CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9 1.3.14(0.62/3/2) 2002-10-24 10:48 i686 unknown

Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the binary
distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to be listed as
supported if no-one disagrees...

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Robert Treat]

I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but
with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I would
try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4 failures: 
horology,geometry,opr_sanity, and misc 

This is on alpha running debian 3 linux 
uname -a = Linux usf-cf-alpha-linux-1 2.2.20 #2 Wed Mar 20 19:57:28 EST
2002 alpha unknown 

regression output can be seen at:
http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/regression.diffs
http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/regression.out 

my alpha history is spotty at best, perhaps someone else can help me
interpret things.

Robert Treat

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 22:41, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote:
> Linux alpha.
> 
> An Redhat 6.2, "Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002
> alpha unknown" (ev56 ruffian).
> 
> gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
> 
> ./configure \
>   --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql-7.3b3 \
>   --with-maxbackends=512 \
>   --with-tcl \
>   --without-tk   \
>   --with-perl\
>   --with-openssl \
>   --enable-odbc  \
>   --with-CXX
> 
> The box passes every tests except Horology.
> It's wintertime here aswell, as i read in some other report.
> 
> It installs and runs nicely.
> 
> Magnus
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])




---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Jason Tishler]

Matthew,

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:50:40PM -0500, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Are you compiling from CVS or from a released tarball?

CVS.

> The bison requirement was recently raised to bison 1.5 or above (1.75
> was recently released also.)  This is an issue only when compiling
> from CVS, since the bison stuff is preprocessed for released tarballs.
> So you might want to try the just release beta3.

Thanks for the above, but see my recent, related posts (if interested).

Jason

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Jason Tishler]

Dave,

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:58:12PM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] 
> > Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:20:16AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > My WAG is that you will be able to upgrade your Cygwin
> > > installation before I fix the Cygwin build issues. :,)
> > 
> > I guess my WAG was wrong... :,)
> 
> I've been meaning to ask this for a while - what exactly is a WAG? :-)

Larry was kind enough to answer this one for me.  :,)

> > 1. Cygwin bison needs to be upgraded from 1.35 to 1.75 (i.e., 
> > 1.50+) to process src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y 
> > successfully.  I will post to the Cygwin mailing list asking 
> > the maintainer for this upgrade.
> 
> OK. This shouldn't stop a release though I assume, only a build from
> CVS.

Yes.  Nevertheless, I have posted my request:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg01740.html

> > 2. The following fseeko/ftello ifdef in src/include/pg_config.h.in:
> > 
> > #ifndef HAVE_FSEEKO
> > #define fseeko(a, b, c) fseek((a), (b), (c))
> > #define ftello(a) ftell((a))
> > #endif
> > 
> > conflicts with the following Cygwin /usr/include/stdio.h entries:
> > 
> > int _EXFUN(fseeko, (FILE *, off_t, int));
> > off_t   _EXFUN(ftello, ( FILE *));
> > 
> > Unfortunately, I'm not sure what is the best way to solve 
> > this one yet. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

I found a solution to the above which will hopefully find its way into
the next Cygwin release:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00042.html

> Yes, I'm seeing errors with this on my updated Cygwin very early in
> the build. I did think it was my hacked about installation, but I
> guess not!

A quick and *dirty* fix for this problem is to temporarily delete the
above two entries from your stdio.h file.

Jason

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tom Lane]

Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Strange.  I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying
> regression tests passed:
>10.2.1, Adam Witney  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The proper value seems to be:
>   15.3864610140472
> or
>   15.3864610140473
> in ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out.  Which is it, folks?

The existing geometry file is exactly correct on my laptop (Powerbook
G3 using OSX 10.1).  I am not sure whether the differences some users
have reported are due to hardware or OS version differences.  We need
to figure that out and refine the resultmap, not just change the
existing file.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Dave Page]

> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] 
> Sent: 29 October 2002 04:24
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> 
> 
> 
> I have updated CVS and re-added getopt.c, now in /port, and 
> updated win32.mak.  That should help.

Thanks. Unfortunately not quite there though:

print.c(1038) : warning C4013: 'pclose' undefined; assuming extern
returning int

describe.c
tab-complete.c
describe.c(1462) : warning C4761: integral size mismatch in argument;
conversion supplied
mbprint.c
link.exe @.\nmc01556.
print.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _pclose
.\Release\psql.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'link.exe' : return code '0x460'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
Studio\VC98\bin\nmake.exe"' : return code '0x2'
Stop.

Any ideas?

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

I have updated CVS and re-added getopt.c, now in /port, and updated
win32.mak.  That should help.

---

Dave Page wrote:
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] 
> > Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
> > To: PostgreSQL-development
> > Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> > Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> > 
> > 
> > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and 
> > version number please.
> > 
> 
> Windows XP Professional SP1
> 
> Client build fails :-(
> 
> Regards, Dave.
> 
> C:\cygwin\usr\local\src\postgresql-7.3b3\src>nmake /f win32.mak
> 
> Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility   Version 6.00.8168.0
> Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.
> 
> cd include
> if not exist pg_config.h copy pg_config.h.win32 pg_config.h
> 1 file(s) copied.
> cd ..
> cd interfaces\libpq
> nmake /f win32.mak
> 
> Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility   Version 6.00.8168.0
> Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.
> 
> Building the Win32 static library...
> 
> if not exist ".\Release/" mkdir ".\Release"
> cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nma04188.
> dllist.c
> cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmb04188.
> md5.c
> cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmc04188.
> wchar.c
> cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmd04188.
> encnames.c
> cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nme04188.
> win32.c
> fe-auth.c
> fe-connect.c
> fe-exec.c
> fe-lobj.c
> fe-misc.c
> fe-print.c
> fe-secure.c
> pqexpbuffer.c
> link.exe -lib @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmf04188.
> cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmg04188.
> libpqdll.c
> rc.exe /l 0x409 /fo".\Release\libpq.res" libpq.rc
> link.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmh04188.
>Creating library .\Release\libpqdll.lib and object
> .\Release\libpqdll.exp
> cd ..\..\bin\psql
> nmake /f win32.mak
> 
> Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility   Version 6.00.8168.0
> Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.
> 
> if not exist ".\Release/" mkdir ".\Release"
> NMAKE : fatal error U1073: don't know how to make '..\..\utils\getopt.c'
> Stop.
> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
> Studio\VC98\bin\N
> MAKE.EXE"' : return code '0x2'
> Stop.
> 
> C:\cygwin\usr\local\src\postgresql-7.3b3\src>
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Matthew T. O'Connor]

Are you compiling from CVS or from a released tarball?  The bison
requirement was recently raised to bison 1.5 or above (1.75 was recently
released also.)  This is an issue only when compiling from CVS, since
the bison stuff is preprocessed for released tarballs.  So you might
want to try the just release beta3.

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 08:32, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Dave,
> 
> Thanks for the heads up...
> 
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:31:00AM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] 
> > > Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
> > > Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> > >
> > > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and 
> > > version number please.
> > 
> > CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14 i686 unknown
> ^^
> 
> Please try with Cygwin 1.3.14-1 while I attempt to deal with at least
> the following Cygwin build issues with PostgreSQL CVS as of today at
> about 7:00 AM EST:
> 
> 1. pg_config.h.in HAVE_FSEEKO ifdef:
> 
> make[4]: Entering directory `/home/jt/src/pgsql/src/backend/access/common'
> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I../../../../src/include  
>-DBUILDING_DLL  -c -o heaptuple.o heaptuple.c
> In file included from ../../../../src/include/c.h:56,
>  from ../../../../src/include/postgres.h:48,
>  from heaptuple.c:21:
> /usr/include/stdio.h:207: parse error before `('
> 
> 2. Cygwin bison limit exceeded:
> 
> make[4]: Entering directory `/home/jt/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc'
> [snip]
> bison -y -d  preproc.y
> preproc.y:5560: fatal error: maximum table size (32767) exceeded
> 
> > Make check failed with the normal spurious errors.
> 
> I would stick with make installcheck due to the Cygwin (i.e., Windows)
> backlog issue.
> 
> > Make installcheck also failed on horology, copy2 and domain - see
> > attached output. 
> > 
> > The clocks changed here on Saturday night, so I guess that shouldn't
> > have caused the first error (or should the docs be updated?).
> > 
> > The second 2 errors are both with copys - related to the problem with
> > the listen() backlog queue in the parallel test perhaps?
> 
> I haven't looked into the above yet due to the build problems.  Any help
> regarding these issues is gratefully appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Ports list updated:

  http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

---
Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote:
> Linux alpha.
> 
> An Redhat 6.2, "Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002
> alpha unknown" (ev56 ruffian).
> 
> gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
> 
> ./configure \
>   --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql-7.3b3 \
>   --with-maxbackends=512 \
>   --with-tcl \
>   --without-tk   \
>   --with-perl\
>   --with-openssl \
>   --enable-odbc  \
>   --with-CXX
> 
> The box passes every tests except Horology.
> It's wintertime here aswell, as i read in some other report.
> 
> It installs and runs nicely.
> 
> Magnus
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Magnus Naeslund(f)]

Linux alpha.

An Redhat 6.2, "Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002
alpha unknown" (ev56 ruffian).

gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)

./configure \
  --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql-7.3b3 \
  --with-maxbackends=512 \
  --with-tcl \
  --without-tk   \
  --with-perl\
  --with-openssl \
  --enable-odbc  \
  --with-CXX

The box passes every tests except Horology.
It's wintertime here aswell, as i read in some other report.

It installs and runs nicely.

Magnus







---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Strange.  I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying
regression tests passed:

 10.2.1, Adam Witney  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The proper value seems to be:

15.3864610140472

or

15.3864610140473

in ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out.  Which is it, folks?

---

Tara Piorkowski wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > Bruce Momjian  writes:
> >
> > >Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> > >number please.
> >
> >
> > I've checked CVS tip on:
> > HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc
> > PPC Linux
> > Mac OS X 10.1
> 
> 
> Here's the regression.diffs file from Mac OS X 10.2.1 (Jaguar). It 
> failed geometry (rounding) and horology (not sure). gcc -v returns 
> "Apple Computer, Inc. GCC version 1161, based on gcc version 3.1 
> 20020420 (prerelease)".
> 
> 
> *** ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out  Mon Dec 11 11:45:16 2000
> --- ./results/geometry.out  Sun Oct 27 21:27:11 2002
> ***
> *** 127,133 
>| (-5,-12)   | [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
> (-1.60487804878049,-4.64390243902439)
>| (10,10)| [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
> (2.39024390243902,-6.48780487804878)
>| (0,0)  | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
> (0.0028402365895872,15.384614860264)
> ! | (-10,0)| [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
> (-9.99715942258202,15.3864610140472)
>| (-3,4) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
> (-2.99789812267519,15.3851688427303)
>| (5.1,34.5) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
> (5.09647083221496,15.3836744976925)
>| (-5,-12)   | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
> (-4.99494420845634,15.3855375281616)
> --- 127,133 
>| (-5,-12)   | [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
> (-1.60487804878049,-4.64390243902439)
>| (10,10)| [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
> (2.39024390243902,-6.48780487804878)
>| (0,0)  | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
> (0.0028402365895872,15.384614860264)
> ! | (-10,0)| [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
> (-9.99715942258202,15.3864610140473)
>| (-3,4) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
> (-2.99789812267519,15.3851688427303)
>| (5.1,34.5) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
> (5.09647083221496,15.3836744976925)
>| (-5,-12)   | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
> (-4.99494420845634,15.3855375281616)
> 
> ==
> 
> *** ./expected/horology.out Wed Sep 18 17:35:25 2002
> --- ./results/horology.out  Sun Oct 27 21:27:12 2002
> ***
> *** 537,549 
>SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'today' = (timestamp with time zone 
> 'tomorrow' - interval '1 day')) as "True";
> True
>--
> !  t
>(1 row)
> 
>SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'tomorrow' = (timestamp with time 
> zone 'yesterday' + interval '2 days')) as "True";
> True
>--
> !  t
>(1 row)
> 
>SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'tomorrow' > 'now') as "True";
> --- 537,549 
>SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'today' = (timestamp with time zone 
> 'tomorrow' - interval '1 day')) as "True";
> True
>--
> !  f
>(1 row)
> 
>SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'tomorrow' = (timestamp with time 
> zone 'yesterday' + interval '2 days')) as "True";
> True
>--
> !  f
>(1 row)
> 
>SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'tomorrow' > 'now') as "True";
> 
> ==
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tara Piorkowski
> System Administrator, vilaj.com, LLC
> 
> 
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Ports list updated:

  http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

---
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests
> > pass.  Solaris 8 forthcoming.
> 
> I should have mentioned that this is for beta 3; I don't have the
> necessary bison installed to compile from CVS.
> 
> Solaris 8, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 3G RAM, gcc 3.2 also passes.
> 
> The details I'll put in the regression database.
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> 
> Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
> Liberty RMS   Toronto, Ontario Canada
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  M2P 2A8
>  +1 416 646 3304 x110
> 
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Ports list updated:

  http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

---
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it. 
> > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> > number please.
> 
> Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests
> pass.  Solaris 8 forthcoming.
> 
> A 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
> Liberty RMS   Toronto, Ontario Canada
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  M2P 2A8
>  +1 416 646 3304 x110
> 
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Sorry, Ian, here is the patch I applied.  You can apply this to whatever
version you are using and test Irix with that, rather than having to
grab CVS.

---

Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ports list updated:
> 
> Shouldn't the "join" regression test failure be fixed?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Neil
> 
> -- 
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
> 
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

? config.log
? GNUmakefile
? config.status
? autom4te.cache
? configure.lineno
? contrib/retep/build
? contrib/retep/jars
? src/log
? src/Makefile.custom
? src/Makefile.global
? src/backend/postgres
? src/backend/catalog/postgres.bki
? src/backend/catalog/postgres.description
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/conversion_create.sql
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic/libascii_and_mic.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/cyrillic_and_mic/libcyrillic_and_mic.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/euc_cn_and_mic/libeuc_cn_and_mic.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/euc_jp_and_sjis/libeuc_jp_and_sjis.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/euc_kr_and_mic/libeuc_kr_and_mic.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/euc_tw_and_big5/libeuc_tw_and_big5.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/latin2_and_win1250/liblatin2_and_win1250.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/latin_and_mic/liblatin_and_mic.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_ascii/libutf8_and_ascii.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_big5/libutf8_and_big5.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_cyrillic/libutf8_and_cyrillic.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_euc_cn/libutf8_and_euc_cn.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_euc_jp/libutf8_and_euc_jp.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_euc_kr/libutf8_and_euc_kr.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_euc_tw/libutf8_and_euc_tw.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_gb18030/libutf8_and_gb18030.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_gbk/libutf8_and_gbk.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_iso8859/libutf8_and_iso8859.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_iso8859_1/libutf8_and_iso8859_1.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_johab/libutf8_and_johab.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_sjis/libutf8_and_sjis.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_tcvn/libutf8_and_tcvn.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_uhc/libutf8_and_uhc.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_win1250/libutf8_and_win1250.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_win1256/libutf8_and_win1256.so.0.0
? src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/utf8_and_win874/libutf8_and_win874.so.0.0
? src/bin/initdb/initdb
? src/bin/initlocation/initlocation
? src/bin/ipcclean/ipcclean
? src/bin/pg_config/pg_config
? src/bin/pg_controldata/pg_controldata
? src/bin/pg_ctl/pg_ctl
? src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump
? src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore
? src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dumpall
? src/bin/pg_encoding/pg_encoding
? src/bin/pg_id/pg_id
? src/bin/pg_resetxlog/pg_resetxlog
? src/bin/psql/psql
? src/bin/psql/i
? src/bin/scripts/createlang
? src/include/pg_config.h
? src/include/stamp-h
? src/interfaces/ecpg/lib/libecpg.so.3.4.0
? src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/ecpg
? src/interfaces/jdbc/build
? src/interfaces/jdbc/jars
? src/interfaces/libpq/libpq.so.2.2
? src/pl/plpgsql/src/libplpgsql.so.1.0
? src/test/regress/pg_regress
? src/test/regress/results
? src/test/regress/regression.out
? src/test/regress/regression.diffs
? src/test/regress/expected/copy.out
? src/test/regress/expected/create_function_1.out
? src/test/regress/expected/create_function_2.out
? src/test/regress/expected/misc.out
? src/test/regress/expected/constraints.out
? src/test/regress/sql/copy.sql
? src/test/regress/sql/create_function_1.sql
? src/test/regress/sql/create_function_2.sql
? src/test/regress/sql/misc.sql
? src/test/regress/sql/constraints.sql
Index: src/test/regress/expected/join.out
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/test/regress/expected/join.out,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -c -c -r1.11 -r1.12
*** src/test/regress/expected/join.out  28 Apr 2002 19:54:29 -  1.11
--- src/test/regress/expected/join.out  28 Oct 2002 22:54:45 -  1.12
**

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Andrew Sullivan]

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests
> pass.  Solaris 8 forthcoming.

I should have mentioned that this is for beta 3; I don't have the
necessary bison installed to compile from CVS.

Solaris 8, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 3G RAM, gcc 3.2 also passes.

The details I'll put in the regression database.

A

-- 

Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS   Toronto, Ontario Canada
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  M2P 2A8
 +1 416 646 3304 x110


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Ian Barwick]

On Tuesday 29 October 2002 00:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Ports list updated:
> >
> > Shouldn't the "join" regression test failure be fixed?
>
> OK, I have updated the join regression test to add ORDER BY in the
> queries Irix differed.  Ian, would you retest the CVS version of
> PostgreSQL to see if all the regression tests pass now?

For confirmation: IIRC CVS now requires the latest Bison (1.75)?
(The Irix machine has 1.35).

Ian Barwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ports list updated:
> 
> Shouldn't the "join" regression test failure be fixed?

OK, I have updated the join regression test to add ORDER BY in the
queries Irix differed.  Ian, would you retest the CVS version of
PostgreSQL to see if all the regression tests pass now?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Andrew Sullivan]

On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it. 
> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> number please.

Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests
pass.  Solaris 8 forthcoming.

A 

-- 

Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS   Toronto, Ontario Canada
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  M2P 2A8
 +1 416 646 3304 x110


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Larry Rosenman]

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 14:58, Dave Page wrote:
> 
> > >
> > > My WAG is that you will be able to upgrade your Cygwin installation 
> > > before I fix the Cygwin build issues. :,)
> > 
> > I guess my WAG was wrong... :,)
> 
> I've been meaning to ask this for a while - what exactly is a WAG? :-)
Wild-A**ed-Guess, I would presume. 


-- 
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Dave Page]

> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] 
> Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; 
> Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> 
> 
> Dave,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:20:16AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >
> > My WAG is that you will be able to upgrade your Cygwin installation 
> > before I fix the Cygwin build issues. :,)
> 
> I guess my WAG was wrong... :,)

I've been meaning to ask this for a while - what exactly is a WAG? :-)

> 1. Cygwin bison needs to be upgraded from 1.35 to 1.75 (i.e., 
> 1.50+) to process src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y 
> successfully.  I will post to the Cygwin mailing list asking 
> the maintainer for this upgrade.

OK. This shouldn't stop a release though I assume, only a build from
CVS.

> 2. The following fseeko/ftello ifdef in src/include/pg_config.h.in:
> 
> #ifndef HAVE_FSEEKO
> #define fseeko(a, b, c) fseek((a), (b), (c))
> #define ftello(a) ftell((a))
> #endif
> 
> conflicts with the following Cygwin /usr/include/stdio.h entries:
> 
> int _EXFUN(fseeko, (FILE *, off_t, int));
> off_t   _EXFUN(ftello, ( FILE *));
> 
> Unfortunately, I'm not sure what is the best way to solve 
> this one yet. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Yes, I'm seeing errors with this on my updated Cygwin very early in the
build. I did think it was my hacked about installation, but I guess not!

Unfortunately though, I don't know the answer either, but I guess the
change was in Cygwin as I didn't see it before you asked me to upgrade.

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Jason Tishler]

Dave,

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:20:16AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > Ok, but this is going to take a while as few of the mirrors seem to
> > have this release yet. I also need to download a new set of everything
> > for reasons I won't go into.
> 
> My WAG is that you will be able to upgrade your Cygwin installation
> before I fix the Cygwin build issues. :,)

I guess my WAG was wrong... :,)

Under the following platform:

$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-5.0 TISHLERJASON 1.3.14(0.62/3/2) 2002-10-23 14:47 i686 unknown

all make installcheck tests pass except for horology.  However, the
horology failure is to be expected due to the recent time change.

Unfortunately, there are some Cygwin build issues that I need to
address:

1. Cygwin bison needs to be upgraded from 1.35 to 1.75 (i.e., 1.50+) to
process src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y successfully.  I will post
to the Cygwin mailing list asking the maintainer for this upgrade.

2. The following fseeko/ftello ifdef in src/include/pg_config.h.in:

#ifndef HAVE_FSEEKO
#define fseeko(a, b, c) fseek((a), (b), (c))
#define ftello(a) ftell((a))
#endif

conflicts with the following Cygwin /usr/include/stdio.h entries:

int _EXFUN(fseeko, (FILE *, off_t, int));
off_t   _EXFUN(ftello, ( FILE *));

Unfortunately, I'm not sure what is the best way to solve this one yet.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Jason

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tom Lane]

"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Horology failures are normal for a day or so on either side 
>> of a DST change --- see the "regression tests interpretation" 
>> docs.  I have no time right now to examine the other diffs.

> The docs say:

> Some of the queries in the timestamp test will fail if you run the test
> on
> the day of a daylight-savings time changeover, or the day before or
> after
> one.

> Clocks changed at midnight Saturday so I figured a Monday morning run
> should be OK. Do they actually change on Sunday at 00:00:00 I wonder?
> I'll try again tomorrow.

In the US, DST changes occur at 02:00 Sunday, so the affected queries
actually fail starting at 00:00 Sunday and ending 00:00 Tuesday ---
but that's local time in PST8PDT.  The docs are vague because your local
time might vary considerably from that ...

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Larry Rosenman]

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 10:20, Jason Tishler wrote:

> > > 2. Cygwin bison limit exceeded:
> > > 
> > > make[4]: Entering directory 
> > > `/home/jt/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc'
> > > [snip]
> > > bison -y -d  preproc.y
> > > preproc.y:5560: fatal error: maximum table size (32767) exceeded
> > 
> > I believe a new bison is required now. Don't know much about it other
> > than ecpg hit some limit or other and much discussion followed. Iirc,
> > it's only an issue when compiling from CVS, not a tarball.
> 
> The above should help save me some time.
1.50 of Bison fixed the issue, 1.75 works as well (current public
release). 

Just my $.02. 


> 
> Thanks,
> Jason
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org
> 
-- 
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Jason Tishler]

Dave,

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] 
> > Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> > 
> > Please try with Cygwin 1.3.14-1 while I attempt to deal with at
> > least the following Cygwin build issues with PostgreSQL CVS as of
> > today at about 7:00 AM EST:
> 
> Ok, but this is going to take a while as few of the mirrors seem to
> have this release yet. I also need to download a new set of everything
> for reasons I won't go into.

My WAG is that you will be able to upgrade your Cygwin installation
before I fix the Cygwin build issues. :,)

> Is there actually a reason for this though or are you just trying to
> keep me busy? :-) It can't be a good thing for us to require that
> people upgrade to the latest release of their OS.

Agreed, but sometimes a new Cygwin release fixes some problems and
breaks others...

> > 2. Cygwin bison limit exceeded:
> > 
> > make[4]: Entering directory 
> > `/home/jt/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc'
> > [snip]
> > bison -y -d  preproc.y
> > preproc.y:5560: fatal error: maximum table size (32767) exceeded
> 
> I believe a new bison is required now. Don't know much about it other
> than ecpg hit some limit or other and much discussion followed. Iirc,
> it's only an issue when compiling from CVS, not a tarball.

The above should help save me some time.

Thanks,
Jason

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Dave Page]

> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@;sss.pgh.pa.us] 
> Sent: 28 October 2002 15:53
> To: Jason Tishler
> Cc: Dave Page; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas 
> Lockhart; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms 
> 
> 
> >> Make installcheck also failed on horology, copy2 and domain - see 
> >> attached output.
> >> 
> >> The clocks changed here on Saturday night, so I guess that 
> shouldn't 
> >> have caused the first error (or should the docs be updated?).
> 
> Horology failures are normal for a day or so on either side 
> of a DST change --- see the "regression tests interpretation" 
> docs.  I have no time right now to examine the other diffs.

The docs say:


Some of the queries in the timestamp test will fail if you run the test
on
the day of a daylight-savings time changeover, or the day before or
after
one.


Clocks changed at midnight Saturday so I figured a Monday morning run
should be OK. Do they actually change on Sunday at 00:00:00 I wonder?
I'll try again tomorrow.

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tom Lane]

>> Make installcheck also failed on horology, copy2 and domain - see
>> attached output. 
>> 
>> The clocks changed here on Saturday night, so I guess that shouldn't
>> have caused the first error (or should the docs be updated?).

Horology failures are normal for a day or so on either side of a DST
change --- see the "regression tests interpretation" docs.  I have
no time right now to examine the other diffs.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Dave Page]

> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] 
> Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; 
> Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> 
> 
> Dave,
> 
> Thanks for the heads up...
> 
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:31:00AM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us]
> > > Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
> > > Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> > >
> > > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and
> > > version number please.
> > 
> > CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14 i686 unknown
> ^^
> 
> Please try with Cygwin 1.3.14-1 while I attempt to deal with 
> at least the following Cygwin build issues with PostgreSQL 
> CVS as of today at about 7:00 AM EST:

Ok, but this is going to take a while as few of the mirrors seem to have
this release yet. I also need to download a new set of everything for
reasons I won't go into.

Is there actually a reason for this though or are you just trying to
keep me busy? :-) It can't be a good thing for us to require that people
upgrade to the latest release of their OS.

> 2. Cygwin bison limit exceeded:
> 
> make[4]: Entering directory 
> `/home/jt/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc'
> [snip]
> bison -y -d  preproc.y
> preproc.y:5560: fatal error: maximum table size (32767) exceeded

I believe a new bison is required now. Don't know much about it other
than ecpg hit some limit or other and much discussion followed. Iirc,
it's only an issue when compiling from CVS, not a tarball.

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

I thought the join was part of the timezone change, but I see now that
it is separate.  I will fix it by adding ORDER BY.

---

Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ports list updated:
> 
> Shouldn't the "join" regression test failure be fixed?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Neil
> 
> -- 
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
> 
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Jason Tishler]

Dave,

Thanks for the heads up...

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:31:00AM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] 
> > Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
> > Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> >
> > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and 
> > version number please.
> 
> CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14 i686 unknown
^^

Please try with Cygwin 1.3.14-1 while I attempt to deal with at least
the following Cygwin build issues with PostgreSQL CVS as of today at
about 7:00 AM EST:

1. pg_config.h.in HAVE_FSEEKO ifdef:

make[4]: Entering directory `/home/jt/src/pgsql/src/backend/access/common'
gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I../../../../src/include  
-DBUILDING_DLL  -c -o heaptuple.o heaptuple.c
In file included from ../../../../src/include/c.h:56,
 from ../../../../src/include/postgres.h:48,
 from heaptuple.c:21:
/usr/include/stdio.h:207: parse error before `('

2. Cygwin bison limit exceeded:

make[4]: Entering directory `/home/jt/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc'
[snip]
bison -y -d  preproc.y
preproc.y:5560: fatal error: maximum table size (32767) exceeded

> Make check failed with the normal spurious errors.

I would stick with make installcheck due to the Cygwin (i.e., Windows)
backlog issue.

> Make installcheck also failed on horology, copy2 and domain - see
> attached output. 
> 
> The clocks changed here on Saturday night, so I guess that shouldn't
> have caused the first error (or should the docs be updated?).
> 
> The second 2 errors are both with copys - related to the problem with
> the listen() backlog queue in the parallel test perhaps?

I haven't looked into the above yet due to the build problems.  Any help
regarding these issues is gratefully appreciated.

Thanks,
Jason

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tara Piorkowski]

Tom Lane wrote:


Bruce Momjian  writes:

>Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
>number please.


I've checked CVS tip on:
	HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc
	PPC Linux
	Mac OS X 10.1



Here's the regression.diffs file from Mac OS X 10.2.1 (Jaguar). It 
failed geometry (rounding) and horology (not sure). gcc -v returns 
"Apple Computer, Inc. GCC version 1161, based on gcc version 3.1 
20020420 (prerelease)".


*** ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out  Mon Dec 11 11:45:16 2000
--- ./results/geometry.out  Sun Oct 27 21:27:11 2002
***
*** 127,133 
  | (-5,-12)   | [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
(-1.60487804878049,-4.64390243902439)
  | (10,10)| [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
(2.39024390243902,-6.48780487804878)
  | (0,0)  | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(0.0028402365895872,15.384614860264)
! | (-10,0)| [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-9.99715942258202,15.3864610140472)
  | (-3,4) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-2.99789812267519,15.3851688427303)
  | (5.1,34.5) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(5.09647083221496,15.3836744976925)
  | (-5,-12)   | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-4.99494420845634,15.3855375281616)
--- 127,133 
  | (-5,-12)   | [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
(-1.60487804878049,-4.64390243902439)
  | (10,10)| [(10,-10),(-3,-4)]| 
(2.39024390243902,-6.48780487804878)
  | (0,0)  | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(0.0028402365895872,15.384614860264)
! | (-10,0)| [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-9.99715942258202,15.3864610140473)
  | (-3,4) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-2.99789812267519,15.3851688427303)
  | (5.1,34.5) | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(5.09647083221496,15.3836744976925)
  | (-5,-12)   | [(-100,200),(30,-40)] | 
(-4.99494420845634,15.3855375281616)

==

*** ./expected/horology.out Wed Sep 18 17:35:25 2002
--- ./results/horology.out  Sun Oct 27 21:27:12 2002
***
*** 537,549 
  SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'today' = (timestamp with time zone 
'tomorrow' - interval '1 day')) as "True";
   True
  --
!  t
  (1 row)

  SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'tomorrow' = (timestamp with time 
zone 'yesterday' + interval '2 days')) as "True";
   True
  --
!  t
  (1 row)

  SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'tomorrow' > 'now') as "True";
--- 537,549 
  SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'today' = (timestamp with time zone 
'tomorrow' - interval '1 day')) as "True";
   True
  --
!  f
  (1 row)

  SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'tomorrow' = (timestamp with time 
zone 'yesterday' + interval '2 days')) as "True";
   True
  --
!  f
  (1 row)

  SELECT (timestamp with time zone 'tomorrow' > 'now') as "True";

==


--
Tara Piorkowski
System Administrator, vilaj.com, LLC



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Dave Page]

> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] 
> Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> 
> 
> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and 
> version number please.
> 

Windows XP Professional SP1

Client build fails :-(

Regards, Dave.

C:\cygwin\usr\local\src\postgresql-7.3b3\src>nmake /f win32.mak

Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility   Version 6.00.8168.0
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.

cd include
if not exist pg_config.h copy pg_config.h.win32 pg_config.h
1 file(s) copied.
cd ..
cd interfaces\libpq
nmake /f win32.mak

Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility   Version 6.00.8168.0
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.

Building the Win32 static library...

if not exist ".\Release/" mkdir ".\Release"
cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nma04188.
dllist.c
cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmb04188.
md5.c
cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmc04188.
wchar.c
cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmd04188.
encnames.c
cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nme04188.
win32.c
fe-auth.c
fe-connect.c
fe-exec.c
fe-lobj.c
fe-misc.c
fe-print.c
fe-secure.c
pqexpbuffer.c
link.exe -lib @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmf04188.
cl.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmg04188.
libpqdll.c
rc.exe /l 0x409 /fo".\Release\libpq.res" libpq.rc
link.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\dpage\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmh04188.
   Creating library .\Release\libpqdll.lib and object
.\Release\libpqdll.exp
cd ..\..\bin\psql
nmake /f win32.mak

Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility   Version 6.00.8168.0
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.

if not exist ".\Release/" mkdir ".\Release"
NMAKE : fatal error U1073: don't know how to make '..\..\utils\getopt.c'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
Studio\VC98\bin\N
MAKE.EXE"' : return code '0x2'
Stop.

C:\cygwin\usr\local\src\postgresql-7.3b3\src>

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Dave Page]

> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] 
> Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> 
>
> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and 
> version number please.

CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14 i686 unknown

Make check failed with the normal spurious errors.
Make installcheck also failed on horology, copy2 and domain - see
attached output. 

The clocks changed here on Saturday night, so I guess that shouldn't
have caused the first error (or should the docs be updated?).

The second 2 errors are both with copys - related to the problem with
the listen() backlog queue in the parallel test perhaps?

Regards, Dave.



regression.out
Description: regression.out


regression.diffs
Description: regression.diffs

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Magnus Naeslund(f)]

On an rh6.2, "Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002
alpha unknown" (ev56 ruffian) i get this failure.

Should ./configure  && gmake && gmake check be the only things
i need to do?

== creating database "regression" ==
/home/mag/d/postgresql/postgresql-7.3b3/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/ins
tall//usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_encoding: error in loading shared
libraries:
/home/mag/d/postgresql/postgresql-7.3b3/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/ins
tall//usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_encoding: undefined symbol:
pg_char_to_encoding
createdb: "SQL_ASCII" is not a valid encoding name
pg_regress: createdb failed
gmake[2]: *** [check] Error 2
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/mag/d/postgresql/postgresql-7.3b3/src/test/regress'
gmake[1]: *** [check] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/mag/d/postgresql/postgresql-7.3b3/src/test'
gmake: *** [check] Error 2

Magnus


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Neil Conway]

Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ports list updated:

Shouldn't the "join" regression test failure be fixed?

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Ports list updated:

  http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

---
Ian Barwick wrote:
> On Saturday 26 October 2002 04:17, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> >
> > OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it.
> > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> > number please.
> >
> > The current platform list is:
> >
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/supported-platforms.html
> 
> ianb > uname -a
> IRIX64 Komma 6.5 07121148 IP27
> ianb > gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/mips-sgi-irix6.5/3.2/specs
> Configured with: ../configure --with-ld=/usr/bin/ld
> Thread model: single
> gcc version 3.2
> 
> Building 7.3b3; failed on four tests:
> abstime, tinterval, horology, join
> 
> The first three are I presume due to the change to winter time (CET)
> earlier today (27.10), see
> http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?regress-evaluation.html#AEN18382 ;
> the join failure is a row ordering difference.
> 
> Should it be of any use the regression.diffs file is here:
> http://home.akademie.de/~IBarwick/IRIX_65_regression.diffs
> 
> Otherwise no apparent problems and the server started fine.
> 
> 
> Ian Barwick
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Ian Barwick]

On Saturday 26 October 2002 04:17, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
> OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it.
> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> number please.
>
> The current platform list is:
>
>   http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/supported-platforms.html

ianb > uname -a
IRIX64 Komma 6.5 07121148 IP27
ianb > gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/mips-sgi-irix6.5/3.2/specs
Configured with: ../configure --with-ld=/usr/bin/ld
Thread model: single
gcc version 3.2

Building 7.3b3; failed on four tests:
abstime, tinterval, horology, join

The first three are I presume due to the change to winter time (CET)
earlier today (27.10), see
http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?regress-evaluation.html#AEN18382 ;
the join failure is a row ordering difference.

Should it be of any use the regression.diffs file is here:
http://home.akademie.de/~IBarwick/IRIX_65_regression.diffs

Otherwise no apparent problems and the server started fine.


Ian Barwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Ports list updated:

  http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Updated:
> > 
> >   http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
> 
> Linux 2.4 on IA32 passes also.
> 
> -- 
> Alvaro Herrera ()
> "La felicidad no es ma?ana. La felicidad es ahora"
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Alvaro Herrera]

On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Updated:
> 
>   http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

Linux 2.4 on IA32 passes also.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera ()
"La felicidad no es mañana. La felicidad es ahora"

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Updated:

  http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

---
Doug McNaught wrote:
> Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failures:
> > 
> > test geometry ... FAILED
> 
> After realizing that my disk had filled up (thanks Alvaro) I reran the
> tests and 'geometry' is the only failure.  I'm guessing this is due to
> floating-point differences?  If this is OK, then
> 
> Linux/Sparc (Debian 3.0) 
> 
> is a PASS.
> 
> -Doug
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Updated:

  http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html


---

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> > number please.
> 
> I've checked CVS tip on:
>   HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc
>   PPC Linux
>   Mac OS X 10.1
> 
>   regards, tom lane
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Doug McNaught]

Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failures:
> 
> test geometry ... FAILED

After realizing that my disk had filled up (thanks Alvaro) I reran the
tests and 'geometry' is the only failure.  I'm guessing this is due to
floating-point differences?  If this is OK, then

Linux/Sparc (Debian 3.0) 

is a PASS.

-Doug

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Stephan Szabo]

On 26 Oct 2002, Doug McNaught wrote:

> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > make[3]: Entering directory 
>`/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic'
> > > gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic
> > > -I../../../../../../src/include   -c -o ascii_and_mic.o
> > > ascii_and_mic.c
> > > ascii_and_mic.c:19: syntax error before `extern'
> > > ascii_and_mic.c:21: syntax error before `extern'
> >
> > That should be fixed as of now.
>
> OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failures:
>
> test geometry ... FAILED
>  select_views ... FAILED
>  foreign_key  ... FAILED
>  limit... FAILED
>  plpgsql  ... FAILED
>  copy2... FAILED
>  temp ... FAILED
>  domain   ... FAILED
>  rangefuncs   ... FAILED
>  prepare  ... FAILED
>  without_oid  ... FAILED
>  conversion   ... FAILED
>  truncate ... FAILED
>  alter_table  ... FAILED
>
> I have attached a gzipped copy of "regression.diffs".  Let me know if
> I can supply any other help.

The geometry one looked like rounding issues.

Did you run out of space on where the data directory was mounted?
At least some of the other errors were complaining about no space
left on device.



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Doug McNaught]

Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > make[3]: Entering directory 
>`/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic'
> > gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic
> > -I../../../../../../src/include   -c -o ascii_and_mic.o
> > ascii_and_mic.c
> > ascii_and_mic.c:19: syntax error before `extern'
> > ascii_and_mic.c:21: syntax error before `extern'
> 
> That should be fixed as of now.

OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failures:

test geometry ... FAILED
 select_views ... FAILED
 foreign_key  ... FAILED
 limit... FAILED
 plpgsql  ... FAILED
 copy2... FAILED
 temp ... FAILED
 domain   ... FAILED
 rangefuncs   ... FAILED
 prepare  ... FAILED
 without_oid  ... FAILED
 conversion   ... FAILED
 truncate ... FAILED
 alter_table  ... FAILED

I have attached a gzipped copy of "regression.diffs".  Let me know if
I can supply any other help.

-Doug



regression.diffs.gz
Description: regression diffs

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tom Lane]

Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> make[3]: Entering directory 
>`/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic'
> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic
> -I../../../../../../src/include   -c -o ascii_and_mic.o
> ascii_and_mic.c
> ascii_and_mic.c:19: syntax error before `extern'
> ascii_and_mic.c:21: syntax error before `extern'

That should be fixed as of now.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Doug McNaught]

Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> > number please.
> 
> I've checked CVS tip on:
>   HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc
>   PPC Linux
>   Mac OS X 10.1

I get the following on Linux/Sparc, Debian 3.0:

make[3]: Entering directory 
`/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic'
gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic
-I../../../../../../src/include   -c -o ascii_and_mic.o
ascii_and_mic.c
ascii_and_mic.c:19: syntax error before `extern'
ascii_and_mic.c:21: syntax error before `extern'
make[3]: *** [ascii_and_mic.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/doug/src/pgsql/src'
make: *** [all] Error 2

My gcc version:

doug@varsoon:~/src/pgsql$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/2.95.4/specs
gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)

This is CVS tip as of about 11:30 EST Saturday.

Looking into it, we have in ascii_and_mic.c:

PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(ascii_to_mic) 
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(mic_to_ascii) 

Putting a semicolon after each such line fixes that compile, but there
are other files under conversion_procs with the same problem.  Is my
gcc not expanding the macro properly?

-Doug

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Tom Lane]

Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> number please.

I've checked CVS tip on:
HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc
PPC Linux
Mac OS X 10.1

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[Bruce Momjian]

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> >>Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports.  The
> >>"supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ...
> > Good point.  Thomas, can you take that on?
> 
> No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the 
> mailing lists, and so can not coordinate anything :( Not sure when or if 
> that will be resolved, but I'll be out of town next week so...

[ Reposted with proper subject line.]

OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it. 
Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
number please.

The current platform list is:

http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/supported-platforms.html

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html