On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
the timestamp column caused the copy to be about 11.3% larger
Grabbed the wrong numbers. It's really 2.5%, but still
Well, that's why Tom doesn't want to add it to pg_class. But putting
it in a separate table will have no impact on the speed of anything
except DDL statements, and even then it won't require copying the
whole table, so the performance impact will be pretty minimal, so I
think it should be all right.
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
