Re: [HACKERS] Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch
Robert Treat wrote: > On Thursday 03 March 2005 19:08, Neil Conway wrote: > > Thomas F.O'Connell wrote: > > committers, myself included, deserve some blame for not making more > > rapid progress on the queue of unapplied patches for 8.1. In the > > meanwhile, the queue should be easier for folks to find (why is the > > "pgpatches" queue the only one linked from postgresql.org, but it is > > almost empty?) > > > > Wow, I hadn't realized just how big that queue had gotten. I've got no qualms > adding another link to the website, but can we get a scheme wrt to links for > the various patche queues? Is pgpatches for the current stable branch and > pgpatches2 for the current development branch? (Well, that can't be true > since before 8.0 release they were both for unstable branches...) > > Incidentally, I think DEV_FAQ 1.4 should be modified to include mentioning > the > patch queues. Done: 1.4) What do I do after choosing an item to work on? Send an email to pgsql-hackers with a proposal for what you want to do (assuming your contribution is not trivial). Working in isolation is not advisable: others may be working on the same TODO item; you may have misunderstood the TODO item; your approach may benefit from the review of others. A web site is maintained for patches that are ready to be applied, http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches, and those that are being kept for the next release, http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [HACKERS] Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch
On Thursday 03 March 2005 19:08, Neil Conway wrote:
> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> committers, myself included, deserve some blame for not making more
> rapid progress on the queue of unapplied patches for 8.1. In the
> meanwhile, the queue should be easier for folks to find (why is the
> "pgpatches" queue the only one linked from postgresql.org, but it is
> almost empty?)
>
Wow, I hadn't realized just how big that queue had gotten. I've got no qualms
adding another link to the website, but can we get a scheme wrt to links for
the various patche queues? Is pgpatches for the current stable branch and
pgpatches2 for the current development branch? (Well, that can't be true
since before 8.0 release they were both for unstable branches...)
Incidentally, I think DEV_FAQ 1.4 should be modified to include mentioning the
patch queues.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [HACKERS] Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch
Thomas F.O'Connell wrote: I have a feeling Bruce was referring to item 1.4: http://developer.postgresql.org/readtext.php?src/FAQ/ FAQ_DEV.html+Developers-FAQ#1.4 It has never been standard practice to ask for comments before the development of small features, such as this one. The recently duplicated work on allowing multiple "-t" and "-n" options in pg_dump is another example (although that is complex enough an RFC might be worth doing). Anyway, I think this is missing the point. Checking "has this work already been done and is sitting in some patch queue somewhere?" before doing anything presupposes the existence of a sizeable queue of unapplied patches that is hard to find. I don't think either of those should be true. I think Matthias' comment is well-founded: the committers, myself included, deserve some blame for not making more rapid progress on the queue of unapplied patches for 8.1. In the meanwhile, the queue should be easier for folks to find (why is the "pgpatches" queue the only one linked from postgresql.org, but it is almost empty?) -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch
I have a feeling Bruce was referring to item 1.4: http://developer.postgresql.org/readtext.php?src/FAQ/ FAQ_DEV.html+Developers-FAQ#1.4 -tfo -- Thomas F. O'Connell Co-Founder, Information Architect Sitening, LLC http://www.sitening.com/ 110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6 Nashville, TN 37203-6320 615-260-0005 On Mar 1, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Neil Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Have you read the developer's FAQ. It is a requirement to get involved. How does the developer's FAQ address this concern? -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch
Bruce Momjian wrote: Have you read the developer's FAQ. It is a requirement to get involved. How does the developer's FAQ address this concern? -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [HACKERS] Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch for Postmaster
Have you read the developer's FAQ. It is a requirement to get involved. --- Matthias Schmidt wrote: > Hi *, > > I have submitted a patch which does exactly this. Somebody edited it > and Bruce put it on > the queue for 8.1. > > Now we both did the same work twice. This is a good example how a > public accessible > Bugtracker and TODO-List where one can claim things (or get assigned to > some workitem) > can save valuable time. > > Image someone likes to get in touch with the codebase by fixing some > bugs first. To my > understanding, there is no Bug Database for Postgres (correct me, if I > am wrong). > Where can this volunteer lookup Bugs? I don't want to restart the > Bugzilla Discussion, > since I personally don't have any preference which Trouble-Ticket > System to use. > But I think the idea of having one is worth considering. > > cheers, > > Matthias > > Am 25.02.2005 um 03:51 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > > > Eric Crampton wrote: > >> On Feb 24, 2005, at 5:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> > >>> "Eric Crampton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed in the TODO that there is an item requesting a function > which > returns the uptime of the postmaster. I've wanted that as well. So, > I've > added just such a thing: server_start_time(). This function returns > the > time when the postmaster was started; a simple now() - > server_start_time() > returns the uptime. > >>> > >>> Isn't there one of these in the patch queue already? > >> > >> There could be, but I didn't see one because perhaps I'm looking in > >> the > >> wrong place. I referenced the TODO list here: > >> > >>http://developer.postgresql.org/todo.php > >> > >> and I referenced the unapplied patches here: > >> > >>http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches > >> > >> Where should I be looking? > >> > > > > Sure: > > > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2 > > > > -- > > Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us > > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 > > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road > > + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania > > 19073 > > > > ---(end of > > broadcast)--- > > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > > >http://archives.postgresql.org > > > > > -- > Matthias Schmidt > Viehtriftstr. 49 > > 67346 Speyer > GERMANY > > Tel.: +49 6232 4867 > Fax.: +49 6232 640089 > -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [HACKERS] Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch for Postmaster
Hi *, I have submitted a patch which does exactly this. Somebody edited it and Bruce put it on the queue for 8.1. Now we both did the same work twice. This is a good example how a public accessible Bugtracker and TODO-List where one can claim things (or get assigned to some workitem) can save valuable time. Image someone likes to get in touch with the codebase by fixing some bugs first. To my understanding, there is no Bug Database for Postgres (correct me, if I am wrong). Where can this volunteer lookup Bugs? I don't want to restart the Bugzilla Discussion, since I personally don't have any preference which Trouble-Ticket System to use. But I think the idea of having one is worth considering. cheers, Matthias Am 25.02.2005 um 03:51 schrieb Bruce Momjian: Eric Crampton wrote: On Feb 24, 2005, at 5:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote: "Eric Crampton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I noticed in the TODO that there is an item requesting a function which returns the uptime of the postmaster. I've wanted that as well. So, I've added just such a thing: server_start_time(). This function returns the time when the postmaster was started; a simple now() - server_start_time() returns the uptime. Isn't there one of these in the patch queue already? There could be, but I didn't see one because perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place. I referenced the TODO list here: http://developer.postgresql.org/todo.php and I referenced the unapplied patches here: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches Where should I be looking? Sure: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2 -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org -- Matthias Schmidt Viehtriftstr. 49 67346 Speyer GERMANY Tel.: +49 6232 4867 Fax.: +49 6232 640089 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
